HANDBOUND
AT THE
UNIVERSITY OF
RECOLLECTIONS OF A LONG LIFE
Es 1st eine alte Geschichte
Doch bleibt es immer treu.
HEINE.
EARL GREY.
From the picture by Sir Thomas Lawrence, P.R.A., in the National Portrait Gallery.
[Frontispiece.
RECOLLECTIONS OF
A LONG LIFE
BY LORD BROUGHTON
(JOHN CAM HOBHOUSE)
WITH ADDITIONAL EXTRACTS
FROM HIS PRIVATE DIARIES
EDITED BY HIS DAUGHTER
LADY DORCHESTER
WITH PORTRAITS. IN FOUR VOLUMES
VOL. IV. 1829 — 1834
LONDON
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET, W.
1910
PRINTED BT
HAZELL, WATSON AND VINEY, LD.,
LONDON AND AYLESBURY.
DA
BIS /1 3
v.y
CONTENTS
CHAPTER IX
Duke and Duchess of Clarence — Continental Opinion of Wellington
— Allan Cunningham — The Byron Copyrights — Moore's Life — Death
of George Tierney — O'Connell's Parliamentary Value — Unopened
American Despatches — Funeral of Douglas Kinnaird — David Wilkie
— Ugo Foscolo — Jewish Disabilities Bill — The Byron Separation —
Buonaparte at St. Helena — " His Majesty's Opposition " — Fanny
Kemble as Juliet — Thomas Campbell — Samuel Rogers — Sermon by
Sydney Smith — Joseph Hume and Middlesex — Death of George IV. —
The New King — The Regency Question — The Revolution of July —
Accession of Louis Philippe — Gait's Life of Byron — The King at
Brighton— Death of Mr. Huskisson . . .4 pp. 1-50
CHAPTER X
Charles X.— The Struggle in Belgium— Trouble in the City— Van-
derweyer and Wellington — Sir Edward Codrington — End of the
Wellington Ministry — The New Government — Lord Chancellor
Brougham — At Holland House — Alarm at Paris — Moore's Life of
Byron — A Day of Fasting — Reform Bill introduced — Lord Grey —
Rejection defeated — Count Walewski . . . . pp. 51-99
CHAPTER XI
Excitement in Parliament — Misunderstanding with Peel — West-
minster Dinner — Lady Julia Hobhouse ill — The Second Reform Bill —
Paganini — Opening of London Bridge — Death of Sir Benjamin
Hobhouse— Social Reform Bills carried . . . . pp. 100-137
vii
viii CONTENTS
CHAPTER XII
Democratic Excitement — Anti-Reform Successes — The National
Union — Lord John Russell's New Bill — Macaulay and Croker — A
Handsome Majority— The Hothams— T. P. Cooke— " God Almighty's
Aristocracy " — Secretary-at-War — Kissing Hands as Minister — Un-
contested Re-election — Proposals to create Peers — The Garrick Club —
The King's First Levee — Lord Althorp's Dilemma — Dangers from
Birmingham — Flogging in the Army .... pp. 138-200
CHAPTER XIII
Audience with the King — James Hogg — Lady Holland — Depressed
— The Princess Victoria — Prince Czartoryski — Reform Bill in the Lords
— Second Reading carried — Tales of Lord Townshend — Crisis Day —
Meeting at Brooks's — The New Government — Baring and Wellington —
Opposition of the Lords — Guarantees secured — Progress of the Reform
Bill — The Duke of Sussex — The King's Anger — Revolution in Paris
— Unpopularity of the King and Queen — Chelsea Hospital — The
Flogging Question — Farewell of the Speaker — Prorogation of Parlia-
ment pp. 201-251
CHAPTER XIV
Nelson and Bobbing— An Efficient War Office— Statesmen of the
Day — Lord Durham — Re-elected for Westminster — Army Reforms —
The House and Window Tax— Emancipation of Slaves— Nahmek
Pasha — Mehemet Ali — Election of Sutton as Speaker — " The Bird of
Prey " — Irish Church Reform— Military Reductions— Ministerial
Troubles— Sinecures and Economy— The Irish Coercion Bill— A Dead-
lock—Lord Goderich's Reluctance to resign— At the Irish Office-
Debate on Currency— Resignation— Re-nominated for Westminster-
Defeated pp. 252-313
CHAPTER XV
The Duchess of Kent— Aspects of Wellington— Illness of Lady Julia
— At Lord Harrington's— The Zoological Gardens — Basildon Park—
CONTENTS IX
Macaulay — Ada Byron — Procession of Trades Unions — Lady Holland's
Testimony — Affairs in France — At the Duchess of Kent's — O'Connell
and Ireland — No Canvass or Pledges — Trouble in the Cabinet — New
Appointments — Conversation with Lord Tavistock — Quarrel between
Ellice and Durham — Resignation of Lord Grey — Minister for Woods
and Forests — Elected for Nottingham — In the Cabinet — The Minis-
terial Fish-dinner— The King and the People . . . pp. 314-363
APPENDIX
Table of Administrations during the Period covered by these
Volumes pp. 364-365
INDEX pp. 367-383
VOL. IV
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
EARL GREY Frontispiece
From the picture by Sir Thomas Lawrence, P.R.A., in the National Portrait
Gallery.
FACING PAGE
ELIZABETH, THIRD LADY HOLLAND 75
From the picture by Robert Fagan at Holland House. By kind permission of
Mary, Countess of Ilchester.
LORD ALTHORP . . . . . . . . .181
John Charles, Third Earl Spencer (Viscount Althorp). By Sir G. Hayter. By
kind permission of his nephew, Viscount Althorp, to Lady Dorchester.
SIR FRANCIS BURDETT (Photogravure) .... 248
From a picture in the possession of Lady Dorchester.
.VI
RECOLLECTIONS OF A
LONG LIFE
CHAPTER IX
EBOM DIARY.
October 16. — I dined with Burdett at Cambridge
House, Eichmond, and was introduced for the first
time to the Duke and Duchess of Clarence.
The Duke seems to be fond of appearing to
know something about everybody and everything.
He said to me, " You were at Oxford " ; and
talking to W. Penn about a Miss Wauchope said,
" She was the daughter of a General." " Not at
all, Sir," replied Penn ; " she was the daughter
of a cheesemonger."
On the whole he is quite a Prince : a great
asker of questions about nothing. His Duchess
a pleasing, amiable-mannered woman.
November 7. — Walked to Lincoln's Inn. Saw
Bickersteth and Seton. The latter just where I
left him many years ago, the same small room,
no sign of progress in his profession. Yet here
is a clever man, a college prizeman, an excellent
scholar, a painstaking person, surpassed by hun-
dreds of inferior capacity. Is it for want of luck
or self-confidence ?
VOL. iv 1
2 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1829* November 9. — Dined at H. Stephenson's. Met
there amongst others my old lackadaisical, ex-
cellent friend, Robert Adair. He told of Pozzo
di Borgo that at one time he was proscribed by
three Emperors — Napoleon, Francis, Alexander —
and had no way of escape but getting a Turkish
firman, which Adair procured for him, and he broke
through the Transylvanian frontier. Afterwards
when the French and Russians made war he went
round by Torneo, and contrived to see Alexander.
From that moment his fortune was made. He
lost his little patrimony in Corsica by adhering
to the English when they were masters there,
and got his pension from us on that account.
November 16. — Lord Tweeddale told me he had
been walking with the Duke of Wellington, who
said the Government were quite strong in both
Houses. He asked Tweeddale what they said of
him on the Continent. Tweeddale replied, " Sir,
they say you have sunk England to be a third-
rate power." "Ah, do they?" said the Duke.
"But," added Tweeddale, "they complain that
you have forced Polignac into the Ministry, and
have saved Constantinople, which is not con-
sistent with your degradation of England." The
Duke laughed and said, " Aye, aye, all is right."
November 20. — The sub-committee of the Byron
Monument met, and agreed to accept Thorwald-
sen's offer of £1,000 for the Byron statue.
I have offered to say that I think Mrs. Leigh
may part with some of her MSS. to Murray, to
CHAP. IX. ALLAN CUNNINGHAM 3
assist Moore in his Life of Byron. This is better
than publishing them herself by means of her son-
in-law, Trevanion, and as she wants the money
very much perhaps she may be justified, but the
necessity is a grievous one.
November 21. — Dined at the S.S.B.S. Brougham
brought me home and said, " Well, what do you
think of politics ? "We should oppose these people,
eh ? " I said I did not see for what, and that the
only fault I found was that the Duke of Welling-
ton had inferior associates where he might have
the best men in the country.
November 24. — Dined at Colonel Hugh Baillie's,
where I met Allan Cunningham, the author of
" Lives of British Painters." He told me of a
Scotsman who admired Shakespeare's Macbeth,
and Julius C&sar, and Lear, but added, (s How
could he write such nonsense as The Tempest
and Midsummer Night's Dream " ! !
I complimented him on the liberal tone of his
" Lives. " He said he never would give it up,
although he knew he was suspected of being too
free in his opinions. Indeed, a Cabinet Minister
told him, "he would do very well if he would
steer clear of that rock."
In this way the literature of the country is
poisoned at its source. The moment a writer
of talent gets into good company he is told that
he must beware of unfashionable opinions, in other
words he must adopt the cant of the age.
December 21. — This day came on the trials for
4 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1829. libel against Alexander, editor of the Morning
Journal. The Chancellor gained his verdict
easily, and deserved it. Alexander pleaded his
own cause very badly, in every sense of the
word.
Lord Tenterden was fair in summing up, and
though his feelings would naturally prompt him
to spare an Anticatholic and an Anticopleyite, yet
he pronounced the charge made by the Journal
against the Chancellor to come within the scope
of indictment to the full extent.
December 22.— This day the editor was tried
for libelling the King and his Ministers. The
jury found him guilty of the first, but not of the
second. The Times takes a decided part against
the Ministry in these prosecutions (not that of
the Chancellor), and so I think will every un-
prejudiced man. They are unworthy of the Duke
of Wellington, and will injure his Government.
1830. January 5, 1830. — I called on Hanson and
agreed with him that I should speak to some
publisher about offering the unsold copyrights
of Byron at a trade sale.
Hanson actually contemplates writing a Life
of Byron, particularly from eight to eighteen,
which he says was the most interesting part of
his existence.
January 14. — Murray has sent Moore's book to
me as a present from the publisher. I see two or
three inaccuracies at once, but am struck with the
information collected as to Lord Byron's early
CHAP. IX. FRENCH POLITICS % 5
days. I doubt the fact of his scepticism in those 1830.
early days on religious subjects.
I called on Murray and told him what I thought
of the book. "Aye," replied Murray; "well, let
Lady Julia read it and hear her opinion." This I
took to be a clever mode of letting me know the
book is written for the women.
January 15. — I find Moore has managed with
much adroitness to make such mention of me as
I can hardly quarrel with even, although the
general result is rather unsatisfactory than other-
wise. As to Byron's character, he has, on the
whole, portrayed it fairly. The most unjust of
his conclusions is that Byron's singularities, both
in conduct and opinion, are chiefly to be ascribed
to his college associates. Certainly Byron had
nothing to learn when he came from Harrow ; nor
were his Southwell recreations such as Moore
pretends them to have been.
I saw Hanson, who is also struck with Moore's
information.
January 23. — I had a party to dine with me.
R. Gordon amused us much by telling stories
of France, and complaining of the Duke's Govern-
ment at home and the apostasy, as he calls it,
of the Opposition.
He seems to think the fall of Charles X. inevit-
able, unless he gives up the obnoxious Ministry.
The Duke of Orleans bids fair for the Crown.
For myself I have no faith in French political
foresight nor any liking for French politicians.
6 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. I have seen too much of them. Gordon thinks
we are ruined at home for want of one-pound
notes, and does not believe the Duke can meet
Parliament without some change.
January 28. — George Tierney died suddenly on
Monday last. The panegyrics in the newspapers
seem to me true as to his Parliamentary capacity,
hut false as to his integrity. My father, who
knew him well, told me he was as great an
intriguer as ever lived. I also think that no
statesman ever took such false views of coming
events as G. Tierney. His conjectures, so far
as I ever heard of them, were never happy.
January 30. — I dined at Brougham's, who was
as usual most pleasing and instructive, without
pedantry or presumption of any kind.
He told us in proof of the vanity of the news-
paper reporters that when he contrived to save
one Collier, of the Times, from being sent to
Newgate by the House of Commons, he happened
to call the man "the person at the Bar." Eor
this offence, though he had rescued the reporter,
he was cushioned by the gallery press for more
than a fortnight.
Another time he incurred the displeasure of the
same powerful body by using the expression " a
poor printer or reporter," as if the two were
on a par. Brougham had a letter from the same
Collier on the subject, and wrote an explanation
to Mackintosh, which Sir James was to hand
to the offended parties.
CHAP. ix. BROUGHAM'S CONTRADICTION 7
Brougham advised that no effort should be isso.
made against the Government, and he said, " Let
us he quite sure, before we turn the Duke out,
whom we shall turn in after him."
Brougham also told us of the King's remark,
when Mr. Canning showed him the letter in which
he (Brougham) had offered to support the Govern-
ment without office. "Does not your Majesty
think that very magnanimous?" "Very mag-
nanimous," said the King ; adding, soon after-
wards, " Take him at his word."
Brougham said the King was highly offended
at a paragraph about his not paying the Duke
of York's debts which appeared in the Times.
So angry was he that he almost quarrelled with
Wellington. A Sunday newspaper imputed the
paragraph to Brougham. Brougham saw T.
Barnes and told him to contradict it, for, said
Brougham, " I never contradict anything my-
self." Query, what is to become of this extra-
ordinary man ?
EROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
Parliament met on February 4 The Eoyal
Speech confined the distress to some parts of the
country, but Knatchbull moved an amendment
which spread the distress over the whole country.
Huskisson, who with his party were in battle-
array in their old places below the gangway, con-
cluded his speech by declaring he should vote
for the amendment. Althorp also declared he
8 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. should vote for the amendment, and Brougham
took the same line, adding, however, that " he
would not do so if he thought it would have a
tendency to disturb the Administration." When
he sat down, I said to him, " Why, Brougham,
it must have a tendency to disturb the Administra-
tion." " Well," said he, " I can't help it."
Ministers had a majority of only 55; 28 of
our side voted with Government, so that, if we
had gone the other way, the amendment would
have been carried. The House was very thin
for a first day, and the tone of Ministers very
low. There were symptoms of a falling cause
even amongst the placemen.
O'Connell made his maiden speech, which
attempted no flights.
February 11. — It was remarked that O'Connell
had spoken almost every night since taking his
seat, and had spoken sensibly. O 'Council's Par-
liamentary value was, at that time, underrated.
Solicitor-General Doherty, speaking to me of him,
said, " Mark my words : he will turn out nothing ;
he will sink down gradually to his proper
dimensions."
February 12. — Sir James Graham made the
speech which was the foundation of his Parlia-
mentary fame. He concluded with a motion
for reducing salaries to the standard of 1797 ;
but Dawson proposed resolutions similar in effect,
and not clogged with the Currency question, so
that there was no division, and Graham gave
CHAP. IX. BYRON COPYRIGHTS SOLD 9
way. Peel concluded the debate by stating that isao.
Government would pursue its course fearlessly,
although fully aware of the opposition to be
encountered in Parliament; but, at the same
time, secure of the final support of the great
majority of the people out of doors.
February 14. — I dined with the Speaker, and
Daniel O'Connell sat opposite to Mr. Speaker.
Oh rare ! thought I. Who would have thought
of this two years ago?
February 18. — There came on the debate on the
Marquis of Blandford's Reform Bill. As no
Ministerialist spoke, the debate would soon have
dropped if I had not unwisely got up and made
something of a flourish, which brought up Horace
Twiss, who roused Sir Erancis Burdett.
Brougham proposed to substitute a general
resolution for Blandford's Bill, and our intention
was to vote for it; but, by some unaccountable
confusion, we voted for Blandford's Bill, and had
but a small minority — only 57.
FROM DIARY.
February 20. — The Byron copyrights, all but
" Don Juan," sold by auction yesterday for 3,700
guineas. There was no bidding for " Don Juan "
beyond 310 guineas. We might have got 4,000
guineas if the auctioneer had trusted Colburn,
who gave him carte blanche to exceed Murray
until he was stopped. However, we did pretty
well.
VOL. iv 2
10 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
On the morning of February 22 I was at the
House of Commons in Committee on my Select
Vestries Bill. The next day Lord J. Russell
made his proposal for giving members to Birming-
ham, Manchester, and Leeds. We divided 140 to
188. Huskisson and his friends, besides one or
two Anticatholics, voted with us.
The Morning Journal of February 24th con-
tained an article charging me with voting with
Ministers against Lord John Russell's Reform
proposal. This was too bad. I went to the office
of the paper, and said I could not permit my
votes to be falsified ; the article was therefore
contradicted.
FROM DIARY.
February 27. — At a party of thirty to-day at
Windsor, the King holloed to the Duke of Devon-
shire that " he did not understand these reforms
and retrenchments ; he would give up the crown,
and ask to be Prince of Wales again. But,"
added he, " they won't let me. No, nor will they
have any more Dukes."
Now, I can't understand how my friend Burdett
and others strive so to turn out an Administration
which stands so ill at Court. As for myself, I will
have no hand in such an exploit, difficult as it
is sometimes to support the acts of Government,
and compelled as I am to vote for all reforms
and retrenchments.
CHAP. IX. UNOPENED AMERICAN DESPATCHES 11
February 28.- — Lord Tweeddale, who had been isso.
talking to Sir G. Murray and the Duke of
Wellington on the state of the Administration,
told me that both had said that the wishes of
most individuals in either House were of the
most liberal tendency, but they felt they had
obstacles at Windsor and from their partisans. It
appears that the dumb mouths on our Treasury
Bench are to be opened and Peel to be supported.
EROM BOOK, " BECOLLECTIONS."
March 7- — We dined at Lord Holland's in
Savile Bow. Mr. Allen was in great force, and
told me several stories which I had reason to
believe were true. When the Whigs came into
office in 1806, several American despatches were
found in Lord Mulgrave's office unopened. I
had heard a similar story of a closet full of
American despatches in the Duke of Newcastle's
time, and I recollected a remark made on that
anecdote by . " Yes, that is very true, and
those who succeeded Newcastle took to reading
despatches ; and what was the consequence ? The
American war."
Mr. Allen also mentioned that Mr. Windham,
having taken great pains in writing a despatch
to the officer commanding our troops in South
America, being summoned down to the Norfolk
election somewhat suddenly, put the despatch in his
pocket, and found it there six weeks afterwards.
He also said that Wilmot Horton gave orders
12 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. to the Commander of our naval forces on the
African coast to make reprisals on one of the
Barbary powers, as a punishment for some insult
of which he found an account in a despatch at
his office. A short time afterwards it was dis-
covered that the said Secretary had not noticed
the date of the said despatch, nor of the insult ;
and that the one was three years back, and that
the other had been explained and forgiven.
March 12. — I called at Messrs. Ransom's bank,
and there heard that my friend of many years,
Douglas Kinnaird, had died that morning. He
was resigned and composed, and discussed matters
of business with his partner, Mr. Squire, with
perfect self-possession. Even in those days I
could not help thinking there was a fatality
attending the friendships of my early days.
Edward Vernon, Charles Matthews, Byron, Kin-
naird, all gone.
In the evening I attended Parliament, and
voted with Sir James Graham against the appoint-
ment of Treasurer of the Navy. Peel was
excited more than usual, appealed to the public,
and said that, if Ministers gained no credit by
attempting to govern by opinion, they would
govern by influence, as others had done. This
was imprudent, and a tremendous cheer rose
from our benches.
PROM DIARY.
March 19. — Attended the funeral of my poor
CHAP. IX. THE CAUSES OF NATIONAL DISTRESS 13
friend Douglas Kinnaird, and saw him laid in isso.
a new vault in St. Martin's Church. He was
forty-two years old.
Some of the mourners seemed much affected,
but a grey-headed servant of the bank, who was
looking on at a distance, cried bitterly, an
undeniable proof of my friend's kindness. It
is a sad ceremony indeed, if it were nothing but
a ceremony.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS. "
This Session we had a debate of four days, on
inquiry into the causes of national distress.
March 26. — We had a lively debate on Dundas
and Bathurst's superannuation pensions. It
appeared to me to be a rank job, and I made
a speech to that effect. Our numbers were 139
to 121, and several members said to me, "We
owe that to your speech."
On March 27, dining with my sister Mrs.
Alexander, I sat next to a gaunt, coarse-looking,
middle-aged man, who hardly spoke a word all
dinner-time, although sitting next to Mrs. Lock-
hart, Sir Walter Scott's most pleasing daughter.
I felt vexed when I heard I had been sitting
next to Wilkie, the great artist, without having
an opportunity of hearing a word from him.
Admiral Sir William Hotham was of the party.
He told us some stories about the mutiny at
the Nore and Spithead. He said the mutineers
scrupulously preserved all the property of the
14 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830 officers, and replaced some crockeryware which
was accidentally broken. He told us also that
Admiral Duncan, when left to watch De Winter,
had only three ships with him, but managed,
by making signals, to make the Dutch believe
that the whole fleet was at hand. When De
Winter was afterwards told this, he would not
believe it; but I did, for Admiral Hotham was
a very truth-speaking man.
EROM DIARY.
March 30. — I went to Devonshire House with
my wife. I hate this amusement, as it is called,
worse than ever. I have no turn nor capacity.
Miss Fanny Kemble was the lion of the evening.
I never saw any celebrated woman so very plain.
March 31. — At Vestry Committee, where we
considered our Report, and agreed to some
resolutions which I had drawn up, recommending
a legislative measure founded on an elective
principle. Mr. Ross, seconded by Sir Thomas
Eremantle, moved counter resolutions. After
much battling we overpowered the M.P. for Oxford,
eighteen to two, and agreed almost unanimously
to my resolutions.
Thus closes the first part of my Vestry labours,
prosperously as far as I have gone, but the
Bill remains behind, and I can hardly promise
myself success in both Houses of Parliament.
April 1. — I sat up till near three in the
morning to hear Peel propose his amendment of
CHAP. IX. UGK) FOSCOLO 15
the forgery laws. There were not above eighteen
members in the House, but Peel spoke as if
there were five hundred. At last we dwindled
to some four or five, and I was the only man
who did not speak and compliment the Home
Secretary.
At half -past two I brought up the Report of
the Vestry Committee, when there was only one
other member in the House. The members are
absolutely worn out with the unremitting long
nights. The Speaker confessed to me that he was,
and said that nothing but Easter would save him.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
Early in the month of April my friend Sinclair
Cullen sent me some papers from the executors
of Ugo Poscolo, in order that I might examine
them, and see whether there were in them
materials for a Memoir. I looked over them,
but did not find much to add to the short notice
contained in my work on Italy.
Poscolo was born in 1778, on January 26.
His father was a doctor. In only one of the
documents do I find him called Count. In
general he is described as "Captain," but here,
in England, his arms were surmounted by a
coronet.
He came to England in 1816. It appeared by
these papers that he had attained to considerable
skill in writing English. I observed in these
documents many evidences of the squabbles in
16 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. which this most unhappy man was perpetually
engaged. That he was a man of very great
genius there can be no doubt, and that he was a
most unhappy man cannot be denied.
April 5. — Robert Grant moved for leave to
bring in a Bill to remove the disabilities affecting
the Jews. Peel was absent on account of his
father's illness. To our infinite surprise, we
divided 115 to 97. I walked across the House,
and said to Calcraft, then on the Treasury Bench,
" By Jove ! you will be turned out if you go
on in this way." "Aye," replied he; "but
you know you like a good weak Government."
I might have said, "Yes, but not a bad weak
Government." I was, however, too angry to play
on words.
I passed the Easter holidays of this year
with my brother Henry, at a pretty country
residence hired by him near Guildford, called
Send Grove.
The clergyman at Send was of a sort more
frequently met with in those days than now. I
heard the good man preach : he chose the story
of Balaam for his sermon, and called the prophet
" a singular character " ; but surely the ass was
a more singular character, but of him he said
not one word. It was not a fit subject for a
sermon, nor for a joke.
At this time, April and May, I had much of
my time taken up by looking after Lord Byron's
affairs, and taking advice as to the expediency of
CHAP. IX. THE BYRON SEPARATION 17
giving some public refutation to a charge made, isso.
as was stated, by Lady Byron, in regard to the
separation between Byron and his wife. The
attack on Lord Byron, on the authority of Lady
Byron, was countenanced by Tom Campbell, who
was a firstrate poet no doubt, but a very bad
pleader, even in a good cause, and made therefore
a most pitiable figure when he had no case at all.
I consulted friends, and amongst them Lord
Holland, who strongly recommended silence, and
did not scruple to say that the lady would be
more annoyed if she were left unnoticed than if,
whether wrong or right, she had to figure in a
controversy. I was far from wishing to annoy
her at all ; my sole wish was to do my duty by
my friend; and I hope I have done that suffi-
ciently by leaving behind me, to be used if
necessary, a full and scrupulously accurate account
of the transaction in question.1 I shall content
myself here with asserting that it was not fear,
on the part of Lord Byron, that persuaded him
to separate from his wife. On the contrary, he
was quite ready to "go into court," as they
call it.
FROM DIARY.
April 23. — Read a good deal of Bourienne's
Memoirs. It seems to me the best and fairest
book yet written about Napoleon.
April 26. — I returned to London. Nothing
1 This account is published in the last chapter of Volume II.
VOL. IV 3
18 LONDON CHAP. IX.
i830t done in the House; the rumour strong that the
King is dying. His illness, however, creates very
little interest, considering what his death must
produce. They say the Duke and Peel will remain
in office, but that King William will make changes
in some departments.
April 27. — At House of Commons. The Terceira1
business was brought on by Charles Grant in a
bitter and eloquent speech. Whilst I went away
to dinner the House was near coming to a division,
but Twiss was put up and made a speech, or
rather read a speech from several folios of paper ;
so that some of the wags opposite drew lots who
should call him to order, and John Russell won
the lot. Accordingly E/ussell complained of Twiss
reading his speech, and brought up Mr. Under-
secretary, who said he had not read, but only
looked at voluminous notes ! ! Here's a fellow !
We had but a poor division, 78 only, though
all the Huskissonians voted for us, but many
Whigs kept away. They care little for Portugal
and less for Huskisson's party.
May 3. — Pound that H. Gordon had made a
smart attack on the miscellaneous estimates in
the House of Commons. I took the opportunity
of speaking, and believe I got votes by what I
1 In December 1828 Count Saldanha sailed from England for
Terceira with a party of Portuguese refugees who were adherents
of the Queen's cause. The ship was, however, stopped off Terceira
by Captain Walpole, under the orders of the British Government.
The Duke of Wellington defended this action as a maintenance of
neutrality between the rival Portuguese parties.
CHAP. IX. A LOCK OF NAPOLEON^ HAIR 19
said, which, as our good people think Parliament i83<x
is dying, is no great exploit.
May 4. — The Speaker said to me to-day at
House of Commons, " I think, Mr. Hohhouse, you
must be at the height of your glory now ; if you
admire a good weak Government, you had your
heart's content last night."
Certainly never did an Administration cut a
poorer figure. If not strong enough to carry their
johs, they should not attempt so to do. We shall
have no more estimates till Peel comes back, and
even his presence will not calm the death-bed
terrors of some county members.
May 5. — Dined at Hudson Gurney's. Bart.
Prere1 and Terrick Hamilton, author of " Antar,"
there. The latter is a most disagreeable fellow
indeed.
Mrs. Gurney was saying she should like to
have a lock of Napoleon's hair. Terrick Hamil-
ton said, "I would not care for a lock of his
hair more than for that of a nager " ; and then
he fell to abusing him, and saying he never had
any curiosity about seeing such a man, and that
Buonaparte was too well treated at St. Helena.
Suppose, said somebody, that one of the sove-
reigns at war with Buonaparte had been taken
by the Erench and treated so, what would you
have said? "Oh," said T. H., "that is another
thing. Buonaparte was not born a King " ! 1 ! I
1 Bartholomew Frere, brother of John Hookham Frere ; Acting
Minister in Spain 1809-10; served afterwards at Constantinople.
20 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. could not help saying that I had heard a good
many hold and strange things said in my life-
time, hut nothing quite so extravagant as that.
Yet T. Hamilton is reckoned a very clever fellow,
and may he so for all I know.
Sir J. Sebright was of the party, and told us
of his skill in instructing puppies. He can make
them extract cube roots. He does it by the eye
entirely. One of Sir John Sebright Js daughters
has invented an expeditious mode of extracting
cubes, which he showed me. What between his
dogs and his daughters, his family must be an
ingenious circle !
Sebright told us some examples of Sir Astley
Cooper's egregious vanity. Sir A. Cooper was, it
seems, almost a Jacobin once, but is now a wor-
shipper of King George IV. Not long ago he
made a speech, and dwelt upon His Majesty's
peculiar regard for truth ! I
May 7. — King's birthday kept, and a favourable
bulletin. It is said the King insisted it should
be so on his birthday, but Paddy Holmes said
to me, " Don't believe a word of what you hear ;
he is dying."
Looked at some letters of Byron's to Kinnaird,
which young Lord Kinnaird has just given to
me. Amongst them is the last he ever wrote,
dated Missolonghi, April 10, 1824, the very day
he was taken ill. He says in the end, "I have
been very unwell, but am thought to be stronger."
May 14. — I hear that Sir Robert Peel has left
CHAP. ix. "HIS MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION" 21
his younger sons nearly £200,000 apiece, and that isso.
his eldest has about £40,000 a year.
Went to House of Commons, and voted with
Sir J. Graham for a return of salaries of Privy
Councillors. Goulburn offered a return of all
salaries; but that was not invidious enough, and
was rejected. Grosvenor (General) said that he
was surprised at Graham's factiousness, as at
the beginning of the Session he had declared that
he differed with the minority only on the trifling
question of the currency.
This was cheered very much; and certainly
there seems some reason to suspect that Graham
has more than a public motive for his present
virulence against Government. He is always,
besides, taunting the Opposition with their feeble
hostility, and said that in the good old days
the benches near him were not filled with Sis
Majesty's Opposition. This saying of mine, and
the other about the " good weak Government,"
are often in his mouth. I shall, one day or the
other, take an opportunity of saying what I think
of the old Opposition, about whom there never
was a more complete delusion.
Graham speaks very well, and will be in high
office some day or the other. He is, however, too
personal in his invective. We had 147 to 232,
a poor minority for such a question on the eve
of dissolution.
May 16. — Saw Lord Lauderdale, and had much
talk with that very clever old man. It seems
22 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830, that Brougham got defeated at the Anti-slavery
meeting on Saturday. He does not bid high
enough for the people now, and is most unjustly
suspected of want of sincerity.
May 17. — The second reading of the Jews
Belief Bill came on in the House of Commons,
when Sir E. Peel made his first appearance since
his father's death, and spoke against the Bill.
Brougham's was the speech of the night. He
was most successful, but was not well heard—
too deep and too learned for the multitude. His
reference to Gibbon and Bolingbroke as professed
infidels, though admirably introduced, failed of
effect.
May 20. — I read my Vestry Bill a second time,
and committed it.
May 22. — Went to Holly Lodge and saw the
many ways by which the good-natured hostess
tries to make all the world forget that such a
person as Miss Mellon ever lived. Very few of
the great people who used to court Mrs. Coutts
were, however, there. They do not choose to
accept favours which they must return at the
hazard of having precedence taken of them in
London by the ci-devant soubrette. There was
no very prominent absurdity in the spectacle,
except that the Duchess1 was drawn in a garden
phaeton up and down a hill, preceded by a band
1 The 9th Duke of St. Albans married, on June 16, 1827, the
daughter of Matthew Mellon, who was widow of Thomas Coutts.
She died in 1837.
CHAP. IX. FANNY KEMBLE AS JULIET 23
of Prague minstrels and followed by her guests isso
in procession. I have seen the sight once, and
shall never see it again.
May 25. — Went to the orchestra at Covent
Garden, and saw Panny Kemhle, for the first
time, in the character of Juliet. I was delighted,
particularly with her tenderness. The tones of
her voice are most impressive and agreeable, her
manner soft and engaging, her action natural and
easy. If she was unequal in any part of the
play, it was in the horror expressed for fear she
should awake in the vault. There, I think, she
was too loud and passionate. On the whole I
was much affected, and know not when the
enchanting poetry of the play has so charmed
me.
May 26. — Walking to-day I met Tom Campbell,
the poet, and took a turn with him. He said
very quietly to me that he thought the Christian
religion was getting into general disrepute, much
more so than the monarchy.
The man has a half-crazy look and air, and
whilst we were talking of Kemble asked me if
I could give him any anecdotes for the Life which
he was writing of him. He soon recollected we
were not speaking of Lawrence. He confessed
that the biography of that great painter was a
difficult task. There was nothing to tell.
May 28. — At House of Commons. O'Connell
proposed Radical Reform, Universal Suffrage,
Ballot, and Triennial Parliaments. Lord John
24 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. Russell followed with his moderate Reform,
•
which stood on the books for a separate motion.
Three or four young members opposed all re-
form, in speeches which the House would not
listen to.
Brougham turned round to me and said, " The
election is coming on, Burdett is not here ; by
heavens you must speak, and if you do not I will
say something to call you up."
I therefore rose at past 12, and made what
was thought a very good speech, of which
Brougham made honourable mention in his, saying
it was one of the ablest he had ever heard in
Parliament. I defended Universal Suffrage,
Ballot, and Short Parliaments ; but declared
myself for any reform, preferring that which
united the greatest number of partisans.
We divided 13 for Radical Reform. After-
wards we divided for Russell's Extended Basis
of Representation, 117 to 213.
May 30. — I saw O'Connell to-day at Brooks's.
He talked to me about the state of Ireland pre-
viously to passing the Relief Bill, and said that
Tipperary alone would have turned out 150,000
fighting men. They had most of them pikes, and
many firearms.
A friend of his, whilst shooting on the moors,
was asked whether the Counsellor (meaning
O'Connell) intended to call them out that year.
He issued a sort of proclamation to keep them
quiet; but a man high in office in Dublin told
CHAP. ix. O'CONNELL'S OPINION OF WELLINGTON 25
him not to disarm the Catholics until six weeks isso.
after the meeting of Parliament. " This," said
O'Connell, " was honest and open enough for a
Government man, and will show you how the
Relief Bill was passed."
O'Connell complained to me of the Duke's
ohstinacy in persisting in the taxing of Ireland
at this moment. He said that the Duke of
Wellington was not a great man ; he was a great
soldier, hut every age produced great soldiers and
great lawyers, which showed that great genius
was not requisite for such productions. A great
genius was more rare, and appeared hut once in
a century, if so often. There is something in the
observation !
May 31. — Dined with the Belgraves. Young
Stuart Wortley at dinner told me that he expected
the Ministry would not last long. He confessed
it was no very pleasant task acting under Peel.
His manners were cold, and very little assistance
was required hy him from anybody.
June 4.- -I dined at John Smith's, and met
there Sam Rogers. He told me that he saw
Lord Aberdeen on Monday last, and that he
seemed much vexed at Prince Leopold's refusal
of the crown of Greece. Rogers said he wondered
any one who had bread to eat should wish to be
in office. Lord Aberdeen said, " True, but I
should not like to leave office either, although
I should not be so sorry as my predecessor
was."
VOL. IV
26 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. June 5. — I am deplorably idle, but help now
and then others who are active. Ten days ago
I joined a party at the Admiralty and founded
a Geographical Society. This is the Society
which, under the guidance chiefly of Sir Roderick
Murchison, has grown to such formidable dimen-
sions. If I were to give up the small shop
business of politics, and confine myself to the
consideration of important questions, perhaps I
could do something, but I do not know this.
FROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
I find recorded that on Sunday, June 6, I went
to St. John's Church, and guessed, by the unusual
muster of fashionable folk, that something good
was expected. I was not wrong, for Sydney Smith
preached a funeral sermon ; and, to my mind,
a very good sermon it was. His manner was
rather energetic than impassioned or pleasing;
his voice more loud than distinct. I was much
gratified, and thought the sermon too short. It
lasted only thirty-five minutes.
The text was the famous comparison of the seed
that dies before it produces grain with the resurrec-
tion of man, for which Voltaire in a most unseemly
manner insults the Apostle of the Gentiles. My
friend's principal argument was that, as nothing
seems to have been created in vain, so God would
not have implanted the desire and expectation of
futurity in man if he were never to attain to
it. He said that the belief in a second life seemed
CHAP. IX. BELIEF IN A SECOND LIFE 27
to have been implanted in every human heart, isso,
and might be called universal. I thought this
had been denied, and that whole nations had been
discovered without any such faith or hope. He
also drew the desired conclusion from the progress
and improvement of man alone of all created
beings, — and here he was eloquent; and from
the love of posthumous fame, — and here he was
pathetic ; and from the fear of death, — a topic
which he also handled with great effect. It
was a great relief, after being so long wearied
with tiresome House of Commons talk, to listen
to a good lecture on a subject interesting
to all.
June 7. — I spoke and voted with Sir James
Graham against some extravagant items in the
charges for South American missions ; and I
paired in favour of Sir James Mackintosh's
proposal to abolish the punishment of death in
all cases of forgery, except the forgery of wills.
EROM DIARY.
June 10. — I went to a party at Lady Graham's
given to celebrate the marriage of my young
friend Lord Seymour with the remaining daughter
of Tom Sheridan. Her face has been her fortune.
Her sister, Mrs. Norton, sang and acted a song
of her own.
June 14. — At a Committee on my Vestry Bill.
A very ungracious task, and by no means a
labour of love !
28 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830 June 19. — Talking with Attwood of Birming-
ham, who seemed to think that popular associations
might procure Reform, if contending for moderate
measures upon the " conservative principle." He
said he was convinced that the whole people of
England were essentially aristocratic and imhued
with respect for their superiors, and hatred of
those neighbours raised hy accident ahove them-
selves. I believe this is true.
EROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
June 15. — Mr. Samuel Whitbread called on
me and told me he intended to retire from
Middlesex at the next election, and asked me
to write his retiring address to the electors
for him.
I called on Sir Erancis Burdett and Mr. Place,
and we agreed that the man most suitable for
the electors and most fit for the situation was
Mr. Hume. Accordingly I communicated with
Mr. Hume, who naturally enough talked of
the probable expense of a contest, adding he was
sure of his seat for the Scottish borough which
he then represented. At last, however, he con-
sented to be put in nomination. Lord Althorp
fell into our project at once, but said some of
the Whigs might be hostile, and it would be
advisable to consult at once with Lord Grey.
This he did. At first his Lordship was restive,
but ended by saying that, if Hume was taken
up by the Reformers, it would be expedient for
CHAP. IX. JOSEPH HUME AND MIDDLESEX 29
the Whigs not to oppose ; but, on the contrary, 1830,
co-operate and support Hume.
Lord John Russell said that the Duke of
Bedford objected to Hume, but wished me to
stand for Middlesex, in which case he, and the
Duke of Devonshire and all the great proprietors
of the party, would support me, and keep me
in for life. I said it was impossible to think of
such a thing. Hume was still very undecided,
even after he had agreed to come forward, and
on June 22 I told him he must positively give
his final answer the next day.
I dined at Sir Francis Burdett's, and met
Attwood of Birmingham, Lord John Russell,
Mr. D. Davenport, and others, whose agreeable
conversation contrasted pleasingly with the
electioneering talk to which I had been lately
accustomed.
The next evening, at the House of Commons,
Mr. Warburton showed me a letter which he
had drawn up for Hume to sign. It was a
refusal to stand for Middlesex. A short time
afterwards "Warburton told me Hume had made
up his mind to come forward for the county.
I said it was too late now, and that, if I was
to take an active part in the contest, my consent
was indispensable. Warburton owned Hume had
misconducted himself, but begged me to do
nothing until the next day.
June 25. — Warburton showed me two letters
signed, Joseph Hume; one of them declining to
30 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830* stand for Middlesex, the other consenting to be
a candidate. I said it was very hard to throw
the weight of abandoning the project upon me,
which would inevitably be the case if I accepted
the letter of resignation. It was agreed it would
be difficult to find any other man besides Hume.
Warburton then said that " he would be answer-
able for £2,500 of the expenses to support Hume."
I consented to take the letter of assent on
condition that I might refer to Lord Althorp and
Mr. Warburton in case of any future difficulty;
and so, all of us confessing Joseph Hume to be
a very shabby shuffling fellow, yet believing he
might be a useful member for Middlesex, we
came to the resolution of standing by him, heart
and hand. I made this remark in my Diary:
" If Hume should be returned for Middlesex, he
of course will forget that he owes his seat to
me twice over : once, when I commended the
project to Burdett and Place ; and again, when
I accepted his affirmative instead of his negative
answer."
I went to the Committee-room, and commenced
operations immediately, writing circulars and
private letters.
I apologise to those whom it may concern for
this tiresome story, about a long-forgotten episode
of our times and adventures.
PROM DIARY.
June 25. — There was no House of Commons
OHAP. IX. DEATH OF GEORGE IV. 31
to-day : some said because the King was dying, isso.
others because the Ministers were afraid ; but
there was a serious conflict in the Lords, Lord
Grey taking a most hostile attitude on the
Gal way Franchise Bill. Ministers had a majority
of only 15 !
We dined at the Duke of Somerset's. Singularly
enough, I sat between my wife and Lady
Charlotte.
Lord Tavistock and I had a great deal of talk
on politics. We agreed as to the strange incon-
sistency and weakness of Lord Grey's general
conduct, sometimes coquetting with Ministers,
and then undoing all previous courtship by un-
reasonable hostility. Now, with the prospect of
a new reign, this change has much the air of
shabbiness. Yet he is not a shabby man; far
from it, only peevish and wayward.1
Lord Dudley dined with us, and was in one of
his most absent moods.
June 26. — This morning, whilst I was reading
in bed Cunningham's Life of Flaxman, I heard
two reports of great guns. A little later I saw
a man in the street with newspapers in mourning,
and crying the sorrowful news, George IV. had
died at ten minutes past three this morning.
I went to the House of Commons a little after
twelve, and found many Members waiting to be
1 I had many opportunities, after writing this, of seeing Lord Grey
when I was Secretary-at- War, and Secretary for Ireland, under him ;
and I believe I did not make any mistake in taking this view of
him— B.
32 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. sworn in, but the Lord Steward had not arrived.
The Lords had taken the oaths to King William IV.
Coming through the Park, I saw the Duke of
Wellington and Peel going to St. James's, where
his new Majesty had arrived and gone through
the usual ceremonies. I heard that the new King
would not he proclaimed until Monday, at eleven
o'clock.
Warburton and I walked to the House of
Commons, and joined a crowd of Members in
the long gallery. We were just in time to write
down our names, and to hurry over the oaths
with the rest — all of us squeezing and giggling,
and running off to the House to be in time to
take the oaths at the table of the House. The
swearing was going on with much rapidity, but
I was not soon enough to go through my part
of the ceremony. It was four o'clock, and the
Speaker adjourned the swearing to ten o'clock
on the following Monday. The oath was printed,
but, to save time, the name of George IV. was
scratched out, and William filled up in writing.
After I went away Brougham made a vehement
speech against the Marquis of Conyngham for
keeping the House waiting, and contrasted his
conduct with the considerate conduct of His
Majesty William IV., who had sent for the
Speaker to facilitate all the forms. " Conduct,"
said our orator, " that called forth his gratitude,
and expressions which would find a responsive
echo in the breast of every man who heard
CHAP. IX. MOOD OF THE NEW KING 33
him." Loud cheers, says the paper. Oh, to isso.
be sure !
I saw nothing like grief or joy — only a bustle
in the streets. Walking afterwards in the Green
Park, I saw the Royal carriage with the Life
Guards escorting William IV. up Constitution
Hill, on his way back to Bushy Park. Now,
though I cannot be supposed to have cause to
care for George IV. or regret him in any way,
yet I own there was something melancholy and
disagreeable to me in the sight of his successor
in the instant enjoyment of Majesty, whilst his
brother's body was scarcely cold. What a change,
too, for him — coming up in his travelling carriage
and stepping from it to a throne. The common
question is, how long will it be before he is crazy ?
Burdett called, and said history would have
but a sad tale to tell of George IV. The Times
threatens a character "for the benefit of his
successors."
C. Moore told me that King William IV. was
seen on the road to London this morning, in his
carriage, with a bit of crape on a white hat,
grinning and nodding to everybody as he whirled
along. This may not be true, but the rumour
shows the character.
June 27. —
Vanessa, not of years a score,
Sighs for a gown of forty- four ! ! !
June 28. — I saw the ceremony of proclaiming
VOL. IV 5
34 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. King William IV. A pretty sight. The crowd
was orderly, the acclamations confined to the
heralds and officiating people.
I went to the House of Commons and took my
oaths at the table. Sir G. Murray, Goulburn,
Herries, and Peel were sworn at the same time.
I thought they all looked a little mournful, hut
it was said they were very well received by the
new King, who was very formal with Lord Grey.
June 29. — Peel brought down a message from
the King announcing immediate dissolution of
Parliament.
June 30. — Peel explained the intentions of the
Government as to putting off all but very urgent
business, and not settling either the Civil List or
the Regency question. His tone was very humble.
Lord Althorp proposed a delay of twenty-four
hours to consider subjects of such vast importance
as the Regency; and Brougham took the same
line, and then left the House. We divided 139
to 185.
I heard that Althorp had communicated with
Lord Grey, who moved in the Lords for a similar
delay, and seemed in determined opposition to
Ministers. Lord Ellenborough, nothing daunted,
told him that an open enemy was better than
an insidious friend. The Lords in opposition
could muster only 51 against more than double
their number.
After our division in the Commons, Lord
Althorp moved an amendment to the Address,
CHAP. IX. BROUGHAM AND PEEL 35
recommending the settlement of the Regency isso.
before the dissolution of Parliament. Everything
seemed going on quietly enough, and we had not
made up our minds about dividing on Althorp's
amendment, when Brougham came in, I supposed
from dinner, and soon commenced a speech which
grew more furious as he went on; and, after
personally singling out Mr. Dundas and Lord
Castlereagh for ironically cheering him, and
exposing them to the ridicule of the House in
every possible way, he, at last, insulted the
whole bench of Ministers, by calling them " base,
fawning parasites of the Duke of Wellington/'
5n this Sir Robert Peel rose to order, and asked
Brougham whether he included him in the charge.
There was great cheering, and loud cries of
" Chair." Brougham replied that he did not
allude to Peel, and he tried to get out of the
scrape as well as he could ; on which Sir Robert,
with infinite skill and coolness, said he had no
doubt that Brougham did not allude to him, or
to anybody personally, and that it would have
been better, instead of making an unsatisfactory
explanation, to have said at once that he had
been betrayed to use the words by the heat of the
debate; and that, as Brougham had not made
that excuse, he would make it for him. On this
there was a cheer from all sides of the House ;
and Brougham rose and accepted Peel's interpre-
tation of his language. So ended this scene, to the
honour and glory of the Ministers, and, as usual,
36 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. to the confusion of my learned friend, who, as
Lord Howick told me, lost us at least four votes
by his intemperance. We had, however, a strong
division, being 146 to 193.
July 2. — I received a copy of Resolutions,
passed at a meeting of Westminster electors,
inviting Burdett and myself to be put in
nomination at the ensuing election. I gave a
formal answer in the affirmative, without any
expressions of gratitude, which I cannot say I
feel.
July 4. — I went to a meeting at Lord Althorp's
after church to-day. There were about sixty
Members there : Brougham, Lord Morpeth, T.
Cooke, Sir James Graham, and many others whom
I had not seen before.
It seems they had been discussing about forming
a systematic Opposition, and when I came in,
Cooke and others were congratulating the com-
pany upon the good old times of Whiggism and
party being likely to be restored under ftie
auspices of Lord Althorp. Morpeth and Sir
James Graham said that the reason they had
not attended these meetings before, was that they
did not think they were sufficiently hostile to
Ministers.
We discussed what was to be done about
Ri. Grant's motion on the Regency question ; and
in spite of this wonderful and sudden union,
there seemed to be a variety of opinions. It
was finally agreed we should go in force ready
CHAP. IX. THE REGENCY QUESTION 37
to divide or not, as best advised at the time, isso
and so we separated, having, as Maule said to
me, just done nothing.
Joe Hume, who was there for the first time,
said the only sensible thing I heard, namely that
unless Lord Grey and Lord Holland and other
party men would declare for cutting down places
and for more decisive reform than they ever had
yet done, the people would not sympathise with
any Parliamentary efforts of theirs.
July 5. — I had a talk with Cal craft on the
state of parties. He confessed to me that
Government had never been sure of a majority
since their acceptance of office, and could not go
on as at present constituted. Shortly after I had
a conversation with Mr. Arbuthnot, Chancellor of
the Duchy of Lancaster, who held nearly the
same language. He owned, however, there was
only one man of their opponents of whom they
had reason to complain — that was Sir James
Graham ; for with him they had negotiations at
the beginning of the Session, and had therefore
no right to expect the violent and systematic
opposition which he had given to them.
July 6. — E». Grant brought on his motion as to
the necessity of settling the Regency question.
Brougham made a humorous but offensive speech,
and in a very inartificial manner ended by an
eulogy of the Duke of Wellington, which pleased
no one. Tom Moore, however, told me he was
lost in admiration at the speech. In spite of it
38 LONDON CHAP. IX.
isao. we made a wretched figure, only 93 against 247.
Never was there a more complete defeat in a less
worthy cause.
July 8. — Dined at Burdett's. Rogers and Moore
there. A complete school for scandal, chiefly of
and concerning Horace Twiss's dinners to the
Duke of Wellington.
Rogers told me that he had tried to bring the
Duke of Wellington together with Lord Grey
and Lord Holland at his house at dinner, but it
would not do. Lord Holland told many diverting
stories and did his best, but His Grace never
relaxed a muscle. This was in last May : who
knows but this failure has sharpened Lord
Holland's wits against the Duke ? Everybody
now sees the folly of the Whigs.
July 9. — I spoke and voted against the recog-
nisance clause in the Libel Law Amendment
Bill. Banishment for libel abolished, after eleven
years of existence in the Statute Book, during
which time it has never once been acted upon.
We went to a party at Lord Grey's, and in
came the Duke of Wellington, who was as gay
and affable with mine host as if nothing had
happened. This is the way to succeed in the
world.
July 10. — I dined with Lady Cork, Dr. John-
son's dunce. She seemed physically to be rather
breaking, but then she is eighty-six. Intellect-
ually she is as young as ever. Her brother,
Mr. Monckton, was at the table; he was eighty-
CHAP. IX. FUNERAL OF GEORGE TV. 39
eight. Lord Eobert Spencer was there also; he isso.
too was eighty-eight. A more pleasant evening I
had not passed for a long time.
July 11. — News arrived that Algiers was taken
on the 5th of this month.1
July 15. — George IV. buried to-day. Lord
Tweeddale, who was at the ceremony, told me
that the account in the Times was every word
true. It was a tiresome, ill-managed, tawdry
pageant. Not a tear was shed, nor a sigh
heard. Paces scarcely grave. William IV.
smiling and chatting.
I called this day on Lord Lauderdale, and
heard that Lord Jersey was made Lord Chamber-
lain. The Duke of Wellington announced the
appointment to him by letter. He was at New-
market, and did not receive it. Lady Jersey
wrote to the Duke, asking for tickets for the
funeral. He said that he had no tickets, and
she had better apply to the proper officer —
namely, the Lord Chamberlain. When . Lord
Jersey returned home she showed him the Duke's
note, and he could not understand it, as he had
not yet opened the Duke's letter.
Lord Lauderdale did not approve the appoint-
ment of the Duke of Buckingham to be Lord
Steward, and told me that his Grace did not
know his own mind for a quarter of an hour
1 In consequence of an insult offered to the French representative
by the Dey of Algiers, an expedition was sent under General de
Bourmont and Admiral Duperre. After two battles and a short
siege, Algiers was surrendered on July 6, 1830.
40 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. together. In 1827 he wrote to him (Lord
Lauderdale), asking him to sign a declaration
of uncompromising hostility to Mr. Canning.
Shortly afterwards he applied to Mr. Canning
for a place. Soon after that he opposed the
Ministers.
July 19. — I went to a public meeting at Maryle-
bohe, called to take into consideration my Vestry
Bill. We had a very good meeting, and the whole
proceedings passed off in a very satisfactory
manner to me. I put to rights the misconceptions
relative to my Bill.
The King is very lively. To-day he reviewed
the Guards in St. James's Park, and made the
officers kiss hands on parade ! !
July 21. — I went to the King's Levee. The
number of people greater than I have ever seen.
The squeezing, and crowd, and heat tremendous.
My name was mentioned in form to His Majesty by
Lord Glenlyon, when the King said, " How d'ye
do ? " .and gave me his hand to kiss. This I did
without saying "Very well, thank ye," and so
passed on. The Duke of Sussex gave me a most
cordial shake by the hand, and seemed most happy
to show his new court honours. He is Banger of
Windsor Park.
July 22. — This day Lord Grey told me that Sir
B. Wilson was restored to his rank, and restored
in the most full and obliging manner, being raised
to a Lieutenant- Generalship, from date of 1825.
Lord Grey remarked to me that the King had
CHAP. IX. PARLIAMENT PROROGUED 41
done nothing but kind things since his accession 1830.
and spoke in a tone very different from his late
attacks on Ministers.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
July 23. — I went early to the House of Com-
mons, and saw King William come down in state
to prorogue the Parliament — a very fine sight on
a very fine day. I squeezed into the Lords wStJi
our Speaker, and heard him deliver his speech to
the King, in which he boasted of the great things
done by the present Parliament. Not three weeks
before, he had said to me, he did not know what
the House had done by all its late sittings. These
harangues, however, are so much a matter of
course that they admit of a little exaggeration ;
and Sutton said what he had to say well, and in a
full round voice. King William also performed
his part well. He spoke with a clear sharp-toned
voice, and what he said was good and agreeable to
hear. He called us a free and a loyal people. He
said the Catholic Emancipation Law was irre-
vocable. The Duke of Norfolk officiated as Earl
Marshal on one hand of him, and the Duke of
Wellington bore the sword of state on the other
side. The King of Wurtemberg was present, but
lost amongst our great folks. About 300 ladies
were in the House. I saw His Majesty return to
the palace. There was not much cheering ; but,
when the Duke of Wellington passed, the applause
was very great.
VOL. IV 6
42 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. The dissolution of Parliament appeared in the
Gazette of July 24, and perhaps my public life is
at an end.
July 26. — I saw King William review between
five and six thousand troops in Hyde Park. I
was on the balcony of Lord Dudley's house in
Park Lane. The arrangements were excellent,
and, when the review was over and the crowd
began to mix with the soldiers, the multitude
appeared innumerable. They were in very good
humour, and cheered the King, the Queen, the
King of "Wurtemberg, the Duke of Sussex, and all
the Royal suite, particularly the Maids of Honour.
The party at Lord Dudley's added a good deal
to the gaiety of the scene ; many of the most
beautiful women in London were amongst them.
In the balcony was Sir Sidney Smith, whom I had
not seen for many years. He appeared to wear
well, but looked rather like an old beau. He
had just been made a General of Marines — another
act of Royal kindness.
July 28. — The newspapers of this morning
contained a report of the Polignac Ministers to
Charles X., and two ordinances founded thereon —
one of which abolished altogether the Liberty of
the Press, and the other dissolved the Chamber of
Deputies, and remodelled, or rather destroyed, the
representative system in France. Our English
press, of all shades in politics, held the same
language, and said, " If the French bear this, they
deserve to be slaves." The few people I saw on
CHAP. IX. GLORIOUS NEWS FROM FRANCE 43
this day held the same language ; but I thought
the general feeling was that they would bear it.
They did not bear it ; for on Eriday, July 30,
Rothschild received a despatch from Paris, saying
that the people in Paris had taken up arms and
were fighting with the King's troops when the
messenger came away. This news drove the
thoughts of the Westminster election, which was
to take place the next day, out of my head ; but
I was obliged to attend to my own concerns when
the time came.
July 31. — The crowd at Covent Garden was not
great, but the attendance of our friends was very
flattering. I hardly missed a man either of the
old or young Westminster Reformers. When
Burdett and I had done speaking, the High
Bailiff read our names to the people, and, as
no one else was proposed, declared us duly elected.
Then came the glorious news from France. The
King had fled — the people were everywhere trium-
phant— and the tricoloured flag was flying on the
Tuileries and the Column of the Place Vendome.
I was, perhaps more than was wise, transported
with the Revolution of July, and wrote to
Lafayette sending him £100 for the subscription
opened for the families of those who fell during
the short but decisive conflict.
August 5. — I went to Brentford, and met Mr.
Hume and his procession of seventy-three carriages
and two steamboats. Mr. Byng did not come
until near two o'clock. They were both elected
44 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. without opposition, and thanked the freeholders
in speeches which were received as might be
expected, Hume's address related chiefly to
Prance.
Burdett, in his address to the Westminster
electors, expatiated on French politics at length.
This frightened some City friends, and kept the
funds down. The cry amongst these timid people
was, " Here is the revolutionary spirit in England,
and we shall have another long war." The
sagacious soldier at the head of the Government
used language very different. He was angry, not
with the French movement, hut with those who
had caused it. Calling at Messrs. Ransom's hank,
Mr. Williams, the principal partner, told me that
the Duke of Wellington had just been there, on
business of his own, and asked " What French
news there was in the City ? " and, hearing what
had been done by Charles X. and his Ministers,
exclaimed, " Oh, oh I ay, damn'd fools ! all soon
over — all soon over — first resigned, then repented,
then resigned again."
FROM DIARY.
August 10. — See by the Courier that the French
Crown was decreed to be offered to the Duke of
Orleans by the Chamber of Deputies on Saturday
last, on condition of his swearing to the new
Charter ; and at 5 o'clock p.m. of that day a
deputation from the Chamber walked from their
place of assembly to the Palais Royal, and did in
CHAP. IX. ACCESSION OF LOUIS PHILIPPE 45
the name of the French people offer the Duke the isso.
crown. Laffitte, the banker, read the new Charter
and announced the decision of the Chamber as to
His Royal Highness. The Duke answered shortly,
accepted the crown and the conditions, and then
threw himself weeping into the arms of Laffitte
and Lafayette, so says the account in the French
papers. All history does not record such a scene.
I would have given half of my useless life to have
witnessed it.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
August 9. — The Duke of Orleans proceeded in
state to the Chamber of Deputies, signed the
Declaration of the Representative body and the
adherence of the Peers ; then swore to the observ-
ance of the new Charter ; and, being saluted Philip
the First, King of the French, took his seat upon
the Throne, and delivered a speech to the two
Chambers.
A great dinner was given by His Majesty to
a mixed party, Ministers, Peers, Deputies, and
others, at which none of the old royal ceremonials
were observed. This pleased the Parisians, who
showed their attachment to equality, even whilst
behaving with wonderful moderation. A crowd
assembled whilst the Chamber was discussing the
question of an hereditary peerage, and shouted
" No Hereditary Peerage " so long and so loudly
that Constant and Lafayette were obliged to address
them before they would separate, with the under-
46 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. standing that the subject would be considered
hereafter.
PROM DIARY.
August 13. — Burdett has allowed the notorious
Mr. Buckingham1 to get up a dinner to com-
memorate the recent Revolution in Prance, with-
out a word to our Westminster friends, who are
in great perplexity. "Tis a difficult thing to act
with Burdett now ; he is certainly losing his head,
at least his memory.
August 18. — The dinner was well attended and
went off very well. Sir Prancis gave the health of
King Louis Philippe and the Prench Nation. I
gave the health of Lafayette and the National
Guards of Prance. One newspaper reported that
inflammatory placards were dispersed about. It
was not true.
August 19. — The Times and Herald give a most
wretched account of our dinner, and particularly
so far as regards myself. However, this always
has been my fate. If I have any fame it will not
be newspaper fame. I do not think I ever spoke
better in my life than at this dinner, nor was ever
more applauded, but the report in these papers
scarcely notices what I said. The Chronicle is
more fair.
August 20. — I sent Warburton £50, my sub-
scription to Joseph Hume's election, which, in
1 James Silk Buckingham, who was expelled from India in 1823
for journalistic attacks on the Government.
CHAP. ix. GALT'S "LIFE OF LORD BYRON" 47
consequence of my propositions to Warburton, 1330.
will not cost Joseph Hume one farthing. Yet this
worthy man on the day of his election said to our
Westminster Chairman : " / hope after this your
Westminster Members will behave a little better"
These Westminster Members made him M.P. for
Middlesex.
I see that some of the Royal Family of France
have landed in the Isle of France. Everything
goes on prosperously at Paris. Philippe has
named his Ministers. Benjamin Constant is
Counsellor of State with a presidency ; Lafayette,
permanent Commander of the National Guards.
The republican party complain that the " doctrin-
aires " are put at the head of affairs, and that
the Faubourg St. Germain is succeeded by the
Chaussee d'Antin. They are trying to adapt their
reformed plans to the Chamber of Deputies, but
find some embarrassment now that the initiative
is not confined to the Ministers. They would do
well to copy our formalities, which I think are
sensible and the fruit of experience.
August 28. — News from France good. Polignac
taken. He was disguised as servant to Me de
Fargeau and on the point of embarking at Gran-
ville. His rings and watch-chain, and his em-
barrassed manner it is said, betrayed him. His
conduct since his apprehension has been that of
an extremely weak man.
August 30. — This day Gait's Life of Lord Byron
came down. I find he says that the " good critic
48 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. who condemned ' Childe Harold' was probably
Mr. Hobhouse."
I wrote John Gait a remonstrance for his
gratuitous falsehood about me ; hinting also that
the idle stories in which he makes me figure with
Byron were not very agreeable, although I was
willing to overlook them ; but I must have the
" Childe Harold " conjecture cancelled.
On September 5 I received a letter from Gait
promising to correct the error in the Monthly
Magazine, and wished all he said of Byron or
me to be "kindly considered." I do not quite
know what line to take with him ; he has not
got the sense or feeling which makes correction
effectual.
PROM BOOK, " BECOLLECTIONS."
On August 31st came the news of a revolution
in Brussels. In Prance also an outcry had been
raised against what was called the new aristocracy,
that is, those who had got a little more money
than their neighbours. We were, however, happy
to see that Lord Stewart, our Ambassador at
Paris, had delivered his credentials in form to
Louis Philippe.
PROM DIARY.
September 13. — Moved to Brighton, where my
father and family were passing the autumn.
Very much struck with the gaiety and number
of the population, and the great addition to the
CHAP. IX. THE KING AT BRIGHTON 49
buildings since I was last there. The chain pier isso.
admirable " pour sa noble inutilite," as Mme. de
Stael says of music.
The first person I met on the road was the
King, in a plain equipage. He drives about like
any other private gentleman. The Queen rides
about on horseback and bathes in the Royal
Bath near the Steyne. In short, the worthy
couple are like wealthy bourgeois.
Whilst my father's carriage was at our door,
10, Montpeller Road, the King came past and
Colonel George Fitzclarence riding behind. Great
greetings between his Majesty, the Colonel, and
my father. All this is worth recording only in
contrast with our late Asiatic monarch.
September 17. — The Liverpool and Manchester
Railway was opened on Wednesday last. It is
said there were half a million of people to witness
the ceremony. The Duke of Wellington and
Peel were present. Mr. Huskisson was getting
down from his own car to shake hands with
the Duke of Wellington, when he was stopped
by some gentleman, who spoke to him and
detained him on the railroad until the Rocket
moved rapidly upon them, and in the hurry to
get into the Duke's car, Huskisson was knocked
or fell down, and the wheels of the Rocket went
over one of his legs across the calf and thigh,
and double-fractured both. He was conveyed
to Eccles to the house of Mr. Blackburn, and
died at nine o'clock at night. This fatal accident
VOL. iv 7
50 LONDON CHAP. IX.
1830. damped one of the most surprising sights that
the world has ever witnessed. The carriage that
carried Lord Wilton when he went for a surgeon
travelled at the rate of thirty-three miles an
hour.
FROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
September 17. — Huskisson seemed to have been
sincerely regretted at Liverpool, and he was in
the enjoyment of a great reputation. Alexander
Baring wrote to me saying that, the great Par-
liamentary light being extinguished, we must be
content now with farthing candles.
An article in the Times said that his loss was
irreparable. On reading this I made a remark,
thus recorded : " I am not an unprejudiced nor
a competent judge, but if this is true, England
is in a very lamentable condition." My own
opinion was that Huskisson, as a politician,
might be missed, but would not be mourned.
As a private man he was said to be very
amiable.
CHAPTER X
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
September 25. — Lord Nugent has seen Charles X. isso.
at Lulworth,1 and heard His Majesty talk very
openly on French affairs. He said the Revolution
would soon pass away, and he be back again
in Paris.
The Duke of Norfolk also had a conversation
with Charles X. at Lulworth, and he told my
brother Henry that Charles drew a distinction
between the Duke of Wellington's policy in
granting Catholic Emancipation and his own
in opposing all liberal measures. He remarked
that the Relief Bill was the completion of
many concessions previously made to the Roman
Catholics, and he should, himself, have voted
for it ; but that he and his family had never
willingly made any concessions to the French
Liberals, and that he had a right to recover
the privileges belonging to the Crown. He said
that he would take the same steps again if
he had the same assurances of success. He
1 In August 1830 Charles X. fled to England and for some time
resided at Lulworth, near Swanage, the seat of the Weld family,
whence he proceeded to Holyrood.
51
52 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. confessed, however, that his Ministers were to
hlame for not knowing the feelings of the
French people. They had assured him that the
Ordinances would be acceded to with little or
no resistance. He concluded thus : " Pour moi
et pour mon fils tout est fini ; mais pour cet
enfant [the Duke of Bordeaux], il sera le salut
de la France."
FROM DIARY.
September 26. — My brother Henry tells me that
the moneyed men entertain the greatest apprehen-
sions of some catastrophe even in England, and
that the great fall in the funds the other day was
occasioned by Rothschild, and Jones, Loyd & Co.,
and Smith, etc., giving notice to those to whom
they had lent money that they should want it
soon. The borrowers made heavy sales accordingly.
September 28. — Lord and Lady James Hay
dined with us. They have just arrived from
France, and were in Paris during the great week.
They gave us some particulars of recent events
which we could not have had from any other
quarter.
The Swiss and French Guard behaved well.
Whenever a soldier fell he was either carried off
in a hackney coach or dragged into some shop,
where his mustachios was cut off and he was
put to bed by the humane Parisian ; but the
Revolutionists were left in heaps where they
fell.
CHAP. X. A DEMOCRATIC COURT 53
All that the Hays mentioned confirms the isso.
general notion of the amiable character of Louis
Philippe. They add that he is reckoned a man
of great talent, and he is thought by the Parisians
to write his Ministers' reports, etc. I hope not.
They consider his Government the most stable in
Europe, next to that of England.
September 30. — News confirmed of the insurrec-
tion at Brussels. I am not without apprehensions
for the consequences — perhaps a Continental war,
and then England forced into the struggle, which
I contend she cannot support and pay the interest
of her debt.
October 2. — Lady James Hay tells me ^that a
Countess Montalembert (a Miss Forbes) is giving
out here that Louis Philippe keeps a democratic
court and desires folks to come in boots. This
is false ; but if it were so, have not the French
gained more than such obliquities can compensate ?
"Point de boucles a ses souliers, alors tout est
perdu/'
October 6. — John Gait has published in the new
Monthly Magazine a letter which, so far from
correcting his error, aggravates his offence. This
fellow annoys me as much as if he was the first
of biographers. Yet I knew him when Byron and
I used to laugh at him as the most absurd of
coxcombs, scarcely responsible for his conduct, for
he had a touch of crazy folly about him.
October 19. — Lord and Lady Tweeddale with
us, just come from Geneva by Paris. They
54 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. say that they ohserved nothing particular in
Prance, except that there were no carriages or
fine-dressed women in Paris. Great appre-
hensions entertained for Ternaux's house, and
even rumours ahout Laffitte. Rothschild has
been transmitting gold in vast quantities to
Paris, and eleven of Meurice's carriages are
employed between Calais and the capital for
that purpose.
Tweeddale says that all the people with whom
he spoke were for saving the Ministers, but there
was a cry against them. He hopes much from
the National Guard ; nevertheless many think
that a crisis is at hand, and some anticipate a
Jacobin insurrection. Amidst these wonders
turns up another miracle : the Prince of Orange
has declared the Independence of Belgium at
Antwerp and half shaken off the Government
of his father ; no one knows how to account for
his conduct.
October 22. — It seems that the rioters in Paris
have received a check ; politics seem to have
taken a liberal complexion everywhere.
October 23. — The Courier of last night contains
the good news that the King and Lafayette,
supported by the National Guard and troops of
the line, have, by their decided conduct, put down
the Paris populace.
October 26. — Parliament met this day.
October 28. — Went down to the House of Com-
mons. Took the oath and my seat. H. Brougham
CHAP. X. THE STRUGGLE IN BELGIUM 55
and I held the swearing board together, and he isso.
parodied the oath as we went on.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
October 29. — It was natural that the Revolution
of July in France should cause much commotion
and alarm in Europe, and more particularly in the
neighbouring states. It could hardly be expected
that the new kingdom of the Netherlands should
escape the infection. But the struggle in Belgium
lasted longer, and was more sanguinary, than it
had been in France. A young English officer of
the 43rd R/egiment, of the name of Byrne, was
present and saw the fighting.
He told me that the conduct of the Dutch
troops was cruel in the extreme. He saw a poor
old notary killed by a soldier, who knocked at
his door, and, when he opened it, shot him dead.
He also saw a citizen, who flung down his musket
and called for quarter, deliberately shot; but he
had the satisfaction of seeing the ruffian knocked
over immediately afterwards. Two drummer-boys
of thirteen and fourteen years of age were shot
in cold blood. This gentleman assured me that
the newspaper accounts of the atrocities com-
mitted by the Dutch soldiers had not been at all
exaggerated.
November 2. — I went to the House of Commons,
and found our folk full of fury and indignation
at the King's Speech. It called the people at
Brussels revolters, and praised the administration
56 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. of their Dutch King as being prudent and en-
lightened, and stated that England, in concert
with her allies, was trying to restore good govern-
ment, and what not ; in short, a Holy Alliance
speech. As to domestic matters : alarm, dis-
affection, and so forth. Doubtless the whole
intended to recall the ultra-Tories to their old
fears. We shall see.
Althorp declared against the foreign policy of
the speech, and said that he should support
Government when right and oppose them when
wrong ; and that he should not be deterred as
he had been, by any fear of turning them out.
I ought to have risen then, being resolved to
oppose the Government now ; as they have taken
their line I have nothing left for it ; but Lord
Blandford got up and made a foolish speech,
concluding with an amendment of a mile long
against the late House of Commons, so I lost my
turn and sat restless the whole evening, feeling
I did not do as I wished nor as I ought.
Brougham made an admirable speech, pulling
the King's Speech, especially the Belgic modera-
tion, to pieces, but ended with a foolish flourish
about "perishing with the aristocracy." He gave
notice of bringing on his Parliamentary Reform
motion on Tuesday, the 16th.
The Duke of Wellington made a speech in the
Lords, and declared against Reform. I hear he
was hissed, and hurt by a stone. The King was
applauded.
CHAP. X. POPULAR UNEASINESS 57
November 3. — At the House of Commons I gave isso.
notice of addressing the Crown on non-interference
with Belgic affairs. I was much cheered, and all
told me I had done right. That remains to be
proved, but I know I intend to do right. Lord
Morpeth told the House that I had anticipated
him only by a few minutes.
November 4. — Mr. Vanderweyer, one of the
Belgian Provisional Government, came to me.
He told me that he did not like to address
himself to any member of the Government, until
he was sure of a friendly reception. Accordingly
I spoke to Sir George Murray, who assured me
the Government felt no ill-will to the Belgians,
and that the King's Speech did not mean any
ill-will to them.
I heard this evening that a very unpleasant
feeling was rising amongst the working-classes,
and that the shopkeepers in the Metropolis were
so much alarmed that they talked of arming
themselves. The Duke of Wellington was not
one of the alarmists ; on the contrary, he told
Lord Tweeddale that everything would end
peaceably, and he might go to Scotland if he
chose. Lord Tweeddale told this to me; but
said, /'Notwithstanding the Duke's opinion, I
shall stay here. I am afraid of some cata-
strophe."
I heard everywhere that a great change had
taken place in public opinion since the meeting
of Parliament. The Duke was scarcely safe in
VOL. iv 8
58 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. the streets, and the King's popularity was
evidently on the wane.
FROM DIARY.
November 5. — I went to the House of Commons,
and on Croker taunting O'Connell for not having
attacked Ministers on the address, I got up and
told my mind very freely of the unfortunate
conduct of the Government, and of my resolution
now to oppose them systematically. Peel nodded
his head and cheered me when I said I was no
party politician.
November 6. — I walked about with Cornwall,
son of the Bishop of Hereford, a Ministerial M.P.
He told me that the Government were taking
extraordinary measures to provide against the
threatened commotions of the next week. Some
of the treasure had been removed from the
Bank, and several regiments ordered up to
London. Many special constables had also been
sworn in.
Mr. Cornwall owned to me that his friends
had been very indiscreet in denouncing the
Belgian revolt in the King's Speech, and he
disapproved of the Duke's declaration against
all Reform. Lord Dudley joined us, and we
soon frightened him so much that he declared
the Government had lost their senses; and that
the Duke of Wellington, by refusing the franchise
to Birmingham, had done more to promote the
cause of Heform than all of us Reformers put
CHAP. X. HUME AND THE MEANING OF WORDS 59
together. Saying this, " he went away sorrowing,
for he had great possessions."
I went to Brooks's and heard rumours of the
Ministry going out. Lord Durham spoke to me
as if it was inevitable, and asked me whether
I would take office under Lord Grey. I said
that a Reforming Ministry might he joined hy
any Reformer. He said that the great difficulty
would he to give great places to all, and that
the memhers for great towns would expect them.
I knew what he meant, but said nothing.
I dined with my friend David Baillie and a
large mixed party : Lord Lansdowne, the Knight
of Kerry, Spring Rice, and Pusey, M.P.
I sat next to Sir James Graham and had much
talk with him. He is dreadfully alarmed, and
thinks a revolution almost inevitable. He asked
me whether I thought Joe Hume meant mischief.
I said, "No." "What then did he mean by
advising the people not to use premature force ? "
said Graham. " He meant nothing," said I ; "he
did not know the meaning of the word."
People seem to think that Ministers will be
turned out on the Reform question. Lord
Stafford and Lord Talbot have declared for Re-
form. The potentates begin to tremble for their
acres.
Lord Lansdowne told me that the Duchesse de
1 Joseph Hume, when speaking in the House of Commons, often
employed wrong phrases, such as " It is not to be surprised at "
meaning " It is not to be wondered at " ; also " He is liable " instead
of "He lied."
60 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. Berri went to see our King open the Parliament,
and, when she saw Prince Talleyrand's carriage
in the procession, exclaimed, " Ah ! voila le
tricolor," like a lively schoolgirl.
November 7. — I dined at Henry Brougham's,
and I met there Lord Morpeth, Sir James Graham,
Mr. Stanley (Lord Derby), Mr. Denmaii, James
Brougham, Sir James Macdonald, and Lord
Howick. After dinner we discussed our pro-
ceedings on Brougham's Reform motion, fixed
for the 16th of November.
We agreed that Mr. Littleton of Staffordshire
should be requested to second it. Sir James
Graham told us that he had spoken to Lord
Palmerston as to the line that he and his friends
would take on the question. Eleven of that party
met at Lord Palmerston's house, and Graham was
informed that they were prepared to go all lengths,
so far as respected turning out the Government ;
also that they would vote for enfranchising the
great towns, and would vote for Brougham's
motion, if vaguely worded. As to my motion on
Belgium they could give no positive answer.
Just before going away I ventured to expostu-
late with Brougham on his eulogy of the aristocracy,
and his resolution of perishing with it. I begged
him to have recourse to no such topic in his
Reform speech, not because the sentiment was
incorrect, but because the people did not like to
hear one of their principal champions re-echo
the language of the corruptionists. Brougham
CHAP. X. NO WHIG 61
said he was sincere in the opinion. I replied isao.
that had nothing to do with the matter, the
question was as to public feeling. Althorp
douhted whether I was right, I insisted as to
the fact. Graham said, if so, all their debates
were futile, for if the public hated the aristocracy
so much as I believed, then no Parliamentary
reform would be satisfactory, and their labours
were lost. I replied that the fact might be as
he stated, but still we were to do what was right,
and not to risk our influence by untimely ex-
pressions such as I objected to. By degrees, I
think what I said had some effect, for Brougham
promised to be very careful about such phrases
\for the future.
I left Brougham flattering Stanley by a re-
monstrance against his silence in Parliament.
N.B. — I took care to declare more than once
that I was no Whig.
My impression was that these men are utterly
ignorant of the state of the country, and will
persevere deliberating on the miseries of petty
political factions till the storm bursts over them,
and all is over with them and the country.
November 8. — The King does not dine at the
Guildhall to-morrow. Oh rare ! Sir Robert Peel
wrote to the Lord Mayor yesterday, saying :
' Prom information which lias been recently
received, there is reason to apprehend that, not-
withstanding the devoted loyalty and affection
borne to His Majesty by the citizens of London,
62 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. advantage would be taken of an occasion, which
must naturally assemble a vast number of persons
by night, to create tumult, and cause confusion,
and thereby endanger the lives and properties of
His Majesty's subjects."
See to what a pass a few foolish words have
brought the Government of the country!
PROM BOOK, " BECOLLECTIONS."
I went to Brooks's, and found the greatest
consternation prevailing there. No one knew
what to think of this proceeding, nor could guess
the cause of it. I heard that the City was in an
uproar, and that the funds had fallen to 77 and
a half. I went to the House of Commons. It
was quite full of members and strangers ; but the
Treasury bench was empty, and Brougham began
by complaining of the absence of Ministers, and
the extraordinary conduct of the Government.
Whilst he was speaking Peel came in, looking
very pale. Then Lord Althorp rose, and asked
him for an explanation of his letter to the Lord
Mayor. Peel answered, and read a letter from
the Lord Mayor elect, Alderman Key, informing
the Duke of Wellington that an attack would
be made on him on his approaching Guildhall.
Here Colonel Davies and Mr. Tennyson broke into
a horse laugh, on which Peel stopped, and then
exclaimed, " Good God ! is it come to this ? "
and he then went on to state that Ministers had
received information which induced them to
CHAP. X. TROUBLE IN THE CITY 63
advise His Majesty to postpone his visit to the isso.
City. The excuse was very ill received ; and
Brougham, in a speech more moderate than usual,
pointed out the absurdity of taking so serious a
step upon such authority, and also upon the
unfairness of making the King suffer from the
unpopularity of his Ministers.
Alderman Waithman then rose, and, for the
first time, was well listened to. He complained
of the conduct of Ministers, and, to the surprise
of all, told the House that the communication of
Alderman Key was not authorised by the Court
of Aldermen, who had that day investigated the
probabilities of disturbance, and had come to a
unanimous resolution that there was not the
slightest cause for alarm, or the least chance of
mischief. He protested that the King was most
popular, although the Ministers were unpopular.
Alderman Thompson confirmed Waithman 's state-
ment, and read a resolution which the Court of
Aldermen had passed that afternoon to the same
effect.
This angered Peel, who said Ministers had no
reason to doubt that Aldermen Key and Hunter,
who came to them, were authorised to say what
they did. Goulburn spoke very ill indeed, and
talked of Ministers resigning, with satisfaction,
if the House did not support them. We laughed,
and Sir James Graham told Goulburn we should
choose our own time for trying our strength with
the Government. He concluded a good speech
64 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. by exhorting the Duke of Wellington to resign
at once. This concluded the debate, Ministers
being completely discomfited, and looking as if
on the verge of a precipice.
Then, as previously agreed upon, Lord Althorp
rose and asked me to defer my Belgian motion.
I consented ; but took occasion to say that the
Belgians would not submit to any dictation as
to the form of Government they might choose.
Peel answered me pettishly, and denied the in-
tention of the Cabinet to dictate to Belgium.
Went to the first meeting of the Geographical
Society. Lord Goderich, our President, made the
inaugural speech.
November 9 was fixed for the expected insur-
rection, which some thought not a bad substitute
for the Lord Mayor's show. Rumours of the
resignation of Ministers were also very rife. But
there happened neither insurrection nor resig-
nation on that day, although there were great
crowds in the streets, and the people seemed
resolved upon having a holiday.
I walked about some time with Lord Althorp,
an excellent person, too good for a party man.
He told me that he should retire from public
life the moment he got into the " Hospital for
Incurables." Lady Spencer, his mother, when
some one told her that "the poor were rising
against the rich," " On the contrary," replied
she, "it is the rich that are rising against the
poor." Whatever may have been the causes of
CHAP. X. VANDERWEYER AND WELLINGTON 65
the alarm, there can be no doubt but that it was isso.
very general. Lady Shrewsbury told my wife
that the Duchesse de Berri said to her, a day or
two ago, that the people of England were mad;
and that, if our Ministers did not resist all Reform,
England would soon fall into the same wretched
condition as Erance !
The night of November 9 passed off quietly. The
new police acted with equal vigour and prudence.
November 11. — I saw Mr. Vanderweyer, who
told me the Duke of Wellington had written to
him a very polite note asking to see him. He
went, and was much surprised, so he told me,
to see an infirm old man in an armchair, from
which he raised himself with difficulty to receive
him. He gave me an account of what passed
between them, "Although," said he, "I am no
diplomatist, I knew there was an advantage in
not speaking first ; and, as the Duke had invited
me, and I had not invited myself, I remained
silent. So did the Duke for a short time, and
then began to talk.
'' He was extremely civil, and said, ( Je vous
donne ma parole d'honneur qu'il n'y a pas la
moindre intention de notre part de nous meler
dans vos affaires.' He also said that he ' hoped
the Belgians, in choosing a form of Government,
would take care not to give cause for disquiet
to neighbouring nations.' I answered that we
should take care of that, provided there was no
intervention."
VOL. iv 9
66 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. Mr. Vanderweyer appeared to me to be a most
amiable, most honourable, and most intelligent
man; and five-and-thirty years of intercourse
with him have not altered the opinion that I
then formed of him.
November 14. — I met Admiral Sir Edward
Codrington, and he gave me an account of his
recent interview with the Emperor Nicholas. I
confess I was a little startled at his report of a
conversation with His Majesty, relative to the
recent revolution in France. The Emperor asked
him what he thought of the conduct of the Duke
of Orleans. Codrington said it had saved France
from anarchy. The Emperor replied that the
Duke of Orleans had only one line of conduct
to adopt — namely, to follow the fortunes of the
King. " Had he done so," said the Admiral,
"there would have been another Revolution of
1793." The Emperor Nicholas rejoined, "Well!
perhaps it would have been better if there had
been." Codrington on this remarked " that
there might be two opinions on that matter";
and so the conversation ended. On a little re-
flection I was not much surprised that an
Emperor of Russia should prefer any revolution
to a family revolution.
November 15. — Belgium and Reform were put
out of our heads by the events of this day, when
Sir Henry Parnell moved to refer the Civil List
to a Committee. We divided. Whilst in the
lobby Brougham addressed us, and begged us,
CHAP. x. "THE GAME WAS UP" 67
in case we were beaten, to stay and try another isao.
question. Whigs, Radicals, Huskisson's friends,
and ultra-Tories combined and numbered 233 to
204. When these numbers were announced there
was some cheering, not much. I rose, and
unwisely asked Ministers " whether they intended
to resign " ; but Brougham, in a friendly way,
interfering, said a few words, and Parnell named
his Committee.
FROM DIARY.
November 16. — The gossip at Brooks's is that
the Duke of Wellington told Holmes last night
that "the game was up." A very rainy day.
As Lord North said, " Not a day to turn a dog
out."
I went down to the House of Commons
a little before 3— found it very full, and the
gallery overflowing — various rumours. Althorp
told me that some one in the Court of Chancery
this morning had heard the Chancellor say,
' We are out." Some of the official people,
not Cabinet Ministers, came in, looking as if
on the verge of dismissal. Sheriffs of London
and Middlesex came to the Bar with a Petition
about London Bridge and Reform of Parlia-
ment. Peel entered, looking very pale indeed,
and talked with the Speaker. Alderman Wood
made a tiresome speech about the City Feast
and Reform of Parliament ; when Peel rose,
and said that his great respect for the House
68 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. induced him to take the earliest opportunity of
announcing that, in consequence of the occurrence
of last night, he had waited on the King and
tendered his resignation, which His Majesty had
heen graciously pleased to accept. He added
that all his colleagues had pursued the same
course. He then sat down : not a word was
said ; no cheers, nor signs either of joy or sorrow.
Lord Althorp then rose, and, in a few solemn
phrases, asked Brougham to put off his motion
on Parliamentary Reform. Brougham rose, and
with equal gravity protested that it was quite
against his private wishes and opinions to defer
his motion ; and he added these words, which he,
or some friend, has taken care to send to the
Times : " As no change that may take place in
the Administration can by any possibility affect
me, I beg it to be understood that, in putting off
the motion, I will put it off until the 25th of
the month, and no longer. I will then, and at
no more distant period, bring forward the question
of Parliamentary Reform, whatever may be the
condition of circumstances, and whoever may be
His Majesty's Ministers." On hearing this, I
said to Denman, " What the deuce does the man
mean ? You know as well as I do that he was
for putting off the motion last night." Denman
replied : "I confess I can't understand this sort
of thing. He told me this morning there could
be no doubt about the matter." I asked Brougham
himself how he could have any doubts as to the
CHAP. X. END OF THE WELLINGTON MINISTRY 69
necessity of delay. He only laughed, and said isso.
something evasive.
Lord Blandford and I were talking together,
just as Brougham crossed us, of the propriety
of deferring the motion, and Blandford heard
Brougham say, " I will not let my motion be
made the stepping-stone of a party."
Now I am confident that Brougham and
Althorp had settled the whole arrangement be-
forehand. As to B.'s not being affected by the
change of Administration, I presume he means
that his motion will not be affected, yet the
words do not convey that precise meaning. He
is a strange creature, and has done more to turn
out the Ministry than any ten men besides.
Peel very unnecessarily corrected Althorp's
expression of there being no Administration in
the country, and said he should do his duty
until his successor was appointed. We gave a
cheer just out of candour, and then began to
break up, leaving Waithman talking about Reform.
The Duke of Wellington made a similar
announcement in the Lords, being scarcely audible,
and retired immediately afterwards.
SO ENDS THE WELLINGTON ADMINISTRATION.
Their partisans say they will soon return to
office ; I think not. To me this appears " le
commencement de la fin," as Talleyrand said
of Buonaparte's defeat in Russia.
70 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. That Peel may come in again is very likely
indeed, but the Duke's age and his unpopularity
will render it very inadvisable to place him
again at the head of any Administration, except
it shall be resolved to run all chances and play
the Polignac game here, which is not quite out
of the question, for if any Reform shall be obtained
the people will feel their force, and will at last
frighten the whole body of the aristocracy into des-
perate measures. At least this is not altogether
off the cards. For the present a mixed Adminis-
tration will be chosen. Lord Grey has been sent
for, and he will be Prime Minister I suppose.
November 17. — I find that folks aiv angry with
me for pushing Ministers on Monday night.
Tavistock told me at Brooks 's that he had been
defending me, and had quoted Eox, who called
the Administration that was outvoted about
Melville's trial, a disgraced Administration.
Now I know friend Tavistock very well, and
am aware that, with all his good qualities, he is
not ill read in the "school for scandal." 'Tis
rather too hard the Whigs should affect to be
angry with me; that the other side should I
can well understand, and they are shy enough.
November 18. — Burdett saw Lord Grey yester-
day, and was much pleased with his frankness,
promising Reform and all good things as the
basis of his Administration.
I went down to the House of Commons, and
found the expiring Ministers in their places
CHAP. X. THE NEW GOVERNMENT 71
attending to a discussion on the new police force. 1830.
This is one of Peel's creations, and he seemed
much pleased with the testimonies in their
favour.
November 19. — At Brooks's, where our friends
were handing about a list of the new Administra-
tion. Brougham Lord Chancellor ! ! Reform of
Parliament, Anti-Slavery, Law Reform, Useful
Knowledge Society, Edinburgh Review, Sublime
Society of Beef Steaks, hail and farewell ! ! But
it is believed, and people seem glad to get rid of
my learned friend from the House of Commons.
He came. We set up a shout, and he soon went
away.
Of all the rumoured nominations, Sir J. Graham,
Eirst Lord of the Admiralty strikes me as the
most preposterous.
Lord Durham (the Privy Seal) had a long talk
with me, and said all was going on well and
nearly settled.
He assured me that Lord Grey based his Ad-
ministration on Reform of Parliament, and next
on retrenchment. He would not have useless
placemen for the sake of influence. In that case I
told him if Lord Grey was turned out in a month
he would come in again in a month. I told
Durham they should get some friend of Govern-
ment to put off Brougham's Reform motion, and
take it up as a Government measure. He said,
"Thank you; it is a very good thought." My
Lord is acting the Cabinet Minister already.
72 LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. Indeed, I hear tljat he has ordered his Windsor
uniform and two or three additional footmen.
November 21. — Tavistock tells me that Holland
House is alive with talk. Lady Holland and
Allen are distributing the Church patronage of
the Duchy of Lancaster already, and act and
think as if they were in the days of the Pelhams
and Walpoles, with perfect tranquillity and self-
complacency.
Very different are the sights and sounds in
the country. Pour or five counties are in a blaze,
and The Grange, Alexander Baring's mansion,
has been all but taken by storm, and Bingham
Baring, attempting to seize a rioter, knocked
down by a sledge-hammer.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
November 22. — -At the House of Commons this
day the old Ministers took their seats on the
Opposition benches — Peel, Hardinge, Calcraft,
Scarlett, and all. I ascended to my mountain
behind them, with Hume, Warburton, John Wood,
Marshall, and a few others of the same stamp.
I went to the House of Lords to see Brougham.
There was a great crowd on the steps of the
Throne and below the Bar — men and women. At
five o'clock, whilst I was talking with the
Swedish Minister, some one said, " There he is ! "
and, looking round, I saw my Lord had stepped
in, almost unobserved, and had taken his seat
on the Woolsack.
CHAP. X. BROUGHAM ON THE WOOLSACK 73
I heard Lord Grey speak. He made a declara- isso.
tion of the principles on which his Government
was formed — very fair and explicit, so it seemed
to me. Brougham was the observed of all — pre-
siding in an assembly of dignitaries, spiritual
and temporal, whom he had for a quarter of a
century endeavoured to render contemptible. He
did not look quite comfortable, nor know what
to do. I heard him turn to his pursebearer and
say, " What am I to say ? " Lord Lyndhurst
walked up to the Woolsack and shook hands
with the new Chancellor; not quite cordially,
I thought.
I returned to the House of Commons, and
heard a discussion on the state of the country.
Baring made no secret of his great alarm; and
Peel said that every man should be prepared to
fight for his property, which sounded rather
oddly to those who knew what sums we paid
for the protection of our lives and properties
by the Government.
The alarm became more general and more
serious every day. The news from Wiltshire was
very bad, and riotous assemblages in Hampshire
had been dispersed and eighty prisoners made
by a military manoeuvre, the credit of which
was given to no less a personage than the Duke
of Wellington, with what truth I knew not.
But, in spite of these unhappy disturbances, the
course of life in London ran pretty much as
usual.
VOL. iv 10
74 LONDON CHAP. X.
PROM DIARY.
November 25. — I had a long talk with Burdett
about the state of the country. He is for strong
measures, such as declaring the counties out of
the King's peace, re-enacting the Alien Act
against foreigners, who are supposed to be at
the bottom of the burnings, etc. And, above
all, arm the householders.
November 26. — I hear that Brougham, in a
judgment delivered in Chancery, has hinted
that his new character will preclude him from
his previous convivial habits.
November 28. — At the Society for the Diffusion
of Useful Knowledge. My Lord Chancellor
Brougham and Vaux, the chairman, came and
transacted business as usual, with much speed
and accuracy. The company, consisting of some
of the most scientific men in the kingdom,
seemed proud of their patron and founder.
Indeed, it is somewhat a wonderful sight to see
such a man in such a place.
November 29. — I had a long talk with Place
on the state of the country. He thinks a
revolution inevitable. The farmers of Kent and
Sussex have for the most part acceded to the
demands of the labourers, and will pay so long
as they can. When they cannot, the parson and
the landlord will be obliged to contribute. The
first will be treated with the least ceremony.
November 30. — Went to the Royal Society's
chambers, where the Presidency was contested
ELIZABETH, THIRD LADY HOLLAND.
From the ^picture "by Robert Fagan at Holland House. By kind permission of
Mary, Countess of Ilchester.
[P. 75
CHAP. X. LORD AND LADY HOLLAND 75
between Herschel and the Duke of Sussex. The isso.
merits of the candidates seem to he that the
first has no quality hut one — science ; the last
has every quality but one — science. I voted for
the Duke, who carried the election only by nine.
December 3. — A deputation from the Metro-
politan parishes waited on me respecting my
Vestry Bill, the essentia1 clause of which dis-
pleases them, so all my labour has been in vain.
This is the fate of most men who try to reconcile
contending interests. Thankless Metropolis ! My
bones shall not rest in either of your cemeteries !
December 4. — Lord Tavistock told meat Brooks's
yesterday that he was going to Lord Althorp
to propose that not less than one hundred seats
shall be remodelled by the proposed Reform.
He says that Althorp wants encouragement, as
he stands almost alone in the Cabinet, so far
as efficient Reform is concerned. I fear so.
December 10. — Called on Lord Holland. Saw
him and his awful lady. I thought he had
rather a ministerial air; he talked of Cabinets
and messengers in waiting, and was more than
usually reserved. We had a few words about
Reform, which seemed to alarm Lady Holland,
but my Lord confessed the time was come and
it must be done. He told me that the Duke
of Wellington last night in the Lords completely
let out the " malus animus" against proceedings
in France, talking of misfortune and bad example,
of events of last summer to which he sagely
76
LONDON CHAP. X.
1830. attributed the disturbances in England. That
and his complaint of the procession of Trades
parading to the Palace on "Wednesday last are
very little to his honour.
December 11. — Walked about with Burdett,
who tells me that a story goes of Lady Jersey
having told the Queen that in the present
Cabinet there is not one man who has any
religion. What did my Lady think of the Duke
of Wellington's religion ?
December 13. — I attended Parliament, and, in
a short speech, made a sort of profession of
faith. I pointed out to the new Ministers the
necessity of listening to the people, and not
taking the advice of those false or foolish friends
who daily urged the propriety of keeping up
establishments and continuing high salaries — e.g.
Ridley Colborne, who compared the public to a
" great gentleman." I said that I could not
doubt of the good intentions of Ministers, particu-
larly Althorp, Russell, and Denman, who were
opposite ; and promised, if they continued as they
had begun, my " cordial support."
Warburton and Hume told me I had made a
very good speech. I did not care about good or bad
so far as speaking went, but I felt a sincere wish to
praise, and by praising uphold and encourage the
Ministers, without any sacrifice of old principles.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS. "
December 15. — I heard at the House of Com-
CHAP. x. COBBETT'S STATE OF AFFECTION 77
mons that Henry Hunt was a good deal ahead isso.
of Mr. Stanley, the new Irish Secretary, at
Preston. And why was this ? Because, as I
was told, Mr. Stanley would not pledge himself
to vote against the Corn Laws and for the Ballot.
Now, although opinions might differ about these
proposals, there ought to be no difference of
opinion about pledges, nor about the manliness
which dictates a refusal to give them.
In days of commotion and difficulty, public
writers and public talkers are often more bitter
against individuals than against Governments and
parties. Of this, in the days of which I am
writing, I had a good proof ; for Cobbett was
much more savage against myself than against
the Ministers, and against individuals in office
than against the Cabinet. He said, or wrote,
that " he hated Stanley more than any one
living ; except Sidmouth and his gang, and
Burdett and Hobhouse."
The tone of some of our friends was also not
at all agreeable. Dr. Bowring went so far as
to tell me that he did not think our revolution
coming — he thought it had come.
Parliament dissolved till February 3.
EROM DIARY.
December 18. — -I dined at Lord Lansdowne's,
with some thirteen or fourteen good people, and
found very little apprehension of anything
happening.
78 LONDON CHAP. X.
Lord Lansdowne told me he had rather bad
news from "Wiltshire. The farmers had begun
to back out of their compulsory bargains with
the labourer.
Edward Ellice confessed to me to-day that
he thought the Ministers ought to dissolve the
Parliament and appeal to the people at once.
I assented most decidedly. He says Lord Grey
and Althorp take everything very quietly and look
at the best side of all matters, but he apprehends
a convulsion.
December 20. — At House of Commons. Peel
made a strange speech, half reproving his friends
for indiscreet attacks on the new Ministry, and
half attacking those Ministers for arrogating to
themselves principles which the late Govern-
ment carried so admirably into effect, e.g. re-
trenchment and peace. He spoke equivocally of
the conduct of the French. Hume answered
him well, which angered Sir Robert, who said
he had not condemned the resistance of the
French, but had only said that revolutions were
bad when best. Funds had fallen to 57 at Paris.
What a sublime discovery !
December 24*. — Great alarms at Paris. Polignac
and the others condemned to perpetual imprison-
ment. The people dissatisfied and moving in
great masses, but the National Guard and
Lafayette, and more than all, the King, by
going amongst the people, quieted them.
December 25. — Ministers have been unwise
CHAP. X. THE BELGIAN QUESTION 79
enough to order a form of prayer to allay the isso.
troubles in various parts of the country; although,
when Spencer Perceval gave notice of an address
to the King to order a general fast for the same
object, the other night, there was a horse laugh.
Why should Ministers think the people greater
fools than the Parliament ?
December 26. — I had a talk with Sir James
Graham, who asked me what I thought of
public feeling, as he had heard me quoted for
an unfavourable opinion on that score. I told
him what I thought, and strongly recommended
a dissolution of Parliament. " What," said he,
" then we are come too late, you think ? " A
day or two afterwards Sir James spoke, and
announced that " Parliament would not be dis-
solved until Ministers had learnt the feeling
of the present House of Commons. If that
should prove to be against them, they would
appeal to the people." Sir George Clerk sagely
observed that, " Perhaps the present Ministers
might not have it in their power to do so, as
there were two words to that bargain."
January 15, 1831. — I had a visit from 1831.
Vanderweyer. He had seen Lord Grey, who
appeared to have a liking for the Prince of
Orange, and asked whether it was possible to
make him King of the Belgians. " Certainly,"
replied Vanderweyer, " with another Revolution—
without it, not ; and, if chosen, he would be
shot out of a window. There are eleven thou-
80 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. sand volunteers who have sworn the death of
any prince of the Nassau family who might be
placed over them."
January 18. — Dined at Warre's, at Cambridge's
house, in Twickenham meadows. Sir R. Inglis
there. He seems to think all our troubles, and
amongst them the cry for Reform, will subside
quietly, and the old Tory principles and practices
finally prevail. If he should turn out to be
right, what blunderers we are ?
January 21. — A letter from Mrs. Kennedy,
widow of Dr. Kennedy, whose religious con-
versations with Lord Byron have been pub-
lished. This insolent epistle is likely to add
to the thousand and one squabbles which my
intimacy, and, I may add, my honest and dis-
interested friendship for Byron, have entailed
upon me.
The woman is angry with me for discouraging
her from publishing the catch-penny conversa-
tions above mentioned : I knowing from Lord
Sidney Osborne that Byron was playing upon
Dr. Kennedy, whom he used to call Saint
Kennedy, in order to distinguish him from
another, a very good fellow, whom he called
Sinner Kennedy.
January 28. — The day fixed for the Belgians
to choose a King, occurrences which now cease
to make us stare. The Poles and Russians seem
about to begin their mortal strife.
January 31. — Finished the second volume of
CHAP. X. MOORE'S LIFE OF BYRON 81
Moore's Life of Byron, and am now more pleased issi.
than ever with the resolution taken by me, of not
contributing to that work. Nevertheless, it pre-
sents a tolerably fair picture of Lord Byron's real
character, and some of Moore's observations are
exceedingly just and conveyed in appropriate
language. That the letters and journals raise
Lord Byron in public estimation as a man of
talent, no one will be foolish enough to assert.
What then has this publication achieved ? It
has put £3,500 at least into the pocket of
T. Moore. Murray, the publisher, says that he
gave Tom Moore £6,000 for the work; but that
sum must include expenses for purchasing
materials.
February 1. — Received an invitation from Lord
Althorp to dine with him at a Parliamentary
dinner on February 2. Determined not to go,
as I considered it a meeting of Members notori-
ously supporting the Administration, amongst
which number I do not choose to be ranked. I
am a friend but no follower, nor ought a Member
for Westminster to be ; so I wrote to Lord
Althorp and told him that my absence in the
country would prevent me having the honour
of dining with him. So long as I am indepen-
dent I will be wholly so ! Erom one or two
observations I have made, I feel certain that
the Ministers or their retainers would be glad
enough to secure me or any one by the cheapest
of favours.
VOL. IV 11
82 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. February 3. — I went to the House of Commons
at four o'clock, and found it so full that I was
scarcely able to get a place.
Lord Althorp announced that Lord J. Russell
would bring forward the Cabinet Reform on
March 1, and that it would be "full and
effectual "; also that the Ministers, one and all,
were agreed upon the measure. Here is an
answer to the taunt that ten men cannot be
found agreeing in one plan. The House seemed
more Ministerial than before the recess.
I walked away early with Tavistock, who told
me as a most inviolable secret that, of all the
Cabinet, Brougham was the one and only one
who was afraid that the Reform Measure was going
too far. He said there would be no seat left for
" a clever young lawyer." However, like a clever
old lawyer, now that the measure is resolved upon,
he takes care to have it given out he originated it.
Tavistock said, had the King stood out against the
measure, Brougham would have gone round. The
King told Lord Holland the other day that he had
a conversation of three hours with Lord Grey on
the subject, and was never better pleased in
his life.
February 7. — The Civil List scheme is not well
received. I had a talk with Sir Henry Hardinge,
who said that a general war was inevitable, and
that either all the thrones of Europe would fall,
or Paris would be a third time taken. This shows
the Duke of Wellington's feeling as strongly as
CHAP. X. ec AS NINEVEH WAS SAVED OF OLD " 83
his declaration against Reform, which Hardinge
defended as the only line to be taken by a sincere
statesman who thought the Monarchy incompatible
with Reform.
Prom some conversation I had with Peregrine
Courtenay,1 I see that Reform will be opposed at
all hazards. P. Courtenay talked of his having
lost his domestic comforts by being out of office.
To be sure, who wonders at his anxiety to resist
Reform.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
February 8. — Mr. Henry Hunt proposed to
address the Crown for a reprieve for the convicts
sentenced under the Special Commission for trying
the rioters in the country. This called forth a
wild, disorderly speech from O' Gorman Mahon,
but Althorp, who answered the Irish declaimer,
said he preferred civil war to the dismemberment
of the Empire.
On this day Mr. Spencer Perceval, who had
given notice of a motion for addressing the Crown
to appoint a day of fasting and humiliation, told
me he " believed that such a supplication might
bring down on us a special interposition of Provi-
dence in our favour, just as Nineveh was saved
of old." Eeeling how much we English are
indebted to fanaticism for our liberties, 1 did not
smile at this; but in after days, when better
1 Thomas Peregrine Courtenay, M.P, for Totnes, Vice-President
of the Board of Trade,
84 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. acquainted with this gentleman, I became con-
vinced that, on such subjects, he was not of sound
mind, although on all others perfectly rational.
FROM DIARY.
February 12.— Read the Budget. See that the
Ministers' project of taxing transfers of stock is
furiously opposed as a breach of faith. I should
not wonder if Lord Althorp was obliged to give
up that scheme. The reduction of the newspaper
tax very good, but might be better. To my mind,
a graduated property tax would be preferable,
and I shall say so.
February 13. — Lord Althorp has again asked
me to a Ministerial dinner, which I again think
it better to decline.
February 14. — The tax on transfers given up.
Attended debate on finance. Althorp announced
his intention to give up the tax, as also to abandon
the reduction of Tobacco Duties. Several other
parts of his scheme attacked, and likely to be
given up also. This shows the imprudence of
having delayed Reform. Lord Tavistock told me
that his brother John urged the necessity of
bringing on the great question early, and the
17th of this month was fixed, but the Cabinet
changed the day.
EROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
February 15. — I attended the Committee on
the reduction of official salaries. Lord Chancellor
CHAP. X. REVOLUTION IN THE PAPAL STATES 85
Brougham was examined at his own request. He
came into the room with the Mace and the Great
Seal, and, when seated, put on his hat. He told
us that his colleagues in the Cabinet had obliged
him to change his mode of living. He had wished
to continue in his house in Hill Street, hut had
been forced to go into a larger house in Berkeley
Square; also that, instead of his one chariot, he
had now two coaches and two chariots, in spite
of his earnest remonstrance. When speaking of
the retiring pension given to ex-Chancellors, he
said he wished to God he could be dispeered by
Act of Parliament, and return to his profession ;
but, as that could not be, he had thought of a
scheme for increasing the retiring salary, and
giving the ex-Minister something to do. Peel
was very cool and solemn, and, as usual with
him, flirted with Acts of Parliament.
At this time we had news of revolutions, or
attempts at revolution, in the Papal States and
Modena. To one of these commotions England
owes the very best Librarian that ever presided
over the literature of the British Museum.
FROM DIARY.
February 15. — Made a speech, and not a bad
one, on the extravagant tastes of the late King,
and the enormous expense of Windsor Castle.
Althorp and Lord John Russell spoke very
honestly.
February 17. — I dined in Berkeley Square, and
86 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. was too late at the House of Commons to bring
on my Vestry Bill, the only time I was ever
too late in my life. A sad business !
February 23. — The Finance schemes of Ministers
are universally decried, and were it not for
Brougham's Chancery Reform and the expected
Parliamentary Reform, would turn them out.
PROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
February 24. — This day I was witness to a
scene in the House of Commons the like of
which, I believe, has never occurred either before
or since. After a skirmish between Stanley and
O'Connell, the latter made several solemn pro-
testations of wishing to keep the peace in Ireland,
whereupon a man in the gallery roared out, " You
LIE." He was immediately secured by the
messengers, and in the course of the evening
brought to the Bar. Making but a lame excuse,
he was committed to Newgate. It was said that
he was mad; but, whether mad or not, there
were many of us who believed he spoke the
truth.
February 26. — The House, contrary to usage,
sat from twelve to six o'clock to receive petitions
on the subject of Reform. No one declared
positively against all Reform — a circumstance
which I could not help remarking at the time,
and which was a novelty.
At last came the great day — Tuesday, March 1.
I went to the House at twelve o'clock, and found
CHAP. X. THE REFORM BILL 87
all the benches, high and low, on all sides, issi,
patched with names. With much difficulty I
got a vacant space on the fourth bench, nearly
behind the Speaker, almost amongst the Opposi-
tion and the Anti-Reformers.
Lord John Russell began his speech at six
o'clock. Never shall I forget the astonishment
of my neighbours as he developed his plan.
Indeed, all the House seemed perfectly astounded ;
and when he read the long list of the boroughs
to be either wholly or partially disfranchised
there was a sort of wild ironical laughter, mixed
with expressions of delight from the ex-Ministers,
who seemed to think themselves sure of recover-
ing their places again immediately. Our own
friends were not so well pleased. Baring Wall,
turning to me, said, " They are mad ! they are
mad ! " and others made use of similar exclama-
tions,— all but Sir Robert Peel ; he looked serious
and angry, as if he had discovered that the
Ministers, by the boldness of their measure, had
secured the support of the country. Lord John
seemed rather to play with the fears of his
audience ; and, after detailing some clauses which
seemed to complete the scheme, smiled and
paused, and said, f< More yet." This " more,"
so well as I recollect, was Schedule B, which
took away one member from some boroughs that
returned two previously. When Lord John sat
down, we of the Mountain cheered long and loud ;
although there was hardly one of us that believed
88 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. such a scheme could, by any possibility, become
the law of the land.
Sir John Sebright seconded the motion in a
short speech. Poor Sir Robert Inglis made a
long Anti-Reform speech, and called the Minis-
terial plan a revolution. Lord Althorp spoke
out manfully ; Lord L. Gower treated us to some
" prose run mad " for an hour or two ; and Hume
adjourned the debate at half -past twelve o'clock.
We all huddled away, not knowing what to
think — the Anti-Reformers chuckling with de-
light at what they supposed was a suicidal pro-
ject, and the friends of Ministers in a sort of
wonderment. I recollect that a very good man,
Mr. John Smith, a brother of Lord Carrington's,
caused much amusement by saying that Russell's
speech made his hair stand on end.
Sir Robert Peel, with his usual quickness and
sagacity, took care at the end of the debate to
ask for an explanation of the £10 qualification
for householders in towns, which certainly par-
took more of disfranchisement than any other
reform, and was calculated to make the whole
plan unpopular.
Burdett and I agreed there was very little
chance of the measure being carried, and that
a revolution would be the consequence. We
thought our Westminster friends would oppose
the £10 qualification clause ; but we were wrong,
for we found all our supporters delighted with
the Bill.
CHAP. X. DEBATE ON REFORM 89
March 2. — House of Commons. I found the
tone of the House generally had been very much
changed since the previous evening. The scheme
was now thought not so very wild. Macaulay
made a powerful speech, but his concluding
peroration was too long and too laboured. Hunt
supported the Bill, but talked like an ass about
Ilchester jail; indeed, he is a very silly fellow.
Sir Charles Wetherell buffooned for nearly two
hours, but was cheered immensely; so that Den-
man, who very imprudently would speak, could
scarcely get a hearing. The debate was adjourned.
March 3. — I had a skirmish with Sir Henry
Hardinge before the adjourned debate began,
for calling the scheme revolutionary. George
Bankes resumed the discussion. " The Lord
delivered him into my hands," for he quoted
Pitt's speech in favour of the Irish Union, from
which I had made extracts, and was enabled to
answer him on his own grounds. I flattered
myself that I gave him and Wetherell a sufficient
dressing. I spoke for an hour and a half, and
concluded by apologising to Sir Robert Peel for
my exultation on the day of his being beaten out
of office, and imploring him to become Reformer.
I was not quite pleased with myself, but I heard
from all quarters that I had done very well
indeed. Peel gave no sign of life when I was
speaking ; but when he spoke he paid me a
handsome compliment, by saying that the asser-
tion that "abilities were not the first requisite
VOL. iv 12
90 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. for an M.P. came with a very bad grace from
the Member for Westminster." Alexander Baring
then made a very efficient although very unfair
speech against Reform. He created so much
effect that Mr. Charles Ross told me it had
changed six votes. I mentioned this to Lord
Duncannon, who consoled me by saying that
Ross said what was not true ; Baring had not
gained even his own son by his speech. Lord
Tavistock was very indignant with him for say-
ing that Russell had drawn his Bill so as to save
the Bedford interest. Palmerston made a very
weak speech. Then rose Peel, and made what was
a most effective address to the House in favour
of the present system; but his speech consisted
chiefly of attacks on Palmerston and Russell for
inconsistencies, and, when I read it afterwards,
I was surprised to find there was so little in it.
However, the House rang with cheers when he
sat down, and the debate was adjourned im-
mediately at past two in the morning.
March 4. — I went rather late to the House of
Commons, but heard Mr. Jeffrey,1 the new Lord
Advocate, speak for an hour and three-quarters.
His fluency and argumentative powers were
admirable ; but he was too quick and too close
for a popular assembly such as our House of
Commons. I must not omit to record that Mr.
1 Francis (afterwards Lord) Jeffrey, editor of the Edinburgh
Review from its foundation in 1803 till 1829; Lord Advocate,
1830-34;. M.P. for Malton and then for Edinburgh; Judge of the
Court of Session, 1834.
CHAP. X. HOPES FOB, REFORM 91
Stanley made so excellent a speech that those
near me whispered he ought to he our leader.
The debate was adjourned to the following
Monday.
Saturday, March 5. — I dined with Mr. Speaker,
at a mixed Ministerial party, for the first time
in the ten years that I had been in Parliament.
After dinner I had a long conversation with
Alexander Baring. I told him that, in my
opinion, Reform would be inevitably carried.
He surprised me by saying he supposed it would ;
and that, if the people showed a determination
for it, he should not continue his opposition. He
expressed regret for his attack on E/ussell, but
added that he could not help thinking that some
great family influences were spared by the
measure, whilst others were sacrificed. I thought
him a strange compound — a timid yet extravagant
politician ; practically kind and friendly, but in
debate ferocious and unfair. He was said to wish
for a peerage, and some added that, if he did not
get it from Lord Grey, he would get it from the
Duke of Wellington, or any one else.
March 7. — At House of Commons. The ad-
journed debate on the Reform Bill became rather
tiresome, and did not seem likely to come to an
end, for I counted no less than fifteen Members
on their legs at once, attempting to catch the
Speaker's eye. I stayed, however, until past one,
and then went away with Lord Durham. He
said he wished to speak to me about a subject to
92 LONDON CHAP. X.
which he had alluded in the month of November
last. He said that Lord Grey would like to
know whether I would take office. As a vacancy
had now occurred, he wanted to he informed what
my answer would he, if asked to fill it. I replied
that, since Lord Grey had brought forward his
Reform Bill, I could have hut one object, namely,
to support him in any way he might think
desirable.
March 9. — Lord John Russell closed the debate
by an excellent speech at exactly twenty-five
minutes to one o'clock on the morning of
March 10; the Speaker put the question, that
" LEAVE BE GIVEN TO BRING IN A BILL TO AMEND
THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE IN ENGLAND
AND WALES." The friends of the Bill gave a
great shout for the "AYES," and only two "NOES "
were heard. " And I have lived to witness this—
the greatest event, for good or for evil, that has
occurred since the Revolution of 1688; in some
respects greater even than that.9' This was the
entry I made in my diary. The Irish and Scottish
Reform Bills were also brought in after short
debates, which lasted till three in the morning.
PROM DIARY.
March 10. — The feeling in the country is all
but unanimous in favour of Reform. Never
before were the Whigs bold, nor the Reformers
prudent. The King answered the City Address
yesterday in most decisive terms.
CHAP. X. BROUGHAM IN THE CABINET 93
March 12.— I dined at Lord Althorp's in Down-
ing Street. Lord Althorp told us that, just before
the Debate on March 1, he told Stanley the plan
of Reform in order that he might be prepared
to speak. Stanley was so surprised that he burst
into an incredulous laugh, but recovered himself
by degrees, and agreed to do as he was bid. Lord
Althorp remarked that if Peel had been wise he
would have spoken immediately after Russell,
and would have endeavoured to negative the
introduction of the Bill at once.
Tavistock told me that Brougham was doing
all sorts of mischief in the Cabinet; that he
had tried to prevent Lord J. Russell from accept-
ing office, and afterwards endeavoured to prevent
him from bringing in the Reform measure. I
can believe anything of the man.
March 13. — I read a good deal of Dryden's
delicious prose ; a great relief from Vestry Bills
and Cotton Factory Bills.
March 18. — I went to the House of Commons,
which I found quite full, debating timber duties.
A great whip against Ministers, and although
Lord Althorp withdrew his original tax on
Canadian timber, and took off duty on Baltic,
it would not satisfy those who had resolved at
all hazards to get a vote against Ministers. We
divided, and were beat by 46.
The enemy were in ecstasies, laughed, clapped
hands, and gave every sign of delight. Our
Benches gave a horse laugh which rather dis-
94 LONDON CHAP. X.
comforted them, but they were still in absolute
hysterics of joy.
Sir Charles Forbes took occasion to abuse the
Reform Bill as revolutionary, on which I said
a word or two ; and Forbes replied by asking me
when I should ask Ministers about resigning.
This moved me, and I gave him a good dressing,
and took occasion to expose the vote of the night
as a poor paltry trick, which would deceive nobody
out of doors and would not affect Eeform. The
Speaker remonstrated with me privately for using
strong language, but I was right, I repeat it :
the vote was got up against Reform, not against
the Timber Duties.
March 19. — I dined with Lord Grey in
Downing Street. A large party of twenty-five,
all M.P.'s. Very different from Lord Grey's
modest menage in Berkeley Square.
I happened to sit next to Lord Grey at dinner,
and had a great deal of talk with him. He
was out of spirits with the vote of the night
before, and seemed to think it would affect
Reform. He told me that nothing could exceed
the excellent, open conduct of the King ; that
His Majesty had a conference of three hours on
framing the Reform measure ; and that it was a
conversation of question and answer, not of
mere listening, as it used to be in the time of
George IV. The King was decidedly for Reform.
He had been displeased with one measure only,
and that was the interference with his household.
CHAP. X. LORD GREY 95
As that was a saving of only £12,000 a year, 1331.
Lord Grey thought it was not worth while to
quarrel with him for that sum, and he asked
me to speak to Hume about it.
Lord Grey told me that he was aware, from
the beginning, that he had only one thing to
do — namely, to give a measure which would
satisfy the people. As for the borough proprietors,
they could not be satisfied.
He said that Lauderdale was once so violent
a Reformer that he called the Duke of Richmond
the greatest apostate that ever lived, except
General Arnold. The Duke called him out, and
Grey was his second, but no fight took place.
Then Arnold called him out, and there was a
duel, in which Mr. Fox was second to Lauder-
dale.
Lord Grey is an over-anxious man, more in
manner perhaps than in action. He was rather
fussy at the head of his table as to the dinner
and waiting. But his kind and generous nature
appears through all his talk; no one can doubt
his sincerity. In this respect he has little of the
statesman in him.
Talking of the infatuation of the other party,
he told me that the Duke of Wellington, when
some one said to him there might be a conflict
with the people, exclaimed, "Ah, bah ! "
I was very glad to hear from Lord Duncannon
this evening, one of the three Ministers who had
drafted the Reform Bill, that the Cabinet was
96 LONDON CHAP. X.
resolved, in case of necessity, to dissolve the
Parliament.
This somewhat consoled me for the complaints
I heard from Lord Nugent and Poulett Thomson,
who told me that it was impossible to go on with
such Cabinet Ministers as Graham, and Grant,
and Palmerston, who either would not or could
not speak. Grant does not attend often, and
when he does he is half asleep. In the meantime
Lord Grey complains of his House of Commons
Treasury Bench suffering such men as Herries to
roll them in the kennel without reply.
March 21. — Lord J. Russell moved the second
reading of his Reform Bill in the House this
evening, and the debate went on till past two
in the morning.
March 22. — The debate on the Reform Bill was
resumed. The rumours were rather more in
favour of our success than they had previously
been. Hume and Holmes compared lists, and
brought them almost to an equality. But some
votes were still doubtful. Acland, as usual,
spoke at two, amidst loud roars of Question !
Russell replied, and Peel looked as if he was
going to speak, but we prepared to give him a
reception on both sides had he done so unfair
a thing.
The gallery was cleared, and at exactly three
minutes to three in the morning the Speaker put
the question on Sir Richard Vyvyan's amendment,
" That the Bill be read a second time this day
CHAP. X. EEJECTION DEFEATED 97
six months.5' The shouts of Ayes and of Noes
were tremendous.
For some time we in the House appeared the
strongest, but by degrees our ranks were thinned,
and we thought we were beaten. Lord Maitland
ran up to me and told me the numbers in the
lobby were 309, but shortly after he returned,
pale and breathless, and said, " You have it."
And so we had, for there were only 301 against
us ; and when the Tellers approached the table,
and ours were on the right, we burst into tumults
of delight, clapping hands, waving hats, and
shouting lustily with all our might. I was in
raptures — not foolish, I hope ; for I said and
thought that the vote had saved the country. I
crossed the House, and shook hands with Althorp,
Graham, and Russell, all of whom seemed de-
lighted with the measure. The defeated party put
a good face on the matter, and, as William Peel
said to me, bore their beating with good humour.
March 23. — Passed the day in giving and re-
ceiving congratulations.
March 24. — There was another debate on pre-
senting the Irish Reform Bill. Peel made the
speech he ought to have made on the English
Bill. Palmerston answered feebly. I think I
could have done it better, for he did not lay hold
of the weak points, especially in Sir H. Hardinge's
silly and impudent speech. Peel declared strongly
against the Bill, and yet threw out a hint that
either that or some Reform was inevitable.
VOL. iv 13
98 LONDON CHAP. X.
1831. March 25. — We had a long debate on the Civil
List. Althorp proposed to give £12,000 more
than recommended by the Civil List Committee.
I tried to do what I could with Hume, who in
the most laughable way seemed to assent and yet
objected to the increase. R. Gordon made a most
mischievous speech, and Ministers got into a
hobble. There was, however, no division, though
we sat up till past three in the morning. Nothing
but Reform can give these men a chance of keeping
their ground.
March 30. — A new writ moved for Parnell, who
has accepted the Secretaryship of War. It is a
good appointment. He is a much better man
there than I should have been ; but I am a better
man in the House, at least so far as speaking
goes.
EROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
March 31. — I walked some time with Sir Henry
Hardinge, a man with whom I became afterwards
officially connected, and whom I never think of
without feelings of affection and esteem. He told
me that he despaired of any effectual opposition
to the Reform Bill, and thought the Ministers
firm in their places. He spoke despondently of
his own situation, and said that he could not bear
to see a child in the street, as it reminded him of
the three that he had at home, who might be
exposed to the same wants. Formerly he had
no such feelings — meaning, I suppose, when he
CHAP. X. A REPUTED SON OF NAPOLEON 99
was in office and his party triumphant. I came
to the conclusion that these good men thought
their offices were a permanent provision for them,
and their acrimonious hostility to the new
Ministers was not to be wondered at. Yet he
was not over-pleased with his own party, and
confessed to me that Sir Robert Peel's manners
and general bearing disqualified him for a Par-
liamentary leader.
On April 3 I again dined with Lord Grey.
There was a large party at his table, and amongst
them Count Walewski, a Pole and a reputed son
of Napoleon. He had just come from Poland
with the passport of a French comedian. He was
in the battle of Praga, of which he gave some
details. The upper part of his face was very like
what I recollected of Napoleon's ; so like that
Lady Holland, in an absent fit, could not help
saying to him, " You are very like your father " ;
on which he replied, "I did not know that you
were acquainted with my father." After dinner
I had a little talk with Lord Grey about the
Poles. He told me that he considered the cause
as hopeless, in spite of their heroic efforts, adding
that, although he could not receive Wielopolski
in his public capacity, he should be glad to see
him as a private gentleman, just as he did Count
Walewski, in consequence of a letter he had
received from Prince Czartoryski.
CHAPTER XI
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
April. — All sorts of rumours were afloat, and
stories, more or less absurd, were told, during the
discussions on the first Reform Bill. I recollect
that Lord Durham informed me Ministers were
sure of a majority in the Lords if the Bill passed
the Commons — a very great mistake.
Andrews, the Bond Street bookseller, told me
that Lord Sidmouth had been with him to know
the feelings of those in his class of life, and his
lordship would not believe that the majority of
them were not against the measure. The truth
was that, of the tradesmen who had any political
opinion at all, the feelings were all but unanimous
in favour of Parliamentary Reform. Of course
those who looked only to an increase of wealthy
customers preferred that all things should remain
as they were.
FROM DIARY.
April 6. — Dined at Lord Belhaven's. Met
Sydney Smith there ; he very agreeable and good-
natured, as usual. I was introduced to Lady
Charlemont, a very handsome woman, but not so
100
CHAP. XI. THE REFORM BILL AMENDED 101
handsome as Lady Tullamore, who also dined
with us. Lady Davy there. I have lately read
some of her husband's " Last Days " —a strange
work, I think : but that a dying man should write
at all is more strange.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
On April 18 a trial of strength between Ministers
and their opponents was expected, for General
Gascoyne was to move that the number of knights,
citizens, and burgesses for England and Wales
ought not to be diminished.
At the House, Lord John Russell opened the
debate by explaining the changes that had been
made since the second reading of the Bill. These
changes did not at all affect the principle of the
measure, but only rectified unavoidable errors.
Then Gascoyne moved his amendment in a violent
and foolish speech. He afterwards confessed to
me that his motion had been agreed upon as
the best way of defeating the Reform Bill ;
yet this was denied by him, and by others, in
the course of the debate.
Lord Althorp declared that the Government
had resolved to consider the decision of the House
on this motion as final with respect to the Bill.
The next day, April 19, I went to the House.
A tall, ungainly young man, with a strong squint
of one eye, spoke with great fluency and precision
during nearly an hour, gaining much upon his
audience, until the House became quite silent.
102 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. His name was Hawkins, a nephew of my late
friend Sir Christopher Hawkins. He was for
the Bill, and he made one of the hest speeches,
certainly the hest first speech, I ever heard in
Parliament. All sides were pleased with him,
hut Sir Robert Peel, according to his usual
practice, continued turning over the pages of
the amended Bill, apparently unmoved and
inattentive. We cheered the maiden orator on
sitting down tremendously.
Sir Robert Wilson came forward with more
boldness, and, it must be confessed, with more
eloquence, than usual, and made the most dis-
graceful exposure that ever closed a life of
pretended patriotism. It was a speech full of
mischief and malice, and at the end of all his
vituperation he declared he should not vote at
all.
Peel began his speech in a tone of much
moderation and mildness, warmed himself up by
degrees, and concluded by a denunciation of
Ministers as persons who, if they could not
govern, had resolved to make it impossible for
others to govern. He attacked the People, he
attacked the Press, and had the air of a person
who thought victory certain. Indeed, Hume and
others told me that we were beaten, but no one
knew by how many ; some said thirty, some ten.
We divided at half -past four. The excitement
was not so great as at the second reading. It
was soon conjectured that we were defeated, but
CHAP. XI. DEFEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT 103
Mr. Planta told me by not more than ten. The
Duke of Cumberland was shut up in Mr. Mitchell's
office, and grinned at us through the oval window
like an old lion. He had attended all the debates
on the Bill.
When the doors opened we heard we were
beaten by eight. Sir James Graham said to me,
"Well, never mind; then we must have it the
other way ; the process will be longer, that's all."
The division was announced in silence, as agreed
upon by our opponents, who did not appear very
triumphant.
The next day I spoke to some of our opponents,
and they seemed to hope that the Ministers would
not resign nor go on with their Bill, by which
process it was certain they would finally lose
their places and their characters. Our wishes,
of course, were for a dissolution of Parliament,
and perseverance with Reform.
EEOM DIARY.
April 21. — When I entered the House of
Commons to-day it appeared the reality of the
dissolution had just been known. It produced
the greatest consternation in the enemy, which
by degrees was inflamed into rage. Peel pre-
served his temper, but looked exceedingly foolish.
Sir R. Vyvyan solemnly asked Althorp whether
he intended to abandon the Reform Bill and to
dissolve the Parliament. To these questions Lord
Althorp answered very coolly, "Yes, as to the
104 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. first ; and, as to the second, his duty commanded
him to decline to give any answer." On this
the friends of Ministers set up a laugh and a
shout, and the House seemed on the point of
separating, so I went away. But a violent debate
sprang up afterwards, on which Maurice Fitz-
gerald, Peel, and Baring made strong speeches
against the Bill and against dissolution, and
William Bankes adjourned the House at one
o'clock to prevent the Ordnance Estimates from
being reported and so to stop the dissolution.
In the Lords, Lord Wharncliffe gave notice
that he should move to address the King next
day not to dissolve Parliament.
BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
April 22. — I now learnt that the King, who at
first had thought of adjourning the House by
Commission, was now resolved to come in person,
which, it seems, he ought to do, in order to thank
the Parliament for granting the Civil List. By
half-past two the House of Commons was very
full, and Mr. Speaker was in his gala robes.
There was time to report some Bills — my Factory
Bill amongst them. Then up got Sir R. Vyvyan,
and made a speech in which he attempted to
do all possible mischief to Ministers, and all
the good to himself and party that time would
allow. He deprecated the dissolution, called
upon the Protestant electors in the three kingdoms
to be on their guard, and announced a revolution
CHAP. XL CONFUSION IN THE COMMONS 105
as certain. He got warm and excited as he went
on, and continued in a strain of violence that
called up Burdett, who spoke to order. This
was natural, but not discreet, in my colleague,
for the Speaker decided there had heen no breach
of order, and Sir Hichard resumed his philippic.
Then Tennyson called him to order, and the
Speaker again protected him. Tennyson disputed
the decision of the Chair, and the noise and
confusion began to be overpowering. Vyvyan
again spoke; the cannons announced the approach
of the King, and at each discharge of the guns
the Ministerialists cheered loudly, as if in derision
of the orator's solemn sentences. At last the
roaring of the cannon, the laughter, and our
cheering fairly beat the Baronet, and he suddenly
sat down.
Peel, quite beside himself, now jumped up ; so
did Burdett. The Speaker, not quite fairly,
called on Peel, and Lord Althorp rose. The calls
for Peel, Burdett, Althorp, and Chair now were
heard in wild confusion. The floor was covered
with Members; half the House left their seats,
and the Opposition seemed perfectly frantic ;
William Bankes looked as if his face would
burst with blood ; Peel stormed ; the Speaker was
equally furious; Lord Althorp stood silent and
quite unmoved. At last the Speaker recovered
himself and said, " I am quite sure I understand
what the noble Lord moves — he moves that Sir
Robert Peel be heard." Althorp assented, and,
VOL. iv 14
106 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. after some more shouting and screaming, Sir
Robert Peel was heard. His " speech " —it was
thus I recorded it at the time — was such as
completely unmasked him : all his candour, all
his moderation, all his trimming, shifty policy
disappeared, and he displayed his real vexation,
and true feelings of disappointment and rage, in
an harangue of sound and fury, signifying nothing
but his own despair, and hatred of those who
had overreached him by calculating on the good
sense of the People, and the firmness of the
King, with more accuracy than himself. The
Black Rod cut short his oration just as he seemed
about to fall into a fit. Then the Speaker, with
a face equally red and quivering with rage,
rose, and, followed by many Members, went to
the Lords. Whilst Peel was speaking, I, who
was opposite to him, on the second bench behind
Ministers, was so much moved at his violence,
that I waved my hand and shook my head, as
if to show him, in no unfriendly manner, that he
was doing harm to himself, and injuring the
character of the country. Indeed, I was more
sorry than angry ; I could hardly have supposed
such an incident possible. But Peel was not
the only over-excited performer on that day ;
for Sir Henry Hardinge crossed the House, and
said, " The next time you hear those guns they
will be shotted, and take off some of your heads.
I do not mean yours," said he to me, "for you
have been always consistent; but those gentle-
CHAP. XI. EXCITEMENT IN PARLIAMENT 107
men," pointing to the Ministers. The Speaker
returned and read the Royal Speech at the tahle
—it was an admirable speech indeed.
Lord Althorp, Sir James Graham, and myself
walked away together, and stopped to see the
King pass the door of the hat-room. He was
much cheered ; but the crowd was not great.
Lord Althorp said to me, " Well, I think I beat
Peel in temper " ; as, indeed, he had most
completely.
We were joined in Palace Yard by Lord
Goderich, who told us that the scene in the
House of Lords had been more disgraceful than
that in the Commons. Lord Londonderry had
shaken his fist at the Duke of Richmond ; and
the Lord Chancellor had been hooted by the
Opposition Peers when he left the woolsack,
and Lord Shaftesbury had been voted into his
seat. Lord Tankerville told me that the angry
Lords would, without the least scruple, have
voted off the Ministers' heads that day. All"
this fury was not surprising when we remember
that the party who had been in possession of
power so long now saw that their hold on that
power, through the borough system, was about to
leave them — never to return. The firmness of
the King had dispelled the last illusion of the
ant i- Reformers, who, to do them justice, did not
give way until all resistance was hopeless.
There was great rejoicing amongst our friends ;
and the joy at the unexpected triumph of the
108 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. Reform party was manifested by him who had
contributed to it more than any one else. Robert
Grosvenor, Comptroller of the Household, told
me that, being sent for in a hurry to attend the
King, he found His Majesty in great spirits.
"When in the House he insisted on putting on
the crown himself, and said to Lord Grey, " This
shall be my only coronation." Lord Grey
apologised to him for the unavoidable haste of
the proceeding. " Never mind that," replied His
Majesty, " I am always at single anchor." Lord
Albemarle, Master of the Horse, told him that
the state coachman was not in the way. " Then,"
said the King, " I will go in a hackney coach."
On the evening of the day on which the King
prorogued the Houses, I was waited upon by our
Westminster friends, requesting me again to be
put in nomination for the City and Liberties.
The next day I attended an assembly at
Lansdowne House, and was assured by the Duke
of Devonshire, Lord Lansdowne, and others, that
the reports of that strange commotion in the
Lords were not at all exaggerated. The room
was quite full of beautiful women and idle men,
with no signs of approaching revolution in the
faces of any of them. There were, however,
none of our opponents nor their families there.
Parliament was dissolved in the Gazette of
April 23. The news from the country was very
encouraging, and the greatest enthusiasm pre-
vailed in the metropolis. A Westminster meeting
CHAP. XI. FUND TO ASSIST REFORM 109
took place in Covent Garden, to address His
Majesty and thank him for dissolving the
Parliament. It was one of the largest meetings
I ever saw assembled in that place, where I
had seen so many crowds. Sir Erancis Burdett
and myself were received as in days of yore.
Our speeches were rather peppery, it must be
confessed, but they suited the taste of the day.
The next day I attended a meeting at the
Crown and Anchor, for establishing a Fund to
assist Reform candidates. I proposed the plan
agreed upon ; we formed a Committee on the
spot. Edward Ellice gave me the list of certain
influential members of Brooks 's Club who had
put down their names for sums amounting already
to £15,000, a good deal of which had been dis-
posed of in procuring seats for some good men
and true. This appeared somewhat in con-
tradiction to the principles on which we put
forward our political pretensions ; but we were
obliged to fight our opponents with their own
weapons, no other mode of warfare would have
had the slightest chance of success. Subscrip-
tions poured in by sums amounting to thousands
of pounds.
May 2. — Sir Erancis Burdett and myself went
in procession to Covent Garden. Our reception
was very gratifying; and we ascended the hust-
ings amidst such thunders of applause as have
been seldom heard even there. There had been
rumours of opposition, but they turned out alto-
110 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. gether unfounded. Indeed, an opposing candidate
would have run some personal risk. As it was,
the utmost good humour prevailed throughout the
vast assemblage.
May 3. — This day Sir Henry Hardinge accosted
me hy saying that I had been using strong lan-
guage in my speech of April 26 in reference to
Sir Robert Peel, and that Sir Robert Peel had
come up from Staffordshire in consequence of it.
I understood by this that what was in those days
called a meeting might take place, and I answered
accordingly. I went to Lord Dacre, and asked
him to stand my friend on the occasion. He said
he would provided I gave him discretion how to
act ; he would not if he was called in merely to
load pistols. I went home and read the speech
complained of in the Times. There was nothing
in it of which Peel had a right to complain.
Lady Julia had been seriously ill ; and as it
was of the utmost consequence that she should
not be disquieted, I was not a little disturbed
when I saw Sir Henry Hardinge approaching
my house. I had, however, time to leave the
room in which I was sitting with my wife, and
to receive him alone in the dining-room. He
gave me a letter from Sir Robert Peel, and said
that the business would be finished in five
minutes. I remarked that I could give no opinion
on that point. He went away, and at parting he
said, " Well, God bless you, at any rate ! "
Peel complained of two sentences in my speech.
CHAP. XI. A MISUNDERSTANDING WITH PEEL 111
One of them I did utter; the other I did not.
I was preparing to go to Cambridge to vote at
the University election ; and it was arranged that,
if a meeting took place, it should he near Dover,
so that I need not come back to London, but
travel at once to the coast.
I went to Cambridge, and dined with Dr. Davy
at Caius College. Mr. Otter, of Jesus College,
and Barnes, editor of the Times, were at this most
agreeable dinner, when we did not fail to con-
gratulate each other on the news which came
pouring in to us from all parts of the country
of the victories of our friends.
The next day I had a letter from Lord Dacre,
telling me that the Peel affair had been settled
in a manner which he said was quite satisfactory.
After voting for Palmerston and Cavendish I
returned to London, and called immediately on
Lord Dacre. He showed me two letters — one
from Hardinge to him, and the other from him
to Hardinge. Hardinge's letter concluded by
congratulating Lord Dacre that the affair had
been settled in a manner so satisfactory to Peel
and to me.
EROM DIARY.
May 5. — The truth is, that had we met the
issue would have done no good to Peel in any
possible way. Had any mischief happened to
him, what would have become of the party ?
Had any happened to me, what would the Re-
112 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. formers have said ? Peel had no right to com-
plain upon the strength of a report only in one
paper ; and although my words were strong, they
did not amount to an insult ; and no insult was
meant, of course. Prohahly Peel wrote in a
passion from Drayton, and could not recall his
letter. Hardinge showed Lord Dacre letters he
had received from Peel, in which his rage was
very violent indeed. " Sic finita est fahula," for
the present at least ; but there will be ink shed,
and blood shed too, before all is over. " Haec
inter," Reform is victorious everywhere.
May 9. — I dined at the Livery Reform dinner,
London Tavern, to celebrate return of four City
Members. The London Members are very poor
creatures. Waithman said that he had "fought
with beasts at Ephesus."
Day after day fresh triumphs. My brother
and I made out that our majority will be 120
at least.
May 12. — Everything going on well. Indeed,
except Bucks and Shropshire, we have been
defeated nowhere; and have not lost even there.
Scotland and Ireland are doing well ; but not so
well as merry old England !
May 18. — Nearly all the elections over; but
the fight still kept up in Northamptonshire,
where the enemy are trying to show that Lord
Althorp has behaved with duplicity. This is Tory
tactic : when you cannot oppose a man's politics,
belie his character.
CHAP. XI. THE WESTMINSTER DINNER 113
May 21. — I have been staying with my brother 1831,
at Send since May 14. I doubt whether Reform
has made much progress in these parts. The new
M.P. is one of those old courtiers who inquires
only what the King wishes. Of these I hear
there are still many in the country, though the
race is nearly extinct in London.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
May 23. — I attended the annual Westminster
dinner. There were about 300 guests, and the
whole festival went off with a spirit and effect
to be expected from the prospect of an immediate
triumph for the cause of which, after all, Burdett
and the Westminster Reformers had been the
principal, and, for a time, were the only promoters.
Burdett, at the end of the evening, proposed the
health of " THOMAS HARDY." The worthy veteran
returned thanks, and expressed, as well he might,
his amazement at living to see the King and his
Ministers propose to do that, for attempting
which he had been tried for his life.
At Brooks's I heard from Ellice that Lord
Grey was in high health and spirits, and that
the Peers would not be able to resist the popular
feeling and the large majorities in the Commons.
The King having given a supernumerary Garter
to Lord Grey, I wrote to congratulate him, and
added that nothing good or honourable could
happen to him without the country gaining some
advantage from it.
VOL. IV 15
114 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. Replying to my letter, Lord Grey told me that
conferring the Garter on him was the spontaneous
act of the King, who said he thought it of im-
portance to grant him the honour at this moment
as a public mark of his favour.
At this time Lady Julia was attacked by that
disease which was fated to be so calamitous to
my family. The symptoms were such as I could
not mistake, and I removed her at once to London
for advice. I now found by sad experience how
little all public concerns appear compared with
an object of domestic interest. I tried to occupy
myself with many matters that used to engage
my eager attention ; and I tried to think of every-
thing but that which pressed most upon all my
thoughts. Of the first medical advisers we called
in, the report was favourable ; but, when I con-
sulted Dr. Warren, he pronounced a sentence
which was all but fatal. I shall not record the
varieties of this treacherous disorder. The courage
and gaiety of the dear creature were such as to
keep hope alive, although at times her very
patience added to my suffering; and, when she
talked of our little projects for the future, I
could hardly master my feelings. Once she
said, (( If this cough would but leave me ; but
I ought to suffer something — I have been too
happy ! "
At this time, also, my father became seriously
ill, and his house, as well as my own, was a house
of sickness and of sorrow. But attendance on
CHAP. XI. OPENING OF PARLIAMENT 115
Parliamentary duties was more of a distraction
than a burthen to me, and I did my best to conceal
my anxieties from my political associates.
June 21. — Parliament was opened to-day. A
vast and well-dressed crowd received His Majesty
most enthusiastically. The roofs of the houses
near the Admiralty and Horse Guards, and all
the way down to Palace Yard, were covered with
spectators. In the streets the sight was still more
striking, and the multitude was so densely packed
that I had some difficulty in getting down to the
House.
The King's Speech was more than of the average
length, and was eked out by allusions to the
cholera. No notice was taken of the result of
the elections. Peel made a speech which I
characterised at the time as "quite worthy of
him/' professing candour and moderation, but
losing no opportunity of saying sly and injurious
things of his opponents. He did just confess that
the People had declared for a large Reform by
a majority; but he attributed this, in great
measure, to the excitement raised by the use of
the King's name, and by accusing the late
Parliament of refusing the supplies, which he
declared to be untrue, and he charged the Lord
Chancellor and Sir James Graham with the false-
hood in terms scarcely measured. He concluded
by declaring that, although in a minority, he
should brave unpopularity by opposing Reform
as before.
116 LONDON CHAP. XI.
Going away from the House of Commons I
looked into the Lords. The array on the Opposi-
tion benches was very formidable ; but I was
consoled by hearing this day, from Samuel Rogers,
that the Duke of Wellington had said to him :
" They want to make me the head of a faction ;
but I will not. I have served my country forty
years in the field and the Cabinet. I will not
now take such a course; and you may tell your
Ministerial friends so."
FEOM DIARY.
June 23. — For the first time in my life I
attended the Speaker of the House of Commons
with the Address to the King. We mustered at
the House in considerable numbers, 130 or 140.
Our Ministers were in their livery, and looked
very menial.
I thought the King looked ill. His answer,
as usual, was short. He was very attentive to
our address, and seemed to wish to show by his
movements that he understood and approved of
what he heard.
When the Speaker put the address into the
King's hand, he knelt on one knee before the
throne so that his head was not much above the
footstool. This looked a little like Persian
adoration, I thought. We all backed out of the
room in a throng, the effect of which was not
imposing but ridiculous. The King is a good
King, the best we ever had.
CHAP. XL THE NEW REFORM BILL 117
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
June 24. — This was the day fixed for the intro- issi,
duction of the second Reform Bill, and, although
I went down earlier than usual, I found every
place taken ; and I heard that all the Opposition
benches had been occupied since eight in the
morning. Being at prayers, however, I did get
a seat on the right, below the gangway, amongst
the Irish Members. Lord John Russell began
his speech at half -past five. He spoke two hours
on introducing his new Bill, which seemed to
differ very little from the old Bill. Part of his
speech was, I thought, good — part of it not so
happy. He did not spare the new moderate
Reformers, and Peel and Chandos, with their
associates, looked a little uncomfortable.
The eccentric Colonel Sibthorp, and Mr. Conolly,
M.P. for Donegal, and Lord Stormont were
amongst the most obstreperous of the minority.
Charles Ross, as usual, was providing materials,
fetching books and paper, for Peel. He looked
more than usually disconcerted, when Russell
mentioned that St. Germans was to be added to
the schedule of boroughs to be disfranchised.
Sir Robert Peel followed Russell in a half-
angry tone. He promised a division on the
second reading, and spoke out most decisively
against the Bill, so that, coupling this with the
threatening aspect of the Lords, we all expected
a most severe struggle.
July 3. — I heard that Prince Leopold had
118 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. accepted the crown of Belgium, the wisest choice,
not only for Belgium, hut all Europe, that could
possibly have heen made. The same day I dined
in company with Achille Murat, eldest son of
the late King of Naples, and his wife, some re-
lation of the great Washington. Achille was an
insignificant-looking man, with something of the
Buonaparte face ahout his forehead, hut he wore
spectacles. He talked to me a good deal, and
in a most depreciating tone, of Louis Philippe,
prophesying that his Government would he over-
thrown before the next anniversary of the Three
Glorious Days. He also foretold that the down-
fall of the Church and the aristocracy would
inevitably follow the Reform Bill. The late
heir-apparent of the kingdom of Naples lived in
the Alpha Cottages.
Two or three days before this I saw, in the
course of a ten minutes' walk, a young man who
had lost two crowns ; and another personage, not
forty years of age, who was very near being
Prince Consort of England, was Sovereign of
Greece, and was about to be King of Belgium.1
Dom Pedro 2 was coming out of the Clarendon
Hotel, where he was lodged. Had I gone to
Holies Street I should have seen a discrowned
1 King Leopold.
2 Dom Pedro, son of John VI., King of Portugal. Proclaimed
Emperor of Brazil in 1822, he was compelled to resign his crown
in favour of his son Pedro II. in 1831. In 1833 he recovered by
force the throne of Portugal, which had been usurped by his
brother Miguel. He died in 1834.
CHAP. XI. SECOND READING OF THE REFORM BILL 119
Queen, Hortense, Duchess of St. Leu. A few
weeks ago the Duchess of Berri passed through
London, and crossed the Duchess of St. Leu on
an excursion to Greenwich. Candide's kings
at the Carnival of Venice seeni no longer a
fiction.
July 4. — The second reading of the new Reform
Bill came on. I came in just as Sir James
Mackintosh rose. He spoke two hours, and spoke
very well indeed — rather " caviare to the general/'
but sound and profound. The best speech on
the other side was from Lord Porchester. It
was rapturously cheered, and, probably, more
applauded in reference to the unexpected quarter
from which it proceeded, as his father, Lord
Carnarvon, had for many years been a strenuous
ally of the Whig party.
The young man was applauded and congratu-
lated by all, and Sir Robert Peel said it was
by far the best first speech he had ever heard.
Lord John Russell said the same. I thought it
somewhat strange that Hawkins and his first
speech should be so soon forgotten. The debate
was adjourned, and I then introduced my Factory
Bill.
July 5. — Macaulay made a most effective
oration, and was applauded to the skies, particu-
larly towards the end of his speech, when he
said that, if this Bill was defeated, Peel would
bring in a Reform Bill of his own. Sir Robert
winced a good deal, and it was expected would
120 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. have followed Macaulay, but William Bankes
rose and made one of the most extraordinary
exhibitions I had ever seen. He whined, clasped
his hands, and put himself into attitudes, con-
cluding one of his sentences thus : "The Lord
deliver us out of their hands, I say ! " To be
sure he was in earnest, for the Bill annihilated
the Corfe Castle dynasty.
Lord Althorp followed, and Sir George Murray
then spoke. He described the approaching down-
fall of the monarchy, the rise of another Crom-
well, and the degradation of the House of Peers
under a Lord Chancellor who would administer
to them " Friendly advice," alluding, it was
supposed, to a pamphlet with that title, addressed
to the Lords, and generally attributed to
Brougham.
The debate was resumed the next day, when
Peel spoke for more than two hours. The speech,
for his purpose, was admirable ; and I perceived
that some of our converts, Harcourt Vernon for
instance, winced under his whipping. He was
very dexterous, and comparatively moderate,
avowing that, if the feeling for Reform was
permanent, he did not see how it could be
resisted.
He ended about three in the morning, when
Burdett, who for the first time spoke from the
floor, answered Peel as well as he could be
answered, treating him civilly, but stripping him
of some of his details, and putting the question
CHAP. XI. DOM PEDRO AND PAGANINI 121
fairly before the House. Some youngsters op-
posite tried to put him out by calling " Question,"
but we cheered him on, and he finished a very
effective speech about four o'clock.
There were 367 in the House, and 231 went
out ; leaving a majority of 136 in favour of
Ministers.
July 9. — There was a banquet at the Mansion
House on the occasion of presenting Lord John
Russell with the freedom of the City. I was
one of the guests at the Mansion House, and
must say that it was a very splendid affair. His
Majesty Dom Pedro was there. He was a
pleasing-looking person.
Lord John Eussell occupied the chair next
to the Lady Mayoress, and, just as we thought
his health was to be given, in came Signor
Paganini, in great ceremony, preceded by the
stewards of the festival, and, mounting a chair
immediately behind Lord Plunket, played a
concerto on his violin. I was disgusted, so was
Hume ; but the company generally were charmed.
Reform seemed pretty much forgotten. I confess
I felt angry that Burdett should be eclipsed,
thinking that, if Reform had anything to do
with the feast, he ought of all men to have been
somewhat exalted ; and I could not help re-
membering that John Russell had said in Par-
liament, in 1829, that he would never introduce
a Reform motion again ; and there he was —
with Lord Lansdowne, and such patriots as
VOL. iv 16
122 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. Palmerston and the Grants — carrying off all the
honours of the day. The kingdom of honest
politicians is certainly not of this world.
In the evening of July 10 I received a note
from Mr. Brodie, the eminent surgeon, afterwards
Sir Benjamin, and President of the Royal Society,
informing me that my father was much worse.
The next day I did not attend the House, and
asked Lord Morpeth to move the second reading
of my Factory Bill for me.
July 12. — At House of Commons. The Oppo-
sition moved seven or eight adjournments to
prevent the Speaker leaving the Chair, and the
House sat till seven in the morning, when the
Government succeeded in committing the Bill
pro forma.
July 14. — The tactics of our opponents were
now to create delay by every available stratagem.
Even Peel took up great part of an evening on
a verbal dispute about leaving out the word each
before the word borough. On this we had a
majority of 290 to 193.
The next day I sat until near two in the
morning. The debate arose on a motion of Sir
Andrew Agnew, for clubbing boroughs instead of
disfranchising them. We divided, and had 316
to 205 — a majority which satisfied our Ministers,
who had previously complained of declining
numbers. After a long and desultory conversa-
tion, it was at last agreed that our Chairman,
Mr. Spring B/ice, having read the words " Aid-
CHAP. XL THE TREASURY BENCH IS OVER-MEEK 123
borough, Suffolk," the first borough in Schedule A
had been disfranchised. So we separated, having,
after four nights' debate, accomplished something
—but very little.
FROM DIARY.
July 16. — Dined at Mr. Balfour's — a large
party. Had some conversation with Lord Mait-
land and Lord Dudley, on whom I endeavoured
to impress the necessity of yielding to the popular
wish on the Bill. The first told me the Bill
would be thrown out on second reading in the
Lords. The latter told me nothing, but I hope
I frightened him. He seemed shy of talking on
the subject.
July 21. — At House of Commons, where Lord
Althorp moved that Reform should precede all
business every day at five. Wynne protested
violently, and after some words from Goulburn
and Milton, our good man gave way, and agreed
that there should be an understanding, not a
standing order.
Peel took occasion to tell Althorp to trust to
his own good sense and good temper, and not
listen to the newspapers. This he said in the
most insolent and angry tone, which annoyed
me, and I had half a mind to reply; but as
Althorp bore it, 1 thought it would be bad taste
to try to anger him, but all around me com-
plained of his patience, and indeed our Treasury
Bench is over-meek.
124 LONDON CHAP. XI.
I heard part of a debate on Bingham Baring's
treatment of the Benches.1 Althorp declared
against the part taken by the press in this affair,
and was loudly cheered by Peel, who seemed to
be appeased during the debate on Reform which
followed, for he witnessed the extinction of
borough after borough without a word.
July 22. — Sir R. Hardinge told me to-day that
the Bill would not pass the Lords, at least not
without some compromise. I can hear of no
converts amongst the Peers.
July 26.— We finished Schedule A of the
Reform Bill after a sort of funeral oration on
Wootton-Basset by Lord Por Chester, whose chief
merit, according to his Lordship, was the having
returned Lord Bolingbroke to Parliament. Mr.
O'Connell reminded him that it had also returned
" Walsh," the swindler. Lord Mahon called this
" an indecent personality."
July 29. — We got on so slowly with our Bill
that even Lord Althorp became impatient, and
said to me, " How the devil shall we get on with
our Bill ? " I had some conversation also with
Stanley, Graham, and Lord John Russell. The
latter told me that Brougham was anxious that
the Attorney-General should be put forward, and
was always grumbling at the delay. It seems
he depreciates Macaulay and always extols the
1 The Bench of Bishops. Lord Grey had appealed to the Bishops
to vote for the Bill, telling them that if they did not do so they
would become just objects of popular odium.
CHAP. XI. " NOT CONTENT WITH BEING A MOON " 125
Attorney as having made the best speech on the issi.
Bill. Sydney Smith says it is because Macaulay
is not content with being a moon, but " wants
to do a little bit in the solar line.'9
Lord Althorp moved that the House should
sit on Saturday. Peel was very angry, and de-
clared he would not do so, but Lord Althorp
persevered, and, at three in the morning, carried
his point.
July 30. — We got on quietly with Schedule B,
PARALYSING, as it was said, borough after borough
until we got to Sudbury — a case which, with
Totnes, we consented to postpone ; and so finished
the schedule. William Bankes gave us a " Jere-
miad " on Marlborough.
Lord Duncannon told me to-day that it was
as much as he could do to keep Althorp and
Graham last night to the sticking point. They
were wishing to give up. He wished me to tell
them what I thought, but when I spoke to
Althorp, all he said was, "Do you think so?"
Everybody begins to complain of the tone taken
by Ministers, who speak as if they were at the
head of a minority, both in the House and the
country.
EBOM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
August 1. — I attended the ceremony of open-
ing the new London Bridge by the King and
Queen. I passed over Waterloo Bridge, and saw
an indescribable sight. The river and the banks
126 LONDON CHAP. XI.
of it were one mass of human beings ; but the
view from the new bridge itself was still more
wonderful. The newspapers gave a very striking
and accurate account of the scene. The contrast
of the poor old bridge with the magnificent new
structure was very striking ; and the preparations
for receiving their Majesties, and other guests
to the number of 1,700, were most superb, and
worthy of the metropolis of the civilised world.
Captain Basil Hall and Sir Francis Chantrey
walked up and down with me, each of us ex-
pressing his unbounded admiration of the sight,
and I recollect a saying of our great sculptor on
this day, that, " of all the countless thousands
around us, probably there was not a man who
had not a guinea in his pocket.'' I mentioned
this to Burdett just afterwards, and he said,
" Does that make for or against Reform ? "
The Royal party came about four o'clock.
Their procession of boats was almost lost on the
bosom of the mighty river; but wherever the
small pinnace with the Royal standard was recog-
nised, tremendous cheering and waving of hats
and handkerchiefs, and every other demonstration
of loyalty and joy, ensued. I was at the head
of the corner-table, just at the top of the stairs
which the King ascended. His Majesty and the
Queen stopped to look down the vista in the
long tent, where the company were all standing to
receive them. The sight was indeed magnificent,
and I heard that our good King confessed that
CHAP. XI. ROYAL OPENING OF LONDON BRIDGE 127
he had never seen anything like it. I, who had
seen a great many sights, said the same to those
near me.
After parading to the other end of the bridge,
and seeing the balloon go off, their Majesties
returned to their seats under the canopy, and the
banquet began. Everything went off very well,
except that the City sages would have Michael
Boai play "God save the King " upon his chin;
not quite so musical as Paganini's violin at the
Mansion House. The party rose about six o'clock,
and the King and Queen returned by water to
Somerset House. The procession returned in more
splendid order than it came, for it was joined by
the great City barges, and the river was covered
with boats and flags, and Southwark Bridge
looked black with the crowds that covered it.
The ceremony of this day was on the whole one
of the most successful, and so acknowledged
by every one, tbat our huge metropolis ever
witnessed.
The Reform Committee got into Schedule C
on August 2 ; and Manchester, Birmingham, and
Leeds had two Members given to each of them,
after some talk from Peel and Baring, but with-
out a division.
August 3. — Sir Robert Peel made a good speech
against giving Members to the Metropolitan
boroughs ; and, when I came to the House, I
found A. Baring speaking on the same side.
Lord Althorp called me to him, and said, " Now,
128 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. master, you must take off your muzzle to-night."
I told him that I had not heard any speech
except Peel's. "That will do," said he; and
accordingly I went to the third hench behind
the Treasury, and, when Baring sat down, rose
at once. I recollect that effort with no little
pride. It was hy far the most successful I had
ever made ; hut it was more to the general
question of Reform than to the matter then in
debate. There was great cheering when I sat
down. Charles Grant handed up a scrap of
paper to me, on which was written, " HOW I
ENVY YOU ! " I folded it up, and have kept it
ever since ; for my friend was no flatterer, and,
being himself a first-rate Parliamentary speaker,
his judgment might be depended upon. I re-
ceived congratulations on all sides, and Mr. Goul-
burn, who followed me, said that " he had heard
me with admiration." I afterwards received civil
speeches and messages from men of all parties;
yet the reporters made very little of my speech,
and, according to the Times, Aldermen Wood and
Waithman were the foremost men of all that night.
However, I hoped that I had done good by taking,
and teaching others to take, the right tone. "We
had a large majority, about 97 ; much to the dis-
appointment, so I was told, of Sir Robert Peel,
who considered our Metropolitan enfranchisements
our weakest case ; and so it was : London, West-
minster, Southwark, and four County Members,
were quite enough for all purposes.
CHAP. XI. DEATH OF SIB, BENJAMIN HOBHOUSE 129
At this time my father became so much worse
in health that I requested Dr. Warren to see
him. When I heard his opinion, I asked Sir
Robert Inglis to get a fortnight's leave of absence
for me from the House of Commons. Prom that
day I lived more in Berkeley Square than in my
own house.
The last day that my father seemed in complete
possession of his senses was August 12. He then
asked me how the Reform Bill was going on,
and whether all would end peaceably. The last
words he uttered to me were, " John, do not let
them leave me." " Never be afraid of that," I
replied. He then said, " I am not afraid of any-
thing." Mr. Brodie was a great comfort to the
family, and tried to persuade my sisters to leave
the room; but they would not. They remained
with him to the last. He died between six and
seven o'clock on August 14. Having watched
him when he was in his last agonies, I was
astounded at the calmness with which I con-
templated him when all was over. His frame was
no longer convulsed. The calm of his benignant
countenance was unruffled by the moans which
had been extorted from him by pain and sleepless
weariness. I kissed his cold hand, and cut off
a lock of his grey hair.
From the death-bed of my father I was called
to attend to my wife, who again had alarming
symptoms that induced me to send for Dr. Warren.
She was much attached to my father, who was
VOL. iv 17
130 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. very fond of her, and the news, which I was
compelled to communicate, was doubtless injurious
to her. I was present at her last interview with
him. I shall never forget the smile with which
he bade her farewell !
I shall say no more of him here. Indeed, it
would be altogether superfluous, as I have pub-
lished more than one short Memoir of him; not
equal, it is true, to his real merit, nor adequately
descriptive of his valuable character, but still,
as I hope, sufficient to show my affection and
reverence for this good man.
EB.OM DIARY.
August 28. — To-morrow I return to my abhorred
public duty. Not the control of or partaking in
any great national concern, which I might under-
take with pride and hope ; but the dull business
of a House of Commons life, and the fruitless
endeavour to satisfy selfish, silly, and unreasonable
men.
September 7. — Went to the House of Commons,
and stayed there to witness the Reform Bill get
out of Committee, which it did at about seven
o'clock. There were not many Members present,
but the Reformers gave a cheer when Bernal left
the Chair. I find Members are becoming quite
wearied and almost indifferent about the Bill.
September 12. — Burdett told me that Calcraft l
1 John Calcraft, M.P. for Dorset, was, like his father, a Whig,
but joined the Tories in 1828. He, however, voted for the Reform
BUI.
CHAP. XI. THE PEERS AND REFORM 131
had killed himself. His daughter Arabella left issi.
him to go to church; returning, she was told
her father had not rung his hell for some time.
She waited a little and then went to his room;
on opening the door she saw him on the floor
with his throat cut, quite dead. The Tories
attribute this to remorse ; I believe politics had
nothing to do with the matter. He had lost his
head from excessive worrying, I hear. However,
this is the fourth public man who has destroyed
himself.
September 19. — At House of Commons, where I
learnt that, owing to some mistake, the Reform
Bill had been read a third time without a dis-
cussion. A debate arose, however, on the question
"that this Bill do pass." Stanley and Macaulay
spoke well ; the latter made one of his essays.
September 21. — I attended a "Westminster meet-
ing in Covent Garden to petition the Lords to
pass the Bill. I saw George Dawson and R. A.
Dundas in the balcony opposite — come to spy the
nakedness of the land.
The foolish Tories now try to make it believed
that the People are beginning to be indifferent.
They will pull an old house over their heads, if
they do not take care.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
September 21. — I went to the House of Com-
mons. At a quarter to three o'clock Sir Robert
Peel rose, and made what was thought a very
132 , LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. brilliant speech, foretelling the downfall of the
monarchy and many uncomfortable events. One
great mistake he made in reminding the House
of the question I had put to him about resigning,
but choosing to omit that I had made an apology
for that indiscretion. The bad taste and bad
feeling of that reminder struck most of us on
our side ; and when he tried to be smart upon
Macaulay, he did not at all succeed, nor did he
ever in that line — so that it might be said of him,
as Quintilian said of Demosthenes, (( Illi non
displicuisse jocos, sed non contigisse." He was,
however, loudly cheered on sitting down.
We divided at twenty-five minutes past four in
the morning. The numbers were declared at five
o'clock — 346 to 235 — and at seven minutes past
five the Speaker said, "That Lord John Russell
do carry this Bill to the Lords, and request their
Lordships' concurrence." We gave a great cheer.
We thought our majority satisfactory; that was
not the common opinion, and it was true that
our friends were rather slack in their attendance.
For example, Lord Uxbridge and Captain Byng
preferred staying at the Doncaster races to their
Parliamentary duties.
FROM DIARY.
September 22. — I accompanied Russell with the
Bill to the Lords. The House was crowded. The
Lord Chancellor came to the Bar very solemnly ;
but, methought, looked a little arch when R/ussell
CHAP. XI. AN INJUDICIOUS " IF " 133
presented the Bill. Lord Grey came in, and a issi.
good many of us stayed to hear him fix the second
reading for Monday week.
Sir Henry Hardinge had some conversation with
me ; and I told him of the strong resolutions
passed at Lord Ebrington's, of supporting Govern-
ment in very strong measures — prorogation of
Parliament, creation of Peers, reintroduction of
the Bill, and suspension of Standing Orders. He
said that the result would be a fight. He felt
sure the Lords would reject the Bill.
Lord Grey to-night made use of the words, " If
the Bill is read, which I trust it will be." A
very injudicious "if."
Hardinge comes to get what he can out of me.
Of course I tell him no lies, nor no truths, except
such as I think he ought to propagate. 'Tis an
awful moment, that is certain.
September 24. — I attended the great dinner
given to the Ministers at Stationers' Hall.
There were 260 guests, and all the arrangements
were as good as possible — so were most of the
speeches. I remarked that the company was, to
the full, as noisy and impatient as our Westminster
tradesmen at the Crown and Anchor, although
representing the greatest and proudest families
in our Empire.
September 30. — At four o'clock I went to the
House of Commons, and got through the Com-
mittee on my Vestry Bill with only one alteration
in it.
134 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. There are various rumours as to the number
by which the Reform Bill will be rejected by the
Lords ; but all agree it will be lost.
October 3. — The great debate commenced to-day
in the Lords. Lord Grey spoke three hours, in
his best style, and appealed to the Bishops in a
way which showed he despaired of their votes.
Lord "Wharncliffe moved the absolute rejection of
the Bill, in terms which he withdrew afterwards,
and substituted the usual form, deferring the Bill
for six months. The House was quite full, and
fitted up with galleries, as at the Queen's trial.
I heard the Duke of Wellington make one of
the poorest speeches he ever made. He gave
quite a different account of his resignation from
that given by Sir R. Peel ; said Reform had
nothing to do with it, and begged their Lord-
ships not to pledge themselves either way about
Reform. He added, whatever had been his
opinion as a man, yet as a Minister he had
opposed Reform. In short, his Grace made a
shabby, shuffling speech, very like a man wanting
office again.
Lord Harrowby, though recommending modera-
tion, was very bitter and personal. The general
result was now pretty well known, but the
numbers of the majority were guessed at very
variously.
This night I read my Factory Bill a third time,
and passed it. I also brought up the Report
on my Vestry Bill at near two in the morning.
CHAP. XL SOCIAL REFORM BILLS PASSED 135
October 5. — I carried up my Factory Bill and issi,
several other Bills to the Lords. The Lord
Chancellor seemed in a merry mood. I was
obliged to go to the House of Commons, and
it was half-past one before I could move the
third reading of my Vestry Bill. Mr. Trevor
proposed an adjournment, and was supported
by George Dawson and my friend Sir Robert
Inglis. We divided 38 against 8 ; and my
opponents not knowing what to do next, I
carried my Bill at last, for which thank Heaven !
It is a very great reform indeed !
October 6. — I carried up my Vestry Bill, with
other Bills, to the Lords. Lord Tenterden re-
ceived them from me. On my bringing up the
second Bill, he said to me, " I beg your pardon,
sir, for not bowing to you before." I did not
know what he meant ; but perhaps he recollected
that the last time he had spoken to me was when
I was brought before him and the other Judges
of the Court of King's Bench, to move for my
release from Newgate, when he called me "the
prisoner at the Bar."
October 7. — I called on Lord Ebrington about
the projected meeting of House of Commons
Reformers, the day after the rejection of the
Bill. Lord Ebrington had seen the Lord Chan-
cellor in the morning. He seemed somewhat
fearful of popular tumult, and said he hoped
that I would not use violent language in debate.
I told him there was no fear of my using violent
136 LONDON CHAP. XI.
1831. language. Indeed, it was silly of Lord Ebrington
to dread such a thing. We Parliamentarians are,
for the most part, mealy-mouthed, and fall into
the opposite extreme.
Ebrington said that the debate would finish
to-night, because Government did not like it to
end on a Saturday evening, when workmen were
paid off. Here is a precaution indeed ! ! How-
ever, no one seemed to think the debate could
end before Monday, so I resolved to visit my
family at Brighton.
October 8. Saturday. — A dark, stormy day—
" big with the fate," etc. About three o'clock I
saw a newspaper, the Advertiser. Bill lost by a
majority 0
Against. For.
Present . . 150 128
Proxies 49 30
199 158
The Archbishop of Canterbury made a short
speech against, and led off twenty Bishops with
him. Only two Bishops for the Bill. The House
adjourned at twenty minutes past six in the
morning.
October 9. — The Tories give out Grey has
resigned. Brougham's speech said by Lord Grey
to be miraculous, and everybody talking of it
in the same strain. I read it attentively, and,
excepting the sarcasms and replies ad hominem,
did not see anything so wonderful in the per-
CHAP. XL BROUGHAMS SPEECH ON REFORM
137
formance. He ended by kneeling down on one
knee, and drank a bottle of mulled port during
the performance.
The Chronicle is in mourning. The Times,
Herald, and other papers assuming an awful
tone. The Common Council and Merchants and
Bankers of London are to meet immediately,
and of course the Westminster Reformers.
1831.
VOL. IV
18
CHAPTER XII
FROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
1831. October 10. — I went to a Westminster meeting
at the Crown and Anchor, the largest meeting
I ever met in the great room there. Everything
passed off with the greatest spirit and propriety ;
nothing could be better, except that I had my
pocket picked as I was borne through the crowd,
amidst great cheering, to the top of the room.
As there was a call of the House, we shortened
our proceedings, and I went down to answer
my name there, and, although it was not twelve
o'clock, could hardly find a place vacant.
When the debate came on, Lord Ebrington
moved his resolution for standing by the Ministers
and their Bill ; but his tone was very moderate.
Dundas, M.P. for Berkshire, seconded him in
an equally moderate style : so it appeared to
me, who was ready to speak and expected to
do so, that it would be very difficult to take a
properly spirited line. Macaulay made a speech,
and took a totally different view of the question
from Ebrington. He went somewhat near the
wind on the intimidation side ; and I told him
so, and I saw he was not pleased. I took
138
CHAP. XII. DEMOCRATIC UPHEAVALS 139
that liberty as an older Member and an older
man.
Our opponents were in low spirits. Goulburn,
as usual, was of no use to them. Even Peel was
humble ; deprecating a division for fear of pledg-
ing Members to the rejected Bill, and referring
to Tom Duncombe's recommendation of mutual
concession 1 The moderation of T. D. showed that
clever gentleman in a totally new character. We
had a great majority — 329 to 198.
This same day came news of disturbances at
Derby, and of the burning of Nottingham Castle,
the property of the Duke of Newcastle. One or
two of the Bishops were insulted going to the
House; and Phillpotts, Bishop of Exeter, com-
plained of it in Parliament, I heard Lord Grey
put down this same Bishop, in the House, for
accusing him of inflaming the people against the
Bishops. Lord Grey spoke to him in a tone of
the most contemptuous severity, and, when he
rose to interrupt, told him to be silent, as if he
was speaking to a noisy child.
October 12. — I went to Court to present ad-
dresses from the electors assembled at the Crown
and Anchor, the parishioners of St. Anne's, West-
minster, and other large bodies of Metropolitan
electors. I was surprised on going into the
streets to find the shops shut, and a great many
ill-looking and ill-dressed people standing about.
There was something in the look and manners
of the crowds which, I confess, I did not like.
140 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. In Bond Street I saw a large placard with this
inscription : " 199 versus 22,000,000 ! " and I went
into the house to persuade the shopman to take
it down. He was a shoemaker, and, though very
civil, was very firm, and refused to remove the
placard, saying he had only done as others had
done. When I told him who I was, he said,
"Oh, I know you very well"; hut he still de-
clined to follow my advice.
There was a strong force of police and of Horse
Guards near St. James's Palace. A line of the
latter was drawn across Pall Mall to keep off
a crowd, whose banners I saw beyond the soldiers,
and whose shouts I heard. Processions paraded
the Mall, which might have been seen by the
King from the Palace windows. The parishioners
from St. Pan eras had, besides their banners, two
red caps of liberty, and they huzzaed lustily ; but
I saw no violence of any kind, nor heard of any
disaster.
As I had not been to Court since the death of
my father, I was presented by Lord Lansdowne ;
at least, his name was on my card. I presented
the petitions to His Majesty, and met with a most
gracious reception. He spoke to me of my father,
and said, " I fear he suffered much at the last."
He then inquired after Lady H. and my sisters,
and behaved to me with marked kindness and
attention.
I went to the House of Commons through
masses of people, who were noisy enough, but
CHAP. XII. " A ROLLICKING RODOMONTADE " 141
not mischievous. I was much vexed, however,
to hear that the Duke of Wellington's windows
had been broken, and that Lord Londonderry had
been wounded by a stone. These occurrences
were too true, and disgraceful enough. At the
House of Commons I heard Lord Althorp and
Lord John Russell complained of as having
inflamed the populace by the answers which
they had given to the addresses from the Bir-
mingham Union. A day or two before it was
asserted that the rejection of the Bill had caused
no excitement.
The next day the streets were quiet, and the
crowds had disappeared. The disturbance now
was transferred to the House of Commons, where
Mr. Trevor brought forward his foolish motion
about rate-paying ; and Sir Charles Wetherell
moved, as an amendment upon it, his more foolish
proposal for a special Commission to inquire about
the riots in the country. This personage so mis-
behaved himself that it was charitable to think
him either drunk or crazy. He threw his legs
on the bench, and called on Lord Althorp to
speak up. We passed the word that no notice
should be taken of his speech ; but, as he had
fallen foul of O'Connell, we could not prevent
that gentleman from rising and giving Sir Charles
his deserts. The castigation was most complete
and most severe. He called Wetherell's speech
" a rollicking rodomontade," and no epithet
could be ^better applied to it. Even Sir H.
142 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. Hardinge spoke of it as it deserved; but soon
turned the conversation on the misconduct of
Ministers, and their contributing to popular ex-
citement. He told me that he carried about him
a small pocket pistol, which he should use if
attacked; and informed me that the Duke of
Wellington's servants were armed, and had orders
to shoot any one who attempted to enter the court-
yard of Apsley House.
I took the chair this day at a meeting of
parishioners of St. George's, Hanover Square, who
were called together to test the truth of an
assertion made by Lord Wharncliffe, in the
Lords, that the shopkeepers in Bond Street and
St. James's Street were opposed to Reform. The
meeting assembled in Farm Street Mews. Lord
Wharncliffe himself came, but did not address
the meeting.
On going away Lord Wharncliffe told me that
a man, dressed like a gentleman, shook a rope at
him ; and he informed me that he had received
threatening letters respecting his Yorkshire man-
sion. I could not help remarking that, consider-
ing the prominent part he had taken against the
Bill, I was not surprised at this news. He
assured me he was not against all Reform, but
only against the Bill. I afterwards heard he was
not pleased with the an ti- Reformers refusing to
join him in some moderate scheme ; and I thought
he was not quite satisfied with the line he had
taken. There was a great meeting in Yorkshire
CHAP. XII. LADY JERSEY'S ANTI-REFORM FICTION 143
the day before; and the bankers and merchants
of London met on this day. The feeling in the
country seemed to be intense.
I cannot refrain from recording here that Lady
Jersey's windows overlooked Farm Street Mews ;
and I heard that fair anti-Reformer was looking out
upon us revolutionists. This lady I had the honour
of knowing well, not only at the time when she
patronised the Whig party, but afterwards, when
she adopted a totally different line ; but she
never discontinued her civilities to me. It may
easily, therefore, be believed that, when I heard
her mention that I had advised the mob to
break her windows, I was compelled to give a
flat denial to so strange an invention. I was
not a little annoyed at this attack, in her own
house, before some of her new friends ; and I
should have been glad to forget it, if possible.
But I was not permitted to do so ; for the great
lady, most friendly in every other respect, lost
no opportunity of repeating the scandal. Even
if I had been capable of making so disgraceful
a proposal, it was impossible the lady should have
heard it from her windows ; the distance would
not admit of it. But it was neither more nor
less than a pure fiction ; and, as I said at the
time, her Ladyship must have dreamt it.1
1 The Editor, years after, heard this fiction repeated at dinner,
42, Berkeley Square, by Lady Jersey, half in joke. " You know, Sir
John, you told the mob to break my windows." Sir John, para-
phrasing the remark about Waterloo to George IV., replied, "I have
heard your Ladyship say so."
144 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831, EROM DIAHY.
October 14. — The Lords have referred my Vestry
Bill to a select committee. This I considered as
tantamount to rejecting it. I spoke to G. Lamb,
who thought so too, and expressed his conviction
that without parochial reform the peace of the
metropolis could not be preserved. The Duke
of Wellington seems as eager against my Bill
as against Lord J. Russell's.
I went to Downing Street with my three
addresses. I put them into the hands of Lord
Grey's secretary and son-in-law, Charles Wood
(afterwards Lord Halifax), who told me that one
of the Yorkshire addresses to Lord Grey had
received a hundred thousand signatures.
October 20. — Lord Grey addressed a letter to
me, which was published in the newspapers of
October 17, in which he promised an equally
efficient Reform Bill for the next session of
Parliament. This, however, did not satisfy the
impatient metropolitans, who drew up a memorial
recommending a creation of Peers, and an ad-
journment of Parliament for seven days. Ac-
cordingly seventeen delegates waited on Lord
Grey, and had an interview which was not very
agreeable to either party. There is, it must be
confessed, a good deal of officious interference
and over-anxiety on the part of friends ; at the
same time I see no reason to be surprised at
their restlessness, considering the state of the
country and the opposition of the Peers.
CHAP. XII. ANTI-REFORM SUCCESSES 145
It is generally believed that the Cabinet are
divided upon the question, and I gather as much
from a letter which I have received from Lord
Durham, in which he complains of the hostility
and lukewarmness of friends, and wishes he was
supported by such men as myself.
Just at this time comes the defeat of Ponsonby
in Dorsetshire, and the Tories are going to try
their hands in Cambridgeshire. The City Tories
also rejected the Lord Mayor Key, twice chosen
by the Livery. All these efforts show that our
opponents are resolved to fight to the last. I
nevertheless believe that the majority of the
Lords now regret their triumph. They foolishly
thought that their vote would turn out the
Ministers; but now, seeing that they stay in,
their apprehension is that the whole Bill will
be carried by a majority in the Peers, and no
modification ever admitted, such as they might
have got by admitting the second reading.
Sir Alexander Cray Grant1 told me he knew
this was the case, and that the anti-E.eform.ers
were fools for their pains. In the meantime the
funds rise a little; this is attributed to the
probable settlement of the Belgian question.
Parliament was prorogued this day, and «fche
Royal Assent given to my Vestry Bill, which now
applies to open as well as close vestries.
October 24. — I have read Eouche's Memoirs for
1 Sir Alexander Grant, M.P. for Westbury, was Chairman of Com-
mittees.
VOL. IV 19
146 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. the first time. It seems incredible that any man
should have been guilty of the superlative base-
ness of which he confesses himself guilty, or
rather which he owns to and defends. He says
he did send a detail of the plan of Napoleon's
entrance into Belgium in 1815, by a Madame
D., but took care to have obstacles thrown in
her way, so that she did not arrive till after
the battle. Nevertheless Eouche does not appear
to have been a man of a bad heart. Madame
de Stael hits off his character admirably in her
" Ten Years of Exile."
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
November 4. — Sir E. Burdett unadvisedly took
the chair at a meeting of the working- classes,
constituted under the name of the " National
Union." I knew some of the most active of
these gentlemen, and that this was a scheme for
watching and controlling Members of Parliament.
Burdett's excuse is that if he did not put
himself at the head of this Union some designing
man or men would. Whereas the truth is, and
I told him so, that if he did not, it would fall
to the ground altogether. My good colleague
generally says Yes, to the last speaker, except
in Parliament, where he always says No ; at
least, has done so for the greater part of his
life. He is so pure himself that he cannot
suspect any one of artifice or malice. But his
facility embarrasses his coadjutors very much.
CHAP. XII. MEETING OF THE NATIONAL UNION 147
I do not know what took place at the meeting,
except that Wakley (afterwards Coroner and M.P.
for Einsbury) became completely master of the
situation, and, amongst other proofs of his pre-
dominance, contrived to get a Council appointed
of which one-half were to belong to the working-
classes ; and, when Burdett opposed this, Wakley
called him to order ! ! ! The consequence of this
was, the Unionists and the Westminster Reformers
came to a decided quarrel ; and the latter resolved
to establish a separate Association, confining their
objects to supporting the Ministerial Reform Bill
and preserving the peace of the City. The
Unionists announced a great meeting of the
working-classes at White Conduit House, with
Wakley in the chair. The anti- Reformers were
very vehement in their preference of the Union
politicians, which, I thought, might be easily
accounted for.
In the meantime, I was pleased to hear that
Lord Melbourne, Home Secretary, was on the
alert, and quite prepared for any attempts which
might be made by the madmen of any party. He
knew that either the overthrow of the monarchy
or of the administration would be the inevitable
result of the contemplated movement.
FROM DIARY.
November 5. — The Government have issued a
proclamation in the King's name, respecting the
Bristol and other riots, which Tory papers call
148 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. the Reform riots, of course. It must be confessed
that the Administration have a most difficult
course to steer, between the people on the one
hand, whom they are afraid to appeal to for fear
of mischief, and the Tories, who cannot be con-
ciliated, except at the expense of character,
consistency, popular support, and finally their
places. The true way, I think, would be to buy
off some of the most active agitators, and then
to take exactly what course they thought most
expedient to carry their Reform, without caring
for a paragraph in one or two newspapers, nor
for a few placards or a Union proclamation. I
suppose, of course, that they mean honestly
themselves.
Lord Grey is evidently not blind to the con-
sequences, and when waited upon by the seventeen
delegates at midnight, said, " If I am driven from
office it will be by these things," striking the
memorial with his finger. This was not in the
newspaper report. I had it from one who was
present. It was not surprising that Lord Grey
should say this, with seventeen men looking in
on him at near midnight, some of whom were
such ill-looking fellows that my friend De Vear
told me he got before one of them that Lord Grey
might not see him. And then these men modestly
asked him to reassemble Parliament in seven days.
I have given my opinion pretty plainly as to
the propriety of this proceeding, and displeased
my Westminster friends thereby. The fact is,
CHAP. XII. ANTI-REFORM MISCHIEF 149
most of the party went merely from over zeal
and officiousness; some, I think, had projects of
a very decisive nature.
Lord Grey received them very civilly, but he
should not have received them at all, as any one
will acknowledge who reads the use made of this
interview in the Quarterly Review.1
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
November 7. — I heard an anecdote at this time
which illustrates in very lively colours the mis-
chievous character of the anti-Reformers. Mr.
Howard Elphinstone, afterwards M.P. for Hastings,
told me that, being at the late Sussex county
meeting, he heard George Dawson say to the
Ministerialists, " You have brought a banner here
with ' No Bishops ' written upon it ; and you do
not dare to show it, so you have furled it." The
High Sheriff interrupted him. " Mr. Dawson,"
said he, "I cannot permit this. The banner was
furled out of courtesy to me ; it is no question
of daring." This was not in the newspaper report
of the proceedings, and, doubtless, was left out
purposely, in order that the reckless malice of
these gentlemen might not be exposed. This
would have made it manifest that they wanted
1 The deputation from several of the London parishes headed by
a Mr. Carpire, "a medical man," and Francis Place, attended on
the Prime Minister at midnight, praying his Lordship to recommend
the King not to prorogue Parliament for a longer period than seven
days. A full report of the interview appeared in the Courier of
October 3, and this is freely I quoted in an article on the state of
the Government in the Quarterly Review, Vol. XLVI.
150 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831 to create a commotion, and then to complain
of it.
The news of the breaking out of the cholera
at Sunderland, about this time, alarmed some
people as much as the Reform Bill and dread
of revolution frightened others ; and with much
more reason. As for the latter panic, there was
not the slightest excuse, and Sir Francis Burdett,
coming into contact with these Unionists, found
them, so he told me, perfectly insignificant.
FROM DIARY.
November 9. — Saw Joe Hume and his good
little wife. He is a singular fellow indeed, and
persuades many people he understands all the
subjects he talks about. He is to be made Lord
Rector of Glasgow University this year, for the
second time, I believe, and a paragraph in the
Herald tells how great a linguist Joe is, and how
much Greek and Latin, all Oriental, and most
modern tongues he knows. " Le pauvre Gil
Perez, a peine en savait-il les premiers principes."
If he knows Greek and Latin it is without
learning them.
November 10. — Burdett has dined twice with
Lord Grey lately, and says truly of him that
nothing is such a mistake as calling him a
haughty, unbending man — quite the contrary, he
is too pliant, too easily swayed; and does not
seem sensible that he is the sole responsible
Minister, and if Reform fails, to him will the
CHAP. XII. SIB, FRANCIS BURDETT 151
failure be imputed. No one knows anything
except of " Lord Grey," either at home or abroad ;
if therefore there are those in the Cabinet who
disagree with Lord Grey, he must turn them out.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS. "
November 11. — Burdett took the chair at the
so-called National Union, and consented to the
Council being composed mainly of artisans. But
these Unionists were not safe associates, and Sir
Francis Burdett told me that he had been an-
nounced as chairman of a public meeting of St.
James's parish without his consent. I said, as
Garrick did to Johnson, " I shall have to bail my
old friend out of the round-house." He said,
" I tell you what — the more I see, the more I
am convinced that there is no having to do with
any but gentlemen ; that is, with men of educa-
tion." A short time after this Sir P. Burdett
withdrew from the National Political Union.
PROM DIARY.
November 12. — Edward Ellice complained to me
of Stanley's going back to Ireland. Stanley had
said to him that the Irish hated him as much as
he hated the Irish. Here is a pretty fellow to
govern a country ! Ellice said Lord Grey was
all right ; but — but — but he added that there had
been certain signs of conversion amongst the Peers.
He deprecated delay in Parliament meeting ; Lord
Durham called it worse than drivelling, and
152 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. Lord Duncannon was of the same opinion. Then
whence the delay ? As Burdett said to me, Lord
Grey should turn the dissentients out of his
Cabinet.
November 17. — Writing to De Vear to-day, I
said, " If by some .error in judgment " — for I am
unwilling to believe it can originate from any
other cause—" Parliament should not meet soon,
then all Reformers, and we above all, must be
on the alert." I foresee a squabble amongst our
Westminster friends, which, if Reform does not
take place, will probably break them up and cost
me my seat. About this I am more than in-
different, for I think I should like an honest
excuse for quitting public life — at least as M.P.
for Westminster. I know I have done my duty,
and if others do not think so, I cannot help it.
November 18. — Finished Madame de StaeTs De-
launay Memoirs, a very amusing and very instruc-
tive book. It is wonderful that whilst there are
such books in the world any one can gravely
recommend the old French regime, in preference
to the modern manners and political condition of
that country. The account of the Castelmare
conspiracy shows how politics and intrigue were
mixed in the old courts of Europe. Europe might
have been drenched in blood for the sake of the
Duchess of Maine's precedence.
November 24*. — The Westminster Reform Asso-
ciation dissolved itself yesterday at the appearance
of the proclamation, under pretext of their rules
CHAP. XII. MEETING OF PARLIAMENT 153
bringing them within the law; but, in fact, be-
cause the attempt was failing. The householders
would not associate, " ibi omnis effusus labor,"
but I am glad.
December 5. — Burdett told me our Reform
prospects were not favourable— no converts. The
King, against so far as inclination went, but being
an honourable man, would not give in. He said
that the National Union was going fast to pieces ;
and so much the better, added he. I had pre-
viously heard from him that the Union had hesi-
tated about accepting his resignation, and I saw
the correspondence. They are trying to trick him,
he pretending not to see their manoeuvre. Such
is the consequence of one false step even in the
best of men.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
December 6. — Parliament met. The House of
Commons was empty when compared with its
numbers during the fierce contests of the recent
session.
Several occurrences, and particularly the Bristol
riots, had tended to cool the ardour of most poli-
ticians ; and it required all the sagacity and
courage of the tried friends of Parliamentary
Reform to persevere in the course most likely to
obtain their object without risk to public tran-
quillity.
The Royal Speech was a good speech, inasmuch
as it afforded very little for opponents to lay hold
VOL. iv 20
154 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. of. It opened with Reform, and allowed the right
of popular meetings to discuss political questions ;
but denied that this right extended to the organi-
sation of political unions. Peel promised to
discuss the new Reform Bill dispassionately.
Russell gave notice that he should bring forward
that Bill on the following Monday. This drew a
loud cheer from our benches.
PROM DIARY.
December 7. — I saw Tavistock to-day. He told
me the King says he considers it to be the duty
of a constitutional King to stand by his Ministers ;
but Tavistock added he believed H.M. was not
for Reform.
No amendment in the Lords, and Lord Harrowby
made a sort of conceding speech. Nevertheless
I believe the Lords are preparing a surprise, as
before, and mean to throw out the Bill.
At the House of Commons Lord Althorp pre-
sented the Yorkshire address signed by 140,000 ;
but this did not prevent Mr. Croker from being
somewhat smart and insolent, nor Hunt from
being lying and vulgar.
December 12. — I went to the House of Commons,
and heard Lord John Russell propose his new
Reform Bill. I thought the Bill an improvement
on the former Bill, and I believe that was the
general opinion. But Peel made a most unjust
and ungenerous attack on the Government, con-
gratulating the House on the escape which his
CHAP. XII. SLASHING SPEECH BY MACAULAY 155
party and the Lords had procured for the country issi.
from the old Bill.
I hardly ever felt so angry in my life, and had
half a mind to speak; but Althorp made a very
good and spirited reply, and subsequently Lord
Clive spoke in a conciliatory tone, as did Lord
Chandos, and Baring, all of whom owned the Bill
to be an improvement. Croker was insolent as
usual. Peel apparently made a bad hit, and
forgot he was leader of a party, for when he was
taunted with Lord Olive's moderation, he rose to
say he should act for himself. Portman of Dorset-
shire made an indiscreet effort to nail Clive to
his new position, which made Clive explain.
Nugent called this " heading the fox."
December 16. — The second reading of the new
Reform Bill came on. Lord Porchester moved
to delay it to "this day six months." Lord
Mahon made a good speech ; but, alluding to
Macaulay, who had just sauntered into the House,
drew up that extraordinary young man, who made
one of his best speeches — indeed, one of the best
I ever heard — and took occasion to tell Peel some
very home truths about himself and his Administra-
tion. We cheered and huzzaed. Peel looked as if
sweating blood. I never saw him so scalded, not
even in the days of Brougham. Croker followed
Macaulay. Reply to him he did not, nor could
not. His speech was a tirade against Ministers
and revolutionary politics in general, with illus-
trations from English and Erench history, full
156 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. of the grossest mistakes, which Macaulay de-
tected at once, and I handed down corrections of
them to Lord Althorp. Lord Althorp said to me,
" Will you undertake him ? " I, seeing he wished
to speak, answered " No." Althorp spoke ill, and
several Members told me that I ought to have
answered Croker. Indeed, I thought I should
have done it well, for he had laid himself very open.
PROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
December 17. — This evening was conspicuous, in
our Reform debates, for a great speech from [Lord]
Edward Stanley, who lashed Mr. Croker so soundly
as he had never been lashed before. He exposed
his false history about Charles I. and his Parlia-
ments, and told him " Inaccurate reading was
as dangerous as a little reading," alluding to
Macaulay's exposure of Croker's " Boswell's Life
of Johnson," in the Edinburgh Review, in which
the quotation had been applied to Croker's edition
of that famous book. But what pleased me most
was the genuine English spirit which breathed
through all he said. He was tremendously
cheered when he sat down.
Then Peel rose, and for three-quarters of an
hour made a very lame and laboured defence of
himself against Macaulay's speech of the night
before. He talked of the " sweltered venom " of
his antagonist, but confessed admiration for his
talents. He read ^his correspondence with the
Duke of Wellington respecting his wish to retire
CHAP. XII. A HANDSOME MAJORITY FOB REFORM 157
from office in 1829. But he did not and could
not answer Macaulay's charges of unhandsome
conduct in taunting Ministers with adopting the
suggestions of their opponents ; " coming," as
Macaulay said, (t from a man whose administra-
tion would be known only hy its concessions."
Peel concluded by declaring positively he would
never be a party to any measure of Parliamentary
E-eform. We had a majority of 324 to 162.
We went home in great glee, and Macaulay,
walking with me, could not refrain from a little
pleasantry at the expense of Peel's performances
at" Oxford. He rendered the "suave mari magno"
of Lucretius in this way : " suave— it is a source
of melancholy satisfaction."
December 20. — I went down to Hastings, and
found my wife decidedly better. During this
visit I formed an acquaintance with a very agree-
able man — Admiral Sir William Hotham 2 — who
had lived much in the world, and was a most
acceptable guest at every table. Thomas Campbell,
the poet, was at Hastings at this time, and, know-
ing him well, I brought him and Sir William a
good deal together.
EROM DIARY.
December 22. — Sir W. Hotham and Thomas
Campbell dined with us ; also my friend Miss
1 The authorised version, in Sir R. Peel's Life by the Right
Honourable C. S. Parker, is " it is a source of satisfaction," with-
out the word "melancholy."
2 Born 1772 ; served under Nelson at Bastia, 1794 ; commanded
Adamant at Camperdown, 1797 ; died 1848.
158 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. Bayley, a very remarkable lady of great acquire-
ments and a vigorous intellect.
Sir William told us that he was present at
a dinner of naval officers in the West Indies
when the Duke of Clarence was one of the com-
pany. H.R.H. rallied Captain Newcome, and
dwelt rather more than was agreeable to him
on his father being a schoolmaster at Hackney.
The Captain, when the Duke asked him why his
father had not bred him up to his own profession,
replied, " Why, sir, I was such a stupid, good-
for-nothing fellow, that my father could make
nothing of me, so he sent me to sea."
The Admiral also told us that the King saw
William Pitt and Lord Nelson for the last time,
on the same day, within ten minutes of each
other; and that both seemed impressed with
the notion they were soon to die, particularly
Nelson. Pitt told him he should never go to
another Council. Hotham saw Pitt after this,
at Bath, in high spirits, but knowing it was over
with him. One day, at dinner, a foolish man
would read a very long letter from a boy who
was in the action at Trafalgar, which Pitt bore
good-naturedly, though all were tired of never-
ending stories about that battle. General Tarleton,
who was present, took the letter and said he would
read it, being best acquainted with sea terms.
Pitt asked him what the " line of bearing " was.
" Why," said Tarleton, " it is— it is— it is— . . .
the — the — line of bearing."
CHAP. XII. ANECDOTES OF THE HOTHAMS 159
Campbell was less absurd than usual, but he
read us a dull prophecy concerning the future
power of Russia — in verse. He told us that he
once heard Sheridan, when drunk, address Lady
Holland " My dear fellow ! "
On another occasion, Sir William told me that
when his ancestors, the two Hothams, were con-
demned by the Parliament1 to lose their heads
on the Tower Hill, the son was executed first,
in order that two Baronets might not be put to
death on the same day — a singular delicacy from
Republicans. The estate was given back to the
family after the Restoration ; and the holder of
it, being in Parliament, voted for the Exclusion
Bill. The Duke of York remonstrated with him,
and reminded him that two of his family had
lost their heads, on which Hotham replied that
he always bore that circumstance in mind, and
it would be as well if H.R.H. would recollect
that his father had perished for opposing the
inclinations of his subjects. This anecdote is
mentioned in the papers preserved by the
Hotham family.
One more anecdote from the Admiral :
Lord Huntingdon, the late Sir C. Hotham,
and a third person were dining at the inn at
1 Sir John Hotham, the first Baronet, was Governor of Hull, and on
the eve of hostilities refused to admit the King and his retinue ;
but in 1643 he and his son were accused of plotting to hand over the
city to the Duke of Newcastle on behalf of the King, on which they
were arrested and sent to London, where they were both beheaded by
order of Parliament in 1645.
160 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1831. Salt Hill ; and talking of the American war
then raging, Lord Huntingdon said that Lord
North ought to lose his head, although he
believed a good deal of the mischief was to he
traced to the King's obstinacy. Shortly after-
wards Hotham was at Windsor, and George III.
addressed him thus : " You dined at Salt Hill
the other day, and so and so were with you.
Pray tell Lord Huntingdon from me that I re-
spect his opinions, supposing that he holds them
conscientiously ; but that, when he devotes a
Minister to the scaffold and accuses his King of
obstinacy, I advise him first to turn the waiters
out of the room."
December 29. — The Cholera is raging dreadfully
and suddenly at Gateshead, where in 46 hours there
have been about 103 cases and 52 deaths, the rate
of mortality being as large as on the Continent, or
larger. It is said to have been caused by the
drunkenness of Christmas Day. Only one person
at all above the lowest orders affected.
December 30. — I have read poor Walter Scott's
last romances, " Robert of Paris" and " Castle
Dangerous " ; incredibly inferior to almost all
his other performances, and smelling of apoplexy.
Nevertheless, no one else perhaps could produce
so good and lively an historical fiction as either
of these tales.
1832. January 1. — I am glad the last melancholy
year is over, although the present commences
with no very favourable auspices.
CHAP. XII. T. P. COOKE 161
January 22. — I left Hastings, and came up 1832.
to London in the coach. T. P. Cooke, the actor,
and his wife were of the party. He is a very
pleasing-mannered, good-looking man, with a
good deal of unassuming conversation. He has
been a common sailor, and then went on the
stage to perform the part of the strong man
at Sadler's Wells ; afterwards he tried higher
departments, and I hear that his William in
Black-eyed Susan is a very pathetic performance.
He talked to me of Talma, with whom he seems
to have been well acquainted, and of Kean,
whom he knows intimately. He is rather an
extraordinary man if his origin be taken into
consideration.
I find that few people, if any, approve of the
Reform measure altogether, the general impres-
sion with all those who have anything to lose
being that it goes too far.
I took up my residence at 42, Berkeley Square.
Lady Hobhouse and her family left England
for the Continent, and I rented the house of her
during her lifetime.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
January 24. — At House of Commons. The
schedules of the Reform Bill came on. I voted
with Ministers for dividing Lincolnshire into two
counties. We had 193 to 64, and the Tories
were so angry that they walked out of the
House in a body.
VOL. iv 21
162 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. The next day, January 25, I heard from Lord
Howick that all arrangements were made for
carrying the Reform Bill. I remarked thereon,
" Of course, if your father has thrown the
country into this ferment, without the certainty
of carrying his measure, he deserves to be
hanged." He smiled, and said he agreed with
me; "hut the thing was done." Several other
official people held the same language to me;
hut all regretted that the creation of a sufficient
number of Peers had been delayed.
I became in those days acquainted with a
man who figured as a leader of a powerful
party — I mean Lord George Bentinck. He did
not support Ministers, but as yet he did not
oppose them. His chief dislike was to Sir Robert
Peel. He gave me a lamentable account of the
Nottingham riots, and assured me that the con-
victs had not the slightest notion that they
would be proceeded against capitally. On the
contrary, they expressed their surprise that the
Attorney- General did not come to defend them.
Indeed, the language held by some of our ad-
herents was sufficient to mislead better-informed
men than the rioters. My friend Colonel Wild-
man, purchaser of Newstead Abbey, addressing
a meeting which might fairly be called a mob,
told them that they were " God Almighty's
aristocracy." This was the aristocracy that burnt
Nottingham Castle, and, when some of them
were condemned to suffer for it, a petition was
CHAP. XII. " GOD ALMIGHTY'S ARISTOCRACY " 163
circulated to save them, which it was not very 1832.
easy to refuse to sign, and similar efforts were
made to save the Bristol rioters ; but, if our
criminal code awards death as a punishment for
any crime, I could not see how these men could
be saved.
January 26. — Mr. Perceval made his foolish
motion for a general East, and the Government
as foolishly gave way to his proposal.
Then followed a discussion on a subject which,
at the time, created a great sensation, and led
to consequences seriously affecting more than
one public man — I allude to the Eussian-Dutch
loan. Mr. Herries moved three resolutions on
this subject, the last of them condemnatory of
the Ministers for continuing the payment of
the loan after the separation of Belgium from
Holland, without applying to Parliament. Lord
Althorp moved the previous question on the two
first resolutions, and a decided negative on the
last.
We had very melancholy forebodings as to
the result of the vote, but in the midst of the
discussion news came that Ministers had a
majority of 37 on the Belgian question in the
Lords. A still more useful effect was produced
by Sir Robert Peel, who, though he made a
strong anti-Ministerial speech, let out that, even
if the vote of censure passed, he should not
think himself precluded from paying the money.
This gave an excuse to the economical Members
164 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. to vote for Ministers ; and Lord Palmerston then
made a speech which I thought far the best he
had ever made since he joined the Whig Cabinet.
We had a majority of 239 to 219. On the vote
of censure our majority was larger, for we were
238 to 214. I had the satisfaction of hearing
afterwards that Sir John Leech had said Ministers
had interpreted the treaty rightly, and Dr. Jenner
said the same; yet Lord Palmerston was the
only Minister who took the right line in the
debate. I should, however, have supported
Ministers even if they had made a mistake about
the loan, for, if Ministers were displaced, I knew
we should not have Reform of Parliament — the
sole object of my public life.
EBOM DIARY.
January 26. — This day I had a long talk with
Prank Place, who told me that when the Lords
threw out the last Bill there was so little real
feeling or spirit in the people that it required
all the efforts of a few individuals to found the
National Political Union, and that the Birming-
ham Union was just kept alive by the subscription
of three men who sent £50 apiece and saved it.
He said that even now the National Political
Union was mere moonshine, and the Birmingham
the same. He added that a vigorous Tory Ministry
would keep the people down easily for some time,
but that they would rise at last and walk over all
the upper classes.
CHAP. XII. THE OFFER OF " SECRETARY- AT- WAR " 165
I had no notion of the apathy or disgust of the 1832.
people, but he assured me he was right.
January 28. — Sir James Macdonald had a long
talk with me, and told me Ministers could not
stand with the present Treasury Bench, and
that I must come into office, also Macaulay. I
said nothing, except that Ministers did appear
to want assistance.
January 30. — King Charles's Martyrdom was
a holiday at the House of Commons. Going to
Brooks's, I heard that Sir Henry Parnell had
been dismissed from the War Office for not voting
with Ministers on the E/ussian- Dutch loan.
January 31. — I had a note from ~Lord Althorp,
desiring me to call on him at eleven o'clock. On
my walking to Downing Street I was overtaken
by a man with a note from Lord Durham, begging
me to call on him at twelve. I went to Lord
Althorp ; so soon as the door was shut and we
were alone he said, " Sit down ; we want you
in harness." " As how ? " said I. "As Secretary-
at-War," replied he. The substance of my answer
was, " That there were two points for considera-
tion on that proposal : first, my own feelings as
to the propriety of accepting the office ; and,
secondly, how the electors of Westminster would
feel on the subject : therefore I should require
some little time for consideration." Lord Althorp
assented, and then added, he would tell me as
a friend what was not to be communicated to
others, " that Ministers would carry the Reform
166 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. Bill, but were not likely to be permanent." I
said that " the carrying the Bill was the only
important matter with me ; the instability of
Ministers would not affect my answer."
He told me that perhaps it might be agreeable
to me to know that the Cabinet were unanimous
in wishing me to take office. He added that
their decision had been conveyed to the King
yesterday, and that His Majesty had returned
an answer highly complimentary to me and
approving of the offer.
I told Lord Althorp that the Secretaryship of
War was the least agreeable place he could offer
to me. He owned it, but said it was a high
place, and they had no other to give me. Nor
were we likely to differ except on one point,
namely, flogging. I told him that on that point
I might come to some terms, but that I was
not sure of my capacity for the details of the
office. This he overruled ; and he added that
my assent would be of advantage to the Ministers
and to the cause of Reform.
Lord Durham told me much the same as Lord
Althorp had told me, but entered more into
detail as to the wishes of the Cabinet Ministers,
particularly the Tory portion of them, and Lord
Palmerston nominatim. He assured me that
the office would be only a step to a more
important position, and that no one would be
promoted over my head. I told him that,
although of course I did not forget what was
CHAP. XTI. VAKIOUS ADVICE 167
due to my position, my chief reflection was as 1832.
to the good to be done to the public; and I
had doubts as to my capacity for the office. He
replied that " my appointment would do away
with any bad impression that might be made
by the dismissal of Sir Henry Parnell ; and that,
as for capacity, there could be no doubt." He
told me that the Reform measure was to be
carried without doubt. On this I remarked that,
without that preliminary assurance, I could not
think of taking office.
My next application was to Mr. De Vear, my
good Westminster chairman. He strongly recom-
mended my acceptance of the office, and after
deliberation I was resolved to give an answer
in the affirmative. I was quite aware of the
objections to such a course, and I think I may
say that I was as little swayed by private and
selfish considerations as any man could be under
similar circumstances. The Administration had
just received a severe check. Parnell's retire-
ment might injure them still further. Lord
Althorp's hint was anything but encouraging. I
had little to gain. I had the certainty of losing
leisure and tranquillity, and the chance of sacri-
ficing reputation by discovering my incapacity
for office. I had nothing to encourage me but
the consciousness of coming forward, when most
wanted, to assist in carrying through the great
measure which it had been the object of my
whole public life to obtain.
168 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. As to personal distinction, it was hardly sufficient
to have much weight, if any ; for many might
think the place too low for me, whilst it might
subsequently be found to be too high. To this
might be added the peculiar nature and duty of
the office in Parliament, particularly obnoxious to
an old antagonist of barracks and standing armies.
However, I made up my mind ; went to Brooks's,
and, finding the rumour afloat, scarcely denied it.
I wrote a short note to Lord Durham, conveying
my assent ; then went to Lord Althorp. He took
me in his carriage to the House of Commons. I
said, "Well, I say yes." "That's right," said
he; and so the affair ended with this good
creature of few words.
The business was soon buzzed about the House.
A good many men congratulated me, and a great
many compliments, not worth recording, were
addressed to me. The Speaker shook hands with
me as I passed the Chair. Sir Henry Hardinge
said that there would be a good many extra
bottles drunk at the United Service Club; and
that I should do justice between the soldiers
and the public. My friend Lord Maitland alone
seemed a little sour. He said, " Of course you
would not take it, if you did not think the
Government likely to last."
I sat up until twelve in the House ; and thus
ended this, to me, important day — the opening
of a new scene in my life.
February 1.— I called on Lord Grey in Downing
CHAP. XII. HIS MAJESTY'S WISH 169
Street. He was very kind and complimentary.
He read to me that part of the King's letter
which referred to me. It approved of the dis-
missal of Sir H. Parnell ; said of me that it had
not escaped His Majesty's notice that I had dis-
countenanced the Unions; that I was of an old
family (umph !) and high station ; of literary
habits, likely to be qualified for business, and
such a person as would be agreeable for personal
intercourse with him; adding, of undoubted
abilities, and concluding, "His Majesty hopes
Sir John Hobhouse will not refuse the offer."
Lord Grey then gave me some hints as to the
nature and duty of my office ; criticised Parnell 's
conduct in some respects ; begged me to keep up
a good understanding with the Commander-in-
Chief and Lord Fitzroy Somerset, and to speak
to them, rather than write, when any differences
occurred.
I thought Lord Grey looked ill, and when I
asked him how he was he shook his head.
February 2. — Mr. De Vear called with a
resolution, passed at a meeting of Westminster
electors, approving of my conduct, and asking
me to stand again for the city.
I saw Lord Althorp, who seemed in good
spirits. This is a bad sign, for nothing would
please him so much as quitting office.
February 3. — I went down to Hastings, and
passed a delightful day on the Saturday with my
wife and her babies.
VOL. iv 22
170 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. February 5. — I returned to London this day,
and dined with Lord Durham. I had some
private talk with him after dinner, and he used
some language which made me think that all
was not right as to the Bill. I told him I had
a character to lose, and if I had been deceived
as to the resolution of carrying the Bill, I had
also deceived my constituents and the public ; and
if the Bill were not carried I should be ruined,
to say nothing of the country. He assented, and
assured me he would give me warning in time.
I added that I would quit office the moment I
knew there was any hesitation. Lord Durham
said he would too.
I was, however, determined not to take any
hasty step, and I received assurances from more
than one member of the Cabinet that, if the
Reform Bill was not carried, the Government
would break up.
BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
February 6. — I went to St. James's with Lord
Durham. I was congratulated, and received in
a most friendly manner, by all the Cabinet
Ministers present, and had several civil speeches
addressed to me. Lord Brougham said, "I do
not congratulate you; I thank you." Sir James
Graham paid me a still more elaborate compli-
ment. My frequent meetings with "brother
Brougham" at the S.S.B.S. had given rise to
much intimacy between us. He and Lord Grey
CHAP. XII. KISSING HANDS AS MINISTER 171
were standing at the fire together, when he took 1332.
out a bottle of medicine from the Lord Chan-
cellor's purse, and drank it off, winking to us,
and saying, "The Bill." I said, "I am glad
you can swallow it." I had heard there had
been some difficulty with him in the Cabinet ;
but Lord Grey told me that his speech on the
Russian-Dutch loan the other night was one of
the finest he had ever made. I heard that the
Duke of Wellington spoke of it in the same
terms. It had, indeed, settled the question, and
recalled some of our deserters to their duty.
I kissed hands with the King on my appoint-
ment. His Majesty was -very, very kind — talked
of my father's last illness, of his intimacy with
him, and of his mode of life. The King's last
words to me on this occasion were, " I trust
that your manners will be as pleasing in inter-
course with me on public matters, as your father
was in private life." He then said, "Goodbye,
for the present " ; and Lord Grey and myself
walked away. Lord Grey said to me, " He gave
you a most gracious reception," as indeed it was ;
but we had to wait a weary time in the Throne-
room, whilst H.M. gave audience to several
people. It was half-past four before the door
opened, and the Privy Councillors took their
seats at the table, at the head of which sat the
King.
Mr. Tennyson, who had resigned the Clerkship
of the Ordnance and was to be made a Privy
172 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. Councillor, was ushered in with me by Mr.
Eathurst, one of the Clerks of the Council, and
we both of us knelt on cushions near His Majesty.
We then took the accustomed oaths, and, when
we had kissed the King's hand and risen, His
Majesty said, " Gentlemen, take your places."
We walked round the table, the Privy Councillors
rising as we passed, and standing with their
backs to the table : each of them shook hands
with me.
Lord Lansdowne read the programme. First
there came the proclamation for the East. The
King asked who preached. The Archbishop said
he did not know. Lord Grey said, "A Bishop,
of course." We all smiled. Indeed, during the
whole proceeding, which consisted of reading
Orders in Council and the King saying "Ap-
proved," we were whispering and talking, and
making signs across the table, particularly
Stanley, and Graham, and Grant. Having never
seen the like before, I could not help saying to
my neighbour, "Do you recollect Chancellor
Oxenstiern's speech to his son ? " It was a tire-
some ceremony, as I thought then ; and, having
assisted at a good many of such afterwards, I may
add that I think so still.
February 8. — This day was fixed upon for the
Westminster electors to show whether or not they
approved of the step I had taken. There was a
very respectable crowd at Covent Garden, but not
the least excitement of any kind. When I was
CHAP. XII. UNCONTESTED RE-ELECTION 173
declared by the High Bailiff duly elected, there
was a good deal of cheering, as also during my
speech. I did not speak long, hut told them
" I should support the Ministers so long as they
supported Reform ; and support them as I had
supported the popular cause — namely, not by
halves, hut without cavilling at little faults,
decidedly and unremittingly." I told them " that
the Ministers looked to the public for support,
and, if they withheld it, Reform might yet be
lost." In conclusion, I said "that my peaceable
re-election was a practical refutation of one of
the charges made against the Bill, namely, that
a Member, accepting office, would not know
where to find a seat, as he could not have recourse
to a rotten borough."
There was not the slightest attempt at inter-
ruption. "The event certainly is favourable to
the Government — at least it ought to be — so far
as the election is concerned, although I have my
misgivings as to my being any great accession
to them as active debater and man of business
in Parliament. Too much is expected of me, that
is certain."
Such was my comment at the time, and I am
afraid it was justified by my subsequent official
conduct and character.
February 9. — I still heard doubts on the great
question of creation of Peers. Lord Brougham
was said to be wavering, and he frightened Lord
Grey, who, I was assured, would be glad to be
174 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. out of the concern. Lord Grey said, (f~D n
Reform ! I wish I had never touched it." "A
fine fellow/5 said , " whom we are trying to
make a great man of against his will ! " —bon gre,
mal gre — a wretched pun.
February 10. — I worked hard at the War Office,
and then took my seat on the Treasury bench
in the House of Commons. The Speaker (Sutton)
called me to him, and addressed me thus : "I
have three things to say to you — first, I am glad
to see you again; secondly, I wish you joy of
having to bring in the Army Estimates ; thirdly,
I hope you like heing in the mire with the rest
of them."
February 11. — Going down to Westminster I
met Lord Howick, who said he wanted to speak
with me; and, accordingly, we walked together
for some time. He told me that he had had a
conversation with his father the night before,
and that Lord Grey still hesitated about creating
Peers previously to the second reading. Lord
Howick said that his father was not aware of
the consequences of rejecting the Bill ; and that,
in fact, he was not aware even of the paramount
importance of the measure itself, and confessed
that, had he known what would ensue, would
never have embarked in it. Lord Grey added
that, up to a certain time, he and all the Cabinet
were resolved upon the creation of Peers; but
that Brougham fell ill, and then took fright,
which was communicated to Lord Grey. Now
CHAP. XII. PROPOSALS TO SWAMP THE PEERAGE 175
Lord Brougham had recovered from his panic, 1832.
and Lord Grey had his doubts. He was most
decidedly adverse to swamping the peerage, and
desired to retire from office. He did not seem
aware that he could not do that without losing
his character, and risking the ruin of the
country.
Lord Howick concluded by begging me to call
on his father and state my opinion. I said I
would do so, but should prefer a meeting of
Members of Parliament to advise Lord Grey.
Lord Howick remarked that his father would
not like that; he would call it dictation, and
would prefer friendly advice given privately.
And this is the man to whom the destinies of
this great nation are entrusted ! a man who, it
now seems, took up Reform as a toy which he
might break or lay down again ; who knows
nothing of its nature or consequences ; who looks
upon it as a mere trick of state for the preser-
vation of power, and when he finds it dis-
agreeable or not worth his while to retain that
power, supposes he may abandon the cause with
the same indifference as his house in Downing
Street. This is incredible, but it is true !
I went to Burdett, and he was equally shocked
with me. He agreed that I ought to save myself
and resign office instantly, upon discovering that
there was any intention of risking the Bill by
not doing that which the Administration have
the power of doing. This would dissolve the
176 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. Ministry perhaps, but the fault would not be
mine. The sacrifice of me is needless ; it will
not save them, nor ought they to be saved.
This day I dined at the Speaker's— my first
Ministerial dinner. I had a serious conversation
with Charles Grant on the state of affairs, and
urged the necessity of creating Peers at once.
I said I should go to Lord Grey before the
Council the next day, and would resign office if
I was not assured that the Bill was to be
carried. I spoke to him, as one of the Cabinet,
with the utmost freedom and unreserve, because
I thought it was best to do so. I was aware
that I was pledging myself to a step which
might produce to myself very painful con-
sequences. However, I have no doubt what I
ought to do. It is absolutely necessary to take a
decisive step. Nothing else will save the country
from convulsion. The making of Peers, were it
ever so objectionable, is nothing in comparison
with the consequences of rejecting the Bill, and
bringing back the old set and the old system.
February 12. — I called on Lord Durham. He
told me that on the previous Thursday he had,
through Lady Durham and Lady Grey, conveyed
to Lord Grey his intention of resigning, unless the
Bill was made quite safe in the House of Lords. He
assured me that, when he persuaded me to accept
office, everything was decided upon. As many
Peers as were thought requisite were to be made,
either at once, or by degrees; and on this the
CHAP. XII. THE PROPOSED CREATION OF PEERS 177
whole Cabinet seemed determined, but Brougham's 1832.
illness made him flinch, and his flinching raised
doubts in Lord Grey; and both together revived
the hesitation in that portion of the Cabinet that
had originally objected to the creation of Peers.
Amongst them were the Duke of Richmond,
Melbourne, Palmer ston, and even John Russell.
At this juncture two well-meaning Peers, Lord
Harrowby and Lord Wharncliffe, had an inter-
view with Sir Herbert Taylor, and proposed,
under certain conditions, to vote for the second
reading of the Bill. The main object of these
personages was to prevent a large creation of
Peers. The King considered the arrangement
satisfactory, but Lord Grey wrote to Lord
Durham saying he considered this proposal as
anything but satisfactory.
This did not tally with what I heard from
Lord Howick, and I mentioned that conversa-
tion to Lord Durham. He answered that the
difference between the two statements was
startling enough ; but that Lord Grey was the
most changeable man in the universe, and,
without a steady monitor constantly at his elbow,
would never persevere in anything.
He then entered into many details which
subsequent events make it unnecessary to record,
except to say that the Cabinet were not kept
together except with the greatest difficulty, and
Lord Durham had been obliged occasionally to
bully both Lord Grey and the Cabinet. He said
VOL. iv 23
178 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. it was framed as if a mere " hors d'oeuvre."
Walking down the steps of the House of Lords,
Lord Grey said to him, " Lambton, I wish you
would take our Reform Bill in hand." Durham
consented, but took Lord J. Russell, Sir James
Graham, and Duncannon as coadjutors. Lord
Durham told Russell that, being an author, he
should draw it up ; but Russell refused, and
Lord Durham drew up the Bill himself. He
made a sketch of the essential principles, and
submitted it to the Cabinet at large. The Cabinet
voted on this syllabus of the Bill, scarcely
knowing what they did. It was sent to the
King, who gave his consent in the same way.
This sketch was afterwards given to Lord
Holland, who talked of using it for his con-
templated " History of His Own Times." He
said Ballot was part of their original plan, but
was not agreed to.
I then went to Lord Althorp, and told him I
must have some positive assurance in regard to
carrying the Reform Bill. Lord Althorp said, " I
can set your mind at ease. Brougham and I will
go out also, unless we have a moral certainty
of carrying the measure." He seemed much
pleased with this chance of quitting office. I
told him that, "He never could go out as he
came in, for that, if it was generally suspected
he might have carried the measure, and would
not do it, he would be stoned in the streets ;
and, if the other party came in, I saw no small
CHAP. XII. LORD GUEY AND THE BILL 179
chance of his coming to the scaffold ! " He
smiled, and said, " I think so too ; I have
long thought so." He then told me they
wished to avoid making Peers if possible. I
replied that it was not possible. The proposal
of Wharncliffe and Harrowby was a trick. He
granted that that might he, and added that, unless
they had a security amounting to a moral certainty
the Peers would do as they promised, either new
Peers would be made or they would go out.
Lord Althorp said positively that Lord Grey
would carry the Bill, but the mode of doing it
must be left to him. I said : " Yes, if his mode
was such as any man of sense and honour would
declare was feasible ; but a pretence would not
do. It was as much as his life was worth to
pretend he had security for the fulfilment of
engagements, which his own conscience must
tell him he had not. As for myself, I must
have an engagement which could not be violated/'
Lord Althorp promised he would tell Lord Grey
what I had said.
I went to Lord Grey's house, and saw Charles
Wood. Prom him I learnt that on Friday night
Lord Grey had told Howick nothing should make
him consent to a creation of Peers ; and on
Saturday morning he had desired Wood to make
out as large a list of new Peers as he could
think of. Here's a man for you ! ! !
The same day I dined with Lord Althorp, and
sat up with him alone until past twelve o'clock.
180 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. He told me that he had seen Lord Grey and
given my message. Lord Grey said, "He will
not be worse off than we are ; if we cannot carry
the Bill we will go out."
I told Lord Althorp I did not agree with Lord
Grey : he had made the Bill and originated many
other measures, and had got into difficulties of
his own ; and I had joined him with assurance
that Reform was to be carried, at great personal
sacrifice, and in the hour of his utmost need, so
that if he went out now merely because he would
not make an effort to do what I was promised
he could do, I should be a dupe, and should
be thought to have deceived my constituents.
Lord Althorp made some sort of reply to this,
half owning it was true, but he added that the
Administration were not going out ; that, " unless
the King broke faith with them/' they were sure
of carrying their Bill in all its material enact-
ments. Peers would be made, if necessary; the
King had solemnly promised it.
Althorp talked very confidentially of his own
repugnance to office, and said it destroyed all
his happiness, adding that he " removed his
pistols from his bedroom for fear of shooting
himself." Such are the secrets of the human
heart ! Who would have imagined that such a
notion ever entered into the head of the pure,
the imperturbable, the virtuous Althorp ?
Amongst his confessions he said he was more
attached to the Radicals than to any other party.
LORD ALTHORP.
John Charles, Third Earl Spencer (Viscount Althorp). By Sir G. Hayter.
By kind permission of his nephew, Viscount Althorp, to Lady Dorchester.
[p. 181
CHAP. XII. THE GARRICK CLTJB 181
I believe it to be so. After all I have heard,
however, I do not feel quite easy about the great
measure, which the very indifference of Althorp
to office puts into peril. I took leave of this excel-
lent man with greater admiration of him than ever.
PROM DIARY.
February 13. — Lord Durham called, and gave
me a satisfactory account of a correspondence
now going on between the King and Lord Grey.
One expression of His Majesty's was, how can it
be ascertained that the creation of forty or fifty
Peers will be sufficient ? " Which/' said Lord
Durham, " is a good sign, inasmuch as it shows
that the King thinks of forty or fifty being made."
The King's last letter to Lord Grey was of several
sheets, and Lord Grey's answer twice as long.
What a singular correspondence for history !
February 14. — The Opposition have endeavoured
to make the most of the few cases of Cholera,
which at last has certainly come to London.
Croker sounded the alarm last night.
February 15. — Dine with the Garrick Club,
a new society to bring together friends of the
drama. The Duke of Sussex in the chair, and
all the principal actors present : a droll scene,
but nothing will make the actors gentlemen nor
the gentlemen actors.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
February 17. — This was to me a very important
182 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. day, I had to bring on the Army Estimates
for the quarter. It was the first official speech
I had ever made, and I had to deal with many
figures, not of speech, hut of financial detail.
Indeed, I was publicly complimented by Sir
Henry Hardinge, and was cheered by all sides
of the House. Mr. Baring1 told me privately
that he was surprised at my familiarity with
accounts. The truth was that I had been exceed-
ingly well " crammed," as the Cambridge students
say ; and I repeated my lesson fluently and
accurately.
Hume tried to put me out, and talked of
reducing 20,000 men from the vote, and of
regiments being commanded by boys ; and, when
convicted of extravagant statements, said, as usual
with him, " Well, I think so, and others think
differently ; that's all." I soon found that there
was no arguing with this gentleman. He was
like the bookseller's customer, who lost one of
a set of books, and could never be convinced
that he ought to find the volume, or buy the
whole set.2
February 18. — I went to the great dinner at
the Mansion House, given to Lord Grey and the
Ministers. The French Ambassador, Talleyrand,
was there with his niece; a wonderful-looking
man, apparently only half alive. He was a good
deal engrossed by talking and listening to Eoth-
1 Afterwards Lord Ashburton.
2 The story is told by Addison.
CHAP. XII. PROSPECTS OF THE REFORM BILL 183
schild — in his way, almost as extraordinary a 1832.
personage as the French Prince. Talleyrand's
health was proposed, and drunk with acclamation.
He rose and bowed, but did not say a word.
Lord Grey made a long speech, expressing his
determination to carry Reform, and saying he
did not consider failure, in that respect, as
possible.
February 20. — I had a good deal of conversation
with Lord Munster, whom I thought worth
listening to. He told me that the general opinion
at Court was that the Reform Bill would pass,
but that the Government would not last long ;
Joseph Hume would involve them in some of
his democratic schemes, which H.M. would not
tolerate. " He himself," Lord M. added, "had
been always a Reformer ; but he thought the Bill
had gone too far." I knew this gentleman pretty
well. He was a man of a certain amount of
capacity, with a good deal of active energy ;
but, as I understood from good authority, not
very manageable, nor calculated to lessen the
difficulties of his own position.
FROM DIARY.
February 21. — Lord Althorp and I went to
Lord Grey and discussed with him my project
for reduction of the force in the Colonies, and
one or two other minor reforms. Althorp agreed
with me beforehand that we should insinuate
our proposal gradually — begin with the smallest
184 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. item, and end with the reduction of the force,
to which we thought the great man would be the
most averse. We did so ; and it was amusing to
observe how we cajoled the good man for his
own good, and obtained his consent to do what
was right against his own inclination. He re-
quested me to go to Sir Herbert Taylor, and sound
him as to the abolition of the Riding Establish-
ment at St. John's Wood — a foolish pet child of
the Duke of York.
February 22. — I saw Sir Herbert Taylor, with
whom I had a long conversation on the Riding
Establishment, and agreed with him to remove
the School to Maidstone, if it could not be done
away with altogether.
I afterwards went to the King's first Levee.
It was very much crowded. The heads of the
Opposition party were there. The Duke of Wel-
lington read an address to His Majesty against
Reform. This unusual proceeding did not please
the King, and it made every one of our side very
angry. The Duke of Wellington looked worn
and ill.
I had a long conversation with Lord Durham,
who was again in the greatest alarm at the delay
in making Peers ; and says that with the King's
repeated consent to the measure, and without any
guarantee from the Harrowby and Wharncliffe
party, it is madness to hesitate. The Duke of
Sussex joined us, and held exactly the same
language. " Pray tell the King," said Lord
CHAP. XII. AT THE LEVEE 185
Durham. " I do," said the Duke; "and pray 1832.
tell Lord Grey," added H.R.H. "I have, and
it is no use," rejoined his Lordship. I begged
Lord Durham would let me know in time to save
myself, for as the coach was to be upset I should
certainly jump off first.
I could not help admiring the quantity of
fine equipages, and fine clothes, and smiling
faces; and almost all belonging to persons who
believe themselves, and perhaps are, on the
brink of destruction ; for that a great and deadly
struggle is at hand, no man can well doubt ; and
all those who do not feel horror at the creation
of Peers are equally alarmed at the consequences
of refusing to do so. I spoke to many on the
subject ; amongst them Lord Cleveland, who
owned to me he saw no security except in the
creation of Peers ; and he expressed most strongly
his anxiety that it should take place. Even
Lord, or rather Lady Stafford, holds the same
language.
February 24. — I went to Lord Hill and Lord
Pitzroy Somerset, and laid before them the project
of reduction of the forces which had been agreed
upon between Lord Althorp and myself. I felt
myself justified in declaring it to be a proposal,
not only of the War Office but of the Cabinet.
Coming away I thought it better to intimate
that the proposal should be considered quite
confidential.
February 26.— A letter from Lord Althorp telling
VOL. IV 24
186 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. me that I have pressed Lord Hill a little too far
in saying the King's Cabinet were determined
on the reduction, and that Lord Goderich com-
plained to Lord Grey of arrangements being
made without him who was the War Secretary
of State.
I was highly indignant at this letter, and an-
swered it most decisively, saying that to me
personally it was a matter of indifference what
reductions took place so long as I was not a
responsible Minister ; but that as to this par-
ticular recommendation I could not permit any
wrong notions to prevail as to my real position.
I said I considered myself merely the organ, not
the adviser of Ministers about the ensuing esti-
mates, merely holding my place as an excuse
for sitting on the Treasury Bench, and thereby
giving myself a chance of being useful to the
cause of Reform — my only object.
When I sent this letter I thought it not at all
improbable that Lord Grey might say that he
would not have any Secretary-at-War on those
terms ; and for this result I was not only prepared,
but I contemplated it with no small pleasure, for
though I will never desert these men so long
as they do not abandon their own cause, nor treat
me unfairly, still I should not, of course, be sorry
to have a real excuse for extricating myself from
a party whom I now find to be divided amongst
themselves, and beyond the salutary advice of
honest adherents.
CHAP. XII. ADDITIONAL MEMBERS FOR LONDON 187
I am quite sure that in the absorbing contem- 1832.
plation of their own interests, and whilst thinking
as they well may do how to save their own necks,
they do not bestow a thought upon a victim more
or less of their own projects for patching up their
power. They thought it a good thing for the
moment to prevail on me to be their Secretary-
at-War, but have never thought afterwards
whether I was to sink or swim. Indeed, Lord
Grey said to Althorp, " He (meaning me) will
be no worse off than myself and all of us."
Mighty fine ! I, who have had no share, either
of the enterprise or glory, if any, am to be over-
whelmed by the defeat, and the country too ! ! !
February 28. — We had a grand struggle to-
night on additional Members to the Metropolis.
It seems that a party headed by Lord George
Bentinck have been endeavouring to persuade
certain moderate reformers to concede this point,
in order to make the Bill more palatable to the
Lords, and thereby avoid making Peers. We
divided, and had a large majority of 80 against
the modification.
Our set were much pleased, perhaps without
reason, for if Lord Grey will not make Peers, and
if this majority widens the breach between the
middlemen and the Ministers, what is to become
of us in the Lords ? My own opinion, however,
is, that the stronger we send the Bill to the
Lords, the more sacrifices we can subsequently
make, and the less they will probably demand.
188 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. March 2. — Sir James Graham came to me about
our Mutiny Bills, and then talked of the position
of the Ministry. He was desponding. He said
not only Grey was faltering, but Brougham was
again sick, and even Althorp was not decided,
besides which others of the Cabinet were divided
against the creation of Peers. I said that the lives
of the Ministry, to say nothing of their properties,
would pay the penalty of a failure, and that
the country would not allow them to walk out
of office to their villas. He agreed with me,
and with that sort of half -laugh which men put
on when in alarm, talked of the revolution which
was inevitable -upon their retiring from office.
He told me he thought that Hardinge would
be against our supplementary Mutiny Bill ; but
I think Graham, being a man of stratagem him-
self, is too apt to suspect deep designs in others.
I repeated this conversation to Lord Althorp,
who replied, " Graham is always in the suds.
Brougham is not sick again ; when most calm
he is most determined. We shall do ; but come
to-morrow, and we will have the sequel of our
former conversation. ' '
March 3. — Went to Lord Althorp's. We had
a long conversation — not so encouraging as I had
expected from what he had said the day before.
It seems the King will allow them to make
fifty Peers ; that some doubts are entertained
whether such a creation would not cause some
of their own friends to vote against them; and
CHAP. XII. LORD ALTHORP'S DILEMMA 189
that this fear, as well as the repugnance to what
they consider a revolutionary coup d'etat, inclines
the majority of the Cabinet to risk the second
reading without making Peers, although, as yet,
they have nothing like conversions enough to
enable them to count upon success. They think
they gain friends, but they are not certain — a few
days would enable them to judge better of the
lists ; and, said Althorp, " I must decide what
I will do — resign, because my colleagues will not
make Peers, or stand the risk with them. If the
latter, and we are beaten, I can never show my
face again. If the former, I know the Govern-
ment is dissolved, and the Bill is lost, and perhaps
a revolution ensues.
" I tell you," added the excellent man, with
much feeling and earnestness, " I have long felt
that uncontrollable circumstances were advancing
me to a position to which my capacity is unequal ;
and I now feel that I have not the mind which
is required for a man in my station. I do not
allude to my conduct in Parliament. There,
I think, I have succeeded in a line altogether
new and untried before. I allude to my manage-
ment out of the House, and more especially in
consulting with my colleagues. Then I find I
have not character enough for the great emer-
gency out of which we are to extricate ourselves."
I told him that, if he threatened to resign
unless Peers were made before the second reading,
the Cabinet would yield. " I do not know that,"
190 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. said he ; " they would rather go out with me ;
and then comes a revolution " ; and he then added
gravely, " I do not know whether I ought not
to make matters easier by shooting myself."
" For God's sake ! " said I, " shoot anybody else
you like."
I told him that, "if he went out even without
his colleagues in the Cabinet, others would resign.
I would not stay an instant after he was gone;
nor would Poulett Thomson, nor Duncannon,
nor even Edward Ellice." "Exactly so," replied
Althorp, "and that is what I say — the Govern-
ment will be destroyed ; and, for all this, I shall
be responsible. Better to shoot myself ! " I
repeated " that I would lay my life that, if he
threatened to resign, his colleagues would yield."
He still hesitated. He said that they were all
agreed Peers should be made after the second
reading, if they wanted them in Committee ; but
they wished to run the risk of the second reading.
Erom this course he was, at present, averse,
because he confessed he did not see his way, nor
think that they had pledges enough to justify
such a risk ; yet he dreaded resignation as the
certain commencement of national ruin. He
added afterwards that he should think himself
justified in regarding his own security in pre-
ference to that of his colleagues ; and, conse-
quently, unless he saw what any man of ordinary
sense would call sufficient ground for being sure
that the second reading would pass without
CHAP. XII. DANGERS FROM BIRMINGHAM 191
creation of Peers, Peers should be made, or he
would resign, let what would come of it.
I urged every topic I could think of to induce
him to abide by this determination. I combated
the notion that making new Peers would disgust
old friends ; and I said that, if fifty Peers were
not enough to carry the Bill, I would make
seventy. I did not deny that the measure was
revolutionary ; but so was the Reform Bill, and
I would not be frightened by a word. I con-
fessed that, if I saw a certainty of carrying the
second reading without Peers, I should prefer so
doing; but, if the slightest doubt existed, not a
moment should be lost.
He seemed to agree with my view ; but added
that some in the Cabinet were afraid of Lord
Durham taking some violent step at once, and
resigning. I replied, I did not think he would
do any such thing ; he was too fond of office,
as also were several of his colleagues. Lord
Althorp remarked, I was right. Lord Althorp's
concluding remark on this part of the subject
was that his own impression was the Bill, some-
how or the other, would pass.
Before I left, I heard from him that Attwood of
Birmingham had been with him in a great fright
at the state of his town ; "so," continued Althorp,
" I was obliged to tell him all was safe." I con-
fessed that such an assurance was an awkward
addition to his difficulties. " Why, what could I
say ? " rejoined he. I owned that his position
192 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. was a very difficult one ; but still I could not
help thinking such an assurance would certainly
become public, and, if any mischief occurred,
would be quoted against him. I found that
Althorp thought our large majority on the Metro-
politan Members clause made a compromise more
difficult ; yet he was persuaded that, if the second
reading passed, the Bill was safe.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
I have been thus particular in recording this
conversation, nearly verbatim, in order to convey
some notion of the difficulties encountered by
Lord Grey's Cabinet in passing the Reform Bill ;
and, more particularly, to give credit to him to
whom most credit was due for accomplishing that
great work. Lord Althorp was Chancellor of the
Exchequer and Leader of the House of Commons ;
but he was something more — being possessed of
the unlimited confidence of the great majority of
the House of Commons, to say nothing of his well-
earned reputation throughout the whole country.
It is true that he was powerfully assisted in debate
by Lord John Russell and Mr. Stanley ; but he
was the mainstay of Lord Grey's Government, and
subsequent events proved how much importance
was attached to his personal influence.
This same evening I presided at a public dinner
of officers of the Army and Navy, met to inaugu-
rate a new Society for maintaining a Library,
Reading-room, and Museum for the use of the
CHAP. XII. LANGUAGE IN PARLIAMENT 193
armed professions. The day went off well, and
the guests seemed pleased with their chairman.
But here, again, I could not help contrasting my
position with my political opinions ; and I felt it
would require much address, and more good for-
tune, to come out of the furnace unsinged. I
think the best plan would be to pass through
the fire, like the conjurers, as quickly as possible.
March 5. — Very hard words passed between
Mr. Croker and Mr. Ewart in the House to-day.
The latter told the former that his accuracy
could be equalled only by his modesty and
humility. Mr. Croker retorted, and defended him-
self against what he called the " low calumny "
of his antagonist. I rose to stop him, and Stanley
afterwards made up the difference.
I give this as a specimen of the language
occasionally used in the unreformed House of
Commons, as I read in some publication a most
audacious assertion of the inferiority in good
manners and decent behaviour of the Parliaments
chosen since the passing of the Reform Bill.
FROM DIARY.
March 7. — I went to Lord Grey to settle about
Army Reductions. After some talk about the best
way of reducing Colonial forces, he said, " Upon my
honour, I think we cannot reduce any of our force,
and that gets rid of our difficulties." To be sure ;
nothing so simple! I pocketed my papers, and
Stanley being announced, took my leave.
VOL. iv 25
194 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. Another agreeable occurrence : I am sent to
Lord Hill to propose a reduction of five thousand
men. He hands to Lord Grey a counter project.
After a fortnight's delay, Lord Grey gives up his
reduction altogether, and thus takes part with
his enemy the Commander-in-Chief against his
friend the Secretary-at-War, leaving me discom-
fited in my efforts to do him and the country a
service.
I told Lord Althorp that under any other than
the present circumstances I would not remain in
office an hour on such conditions ; but poor Lord
Grey was evidently thinking of his Eeform and
his Irish Tithes, and was glad to get rid of his
Army Estimates at any terms.
March 10. — Lord Althorp asked me to walk
home to Downing Street with him, " in order,"
said he, " to talk de summa rerum" This was the
only time I ever heard him use a Latin phrase.
He told me that he had laboured hard to
prevail on the Cabinet to create Peers, as the
only safe mode of accomplishing their great
object ; for, if they proposed making fifty Peers,
and the King refused, and they went out, and the
Eill was lost — they, however, would not be lost,
nor the country convulsed, and Eeform would
come by their return to power; also, if they
made fifty Peers, and yet were overpowered in
the Lords, just the same result would follow,
for the country would stand by them, and the
Eill be carried finally. But if they were beaten
CHAP. XII. CHARACTER OR COUNTRY 195
in the Lords, without making Peers, everything
would be lost — the Bill, their character, and the
country too.
To this the opponents in the Cabinet reply
that, they have a moral certainty of carrying the
second reading of the Bill by 14 to 20 majority,
and after that, Peers, if wanted, might be created.
This did not satisfy Lord Althorp, nor Brougham,
who certainly acts with Althorp. Then comes the
question, should Althorp resign ? He has ascer-
tained that his threat to do so would not induce
the others to make Peers, it would only make
them resign ; then would follow the loss of the
Bill, and perhaps a convulsion in the country.
" But," said Althorp, (( my own character would
undoubtedly be saved. However," he continued,
" a man under certain circumstances ought to
sacrifice his character for the sake of his country."
I said, of course he ought, but then he should
be sure that his country was to be the gainer,
and I did not see how that would be the
case now.
Althorp evidently agreed with my view of the
question, but showed he did not know how to
extricate himself from his individual difficulties.
He said that on any other question than this he
should say that Government had a certainty of
success, but on this his mind misgave him. He
should, however, insist on some demonstration in
the House of Lords previously to the second read-
ing, in order to be sure who were going to vote
196 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. with them. He added that a day or two would
decide what was to he done, and he would let
me know immediately.
We then turned to other topics, and Lord
Althorp observed to me that no Administration
could stand against an Opposition of 250 Members,
organised as our antagonists were, and ready to
vote factiously on every occasion, and that nothing
hut a dissolution after the passing of the Reform
Bill could save them.
We then had a conversation on my office. He
agreed with me that, if the Bill passed, a thorough
reform should take place in the management of
the Army; and that no man of honour or inde-
pendence would consent to he Secretary-at-War
without it.
Althorp told me hefore that, when the Whigs
came in, he wanted Parnell to be Chief Lord
Commissioner of the Treasury. Parnell wrote
back that there was only one place he could
take, and that was Chancellor of the Exchequer.
"Now," said Althorp, "to write this to the
Chancellor of the Exchequer was a little too
much." I think so.
I went away pondering on my own position,
whether I ought to resign now, for I see the Bill is
to be risked, which is not the condition on which I
came into office. I think my character is at stake.
How am I to save it in the general wreck ? It
may be selfish to think so much about it, never-
theless I do think of it daily and nightly.
CHAP. XII. FLOGGING IN THE ARMY 197
I dined at Lansdowne House. Lord Plunket 1832.
there ; silent, and rather sulky, at least looking
so. He told me he supposed the Bill was safe.
Lady Charlemont and Lady Kenmare there also,
each of them, though in different ways, looking
very beautiful.
March 11. — The Duke of Wellington sent me
an Essay on flogging soldiers. It seemed to me
very well written. He says the British soldier
must be the best in the world, meaning, I presume,
that there is a sort of moral necessity for this
superiority, not that it is inevitable from physical
circumstances that he should be so.
I am striving hard with Lord Hill to modify
military punishment, and as I cannot do away
with flogging, at least to put it under strict
regulations.
March 12. — I asked Ellice what he thought
of our chances for the second reading in the
Lords without Peers. He tossed up his glove
and said, Just this. On which I said that in that
case I conceived the Administration was mad.
March 13. — Went to Lord Durham, who had
sent to see me very urgently.
He told me the story of his division with his
Cabinet friends on Sunday, and read to me four
resolutions which he had moved on that occasion;
the first three declaratory of the insufficiency
and unsatisfactory calculation for the majority
on the second reading, and the fourth declaring
the necessity for an immediate creation of Peers.
198 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. He said that the majority of the Cabinet agreed
with him in the first three propositions, hut was
not prepared to go out upon them. However,
when the Duke of Richmond insisted upon going
to the vote, all were against the motion, and he
stood alone. He showed me the paper on which
the pencil marks were made. On this he resolved
to resign, and had written a letter to Lord Grey ;
hut in the meantime came a member of the
Cabinet, no other than Lord John Russell, and
said that if Lord Durham went out, he would
resign also. Seeing that the Cabinet would be
broken up and Reform certainly lost, Lord Durham
resolved to remain in office.
Then he told me that this was the dark side
of the picture, but there was a brighter. He
did really think that the second reading would
be carried. His course had done good ; even
Palmerston had declared he would stand by the
franchise. Goderich had assured him that the
Metropolitan Members should not be given up,
and Lansdowne also; moreover, all were agreed
upon making Peers after the second reading, if
necessary. The majority is expected to be twelve.
The King is bestirring himself, which he did not
do before.
Brougham is ill and out of sorts. He used
to laugh and play off Palmerston and his speeches,
now he sits silent.
Lord Durham showed me the letter which the
King wrote to Lord Grey when he agreed to
CHAP. XII. LORD DURHAM AND THE KING 199
dissolve the late Parliament, verbosa et grandis, 1832.
stating all his objections, and consenting only
because he thought a change of Ministry pre-
judicial to England and to Europe, merely as
change. He expressed that he had the same
regret to see the Duke of Wellington go out
of office. There was a civility and kindness,
and approbation of Lord Grey's conduct, but
still no great regard shown ; and the King
positively enjoined Lord Grey to take care that
there should be no stronger Reform Bill than
before, no violence tolerated, and Ireland was
to be kept quiet.
Lord Grey employed Lord Durham to write
his answer, which he showed me. It was very
well done, and bound the King to Reform in
as civil and respectful terms as possible. Lord
Grey seems to have thought much of the letter,
for in a note to Lord Durham he calls it
"perfect."
Durham told me that the King had never
forgiven him a letter written on the subject of
dissolution, shown by Sir H. Taylor to His
Majesty. The King never speaks to him at
Council, all which he bears, he says, for love
of the cause.
Lord John Russell called at the War Office,
and talked an hour with me on the same subject
as that with Lord Durham. I told him my mind
freely, and also what I thought of Lord Grey
and some of his colleagues, to which he more
200 LONDON CHAP. XII.
1832. than half assented. He agreed that, if they were
defeated, the least that would happen would be
" eternal infamy " for them ; but, added he, " you
are on velvet." "Yes," I said, "I should be
reckoned only a dupe."
I collected nothing satisfactory from him except
that his impression was the Bill would pass the
second reading. At any rate, he thought Reform
safe even if the Ministry went out, for no anti-
Heforming party would control the present House
of Commons.
The Tories are now convinced that Reform is
inevitable ; and one of them said to Lord Durham
to-day, that it was no use throwing out this
Bill, for if they did another would be brought
in on a more extended basis by Sir J. Hobhouse.
CHAPTER XIII
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
March. — In those days Ministers had much to
contend with beyond their Parliamentary diffi-
culties. For example, the letters of several active
politicians were opened at foreign Courts, particu-
larly at Paris ; and, if they contained anything
the authorities thought worth communicating,
were copied and sent to London. One copy was
always sent to His Majesty, another to the
Prime Minister, and another to the Home Secre-
tary. One of Joseph Hume's letters was thus
forwarded in triplicate. The imprudent man
wrote of the Reform Bill as being a good measure
so far as it went, and as certain of producing a
better, accompanied by the destruction of our
Church Establishment. This angered King
William exceedingly, and did not add to his
attachment to the Grey Cabinet.
FROM DIARY.
March 14. — I went to the Levee, and after-
wards had an audience of the King. Received
very civilly indeed. After some talk he ordered
me to remove the Riding Establishment to the
VOL. iv 201 26
202 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Maidstone Depot. We then talked about Sand-
hurst. He agreed with me that it ought to pay
its own expenses, hut when he heard that the
Duke of Wellington and the Board, who have
heen inquiring into this subject, were against
that plan being carried entirely into effect, he
told me to settle the question with Lord Hill,
saying that he was glad to find that we agreed
so well together.
I spoke to him as freely as I thought decent,
and told him that, although the objections to these
establishments might rise from prejudice, and
although the saving would be small, yet it would
be advisable to give way where concession would
not be injurious to the service. The King said
certainly, and the saving, however little, would
show the inclination of Government to be
economical. He told me that he was for in-
creasing rather than diminishing the establish-
ments in question, but not at the public expense.
I ventured to say that I should want every
assistance which His Majesty might afford to
me, and I hoped that in any amicable contest
with the Horse Guards His Majesty would support
his Secretary-at-War. The King said nothing,
but did not appear displeased.
Prom what I have seen of the manners of the
King, not to me personally, but to others, my
impression is that he does not like his present
Ministers.
Lord Hill and I had some talk after the Levee.
CHAP. XIII. THE ETTRICK SHEPHERD 203
He showed the report of the Duke of Wellington's 1832,
board. I said since His Grace had been so good
as to settle this estimate for me, I presented my
respectful compliments to him and requested him
to arrange all the rest for me. The Commander-
in-Chief looked a little red, and did not relish
the joke.
This night, in the Commons, we got through
the Committee on the Reform Bill, and fixed the
third reading for the following Monday.
March 16. — Lord Althorp tells me that a friend
of his has seen a letter from Lord Mansfield to
a correspondent in Paris, in which was this
expression : " The Bill will be carried by a very
small majority, which will be the less of two
evils ; as rejecting it would cause a convulsion."
March 17. — Dined at S.S.B.S., where I met
Mr. Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd. He was a
good-natured, broad, and sandy-faced man, sang
his own songs, and made excellent whisky-
punch.
Macleod of Macleod was at this party, and
he told me of the poetical Shepherd, that he
met Sir Robert Peel at dinner at his (Macleod's)
house, and said, " Faith ! Sir Robert, I heard
you praised by both sides the other night ; I hope
you are not going to rat ! " Peel did not like
it at all. Afterwards Peel asked Hogg if he
had ever been in the House of Commons ? Hogg
said he had ; but he had never heard those whom
he wanted to hear — he had never heard Sir Robert
204 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Peel. On this Peel smiled, and said he would
take him down that evening, and would speak ;
on which Hogg replied, " Thankye, no ; this is a
wetter table than yours."
Hogg seemed to me to be a simple, funny
fellow, and, on the occasion before alluded to, he
told Sir Robert Peel it was of no use his sitting
to oppose the Reform Bill any longer, " it looked
just like ill-nature."
March 19. — At House of Commons, where third
reading of the Reform Bill came on.
March 23. — The third reading of our Bill passed
in a very thin House, amidst no cheers, at about
one o'clock in the morning.
March 24. — Dining at Holland House, I found
my Lady, in spite of our large majority, in very
low spirits. She quite agreed with me on the
probability of defeat ; and said that Lord Holland
had been for decisive measures from first to last,
that the King was as true as true could be, and
that the timidity of Lord Grey was unaccountable.
Even if all went according to promise, Lady
Holland said there could not be more than 8
majority.
Lord Holland repeated all my Lady had said-
regretted that twenty Peers had not been made at
Christmas ; but even now Lord Grey persists in
saying that by making sixty Peers he runs more
risk of defeat than by not making one.
Lord Holland remarked that the prorogation
was clearly to be used only on great occasions,
CHAP. XIII. AT KENSINGTON PALACE 205
but this was the occasion. It was the sword of 1832.
Goliath to be taken from the Temple1 once in
a century perhaps. He said he was sure the King
was vexed that he had not been called upon to
strike the blow; he liked such lively demon-
strations of power, and he disliked the Tories.
Both these facts I never heard before, if facts
they be. The whole of this conversation was very
unsatisfactory to me. I am sure the Cabinet
anticipate defeat.
Lady Holland was peculiarly earnest, not to
say pathetic: "My dear H." and " Dear H." at
every sentence, and " Oh that we could retrace
our steps." We agreed to put a good face on
the matter, and so were merry as before. In the
meantime the Tories predict that we shall beat
them, which is more frightful still, for this was
their cry last time.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
March 26. — I dined at Kensington Palace with
the Duchess of Kent. The party was numerous :
Lord Durham, Lord and Lady Surrey, the Duke
of Somerset and Lady C. St. Maur, Lord Radnor,
Sir John Sebright, the Duke and Duchess of
Leinster, and Sir John Conroy. The Princess
1 No doubt the tabernacle is meant (see 1 Sam. xxi. 8, 9). David
applied to Ahimelech at Nob for shewbread, and also for arms.
And Ahimelech answered, "The sword of Goliath the Philistine,
whom thou slewest in the valley of Elah, behold, it is here wrapped
in a cloth behind the ephod : if thou wilt take that, take it : for there
is no other save that here. And David said, There is none like that ;
give it me."
206 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Victoria sat on her mother's right hand. Sir
John Conroy, the Controller of H.R.H.'s house-
hold, sat at the bottom of the table. Lord
Durham handed the Duchess in to dinner.
The young Princess was treated in every respect
like a grown-up woman, although apparently
quite a child. Her manners were very pleasing
and natural, and she seemed much amused by
some conversation with Lord Durham, a manifest
favourite at Kensington.1
After dinner the Duchess of Kent came up to
me in the drawing-room, and talked to me about
her daughter. H.R.H. said "it was a most
anxious charge. She did her best, and hoped
that her expectations would not be disappointed."
I took the liberty of saying that the nation looked
up to her, and that, from the success which
apparently had attended her previous endeavours,
there was every reason to hope that her daughter
would be everything that England could desire.
The Duchess asked me if I did not think the
Princess like the Royal Family ? I replied that
the upper part of her face was like that of the
Princess Charlotte, but the mouth and chin of
a better shape.
When she left the company she curtsied
1 An interval of thirty-three years, a reign of twenty-eight years —
some of them in very difficult if not dangerous times — and the
greatest of all calamities that can befall a woman and a Queen,
have not deprived her of the smile, the kind and gracious smile,
which charmed me in those long by-gone days, and with which
she received an old subject and servant only two days ago. (B.,
May 15, 1865.)
CHAP. XIII. THE PRINCESS VICTORIA 207
round very prettily to all the guests, and then 1832.
ran out of the room. What will become of
this young, pretty, unaffected child in a few,
few years ?
I was present this afternoon in the House of
Lords when Lord John Russell brought up the
Reform Bill. The new gallery was crowded with
ladies, the Throne covered with Members. The
body of the House was tolerably full ; but the
interest was nothing like so great as when the
first Bill was brought up, nor did Russell put it
into the Lord Chancellor's hands with a solemn
speech, as before.
Lords Harrowby and Wharncliffe made their
declaration of voting for the second reading ; and
they confessed that the country contained no
party prepared for a total rejection of the
measure. The Bishop of London made a bolder
and a better speech. He said he should have
voted for the second reading of that Bill, and he
should vote for the second reading of this Bill;
also that he would not, in Committee, propose
any change that would affect the principle of the
Bill. Lord Carnarvon made an angry speech
against Lord Harrowby; and then Lord Grey
made an excellent speech — temperate, but deter-
mined, and in his best manner. He fixed
Thursday week for the second reading. The
Duke of Wellington spoke shortly this evening,
and said he should oppose the second reading.
March 28. — I called on Lord Althorp. He had
208 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. just returned from the Levee. 6f It is all right/'
said he ; " the King will do it. If we are beaten
the Parliament will be prorogued, and we shall
make eighty Peers the next day. The Cabinet
are unanimous on that point." I wished him joy,
and told him " that now, indeed, they were on
velvet." He agreed that they were, and he added
that " His Majesty was much pleased at not being
pressed to make Peers before the second reading."
I remarked that this did not correspond with
what Lord Holland had told me. I then learnt
that Lord Holland had not much influence with
the King, notwithstanding their family connection ;
and I afterwards heard from good authority that
no one of the Cabinet had much influence with
His Majesty except Lord Grey.
March 30. — I brought in my Mutiny Bill, and
the next day read it a second time.
April 2. — We went into Committee on the
Mutiny Bill. Mr. Hunt — the Mr. Hunt — moved
to leave out what he called corporeal punishment
from the Bill. I felt very uncomfortable, but
resolved to tell the exact truth ; which I did
by saying that I was as much against flogging
in the Army as ever ; that all the authorities I
had consulted were on the other side ; and that,
as I did not frame the Mutiny Bill, I could
not help the continuance of the practice.
Sir Henry Hardinge followed me, saying I was,
" as Secretary-at-War, responsible Minister for the
Mutiny Bill and Articles of War." This got up a
CHAP. XIII. THE NUMBER OF NEW PEERS 209
cheer against me, and, truth to tell, I felt in a
very unpleasant predicament, which I had foreseen
when I took office ; for, though I was not the
framer of the Mutiny Bill, I was the Minister
officially bound to defend it, and, if I could not
defend it, I was hound to give up my office.
Strange to say, Hunt, either from indifference
or generosity, did not press his motion to a vote,
and I was " quitte pour la peur." I hardly knew
how I could have brought myself to vote against
him.
April 4. — The King now hesitates about making
the requisite number of Peers, and said he never
meant an unlimited number, and thought twenty-
five would be enough, yet His Majesty certainly
empowered Lord Grey to show to Lords Harrowby
and Wharncliffe a letter from him to Lord Grey
in which the power of making Peers, without
any stated limit, was given to him. Lord Althorp
confessed to me that he did not understand the
King to have had any reserve on this point ; but,
said Althorp, " Kings are kings, even the best
of them."
We then recurred to the old topic. Lord
Althorp thought the second reading would be
carried by a small majority ; but Ministers would
be beaten on the first clause, where fifty- six
boroughs were condemned to be disfranchised.
On being beaten, they would propose to make
sixty Peers — the King would refuse ; they would
resign. Sir R. Peel would come in, and would
VOL. iv 27
210 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. propose a moderate Reform Bill, which they
would support. By this process he thought no
serious damage would be done to the character
of the Whig Party, and something would be
gained for the cause of Reform. I disagreed
with this view, and told him that the People
would not understand why, when they had the
power, they did not make a sufficient number of
Peers; for this could not be explained without
a reference to the wishes and conduct of the
King.
Lord J. Russell called, and we had a talk on
the Bill. He agreed that our prospects were
gloomy, but said very truly that, as the Govern-
ment had not carried their measure by force,
they ought not to hesitate about concession. It
would be foolish to go out because they were
beaten on the number of boroughs, which Althorp
thought ought to be the test.
April 5. — Dining with Sir Francis Burdett,
I met Prince Czartoryski, and another Pole, a
patriot and a poet, whose name I did not hear
distinctly. The Prince was one of the most
attractive men I ever met ; he had an air of
noble resignation, which never deserted him in
any emergency. The poet was a lively old man
of very engaging manners.
We had some conversation on Cutlar Per-
gusson's1 proposed debate on Polish affairs. I
1 Robert Cutlar Fergusson, Judge- Advocate-General, M.P. for
Kirkcudbright.
CHAP. XIII. THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON 211
thought it right to mention that neither the
Parliament nor the public took much interest
in foreign affairs, except so far as they, affected
the funds. The Prince seemed to agree with
me, and said we wanted the will more than
the power to hefriend the Poles.
He called on me the next day, and he seemed
much surprised to find that any apprehensions
were entertained about carrying our Reform Bill.
He also assured me that the English had not
an adequate opinion on their own European
influence. I confessed that I was not aware of
that deficiency in their character.
April 7. — This was to me a memorable day,
for, dining at our S.S.B.S., I heard from Lord
Saltoun a most interesting account of the exploits
of the Guards at Hougoumont, and of the battle
of Waterloo towards the close of that great day ;
and, being at the Speaker's Levee in the evening,
I was introduced to the Duke of Wellington.
He was most kind, and encouraged me to talk
about his sporting pursuits, and the falls he had
had hunting. I could not help congratulating
him on looking so well, and told him that he
would want all his health for the campaign of
next week, when the Reform battle was to be
fought. He laughed, and said, " Oh, our House
is not so bad as yours ; we call half-past nine
late."
April 8. Sunday. — A large party dined with
me : Lord Hill, Lord Pitzroy Somerset, Sir James
212 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Kempt, Sir Willoughby Gordon, Sir John Mac-
donald, Lord Althorp, Duke of Leinster, Prince
Cimitile, Mr. Vanderweyer, my friend Methuen,
Lord Killeen, and Macaulay. It was a sort of
official dinner, and, as the saying is, went off
pretty well.
Sunday dinners were not then reckoned
sinful.
April 9. — I went to the House of Lords, and
heard part of Lord Grey's speech introducing our
Reform Bill, and commenting on the Duke of
Buckingham's fine project for Reform, which is
not likely to allure a single soul. On Tuesday
I went again to the Lords, and heard the Duke
of Wellington declare in favour of some Reform.
The King came to London this day, in order
to be in readiness to prorogue Parliament if the
Bill should he lost, so they said; and Lord
Althorp again told me, "All was right." But
the concluding sentences of Lord Grey's speech
the day before were rather desponding.
April 11. — I went to the Lords, and heard the
continuation of the adjourned debate. Phillpotts
of Exeter made a most furious harangue in
opposition. Lord Durham answered his speech
the next day, charging him with telling untruths
and speaking pamphleteering slang. Phillpotts
spoke again, and charged the Government with
being connected with the Times newspaper. Lord
Grey disclaimed this, and accused the Bishop of
slander and want of charity.
CHAP. XIII. VICTORY IN THE LORDS 213
PROM DIARY.
April 13. — I went into the Lords, and heard
Lord Carnarvon. The House was not so full as
on the last Reform Bill discussions, and the speak-
ing was not so lively ; indeed, I thought it much
more dull. There were many ladies in the gallery,
and many Members of our House on the steps
of the Throne and at the Bar. Sir James Graham
and Stanley were amongst them, more anxious-
looking, I thought, than became Cabinet Ministers.
This certainly was a most momentous occasion,
it must be confessed; but, personally, I cannot
say I felt the least anxiety, for to tell the truth
I should not dislike a decent excuse for quitting
my absurd office. However, the rejection of the
Bill would be most calamitous for England and
all Europe.
April 14 — At breakfast we heard newsmen
crying something, and shortly after I heard that
the second reading had been carried by nine.
Well done Lord Althorp's calculations ; and well
done Lord Grey's adherence to his own persuasion
that he could safely risk this great struggle
without a creation of Peers !
The division took place at twenty-five minutes
to seven this morning. For second reading :
Contents. Non-contents.
Present . . 128 126
Proxies 56 49
184 175
214 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
Every one was in high spirits. Lord Grey was
extolled as the boldest and best of statesmen,
and certain to hold office for life. Seeing Lord
Melbourne, I congratulated him on the triumph
of the second reading. He said it had been a
most nervous moment. He did not think that
all was over yet. I told him I thought that
having weathered the great storm the rest of
the voyage would or ought to be prosperous ;
also that they ought not to be pertinacious about
the clauses in Committee, for let the Lords
mutilate the Bill as they pleased, it would still
be ten times more radical than Lord Brougham's
scheme in 1830.
I hear Lord Grey's concluding address was
splendid, and most forcible at the conclusion.
He seemed to rise with the occasion. The report
made him very lofty and energetic ; but at the
same time, very prudent, for he is evidently
preparing for some concession about the £10
franchise or to the schedules.
EB.OM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
This day Prince Czartoryski and his poetical
friend dined with me ; I asked Warburton, Shiel,
Hudson Gurney, George Sinclair, Bickersteth,
and Ronald Ferguson to meet them. I attempted
to convince them that the English are not the
sort of people which the writers in reviews and
newspapers represent them to be — i.e. are not
eager to sympathise with, at least not to fight for,
CHAP. XIII. HUME AND THE WHIGS 215
the friends of liberty in other countries. They 1832.
would hardly believe me ; and when I told them
that I did not think Cutlar Fergusson's speech
in the ensuing week would produce much effect,
N. said, " Oh, give us a few * hear, hears,' at
least ; it will be some encouragement to us."
The patriot poet was a most interesting old man
of seventy-four years old, but with all the
liveliness of youth.
Lady Julia, who dined with us, being some-
what better, said very truly that it was impossible
to look at these men without feeling a mournful
interest in them which is too painful for mixed
society.
April 16. — At House of Commons. Joseph
Hume, in a speech on Brazilian aggressions,
said that, since the Whigs had been in office,
the British flag had been disgraced in every
quarter of the world. I often thought that
this man was totally careless about his own
assertions, as well as what had been said or
done by others. This appeared to me strange
enough in any politician ; but, in a man of long
experience, and much reputation, and very
high popular position, I thought it totally
inexplicable.
EROM DIARY.
April 18. — At the Levee. The King paid
marked attention to the Duke of Wellington,
the Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Rosslyn,
216 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. and, in short, to the anti-Reformers. Our friends
seemed out of sorts. Nevertheless, when I spoke
to Althorp this evening in the House of Commons,
he said that there was no cause for despondency,
and I have heard that Lord Grey is in good
spirits. However, that something has happened
at headquarters I feel sure, and the Tories begin
to lift up their heads again.
The House of Commons adjourned to the 7th
of May.
April 24. — The Cholera killing its thousands
at Paris ; here it is nearly extinct.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
May 3. — I presided at a dinner of the Literary
Pund Club, where one of the guests was Sir
John Swinburne, a well-known traveller and a
remarkable man. He told us one or two curious
stories, which I thought worth recording. He
was travelling to Berlin in the year 1786, when
a Prench gentleman, whose carriage had broken
down, asked for a seat with him. Sir John
consented : a large, round, pock-marked, powdered
beau, in silk stockings dirtied to the ankles and
a white handkerchief tied round his head, entered
the carriage, and keep up a most agreeable con-
versation with him for the remainder of the
journey. This was Mirabeau, going on the secret
mission to Berlin of which he published so curious
an account. Whilst at Berlin Sir John Swinburne
soon heard that Mirabeau, notwithstanding all
CHAP. XIII. ANECDOTES OF LORD TOWNSHEND 217
his adroitness and pretending to be a persecuted
man, had been found out by Prince Henry, who
told Swinburne that the Frenchman was a spy.
He borrowed £50 of Swinburne, in order to
keep up the farce, although his pockets were
full of money. After all, he did not accomplish
his main object of giving the first intelligence
of the death of Frederick ; for the gates were
closed, and a rocket gave the first signal of the
event, which was passed on to Paris.
Sir John told two anecdotes of Lord Townshend,
when Lord Lieutenant of Ireland. At one of his
dinners at the Castle, a notorious Jacobite was
sitting next to him when he gave the King's
health, and, speaking to his neighbour, said, " Not
your King, but my King." The Jacobite, not the
least disconcerted, turned to the gentleman next
to him, saying, " Pass the Lord Lieutenant's
toast, 'The King— not your King, but my King.' '
Another story : Lord Townshend at dinner one
day observed a very ugly man, a Major in the
Army, sitting at the bottom of the table. He took
a card, and drew a caricatured likeness of the
Major. This was handed from guest to guest
until it reached the ofiicer, who very quietly
turned the card, and, drawing a likeness of the
Lord Lieutenant, had it handed up to him. Lord
Townshend the next day sent for the gentleman,
and, finding he was a meritorious officer, pro-
moted him.
May 7. — Parliament resumed its sittings. This
VOL. iv 28
218 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
was the period of the crisis which was to deter-
mine the fate of the Grey Government and their
Reform Bill.
FROM DIARY.
May 7. — The streets were placarded :
"Seventh of May,
Crisis Day"—
alluding to the debate in the Lords on committal
of the Reform Bill.
I went to the House of Lords, and heard that
Lord Lyndhurst had proposed to take the enfran-
chisement clauses of the Bill before the dis-
franchisement clauses ; and that Lord Grey had
declared such a course would be fatal to the Bill ;
that Lords Harrowby, Wharncliffe, and others
had declared in favour of Lyndhurst ; and that
Ministers would be in a minority of 20 or 25 at'
the least. Nothing was more unexpected than
this news.
A great many friends supposed that a creation
of Peers was now inevitable ; indeed, even the
other side held the same language, and seemed
afraid of their certain victory. The House
divided, and, for the first time, I saw the division :
Lyndhurst 151 ; Ministers 116.
Lord Grey then postponed the further con-
sideration of the Bill until Thursday. Of this
Lord Ellenborough complained, and said he was
willing to admit the disfranchisement of 113
seats, and that he preferred household suffrage
CHAP. XIII. RESIGNATION OF THE GOVERNMENT 219
to the £10 qualification. This disclosure of the
intention of the Tories to come in, and carry
Whig Reform, drew forth a hurst of eloquence
from Lord Grey, who was loudly cheered by our
friends, and then the House adjourned. I told
several friends that Ministers were out. No one
would believe me, but insisted that the King
would create Peers. I told my wife with great
glee, so far as I was concerned, that the Admi-
nistration was at an end, for it had been beaten,
and would resign.
May 8. Tuesday. — I packed up my papers at
the War Office to be ready for a start, for I felt
sure all was over. At half-past two Lords Grey
and Brougham went to the King at Windsor,
with a proposal to create a sufficient number of
Peers. Graham and Stanley and all seemed in
good spirits, and said that, if the Tories had been
paid for it, they could not have acted more for
the country and the character of the Ministers.
They did not seem to be sure, or indeed to care
much, about the result of the proposal.
Lord Dover told me that Lord Grey had hesi-
tated about proposing to make Peers, and preferred
offering to resign. At last he was persuaded to
take the other line.
May 9. Wednesday. — Whilst I was getting up
I received a note from Lord Durham marked
" Immediate." It contained these words : " Half-
past nine. The King has refused to make Peers,
and has accepted our resignation."
220 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
J832. After breakfast I went to Lord Durham's, and
he showed me the note just arrived from Lord
Grey. " Dear Lambton, the King has accepted
our resignations. Ever yours, G."
We went to the Levee together. The only
person, almost, to whom the King said nothing
at the entree Levee was the Duke of Wellington.-
The Duke of Richmond and Lord John Russell,
standing by me, remarked it ; and said the King
was wretched, and angry with the Duke of
Wellington. I said, " Just the contrary ; I would
bet anything the Duke was Prime Minister."
I talked with all the honest resigners, and
shook hands with Lord Grey most warmly. He
said to me, " I could do nothing else ; the Bill
was taken out of my hands ; I was no longer
Minister." We were all very merry, for undone
dogs, as we were ; and, when the Levee was over,
the question was, what was the formality of
resignation ? No one seemed to know ; but, at
last, we were told that the King would see only
those of the Cabinet who had particular business
with him. Lords Grey, Lansdowne, Goderich,
Palmerston, Duke of Richmond, and Lord Althorp
went in one by one ; and the Lord Chancellor
came so late that some thought he was not
coming at all. I was told that the King was
very gracious, and wept, taking leave of Pal-
merston and Goderich, if not of others. He
pressed Brougham and the Duke of Richmond
to stay in office. The Duke of Richmond told
CHAP. XIII. POLITICIANS AT BROOKS's 221
me that he had got nothing by being in office,
except the entree for his two carriages. Lord
John Eussell told me he had been treated, before
the Levee, with marked disrespect by the King,
who did not speak to him, nor ask him to come
in after the Levee. Nothing was known at Court
about the new arrangements ; but it appeared
that Lord Lyndhurst was sent for after the
Levee.
The House of Commons was very full. Ebrington
gave notice of a call of the House, and an Address
to the Crown, for the next day.
We adjourned, and I went to the Lords, where
Lord Carnarvon was abusing Lord Grey for
deserting the King!! Lord Grey made a very
spirited answer, saying he would not consent to
be the shadow of a Minister.
There was a great meeting at Brooks's, to con-
sider Ebrington's Address. I had spoken to him
about it, begging that it might be of a good
decisive character, and that his speech would
correspond with it. I told him, and Althorp
too, that I did not approve of preaching patience,
nor complimenting the King upon his conduct.
Althorp replied that nothing should make him
implicate the King.
I find the meeting at Brooks's was considered
satisfactory. Ebrington, at first, proposed a
milk-and-water Address, which was much im-
proved upon.
May 10. Thursday. — Ebrington introduced his
222 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. motion with a good strong speech. Baring made
a clever, unfair speech, and moved the negative,
calling on Lord Althorp to tell what his advice
to the King had been. Althorp rose, and, in
the most impressive manner, plainly and reso-
lutely, said that Baring knew what the advice
had been ; but, if he wished to be told, it was
this : to create a sufficient number of Peers to
carry the Reform Bill, in an efficient form,
through the other House of Parliament.
Here the most tremendous cheers burst from
all quarters of the House, and lasted louder and
longer than I ever recollect to have heard ;
indeed, the spirit of the Reformers was up
during the whole debate, and evidently cowed
the other side, and gave the lie to the rumour
of our apostacy.
Peel was very feeble, and felt it, as did the
House ; he said nothing about Reform. O'Connell
handled him roughly. Macaulay made a good
speech ; but, as Burdett said, too like Coach-
makers' Hall. We then divided, thinking we
had a majority of at least a hundred ; but we
came in 288, the numbers inside being 208. The
Opposition, particularly Lord Chandos, cheered as
if they had gained a victory ; and Sir Richard
Vyvyan, amidst the laughter of us and ours,
talked of the smallness of our majority. We
went away, well pleased, about twelve o'clock.
May 11. Friday.— Rumours that Peel and the
Duke of Wellington are in negotiation with
CHAP. XIII. THE NEW GOVERNMENT 223
Lord Lyndhurst ; the greatest possible excitement 1332.
prevailing everywhere. A large Westminster
meeting at Crown and Anchor, and meetings in
the City. At House of Commons very sharp
debates on presenting petitions, and everything
announcing some crisis. The Duke of Wellington
said to be Minister.
May 12. Saturday. — For a short time at W.O.
[War Office]. Sir James Graham called out
under the window that everything was settled,
and that the Duke of Wellington was Minister ;
Baring Chancellor of the Exchequer; Murray,
Hardinge, etc., in office; and Parliament to be
dissolved on Monday.
I went to Lord Grey, and saw him for a short
time. He spoke to me about his resignation,
and seemed very much affected by the tributes
of esteem and respect offered to him from
every part of the country. He told me that a
Birmingham man had burst into tears before
him ; he said that Reform of Parliament was,
in his view, like Catholic Emancipation, the
removal of a stumbling-block, and not a cure
for all evils. He had done his best to pass
the measure, and when he failed, went out.
May 13. Sunday. — It seems the Duke of
Wellington is the chief, or, at least, the framer
of the Ministry ; and, from something that
A. Baring said to me on Friday, I think he is
Chancellor of the Exchequer. In the meantime
the spirit is roused all over the country, and
224 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. seems likely to end in mischief. I saw Tavistock
to-day, and walked a good deal with him ; he
is completely benighted, I think, and supposes
everything is to go off quietly. Peel, Croker, and
Goulburn, all have declined office under the
Tory Reformers; for it now turns out we are
to have the Bill and the Duke of Wellington ! ! !
Almost incredible; but true.
I went to a meeting at Brooks's where Lord
Ebrington proposed another Address to the Crown,
against the Duke of Wellington, but he eventually
withdrew his proposal. The truth was, many of
our people were afraid of a dissolution, and
thought an Address would bring it on. I was
afraid that, if we relaxed, the People would dis-
trust us ; and, besides, the Tories would find
means to fritter away our opposition.
I had a letter from Sir Herbert Taylor to-day,
expressing the King's regret at losing my services,
and his satisfaction with my civility, etc., and
appointing me to call on him the next day.
May 14. Monday. — At half-past two I went
to St. James's, and had my audience of resigna-
tion. The King was extremely civil ; calling me
"My good friend," " My dear sir," etc. He told
me he knew I had too much property to lose, to
wish for, or assist, any attempts at convulsion.
I said, " Your Majesty has not a more loyal
subject than myself." He replied, " I know it."
He then talked of various matters, of my father,
of his intimacy with Lord Sidmouth, of the way
CHAP. XIII. INTERVIEW WITH THE KING 225
in which it began. He said Sidmouth was a good
speaker, and an agreeable man, but not a Minister
of great capacity. I told him of my father being
present when Pitt made his first speech at the
Bar. We then talked of the cholera, which, he
said, he did not think had been bad in London ;
then asked whether I had a house in Wiltshire,
and where I should settle in the summer; then,
about the James Hays, and other trifling matters.
In conclusion, he said, " I will not take up
more of your time ; I have now seen you in public
and in private, and I hope I may be permitted,
occasionally, to keep up our acquaintance." I
replied that he was very condescending, and
bowed backwards out of the room. He was look-
ing well, and in good spirits ; and, when I told
him so, he said, " Thank God, I was never better
in my life." I thought he seemed pleased to be
rid of his Whig tutors.
At House of Commons. Call of the House not
enforced. Lord Ebrington, on London petition,
commenced a fire on the Duke of Wellington, for
accepting office to carry the Reform Bill. He
called it a violation of public morality. Macaulay
spoke much to the same purpose ; T. Duncombe
was more explicit, and spared no epithet of con-
tempt. Peel was there, but said nothing, looking
most miserable. Baring tried his hand, very
badly : it appeared he was mouthpiece to Welling-
ton. He was received with horse-laughter when
he declared that the Bill must pass, and that
VOL. iv 29
226 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Wellington was justified in passing it. The
debate was most triumphant, if debate it can
be called.
I came away at half-past seven. It appears
the debate went on, afterwards, until eleven ; and
that the Wellingtonians were so chapfallen that
Burdett, Hume, and O'Connell recommended a
cessation of hostilities, for the sake of a reconcilia-
tion between the King and the Whigs.
But the " coup de grace " was given to the
phantom Ministry by Inglis, who declared against
such a dereliction of public honour ; and Wynne
also said, if the Bill was to be carried, it ought
to be carried by the Whigs. Even Hunt owned
that nothing but the return of Lord Grey could
tranquillise the country. Baring made a second
speech in a different tone from his first speech;
so much so, it was thought he had heard from the
Duke of Wellington, for he recommended recon-
ciliation between the King and the Whigs. I
suppose there was never before such a scene in
Parliament.
May 15. Tuesday. — I called on Lord Althorp,
when in came the Duke of Richmond, and said :
"Well, I have bad news for you; no shooting this
year. Pack up your guns again. I have the
intelligence from the Palace, and know it to be
true. The Duke of Wellington has been with the
King this morning, and given up his commission
altogether."
At a quarter past four I went to the House
CHAP. XIII. GREATEST REVOLUTION IN HISTORY 227
of Commons. There was much excitement in the
streets and near the Houses of Parliament. The
Duke's failure was generally known, but nothing
was said about Lord Grey.
The House was very full and much expectation
alive. Lord Althorp, Graham, Stanley, and
Palmerston entered, and took their old seats.
Baring then rose, and said that he had to tell
the House that the Duke of Wellington's effort
to construct a new Ministry had totally failed,
and he hoped the new arrangements would be
satisfactory.
Lord Althorp stated that Lord Grey had re-
ceived a message from the King, and proposed
adjourning the House till Thursday.
The greatest joy was apparent in the faces of
all our friends, and even some opponents seemed
rather pleased than otherwise ; but we spared our
baffled enemies. In the streets there was one
universal look, and gesture, and language of
delight.
I went to Francis Place ; he was overjoyed, and
said it was the greatest and most surprising Revo-
lution in History. He told me there would have
been a convulsion if the Duke had persevered.
The demand for gold was increasing. Birming-
ham was preparing for resistance ; and here, in
London, there were symptoms of fighting. Now,
he thought, all would be well, I told him not
to be so sure of Lord Grey's return.
May 16. Wednesday. — I joined Alexander
228 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Baring in Berkeley Square, where we walked a
long time together. He told me he had escaped
a great honour. He was to be Chancellor of the
Exchequer, but not Leader of the House of
Commons. Peel's refusal to join them had been
their first great obstacle. He thought Peel
shabby for this, and did not understand his
morality, or the difference between supporting
the Tories in office, to carry the Reform Bill, and
being in office himself. He supposed that Peel,
as usual, thought chiefly of Peel.
He said that the Duke of Wellington had told
him that he should think himself unfit to crawl
on earth, if he did not stand by the King, even
at the expense of his own consistency ; and that
he had resolved to carry the Reform Bill, as an
inevitable measure, in all its great provisions ;
indeed, a Bill probably more extensive than that
which Lord Grey would now grant.
Baring said that the King had resolved to pass
the Reform Bill, and made that the condition of
giving office to the Duke ; what he objected to
was the making of Peers. The Duke was not
to have been Prime Minister.
Baring said that, if the mere love of office
had been their object, it would have been better
to have waited until the R/eform Bill had passed,
when the Whigs would probably have fallen, and
the Tories or some others succeeded.
We then talked about what was to be done
now. Baring said that it was all our own game
CHAP. XIII. BARING AND WELLINGTON 229
now. We should let the King down easily. We
should modify the Bill a little ; we should keep
the peace. I said the first would he done; the
second was rendered difficult, if not impossible,
by the events of last week ; for the Political
Unions were now raised to an importance which
rendered their immediate suppression almost im-
possible. Baring seemed to agree with me. I
collected from his whole conversation that he con-
sidered the affair settled, and Lord Grey in office.
He told me that his second speech on Monday
was not in consequence of any hint from the
Duke; it was his own conviction that it was
best to open a loophole of retreat for the Duke.
When he sat down, Hardinge and Murray told
him he was right; and the Duke told him the
same, on the same evening, and resolved to give
way. It was proposed to try a middle course,
and a third party ; but the Duke said, " No ;
if I do not succeed, the King had better send
for Lord Grey at once. He will have to do it at
last; and it is not right to keep the country in
agitation during the interval." The King adopted
this counsel. I took leave of Baring, saying,
" You are a bold man." He replied, " You
mean an impudent one."
I dined at Sir P. Burdett's. Lord Duncannon
told me, after dinner, that the Cabinet had
agreed not to retain office without the certainty
of carrying the Bill, but they would not press
too hard upon the King. This seemed to satisfy
230 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. even Lord Durham, and Lord Duncannon said
all would be well.
We had then some talk about Ireland, and
Lord D. said I should be Secretary, with some
new arrangement ; but, in these times, 'tis absurd
to think of individuals, or anything but the
great national question.
May 17. Thursday. — I find disturbances in
Westminster, and the panic returning. I went
to the House of Commons, and there Ellice told
me that the King had written to Lord Grey,
stating that the Duke of Wellington, Lord
Lyndhurst, the Dukes of Cumberland and Glou-
cester, and others, would make conciliatory
speeches, which would enable the Reform Bill
to pass without Peers being made.
I heard the Duke of Wellington state his case
at the Lords ; but so far was he from conciliation,
or anything like withdrawing his opposition to
the Bill, that every sentence was an attack either
on Reform or Lord Grey. He did not say a
word about his intended support of the measure,
had he been Minister; but he did make use of
the expression attributed to him by Baring,
about his not deserting the King. Lord Lynd-
hurst followed him in a still more bitter speech,
and did not show the slightest symptom of
concession. I was near Ellice : we both stared,
and he said that these men had deceived the
King, for he had positively seen the King's
letter; and Lord Althorp had announced, in the
CHAP. XIII. WOULD THE LORDS YIELD ? 231
Commons, that there was " every probability of 1832.
the affair coming to a satisfactory result."
Lord Grey answered in a firm and manly
speech, defending the creation of Peers, and
stating that he was resolved not to retain office
unless he could carry the Bill unmutilated. He
spoke too handsomely of the King, and he refuted
the Duke of Wellington's charge of leaving the
King alone. Lord Mansfield spoke, and in-
dignantly disclaimed the virtue, imputed to him
by the Times, of rejecting the Duke's offer of
office. I was satisfied that all was over, and I
went to the Commons. I sat down next to
Althorp, and told him what had passed. He
said : " Well, so much the better ; but it is rather
a bore for me to have spoken with so much
confidence, though I was quite justified in so
doing. Now I shall have my shooting." "You
may," I said ; " so shall we. The pitchforks will
be here." " Not here," he replied; "the other
House." I said, " I don't care for that."
I found the Members of the House of Commons
quite satisfied with the proceedings in their
House, and could not persuade them that the
Lords would not yield. They had written good
news to all parts of the country.
May 18. — I see by the Times that the debate
in the Lords ended as it began — no conciliation,
and the order for the Reform Bill discharged.
I went to the Treasury. Lord Duncannon showed
me an Address for the House of Commons to the
232 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. King, to make Peers. Lord Ebrington showed
me one he had drawn up, for the same ohject,
to be moved to-night, in case the Ministers re-
tired finally from office.
Ellice told me that the King had written to
Lord Grey this morning, stating his surprise at
the conduct of the Opposition Lords last night.
The Ministers are now in Cabinet, and, one way or
the other, the business will be settled this evening.
I came down to the House of Commons at half-
past four ; found the call going on and every pre-
paration for the Address. Nothing known, except
that the Cabinet had agreed upon a minute, and
that Lords Grey and Brougham had carried that
minute to the King, and were with him at that
moment. Althorp, Palmerston, Stanley, Graham,
and Grant entered the House; but they knew
nothing more. The call went on. Lord Milton
came to Ebrington and me, pressing some change
in the Address. We advised none, but, at last,
Ebrington consented to go out with him to look
at the alteration. The call was nearly over,
when Tom Duncombe came to the end of the
Treasury bench, where I was, and said, " All
was done and settled." There was a great
bustle — many complaints of the Ministers keeping
the secret too long. Stanley was called out of
the House, but presently returned and said to
me, "All right!" When the call was over
Lord Althorp rose, and, in one sentence, told the
House "THAT MINISTERS, HAVING WHAT THEY
CHAP. XIII. GUARANTEES SECURED 233
CONCEIVED A SUFFICIENT GUARANTEE FOR BEING 1832.
ABLE TO PASS THE REFORM BILL UNIMPAIRED,
RETAINED THEIR OFFICES."
There was great shouting, and some waving of
hats, particularly by O'Connell, who, by the way,
has behaved very well in this great emergency.
Peel made a long apology for refusing office—
every word of said excuse being an attack on
the Duke of Wellington, whom, at the same
time, he praised. He also lauded the talents
and character of Lord Lyndhurst, whose name
was received by a horse laugh.
Our friends cheered Peel, and when he sat
down, Althorp rose, and said he was satisfied
with the Eight Hon. Baronet, of whom he
thought as highly as ever. This very humili-
ating testimony to character, though given with
good faith, made poor Peel look very foolish
and sulky; he did not acknowledge Althorp 's
civility, but blushed, and fidgeted, and was silent.
Alexander Baring then rose, and defended the
Duke of Wellington. This defence, of course,
was an implied censure of Peel. Never was
such an exposure of a party ; enough to satisfy
the utmost malice, and forbid revenge. I went
away. It seems that Vyvyan and George Bankes
added to the discomfiture of the enemy by two
silly speeches.
Such, for the present, is the conclusion of this
memorable interregnum, which has done more,
in nine or ten days, to discover the real char-
VOL. iv 30
r
234 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. acter of the King, and the People, and the
parties in the state, than could otherwise have
been found out in as many years.
Lord Grey made much the same declaration
in the Lords as Althorp in the Commons, and
the Duke of Portland, and Lord Carnarvon, and
other rabid Welling tonians, gave further speci-
mens of their spite.
In the evening I went to the Queen's Ball
at St. James's. Our Ministers were there, and
everybody else. Lord Lowther told me that the
great blunder had been not coming out with
the whole Ministerial arrangements on Monday
last. They had been completed on Saturday,
and, if they had been announced, many of our
waverers would have gone over. I said I doubted
if anything would have overcome the repugnance
of the people to the Duke of Wellington. The
truth is, the Tories cannot be persuaded of the
spirit or real character of the people.
May 19. Saturday. — I went to Place. He
told me that there would, positively, have been
a rising if Wellington had recovered power
yesterday. Everything was arranged for it ; he
himself would not have slept at home.
Stephenson told me that on account of a
petition from Bristol, which the Duke of Sussex
twice presented to the King, on Sunday and
Monday last, H.M. wrote on Tuesday morning,
at nine o'clock, a letter to H.R.H. forbidding him
the Court ! ! ! Now who did this ? Wellington
CHAP. XIII. REFORM BILL GOING THROUGH 235
was still thought to be Minister up to eleven 1832.
on that day. Stephenson showed the letter to
Lord Grey ; something must be done about it.
There are fears that the Duke of Sussex means
to play the part of the Duke of Orleans ; and
yesterday an address came from the City, asking
the Duke of Sussex to take charge of the City
in case of disturbance. This address was shown
to the King when they took the Cabinet minute
to him. Who shall say what effect it had in
securing an affirmative answer ?
From all I hear it seems to me quite clear
that H.M. must be considered as an irreconcil-
able enemy of the Ministers ; and that, if there
is the slightest chance of his escaping from
them, he will. The Tories hope that we shall
be embarrassed by the Irish Bill ; and even
now look to a Wellington or Peel administra-
tion. Force, force, force — that is, Peers, Peers,
Peers — nothing else will save us and the
country.
May 21. Monday. — The Lords went into com-
mittee on the Reform Bill. The Wellingtonians
for the most part did not attend. Lord Grey
got on with Schedule D as far as Wolverhampton.
Thus the Tories, after describing the Bill as
utterly destructive of Church and State and
King and property, have given up their oppo-
sition to it rather than allow a creation of Peers,
which could not, by any possibility,' produce
more mischief than the Bill, and which would
236 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. have saved their honour by making them yield
only to force (i.e. numbers).
May 22. — Charles Pox told me, when walking
down to the H. of C. to-day, that a good deal
of the late mischief had been caused by Lord
Munster,1 whom he called a lover of money,
not a politician. He had not spoken to the
King for eight months, but was recommended
by G. Seymour, and helped to bring about
the Duke of Wellington's foolish effort. "The
other PitzClarences are with us," said Fox.
" Munster and the Duke of Cumberland are
now forbidden to talk politics at Court. The
King has no liking nor disliking for Ministers
—a good old man, but forgets what he says.
He certainly had acceded to the making Peers,
and the Duke of Wellington confessed it when
he was shown the correspondence between the
King and Lord Grey/'
Pox said to the King, " By recalling Lord
Grey, you have saved the country from civil
war." " Yes," said the King, " for the present."
Pox said that the Duke of Sussex had been
imprudent in presenting the Bristol petition to
the King. I think so too.
At H. of C., a long discussion on Pree Trade.
The Reform Bill in committee in the Lords.
May 23. Wednesday. — Went to the Levee.
1 George Augustus Frederick FitzClarence, son of William IV. and
Mrs. Jordan ; served in the Peninsula and in India ; created Earl
of Munster 1831.
CHAP. XIII. DANCING, POLITICS, DEATH 237
The returned Ministers there. The King did 1832.
not seem very well pleased with his Court, and
did not smile upon our leaders.
Lord Durham and I had a long talk ; he spoke
of affairs being in a very precarious state, and
said that nothing but fear would keep the
governor in order.
May 24. Thursday. — I had to go to a Children's
Ball at St. James's. I did not think it so pretty
a sight as I expected ; there was a great crowd.
Lord Byron re-introduced himself to me, after an
estrangement of some years ; he has some place
about the Court. We had some friendly talk, but
not a word about my friend and his cousin.
May 25. Friday. — At House of Commons,
where I sat out debate on Reform. Divided
246 to 130. The spirit of the Conservatives is
dead and gone.
In the Lords the Reform Bill went on swim-
mingly; nearly all over, except Schedules A
and B.
This week Sir James Mackintosh died, at the
age of 66. Sir Robert Inglis, who lived near
him at Clapham, told me his last articulate words
were, " I am happy." Pretty much the same
were put into the mouth of Charles Pox on his
death-bed.
May 30. — I went to the House of Commons,
and looked in at the Lords, where the remaining
clauses of the Bill were passed with very little
opposition, and without any discussion.
238 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. Edward Ellice told me that on Monday last
the King wrote an angry letter to Lord Grey,
complaining of the Irish Reform Bill being
hurried on, and of the English Bill passing the
Lords without amendments. To this letter Lord
Grey, with the unanimous consent of the Cabinet,
wrote a very decided answer. The poor King
then wrote to say that his first letter had
originated in mistake.
There is no doubt, nor concealment now, as
to the real inclination, and, indeed, intentions
of H.M. to turn out the Government if he can.
He is angry at being hissed. He persists in
forbidding the Duke of Sussex from Court.
May 31.— I went to the House of Commons,
and sat up till near two in the morning. H.M.
will not, they say, go to the House to give
the Royal Assent to the Reform Bill. Add to
these symptoms I hear, from good authority,
Lord Grey himself remarked a change in the
King's manner, even to him, before the resigna-
tion ; and that manner has not altered since the
return of Lord Grey to power. Sir James Graham
confirmed this, and like the rest is prepared
for quitting office. However, the Reform Bill
made steady progress in the Lords.
The Tories are now preaching up Household
Suffrage and equal division of districts, and are
prepared for any extremity. They say the
Monarchy is at an end.
June 1. — The report of the Reform Bill passed
CHAP. XIII. THE KING AND THE DUKE OF SUSSEX 239
the Lords this night after some furious follies 1832
from Lord Carnarvon. It is now certain there
will be no attempt to throw out the Bill on
the third reading.
June 2. — Lord Durham called on me at the
War Office, and held language much calculated
to alarm any one that gave him credit for fore-
sight. He looked upon the King as little short
of mad, and thought there would be some fierce
struggle yet, unless the King died shortly ; for
he would try a new Government, and a return
to the old system. He thought that some great
change was inevitable, and that we ought to be
prepared for it. He complained of some of his
colleagues in the Cabinet, particularly of Palmer-
ston, and from what I hear from Sullivan,
Palmer ston complains of him. This gives rise
to rumours of dissensions in the Cabinet.
Lord Durham told me that the real reason
of the King's quarrel with the Duke of Sussex
was the Duke's refusal to dine with H.M. on
the Wednesday, the day when the Grey Cabinet
resigned. The Duke of Sussex and the Duchess
of Kent were the only members of the Royal
Family who did not dine with H.M. on that
occasion. This made the King very angry ; yet
at his birthday dinner, Monday, 28th of May,
he called the Queen back to hear him give a
toast : " The Princess Victoria ; and remember
that I declare her to be the lawful successor
to the Throne." This is one of the many extrava-
240 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. gances attributed to him. Pray Heaven that he
may continue sound until Thursday, June 7.
We had a large dinner party and opened our
handsome drawing-rooms. How long for ! Lord
Dundonald dined with us, the Berrys, Lady Davy,
the Maitlands, T. Creevey, Ealfours, Fergusons,
etc. ; so we go on, even on the hrink, so they say,
of ruin and revolution.
June 4. — Debate on third reading of Reform Bill
in the Lords. A little past ten a rumour reached
us .that the Lords were dividing. I ran away
and got before the throne to the rail. Their
Lordships were telling, and there was much
confusion. Only two Bishops, Grey and Maltby,
with us, two against us. Lord Brougham then
read the numbers : 106 to 22, and after going
shortly over the amendments, said, " that this
Sill do pass" and pass it did.
I returned to the Commons, where the Scottish
Reform Bill was going on. Presently Martin
and Adam, Masters in Chancery, came into the
House with the Bill in their hands. There was
a general murmur, and Alderman Wood made a
foolish attempt to suspend our proceedings for
the sake of having it brought up, but Althorp
resisted, and we went on till half-past eleven,
when Bernal left the chair, and the Masters
brought up the Bill with several others. The
Speaker took a malicious pleasure in confounding
the Reform with some Church and Road Bills,
and there was no cheering or other sign of exulta-
CHAP. XIII. REVOLUTION IN PARIS 241
tion. Althorp moved that the amendments should 1832.
be considered the next day, and we hroke up.
June 5. — Lord John Russell moved the second
reading of the Lords' amendments of the Bill ;
and after a debate very much in our favour, they
were agreed to without a division.
June 6. — At the King's Levee. Saw Palmerston
invested with the Order of the Bath, which our
gracious King forced upon him at his last visit
to Windsor with Bulow. The Duke of Wellington,
Lord Rosslyn, and the rest were in the ceremony,
and did not look very merry, I thought. I saw
the knighting, a silly barbarous farce.
The King does not give the Royal Assent in
person to the Great Bill ; a very foolish spite, which
takes away the grace from what he wishes to be
thought or did wish to be thought his own gift.
June 7. — Sad news from Paris. Another revo-
lution. A regular battle between the people and
the soldiery; the troops said to be worsted, and
few National Guards fighting with them. The
news completely upset me. A few hours more
will announce who reigns in France. What
advantage will our fools at home take of this
dreadful event, and what a mercy for us that
it did not happen during the interregnum ! But
the crisis is coming, and we must soon be at
our posts. I hope I shall act as I ought. In
the meantime our gay and gambling world are
all gone to the Derby ! !
I went down to the House early to hear the
VOL. iv 31
242 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832, Royal Assent given to the Reform Bill, but was
too late. It was just over. A little before four
o'clock, the Speaker, attended by Lord John
Russell and some thirty or forty Members, went
to the Lords. The Commissioners were Lords
Grey, Lansdowne, Holland, Wellesley, Durham,
and the Lord Chancellor. Only our great Bill
received the Royal Assent. The whole proceeding
lasted but a short time, and was slurred over as
quickly as possible. Not a single Peer was to
be seen on the Opposition benches, and not more
than nine or ten on the Ministerial side.
A very poor picture was painted, misrepresent-
ing this scene, as I can assert; for I am placed
there next to Sir Francis Burdett, whereas I was
not in the House.
There were a few people collected about the
doors of Parliament; but there was very little
excitement. The Ministers were, however, cheered
as they left the House.
Thus ends this great national exploit. The
deed is done. It is difficult to believe that it
is done. I was obliged to leave the House of
Commons, being ill ; but I see that, when the
Boundaries Bill was discussed, Croker took occa-
sion, as might be expected, to allude to Paris
running in blood, just as our Reform Bill was
receiving the Royal sanction.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
June 9. — I was attacked by a violent head-
CHAP. XIII. UNPOPULARITY OF THEIR MAJESTIES 243
ache, and, unluckily, had to entertain three of 1832.
my masters at dinner — Graham, Goderich, and
Palmer ston. Lord Dacre and Sir Erancis Burdett
were of the party ; and talked of Reform, which
was not relished by two out of three of my
Cabinet guests.
June 14, — I went to the drawing-room, where
I was most ungraciously received by Queen
Adelaide ; but that did not prevent me from
going to the Queen's Ball at St. James's the
next evening — a very poor pageant ; their
Majesties sitting on a dais in a row, like
monarchs in a playhouse. I thanked Heaven
that this was the last of the season.
June 20. — The King was struck on the head
with a stone, on Ascot race-ground, by a one-
legged ex-pensioner of Greenwich. Both Houses
voted addresses to him, and Sir Robert Peel could
not resist the temptation to connect the outrage
with some intemperate language of the press and
speeches in Parliament.
FROM DIARY.
June 26. — There was a Review in Hyde Park,
which was attended by the King and Queen.
The Duke of Wellington was at the head of
his regiment. He was cheered by the " mob of
gentlemen," but coldly received by the crowd.
The Queen much hissed.
I afterwards went in full dress to a party at the
Duke of Wellington's to meet their Majesties. A
244 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. hundred or so of the Guards were drawn up in the
courtyard, and the whole scene had a very military
appearance; it was said that a thousand guests
were present. The King made a long speech to
the Guards when he gave them their new colours,
and said Caesar was the first Grenadier.
This is my first, and prohably will he my last,
appearance at the Duke's. His pistol-proof blinds
are no proof of his wisdom, nor his broken, un-
mended windows.
June 27. — I went to the annual Westminster
dinner. Sir Erancis Burdett announced this to
be the last : E/eform having been gained, our
occupation was over.
Daniel O'Connell was the hero of the evening ;
and he made a speech about "the echoes of liberty
resounding from the peaks of the Andes to the
banks of Burrampooter."
June 28. — Going to the War Office, I met the
Duke of Wellington at the head of a detachment
of his regiment, marching from a Review in the
Palace Garden. All these shows are got up evi-
dently to remind King and people of the advantage
of a standing army, and of the hero of Waterloo.
At twelve I went to the Military Asylum at
Chelsea, and there was the Duke of Wellington
again, and a host of officers in attendance to
show the children to their Majesties. Many of
the soldiers expressed their pleasure at seeing
me there, saying they hoped I would not permit
the establishment to be put down.
CHAP. XIII. AT CHELSEA HOSPITAL 245
After seeing the children dine, we went over
to Chelsea Hospital. The Duke of Wellington
was hissed by the way, and their Majesties were
not over and above well received. Lord John
Russell, President of the Commissioners, Lord
Goderich and Lord Melbourne, also Commis-
sioners, were present; these civilians with my-
self were the only persons not in gorgeous
apparel, and we looked very small on that
account. Indeed, the whole ceremonies of this
hot, tiresome day seemed contrived to con-
trast military pomp with civil insignificance ;
and also to prevent any of us Reformers
from innovating upon these favourite establish-
ments.
Erom the Hospital we went to Sir Willoughby
Gordon's neighbouring villa, on the banks of the
Thames ; and there walked about at what is called
a breakfast : the dullest of all our dull English
amusements. Obliged to keep our hats off in a
hot sun whenever we came across King, Queen,
or Princess.
Sir W. Gordon told me that he had not asked
any of the Royal Family until the day before,
when he was ordered by the King to invite all,
except the Duke of Sussex.
June 29. — At House of Commons. Tithes, Irish
Reform or Scotch Reform, I forget which, but all
now comes, of course. Even Reform ceases to be
a subject of anxiety : the Lords having given way,
the interest is gone.
246 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
July 3. — Joseph Hume brought on a motion
relative to Somerville, a private of the Scots
Greys, who was flogged for refusing to mount
an unruly horse. The partisans of Somerville
alleged that his real offence was that he corre-
sponded with a newspaper called the Weekly
Dispatch and discussed the political duties of
soldiers.
Hume said he had taken up the case to prevent
O'Connell taking it up in a more hostile spirit.
He agreed the less said about it the better, and
he added that if I got the man his discharge,
he would say as little as possible on the subject.
I did procure a conditional discharge, and was
never more surprised than when Hume got up
and made a bitter speech against me. I was in
no little embarrassment, for as I told the Ministers
I could not and would not defend the punishment.
I was pledged against flogging ; the Cabinet were
not ; therefore the best thing was for me to resign.
Althorp insisted that I was not to be sacrificed,
and proposed that an inquiry should be made
which should be laid before the King. If he
said " No," the Government should resign ; but
eventually Hume withdrew his motion.
PROM DIARY.
July 5. — Lord Althorp says the King instantly
consented to the inquiry on the Somerville case.
I then went to Lord Hill, and had a smart dis-
CHAP. XIII. OFFICIAL FRICTION 247
cussion with him. I foresee that the two sides 1832.
of the arclnvay at the Horse Guards will be in
acknowledged hostility, and either my Lord or
I must go out, that is clear. Indeed, I think
it is useless to disguise the fact even from my
opponents. Lord Hill must be a poor creature to
maintain himself in a lucrative post in opposition
to the known wishes of a Cabinet whom he does
not support, and nothing but the hope of seeing
the office in proper hands could induce me to
remain a moment where I am. But it would be
unwise to attempt anything at this moment.
July 8. — The Examiner calls Lord Althorp and
me " infamous," for our conduct on Somerville's
case. Such are these gentlemen of the Press !
My brother called on A. Eonblanque, the editor,
who said he used " infamous " in its etymological
sense of " injurious to fame." When my brother
asked him how he could allow the letter of Junius
E/edivivus to charge me with personal corruption,
he said that he had not looked over the letter
accurately. He never saw it until late on Satur-
day night, and did not perceive the paragraph
alluded to. Are such men fit dispensers of daily
fame?
July 11. — Went to the great Reform Festival
at the Guildhall. Saw and heard the freedom
of the City presented to Lord Grey and Lord
Althorp.
The Duke of Sussex, Lord Grey, Lord Althorp,
and the Peers were at the top table; the others
248 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
were arranged alphabetically. I was a great way
off, next to Sir James Graham. Stanley was still
lower down ; he looked a little sulky, I thought.
The enthusiasm, if there was much, scarcely
reached us. All made Conservative speeches,
especially Brougham, who parodied " the Bill, the
whole Bill, etc.," into "the Law, the whole Law,
and nothing but the Law."
More than one person remarked to me that,
if justice were done, Burdett and myself should
not have been lost in the crowd when Reform was
the triumph of the day ; but Burdett did not
come, and I received notice from the Lord Mayor
that our healths were about to be drunk, just
as the Duke of Sussex rose, and the upper table
moved away, so I rose, and what became of the
toast I never inquired nor heard. If fame be an
object, there is no fear that the truth will be
acknowledged, and Burdett at least have his due.
July 12. — At House of Commons, where sat up
till 5 a.m. on Russo-Belgian loan debate. Our
friends had the best of the debate throughout this
time. Peel was very bitter, but only bitter. He
made no figure at all.
Our 46 majority did not satisfy Lord Althorp ;
indeed, he said to me that "the Government
was like a hard-pushed fox running fast, but
which might be run in upon at any moment."
However, I thought our majority quite enough.
Althorp announced that, if Ministers were
beaten, they should resign. Peel remarked on
\S
A n, <t
^Jj iU \tc II
kz fioAteAd-um Of
CHAP. XIII. FAREWELL OF THE SPEAKER 249
this, " No wonder, considering the state of the 1832.
country." A pretty fellow ! What was the state
of the country when he left office ?
July 17. — Another debate on Russian loan.
The Opposition made very angry by Joe Hume
declaring he would vote black white, rather than
assist the Tories in turning out the Ministers.
July 20. — A last struggle on Russian loan. We
had 191 to 112, an increasing majority, which
called forth a cheer from our friends.
July 30. — Mr. Speaker took leave of the Chair
and the House. I did not hear his speech, but
I heard some of the compliments.
The Speaker was somewhat moved ; a good many
that moved had complained of his partiality in
latter times, indeed he could be partial at a pinch.
However, he is a gentleman, and we shall not like
his successor so well, let him be who he will.
I spoke to him afterwards, and he told me to
my surprise that he did not consider his adieu
as definitive. He had two or three communica-
tions with Lord Grey; and not being certain of
his return to the new Parliament, had thought
it right to take leave ; but the House might chose
him again.
August 2. — Very difficult to keep together a
House. Wearisome work battling between Stanley
and Irish Members. Stanley announces a new
Irish Impartial Justice Hill, when it is almost
impossible to carry through the ordinary business
of Parliament.
VOL. iv 32
250 LONDON CHAP. XIII.
1832. August 9. — I presented the Report and evidence
taken before the Court of Inquiry on the case
of Somerville. The Court of Inquiry appear to
me to have acted fairly enough. Their report
and the King's pleasure quite sufficient censure
on Windham. The latter was much stronger as
drawn up by Grant, and assented to by Lord Hill ;
but Lord Althorp struck out the words "severe
censure." I presented these papers at House
of Commons this night at two o'clock in the
morning.
This evening Stanley told me he was going to
Ireland, and would get the Secretary's house in
the Phoenix Park ready for me. I laughed ; but
he said, " Upon my honour, I am in earnest " ;
and he then spoke about my succeeding him as
a settled scheme.
August 15. — I saw Lord Frederick EitzClarence,
who told me matters were going on well at Court.
They had been very uncomfortable ; but now were
going on quiet, and the King in good humour.
He owned he and his family were ' under the
greatest obligations to the Queen, but that she
ought not to have been a politician.
EEOM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
August 16. — Parliament was prorogued; and
Lord Althorp, Lord John Russell, and myself
were the only occupants of the Treasury bench
who attended the Speaker and some eighty
Members to the House of Lords.
CHAP. XHI. PARLIAMENT PROROGUED 251
There were not many Peers present ; and only 1832.
a few ladies — none of any distinction, either for
rank or beauty. Lord Grey hore the sword of
State, and was the most appropriate personage
in the ceremony. Lord Chancellor Brougham
also made a suitable part of the show ; hut I
thought, when he put the speech into the King's
hand, he bowed with Persian adoration. The
Speaker made a good speech, and touched on our
Reform Bill without any offensive remark. The
King's Speech was, as usual, a poor performance.
Reform was mentioned, but without any par-
ticular notice. The King was very loud ; in some
sentences ludicrously so ; as, when he addressed
the Gentlemen of the House of Commons, he
spoke with a sudden roar and emphasis that made
me start. The Lord Chancellor prorogued the
Parliament until the 16th of October.
I saw the King return to the Palace. It was
like a funeral procession : scarcely a hat taken
off, and positively no cheering. I never saw
anything of the kind like it before. What a
difference between his prorogation in April 183]
and this ceremony ! I was very sorry, and au-
gured no good from this bad reception of royalty.
CHAPTER XIV
EROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
1832. August. — Wishing to be near London during
the long vacation, I rented the long-known
residence of Archdeacon Cambridge, in Twicken-
ham Meadows. Whilst there, our friend Admiral
Sir William Hotham paid us a visit, and was
as agreeable as ever. He told us that he was
at an advanced post with Lord Nelson in Corsica ;
and, as the shots were flying about him, he
(Hotham) could not help bobbing. Nelson asked
to look through Hotham's telescope, and said,
" This is an excellent glass ; do you know, I see
the French officers bobbing ! " Hotham felt the
reproach deeply ; but presently, when the fire
became hotter, he saw Nelson bobbing. He then
remonstrated for adverting to that which the
bravest man in the world might do inadvertently.
Old Lord Duncan used to say, "You may bob
with your head, but you maunna bob with your
heels."
August 29. — I dined with Lord Palmerston. A
gentleman next to me, just come from Russia,
told me that the Emperor Nicholas had been
much enraged at the strictures on his conduct
252
CHAP. XIV. AN EFFICIENT WAR OFFICE 263
in our Parliament. I was not much surprised
at this ; but I was much surprised when the same
gentleman added that " the Emperor was the most
liberal man in his own dominions."
FROM DIARY.
September 8. — I went to Bath with my wife to
attend a public dinner given to my brother Henry,
who was candidate for the city.
September 14. — Left Bath, which I should not
like to live in.
EROM BOOK, " BECOLLECTIONS."
Monday, October 1. — I had not a single paper
undecided on my table at the War Office, and
Mr. Sullivan told me that very soon all the arrears
would be disposed of. This was well for our
Office ; but I heard on the following Monday,
from Sir James Graham, that the Government
had an awful amount of demands for next session.
Something must be done in regard to the East
Indies, also the West Indies, also the Bank
Charter, also the Church questions both in
England and Ireland. He told me, moreover,
that he did not at all like the Belgian business.
October 10. — I heard that most of the Ministers
were in London, and the King at St. James's ; and
that, in expectation of war between Holland and
Belgium, a French fleet was to join our squadron
at Portsmouth. I was glad, however, to hear
from Lord Chancellor Brougham that there was
254 LONDON CHAP. XTV.
1832. no intention of calling upon the old Parliament
to reassemble ; or, as he phrased it, " to call the
old condemned thief into court again."
PROM DIARY.
October 17. — Called at Holland House, and
found Lord and Lady Holland looking very ill.
She told me she was frightened, and was attended
by seven physicians.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
October 23. — I dined at 5 o'clock at Holland
House. Allen was there, Miss Pox, Lord Althorp,
Sir James Graham, Labouchere, Lord and Lady
Grey, and Sydney Smith.
Before dinner we went to look at a bed used
in hospitals. It floated on water, and Sydney
Smith got upon it, and floundered and flounced
upon it for some time. " Oh for H.B. ! " said
Graham. The sight was infinitely ludicrous,
and we laughed most heartily at it, and kept
up the merriment in the dining-room; but
whatever pleasantry there was in the sight, the
joke was lost without the man who caused it,
as is generally the case with humorists, and
more so with Sydney Smith than any man I
ever knew. However, the party on this evening
were in high spirits, in spite of fears for Ireland,
and uncertainties about Dom Pedro and the
struggles in Belgium.
There was a good deal of freedom in the talk
CHAP. XIV. PERSONALITIES OF A CABINET 255
concerning our Lord Chancellor, and Lord Grey 1832.
did not spare him. He told us that Brougham
would never forgive Hayter, the painter, for
representing him looking towards Denman, as if
for a hint. But the Cabinet of those days con-
tained one man who did not speak well of any
of his colleagues, or of the Court. According
to him, E/ussell was the best of them, next
Graham, next Althorp ; but the others either
unwilling or incapable. One day, at a party
which Lord Grey had not left more than five
minutes, this colleague of his said, in presence
of Lord John Russell, speaking of the Cabinet,
" Such a set ! such a fourteen round a table ! ! "
Russell said nothing to this exclamation.
During my residence at Cambridge House,
Lord Durham lived at Sudbroke Park, and I saw
a good deal of him just after his return from
St. Petersburg. He spoke very highly of the
Emperor Nicholas, and of his minister Nesselrode.
PROM DIARY.
November 2. — Walked over to Sudbroke, and
passed the whole morning walking with Lord
Durham. He told me the other day Stanley
proposed his Church Reform at a Cabinet dinner,
and insisted that it should be agreed to and made
a final measure like the Reform Bill. Lord
Durham protested against the Cabinet pledging
itself in such a manner, and it was resolved to
postpone the measure until next Cabinet. Ac-
256 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1832. cordingly they met at Lord Holland's, and to
Lord Durham's surprise he was the only opponent
of the measure. So Stanley is gone to Ireland
to prepare his Bills.
Lord Durham said he had often heen tempted
to resign in consequence of the imbecility of the
Government ; nothing but his attachment to Lord
Grey kept him in office. Yet even Lord Grey
did not do well ; he liked best those who flattered
him most, and was happier with Madame de Lieven
and the Duchesse de Dino (Talleyrand's niece)
than with plain-spoken politicians.
Lord Durham talking of home politics said
that he thought a dispersion of the present
Cabinet very probable, but was confident that
all would go right after this King's death ; even
he was getting more sensible. (( Le jour viendra,"
was Lord Durham's motto.
We talked of the formation of the present
Government. At the meeting of Lord Grey's
friends at Lansdowne House, it was discussed
who was to be Lord Chancellor. Lord Lynd-
hurst? "No." Brougham? "Oh, no, no!"
Everybody was against him ; and when he was
subsequently selected, Lord Holland said, " Then
we shall never have another comfortable moment
in this room."
Brougham, however, has done pretty well in
that respect, except that he once opposed the
Disfranchisement of the Rotten Boroughs, but was
overpowered. "And this man's name," said Lord
CHAP. XIV. BBOUGHAM AND OTHERS 257
Durham, " is to be on the Reform Column, and
mine, who drew the Bill, not ! " " Never mind,"
said I, "there is History; a book lasts, but a
column falls." Lord Durham replied that was
his consolation. I added that others who had
struggled from beginning to end in this cause
would not be named either on columns or by
history, but such had been the lot of men at all
times, so we moralised.
Durham dealt his censures pretty impartially
on all his colleagues.1 He says Brougham is an
altered man, but he still retains his boundless
ambition, and will be trying at everything and
dropping everything. His Chancery Bankrupt
Court is a complete failure, and in the business
of his own court, the arrears are getting as bad
as ever.
Stanley he thinks nothing but a debater, an
arrogant, narrow-minded man ; Graham, an official
drudge, a gentleman and a saint, inclined to
Stanley. Graham had my place .offered to him,
but he said he was a county member and could
take nothing under a Cabinet place, so Lord
Durham proposed he should have the Admiralty.
This was arranged in the hurry of the moment ;
Graham not knowing a man-of-war from a day
barge, nor was it necessary he should. My name
was mentioned, but the reply was, " What, have
a Radical ! " etc. And so they went to sober,
steady Charles Wynn first, then came Parnell ;
1 He held the office of Lord Privy Seal.
VOL. iv 33
258 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
and when one deserted, and the other betrayed,
came to the Radical at last.
We talked a good deal about the Elections.
Lord Durham expected the returns would be
decidedly against the Conservatives, although
he was most anxious for the Government to hold
together until the new Parliament should be
chosen, so I suppose he thinks the contrary not
altogether impossible.
He said neither Lord Grey nor Lord Althorp in
reality thought of or wished to resign. Even
Lord Goderich, who, when the last short inter-
regnum took place, left the Cabinet room saying,
" Now, thank God, this is the last time I shall
put foot here," even he will not give way that
Stanley may have his place. As for Brougham,
he wants to be Prime Minister, and is doing all
to please the King.
I put down all these things from Lord Durham
as being true ; I do not see why they should not
be. I gave him my own opinion very freely,
and told him I did not know how I could meet
the new House of Commons as Secretary-at-War.
He agreed with me, but said I ought to wait and
do nothing precipitately. I am not quite sure
that he is right; indeed, had I not the hope of
doing some good in the office by my new warrant,
and seeing all the arrears got rid of, I do not
know that I should feel justified in staying any
longer in office.
November 13. — I dined with Lord Durham, who
CHAP. XIV. A REQUEST FOB PLEDGES 259
seemed as little pleased as ever. He told me that
the "fortunate youth " (Stanley) had managed to
lose every election in Ireland.
November 18. — Three independent electors of
Westminster, whose names were unknown to me,
called, and asked me to pledge myself to hallot,
triennial Parliaments, and abolition of taxes on
houses and windows and assessed taxes. I did not
hesitate a moment in refusing to give any pledge
whatever. I said they were quite right, if they
suspected me, to choose somebody else ; that I
was perfectly indifferent whether I was chosen
or not; that if I had not acted in such a way
as to beget confidence in fourteen years I never
should be able so to do. I did not intend to
divide the Reformers ; I should soon see how the
land lay, and would take measures accordingly;
that I should part with the electors on good terms,
and look back on our long connection with feelings
of pride and satisfaction, without a single regret,
and persuaded that the time would come when
my view on the subject of pledges would be
theirs.
They remarked that my conduct, on that
occasion, was very handsome and open, and they
hoped theirs had been the same. I replied that
it had, they had acted openly and handsomely;
but others had not so acted, and that long ago I
had information that it had been resolved to
oppose me, on some protext or the other. They
replied that the result depended on my answer.
260 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1832. I added that "they had my answer; and that
Colonel Evans, or Colonel anybody, would be a
better man than myself for .any constituency that
thought pledges requisite.
One of the party, a young man, said that he
had formed quite a romantic opinion of me. I
smiled, and said, "There was an end of all
romance after this conversation." They laughed
and made their bows. Such was Scene 1 of
Act I. of my separation from Westminster. I felt
that I had done quite right, and never was better
satisfied with myself in my life.
Later in the day I had a visit from Sir Francis
Burdett, who said he had a letter from Colonel
Evans, stating that he had consented to become
a candidate for Westminster, and was determined
to oppose me.
November 19. — E. Ellice called and showed me
a most extraordinary correspondence between him
and Lord Grey, relative to Lord Durham's con-
duct since his return.
Lord Grey complains that it would be impos-
sible to prevent a rupture between him and Lord
Durham. Lord Durham had said Stanley was
not the man to conduct Irish affairs. On the
other hand, Lord Grey said to Ellice that Stanley
must be Secretary of State, and that Lord Durham
was much mistaken if he thought he could head
a party.
Ellice wrote a very sensible letter to Lord Grey,
confessing the faults of Durham's temper, but
CHAP. XIV. LORD DURHAM 261
telling him that all his views on the great points
of discussion last session had turned out to be
right, and therefore he was a considerable man
and ought not to be neglected, urging on Lord
Grey at the same time the necessity of yielding
to public opinion.
I own I thought Ellice's views quite correct,
but how Lord Grey should have sent such a
letter to Ellice at Paris passes my comprehension.
It is impossible things can go on in this way !
November 21. — I had a note from Lord Durham
begging me to see him on important business. I
went, and he showed me a correspondence re-
specting the projected Irish Tithe Measure;
Stanley's plan in print, and his remarks thereon.
Stanley stated that if there had been any objec-
tion to his measure, he ought to have been told
so before, and altogether took a very high tone
indeed.
Lord Durham was undecided whether he ought
to resign at once or wait until the Bill came
before Parliament. He asked me whether I
thought he would be supported by the public
if he went out; and wished me to consult Tom
Barnes on the matter. I told him my impres-
sion was he ought not to resign ; and as he in-
sisted on the necessity of knowing how he might
be supported, I said I would consult the person
in question.
I found Tom Barnes in bed at half-past one,
the shutters closed, and there talked to him " in
262 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1832. cloudy tabernacle shrined." The result was he
thought nobody knew Lord Durham's merits ;
nobody would think about him if he went out;
that except Lord Grey and Lord Brougham no one
had such influence as to interest the public about
the Irish Church question, and that the Protestant
feeling in England was so strong as to make it
very doubtful whether Government would be
supported at home in upholding Catholicism in
Ireland. It was time enough for Lord Durham
to go out when the Bill came in.
How Tom Barnes must laugh in his sleeve at
a Cabinet question being referred to the editor
of a newspaper 1 Nevertheless I believe there
was no better course to take in order to keep
my friend straight.
November 22. — Lord Durham was rather piqued
at the result of my interview with Tom Barnes,
but agreed that it would be better for him to
acquiesce in the decision of the Cabinet. On
going away he said : " I shall not let the fellows
know my determination sooner than I can help.
I will keep them in hot water as long as I can."
Amusing man !
Ellice told me to-day that the real origin of
Lord Durham's dissatisfaction with Lord Grey
was the refusal of an Earldom at the Corona-
tion.1
November 28. — Lord Al thorp told me to-day
that Lord Grey has consented to my W.O. re-
1 He was created Earl of Durham in 1833.
CHAP. XIV. NEW ELECTION AT WESTMINSTER 263
forms, which are to be finally determined on by
Palmer ston.
December 3. — Parliament dissolved this day.
December 6. — I dined at East Sheen with Lord
Grey: a small family party. The talk chiefly
about novels. He is an amiable man with an
amiable family, but I cannot discover his capacity,
except, to be sure, as a talker in Parliament.
BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
On Saturday, December 8, came on the nomina-
tion for the representation of Westminster, at
the usual hustings before St. Paul's Church in
Covent Garden.
A considerable crowd of friends accompanied
Sir Francis and myself. Mr. Hughes, the American
Minister,, and a son of Casimir Perier were
amongst them. We were at first well received,
but hissing and hooting soon began ; and placards
were exhibited, containing caricatures, one of
which represented the Secretary-at-War flogging
Somerville ! ! and extracting thirty shillings from
his pocket. One man immediately in front
dangled a cat-o' -nine-tails at me. Our foreign
friends had full opportunity of witnessing the
humours of an English contested election.
My opponent made up for previous civility by
making a very malignant attack on me, charging
me with all sorts of delinquencies, of which he
must have known I was not guilty ; and par-
ticularly dwelling on flogging, and my bringing
264 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1832. in the Mutiny Bill to perpetuate that cruel
punishment. He spoke from notes, and spoke
for a hour. I bore it all as well as I could, and
then stepped forward to speak ; but the crowd
began yelling and flinging mud. Some of this
strayed and lighted on the American Minister,
who was not at all pleased, and said he had seen
nothing like it in America. On my remarking
that the mud was not dangerous, he said it was
not mud, it was merde, which it was not.
Wednesday, December 12. — Sir Francis and
myself went to Covent Garden, and heard the
High Bailiff declare the state of the poll at the
close : B., 3247; IL, 3214; E., 1096. So Burdett
and I were declared duly elected. " Gratse vices. "
To compensate for this Westminster triumph,
I soon heard the very disagreeable news that my
brother Henry was beaten at Bath, and my half-
brother Thomas Benjamin beaten at Aylesbury.
It was something of a set-off against these
disasters that my late opponent, Colonel Evans,
had been beaten at Rye, after his defeat at
Westminster.
PROM DIARY.
December 21. — I foresee the impossibility of
holding office, Westminster, and character to-
gether. I may add, conscience, for Westminster
may require more than I ought to grant, even
were I not in office.
December 23. — I met Lord Sidmouth to-day,
CHAP. XIV. A QUESTION OF RESIGNING 265
looking as fresh as if he had never drunk a glass
of wine, he heing seventy-seven.
December 30. — I had a hint from Lord John
Russell that the army was not to be reduced.
I saw Lord Althorp on the subject, and told
him unless there was to be some reduction of the
army I could not remain at the War Office. He
agreed with me ; but said that my resigning would
go far to break up the Government. I remarked
that I would do this in a way the least injurious
to the Cabinet, and that it would be easy to find
another Secretary-at-War. Lord Althorp then
asked me how I would like Ireland. I replied,
" Better." He then said that he wished me to
write a very strong letter to him, which, if it met
with his own views, he would stand by as well
as myself.
January 1, 1833. — My servants had a dance ;
all seemed very happy, so should I be if my wife's
cough would get well. The babies are in excellent
health, and most things prosper with me ; but then
this frightful disease.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
I employed the first days of this year in writing
my letter to Lord Althorp, and preparing a
scheme .for reducing the land forces. Although
nominally the reduction amounted to 4,667 men,
it did not exceed 927 actual effectives. Lord
Althorp consented to back this proposal, and, if
resisted, to adopt whatever course I might think
VOL. iv 34
266 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
fit to follow. I begged him not to quit office for
a few thousand men more or less on their military
establishment, and thereby break up a good
Administration. Lord Althorp persisted, saying,
"An Administration is only good when it does
good things."
FROM DIARY.
January 7. — Lord Althorp read to me some
notes made by Lord Grey on my letter, the sum
of which was, that he was responsible for the
safety of the country, that he thought the force
wanted, that he hoped the House of Commons
would not ask anything that was not reasonable,
and finally that my retiring from office would be
"fatal."
The next day I went with Lord Althorp to
Lord Grey. As we were walking, Lord Althorp
told me that he would resign if I did. He would
not face the House of Commons if I went out.
Parnell and myself leaving the War Office, one
after the other, would be fatal ; for, although
Parnell was an extravagant Reformer, it was now
notorious that I was a moderate man. He said
that Lord Grey was stiff against reduction of
force.
Lord Grey received us with a long face, having
half a dozen red boxes under his arm, filled, as
he said, with disastrous news from Ireland, and
from Huddersfield, requiring more troops.
He then talked of my proposed reductions, and
CHAP. XIV. ARMY REFORMS 267
said he had no objection to taking away troops 1833
from the Colonies ; but those taken must be sent
to Ireland. He read to me a letter from Lord
Anglesey, stating that he should want three or
four additional regiments, if not more. I had
nothing to say to this ; but asked what was to be
done if we were beaten on the Estimates. Lord
Grey said, " Go out " ; and he then talked of
his " responsibilities for the safety of the country,
and how likely it was that some collision would
take place between the soldiers and the people ;
and if the people got the better of the soldiers
once, there would be an end of everything."
Lord Grey did not think I could diminish the
Pension Warrant to the scale fixed by me. He
pitied the soldier, and, in short, convinced me that
I had another Lord Hill, or worse, to deal with.
As to my other reforms respecting defining and
raising the character of the Secretary-at-War, and
making the transfers which I proposed in my last
letter to the Treasury, he approved ; but the first
plan was to be submitted to Lord Hill ! ! ! That
is, to the person who is to have his power and
authority curtailed by my plan. I said I had no
objection to have the scheme submitted to Lord
Hill ; but if he was to have a veto my whole
labour would be lost. It was agreed that I should
draw up reasons for framing a new Minute of
Council respecting the Secretary-at-War.
I took leave of the First Lord and his Chancel-
lor of the Exchequer " re infecta" Thus ended
268 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
this interview by which my masters, no doubt,
think they have accomplished their object of
inducing me to remain in office without any
material reform or retrenchment, if any at all.
But I will do no such thing ; if I cannot carry
my reductions, I will attempt the other alternative
proposed in my letter: reform of my office. If
I fail there, I will resign, and I shall fail and I
shall resign.
Some of my constituents called on me to ask me
what course Ministers intended to take about the
House and Window Tax, and hinted that I ought
to threaten to resign if the tax were not repealed.
I said I was not chosen M.P. for Westminster
solely to take off the House and Window Tax.
We had another warm debate, which convinces
me that I cannot long be M.P. for Westminster
and in the War Office,
In short, I am beset with difficulties every way.
What sort of speech am I to make on Monday ?
I cannot and will not say what I do not think ;
and if I am perfectly sincere and tell all I feel,
much mischief may be done.
Lord Al thorp owned to me that Stanley had done
harm by his declarations as to ballot, but more
by the mode and manner of making them than
by the substance, which was nothing more than
he, Althorp, said, namely, that so far as the present
Government were concerned, the Reform Bill was a
final measure.
January 12. — I had a note from Lord Althorp,
CHAP. XIV. EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES 269
requesting me to go to him before four o'clock, on 1333.
urgent business. I went, and he told me that the
army was to be increased by an additional five
thousand rank and file; and that the increase
would be wanted, and justified, in consequence
of a great measure which had been resolved upon
by the Cabinet. This was neither more nor less
than the entire Emancipation of the Slaves, at a
period to be fixed either for January 1835 or
January 1837, probably the former. I stared,
and smiled, as well I might.
He added that he thought the Emancipation
would be more popular than the Reform Bill. I
did not agree with an augmentation, and said I
could find 5,000 men amongst the veterans.
Lord Al thorp then changed the subject and asked
me if I could go to Ireland at once. I replied that
I was not aware of anything to prevent me ; but
that one office was pretty much like another —
it was being "between the devil and the deep
sea," although, of the two, perhaps Ireland was
the least detestable.
I said my real wish was to withdraw altogether ;
but I did not see how I could do so, unless
required to do something palpably wrong. Lord
Althorp told me that I must not leave them on
any account, and added that, when he had told
Lord Grey he would not face the House if I left
the War Office on account of the amount of
the Estimates, Lord Grey replied, " By G — d !
nor will I."
270 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. I went away to the War Office, and prepared
a scheme for a transfer of troops to the West
Indies, without augmentation of the army. I
then went to Downing Street and made my
statement, which was agreed to, so that I had a
right to conclude there was to be no augmentation
of force.
I dined with a party at Baillie's, and had a
long conversation with Eickersteth. I think
even he is not satisfied with an M.P. for West-
minster belonging to the present Administration.
He most particularly dislikes Brougham, who
he tells me gives general dissatisfaction in his
court, and never finishes anything that he begins.
We both agreed that his fame could not rest on
the versatility of his powers.
January 14. — A Westminster dinner, but it did
not resemble our old Westminster dinners in the
least. Thomas Duncombe, our Chairman, con-
trived to be very violent against the finality of
the Reform Bill ; on which, when it came to my
turn, I only said that a good authority had told
us there was no such thing as " man and for
ever," but that I hoped the country would give
the Ministers and their measure a fair trial.
January 16. — I sent Lord Grey a short memo-
randum on the duties and power of the Secretary -
at-War, and also a draft of a Minute of Council,
which I proposed to substitute for that of 29th
of May, 1822, which sanctions the intolerable
interference of the military authorities.
CHAP. XIV. NAHMEK PASHA 271
Dined at home and went in the evening to a 1833.
public meeting of the parishioners of St. James's,
convened to consider the Repeal of House and
Window Tax. Very disagreeable. I spoke my
mind very openly, that if they persevered in
pressing the Government to repeal taxes, they
would embarrass them in every possible way.
I warned them that, as belonging to that Govern-
ment, I must stand by them, and recommended
them to give me instructions what they wished
me to do.
I foresee a storm in Westminster, and I trust
shall weather it without losing character or
sacrificing my own conscience, though I do not
know how.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
January 18. — I met a very remarkable man
at the Lord Chancellor's dinner-table. This was
Nahmek Pasha, the Turkish Ambassador. He
had nothing to distinguish him from us, except
that he wore the plain red cap, which he occasion-
ally removed, and discovered a head of black hair.
On his left breast was a diamond crescent, a
present from the Sultan, and he had a gold chain
round his neck. He was rather good-looking,
with arched black eyebrows, and an aquiline
nose. His manners were easy and polite, with
very little, if any, of the gravity of a Turk. He
handed down pretty Miss Spalding to dinner
(Lady Brougham's daughter) with the air of a
272 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833t Frenchman. He drank wine like the rest of us.
He spoke French, not very well, but quite enough
for conversation.
I thought, whilst sitting between Lord Chan-
cellor Brougham and Lord Chief Justice Denman,
I myself being Secretary-at-War, the Reform Bill
being now the law of the land, and other wonders
now in full play, that the sight of the reformed
Turk opposite to me was more strange than all.
He conversed on all the usual topics, the operas
and plays, our climate, etc., with Miss Spalding ;
and, when she was gone, answered all Brougham's
questions about Constantinople and the Sultan
very pleasantly and readily. He gave us an
account of the present Grand Vizier, and told us
that His Highness had been the slave of another
great officer of state, who now treated him with
the utmost deference. He mentioned several
other grandees of the Court, and generally added
whose slaves they had originally been. He
mentioned the word without the least repugnance.
He spoke of the present Grand Vizier as being
very f( vif," when manoeuvring his troops in
sham battles ; so lively, indeed, that he made
them fire bullets and charge bayonets, and kill
one another ; although, in private life, he was
a mild man.
The Sultan, he said, was a great man, and a
very handsome man, forty -six years of age. Of
his two sons, the younger, only six years of
age, was a prodigy. He gave us an account
CHAP. XIV. TURKEY AND ENGLAND 273
of his taking leave of this child. The boy asked
him where he was going. " To England." " Do
you go by Persia P " " No, nearer to Egypt."
" Oh," said the child, " there are revolutions
there." The boy called the Sultan "the great
Lion," his brother "the middle Lion," and him-
self " the little Lion." " And what am I ? " asked
Nahmek Pasha. "Oh, you are the Eox ! " replied
the boy.
Lord Brougham asked Nahmek about the Turkish
laws. He said they were very good in them-
selves, but badly executed. He mentioned several
punishments in use, but not sanctioned by law.
Brougham asked him how they punished theft.
The Pasha said the law awarded the loss of the
left hand for the first offence, of the right hand
for the second, and of the head for the third ;
but often they began by the head I !
When the party broke up, I took the liberty of
talking with the Pasha alone. He said : " Ah,
you are a great nation, superior to any I have
seen. What is experiment elsewhere, is stability
here. They are beginning in France ; but you
have been long superior to all. Your villages
look as handsome as the streets of some metro-
politan cities." I remarked that we had just
accomplished a great Reform; but we did not
think we had arrived at perfection. "Another
proof," said the Pasha, "of your wisdom." I
complimented him on their improvements in
Turkey. " Oh," said he, " we do something, some
VOL. iv 35
274 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. little matter in our way ; mais que voulez-
vous ? "
Miss Spalding told us afterwards that she had
some conversation with the Pasha, and said to
him that the Turks ought to have a Parliament.
"Yes," he replied, " in three hundred years."
"Well, well," said she, "at least you want a
revolution in regard to your women. You want
a great change there." The Pasha laughed, and
said, " With all my heart ; oh, yes ! you may
reckon on me for that." Miss Spalding asked
who his mother was. He said, "A Georgian."
" Did she never try to make a bit of a Christian
of you?" asked Miss Spalding. "Comment
pouvait-elle le faire ? elle n'avait que cinq ans
quand elle etait enlevee de sa patrie." His
Excellency answered all this pretty impertinence,
from a very pretty mouth, with the utmost good-
humour.
January 19. — I went to Lord Althorp, and
heard from him that his efforts to second my
military reductions had placed him in direct
opposition with the authorities at the Horse
Guards. Althorp said he was nothing in the
Cabinet ; he had neither great talent, nor ill-
temper, so nobody cared for him. He read Lord
Grey's objections to my proposed Minute of
Council. I consented to make any alteration of
detail which did not compromise the principle
of non-interference of military authorities with
the civil department of the Secretary-at-War.
CHAP. XIV. MEHEMET ALI 275
Before I left Downing Street, Lord Althorp 1833,
said it was very, very likely that I should have
the Irish Secretaryship offered to me. I re-
marked that of the two offices the Irish was the
less detestable ; hut I wished not to leave the
War Office until I had got my Pension Warrant
signed hy the King, and had prepared my official
reforms.
January 21. — I dined at the Asiatic Society
Cluh, and sat next to Sir John Malcolm, who
amused me with an account of his visit to
Mehemet Ali, at Alexandria, in 1831. There was
then a mail-coach running between Alexandria
and Grand Cairo. The regiments had bands of
fifty Arabs, headed by a Frank ; and these played
"God save the King" and " Rule Britannia,"
at Malcolm's first reception by the Pasha. Sir
John asked them to play " Yive Henri Quatre,"
which, in those days, was the Erench national
air. Mehemet Ali talked of the Turks with great
contempt. He had two enormous ships-of-war,
and told Sir John that his brother Sir Pulteney
had advised him not to build ships so large.
" But," said the Pasha, " though the Admiral
was right so far as real usefulness goes, yet I
am right in order to impose upon those stupid
Turks, who are frightened at anything big."
January 22. — The next day I saw for the first
time and was introduced to Count Pozzo di
Borgo, another person who figured much in his
time. I was dining with the Miss Berry s ; the
276 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. party consisted of the Lord Chancellor, Macaulay,
Lady Charlotte Lindsay, and Lady Carlisle.
The Count spoke English easily and fluently,
and was not the least diplomatic in his manner.
He said, " Everything promised well for the peace
of Europe. His Emperor was convinced of the
expediency of preserving it."
The same evening Macaulay took me aside,
and talked very seriously of the difficulty of his
own position. He was, he felt, placed in a
different position from others ; for he was liahle
to he taunted with sacrificing his opinions for
money. I told him that the charge would be
made against all of us, as well as himself, and
with equal injustice ; and that it was our duty to
do nothing until Parliament met, and Ministers
told us what they were going to do.
EEOM DIARY.
January 25. — At War Office : Stewart of the
Treasury with me. He seems to understand the
difficulty of my position, and he told me that
everybody to whom he had spoken on the subject
understood it also, and knew that I stayed in
office only from patriotic motives. This is saying
a good deal, but I hope it is true. The great
object in keeping up our forces was to make the
Whigs unpopular with the country: and to give
the Duke of Wellington a large army to fall
back upon when he returned to office.
Stewart said if I carried my reforms the Secre-
CHAP. XIV. " THE FRIEND OF THE PEOPLE " 277
tary-at-War would be a great state officer, and
so he ought to he. At present, he is nobody.
January 26. — Lord Dover is corresponding with
Lord Hill and me, begging us to silence or muffle
the clock at the Horse Guards, which strikes so
loud as to alarm him, his nerves being shattered
by a fever. He is afraid of coming back to
Whitehall. This comes, as Eitzroy Somerset
said to me, of being cradled in luxury ; as if
the clock could be stopped for him!
January 26. — I dined at the Mansion House
with Lord Mayor Laurie, to meet Ministers. I
sat between Vice-Chancellor Shadwell and Home,
Attorney- General ; the latter a strange man. He
told me Brougham had behaved to him like an
insane man; would not let him know that he
was to be Attorney-General, although the delay
might have lost Marylebone for him, and did
in fact cost him £1,000 and more. He also said
that one of his placards was, Home, the friend
of the People. Two Irishmen who saw it said,
" By Jasus, a pretty friend the people have got
at last."
January 27. — The awful Session at hand. I
dined at Lord John Russell's. Mr. Hallam was
of the party, Prince Lieven, Lord Melbourne,
Count Pozzo di Borgo, Sir James Graham, besides
Lady Hardy and her two daughters.
Lord Melbourne spluttered, spoke loud, and
swilled wine, as usual, very jovially. Graham
in chastened good temper, behaved as he some-
278 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. times does, like a man raised beyond his natural
level : the pump is dry now and then.
The Count was the most agreeable of the party ;
and he told us, amongst other curious stories,
that he had seen a letter addressed by Napoleon,
when Brigadier at Toulon, to a man who had
refused to allow his two daughters to marry Berna-
dotte and Joseph Buonaparte. He consented to
one of the marriages, but not to the other, say-
ing, "It is enough to have one adventurer in a
family." Napoleon was angry, and wrote to the
father of the girls : " You are a fool ; give both
your daughters. You think I am nothing. It
is true I am nothing now ; but I shall astonish
the world." Madame Bernadotte had shown that
letter to Pozzo di Borgo.
Graham talked in a most melancholy style of
convulsions, and God knows what; but he was
as neat and amiable as ever.
EROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
January 29. — Parliament met. On entering the
House of Commons I must say that I thought
the appearance of the Members was very credit-
able to the first Reformed Parliament. The
Ministerial benches were very full, and, as was
customary, the Members for the City of London
sat on the Treasury Bench. The Conservatives,
as they were now called, sat on the Opposition
front bench — Peel, Chandos, Goulburn, Lord
Mahon.
ELECTION OF SPEAKER 279
Hume, by a trick, got possession of the House,
and in a long, rambling, slipslop speech, pro-
posed Littleton, saying at the same time that he
was not exactly the man fit to be the Speaker.
O'Connell seconded Littleton. Lord Morpeth and
Burdett then proposed Manners Sutton. We
divided 241 to 31 against Littleton. There was
no division against Sutton, although there was
some debate. I was sitting next to Cobbett,
who was joking out loud to himself, and making
running comments on the speeches. When the
law was stated as to the Speaker's continuance
in office, he called out, " Then he is like the
King, and never dies."
Sutton was handed to the Chair by Lord Mor-
peth and Sir Erancis Burdett, and he thanked
the House in handsome terms; and thus ended
Joseph Hume's first attempt to head and lead a
party.
EROM DIARY.
January 30. — Ellice told me that an interview
had taken place between Lord Grey and Lord
Durham. Lord Durham accused Lord Grey of
wishing to get rid of him; and so they went
on. Ellice said he thought the best thing Lord
Durham could do was to resign on plea of ill-
health. Lord Duncannon took a different view
of the matter, however, and thought Lord Durham
ought not to go out.
January 31. — Lord Durham has written the
280 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
handsomest possible letter to Lord Grey, begging
that all differences might be forgotten, promising
cordial support in Cabinet, and begging a fort-
night's absence to recover his health. In short,
a very conciliatory epistle, with which Lord Grey
was much pleased. Now Lord Durham stands
pledged to support Stanley's Irish measures.
Thus ends this squabble.
This evening I went to Lord Holland's.
Brougham, and Melbourne, and Lady Carlisle
were there. We talked about Lord Mulgrave's
dissolution of the Jamaica Assembly, and
Brougham read Mulgrave's speech aloud. We
agreed it was a very good speech for the pur-
pose ; but Lord Melbourne rose, and, as he
was going away, said, " By G — d ! you are ruin-
ing your empire." "Yes," said Lady Holland,
" and there is the chief sinner," pointing to
Brougham.
Poor Lady Holland talked to me privately
about her health, and said she was very much
afraid. I comforted her as well as I could.
February 2. — Got my last note from Lord Hill
on Pension Warrant and his final assent to this
measure, which, prospectively, is a very great
one. I shall get no present fame, perhaps much
obloquy, but it is a very important public act,
and will save at least one-half of the charge for
retired soldiers.
February 4. — This morning came a note from
Lord Althorp : " The Irish Government not to be
CHAP. XIV. O'CONNELL THE AGITATOR 281
changed, so all hopes of immediately relieving 1332.
you are at an end."
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
February 5. — I went to the House of Commons
at two o'clock, and attended the Speaker to the
House of Lords. The House was crowded with
women in feathers, and the Commons were in
great force at the Bar. The King was very well
received out of doors, and apparently in good
spirits. He laid great stress on those sentences
of his speech which alluded to Ireland.
The Address in the Commons was moved by
Lord Ormelie (the late Marquis of Breadalbane),
in a speech which I thought unnecessarily vio-
lent. He called Daniel O'Connell "a bird of
prey." The " Bird of Prey" made one of the
most furious speeches I ever heard in any
assembly, so furious indeed that Lord John
Russell moved to have some of his words taken
down. O'Connell very coolly retracted the
words ; but then went on in the same tone, not
of an apologist, but an accuser. He seemed
over-excited, and, when Lord Grey was praised
during the debate, called out, " No, no ! blood,
blood ! " In short, he was the great Irish
agitator, not the Member of the Imperial
Parliament.
'February 7. — I waited on the King with my
Pension Warrant. H.M. was very gracious, and
signed it both at the top and bottom, asking
VOL. iv 36
282 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
me if there was any harm in his double signa-
ture.
I was going away, when he said he could not
refrain from telling me how much he approved
my conduct — " public, of course," he added — par-
ticularly to the justice done to his Hanoverian
subjects (the widows' pensions), for which, as King
of Hanover, he begged to thank me.
He asked me how old I was ; also whether I
had ever had the gout. He gave me a pre-
scription for it : six grains of ginger, six of
carbonate of soda, to be taken before dinner.
H.M. then showed me his wrist, which was a
little swelled with rheumatism, and told me he
had never been so well in his life as since he had
been in his present situation. After several other
inquiries I took my leave.
Thus, with infinite trouble, was accomplished
the most serious change which had occurred in
War Office Warrants since the days of Mr. Wind-
ham. Before leaving Sir Herbert Taylor, I had
some talk with him about the state of Ireland.
He asserted that there was no doubt but that the
Repealers were for the separation of the two
islands, and had calculated seriously on the rank
they might occupy in the scale of independent
nations. They were to be number thirteen, Sir
Herbert told me. I wondered at the modesty of
their claims.
The adjourned debate began this evening. Sir
Robert Peel spoke most admirably, with good
CHAP. XIV. IRISH CHURCH REFORM 283
feeling, as well as good sense, and great eloquence.
He did not approve the foreign policy of Ministers,
nor was his opinion of individuals altered; hut
he stood by the Government in all their domestic
arrangements. He owned that in former Parlia-
ments he had acted as a party man, taking ad-
vantage of all accidents to defeat antagonists ; hut
he should do so no more. He should support
Government in all measures tending to peace and
order.
He was much cheered throughout all his
speech, particularly when he praised Stanley.
Indeed, the old usages of the unreformed House,
in this particular, seemed revived. But there
did not appear to be anything like a decided
Opposition in the House, except the Conservative
minority.
The debate was again adjourned, but the next
day we divided — 428 to 40 : a complete defeat,
which seemed to stagger the Repealers.
February 11. — Lord Althorp told me the plan
to be proposed for Irish Church Reform, and
said he expected it would be received with
acclamation. Well might he say this ! Ten
Bishops were to be abolished ; Church cess alto-
gether given up ; and Church revenues revised
and redistributed.
I left Downing Street quite satisfied, and when
Macaulay asked me privately about the Irish plan,
in the House, I replied, " You may depend upon
it, it will do."
284 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. February 12. — At five o'clock, in the House of
Commons, I heard Al thorp open his Church of
Ireland Reform scheme. He was quite right ; it
was hailed with acclamation. When he cut down
the Eishops, and abolished Church cess, there
were thunders of applause, O'Connell and the
Irish particularly loud. We were all in great
spirits : Poulett Thomson and Macaulay more
particularly so. O'Connell expressed his grati-
tude to Ministers publicly; and Shiel told me
privately that the plan was admirable. Leave
to bring in the Bill was given about half-past
ten o'clock.
This was Reform the second ; yet some of our
supporters still affected to think — or did really
think — that Government did not go on fast
enough ! ! Stanley made an admirable speech, in
the course of which he said he felt no anger
against any man who had crossed him in the
exercise of his conscientious duties ; and this he
said in a way and with an air that carried with
them the conviction that he spoke as he felt.
He told me privately that, after eight months'
battling, he had gained over the Primate to his
plan. He was, and naturally enough, in great
spirits.
ER.OM DIARY.
February 13. — Dined at Literary Eund Club.
Lord Mountnorris was in the chair. I knew him
some twenty years ago as Lord Valentia, a hand-
CHAP. XIV. GARRISON APPOINTMENTS REDUCED 285
some, taking, flourishing person, of a mixed
reputation. He is now bent, hairless, and tooth-
less, scarcely recognisable.
Lytton Bulwer, the novelist, patriot, and M.P.,
sat next to me. He is not an agreeable man, but
seems to have some sense, though with a dash
of affectation.
February 14. — Hume is to bring on a motion
about abolishing Naval and Military sinecures.
I went to Lord Althorp, who was in bad spirits
and bad humour, and confessed we were in danger.
It was very hard upon me, who had recommended
the Governorship of Berwick to be left vacant, to
have to defend these grants. But Hume brought
on his motion, and things looked so queer that
Althorp said the worst speech I could make would
be better than silence ; so I rose and turned the
debate into a constitutional question, as to whether
the King or the House of Commons should dis-
tribute great military rewards. I spoke with
great effect, and was loudly cheered. We divided
232 to 138 — a great escape. Even the minority
gave a cheer.
February 15. — I now determined to reduce, on
vacancy, several of the Garrison appointments.
I made out a list and carried them to Lord
Althorp, saying if the reductions did not take
place I would resign, and that it was absurd for
a Government accomplishing such mighty reforms
to split on such wretched trifles.
February 16. — Lord Althorp says that Lord
286 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. Grey has consented to my proposed Garrison
reductions, and he will speak to the King himself.
I called on Lord Durham with Ellice, and there
had a talk on the state of the Government,
and the misfortune of Lord Grey not listening
to good advice, nor to any that was not given
hy a flatterer. We all agreed that mischief
would ensue ; and that as for Lord Grey think-
ing he would be let off hy simply quitting office,
it was ridiculous ! !
February 21. — I was surprised hy a memoran-
dum sent in from the Horse Guards appointing
some Major-General to the Lieutenant-Governor-
ship of Berwick, and signed by the King, the very
appointment which I had given directions to be
left vacant. The paper threw me into a fluster ; I
considered the step as a premeditated outrage on
the part of Lord Hill. Lord Althorp consulted
Lord Grey and found he knew of the appointment.
This was still more astounding. We both agreed
it was a most unaccountable infatuation.
Lord Althorp said that Lord Grey was getting
more intractable than ever, he had sworn and was
in a towering passion ; said his friends would not
back him, and made obstacles of trumpery matters,
He agreed, however, to suspend the gazetting,
which, to be sure, he could not help, for I would
not sign it. He sent several letters for Althorp
to read to me, all conveying H.M.'s sentiments on
passing politics, and on the garrison vote and the
two Eitzclarence appointments. I never heard
CHAP. XIV. MINISTERIAL TROUBLES 287
such rigmarole, inconclusive nonsense. Not one
word said about the House of Commons, but
merely a discussion on the abstract right of the
King to name to these two places. It made me
despair of any good result to find such blindness
at headquarters.
I told Lord Althorp it would be better for me
to retire. I was a source of nothing but uneasi-
ness to him and the Government. But he said
that I gave him strength and enabled him to fight
up against Lord Grey.
He told me that Lord Grey was always resolved
in the Duke of Wellington's time not to come
in, of which there was some talk, without Reform
of Parliament, and that E/eform was to be a good
and not a half measure. This bargain he made
with the King when he accepted office. Lord
Althorp told me it was but due to Lord Grey
to say this, but that it was true Lord Grey had
since been too delicate in his intercourse with the
King, and acted in perfect ignorance of the House
of Commons.
Lord Hill is preparing resistance to my Minute
of Council, but Sir W. Gordon has advised him
to yield with a good grace, as the arrangement
is inevitable. I hope it is so. The turmoil,
intrigue, and perpetual discord between the
Horse Guards and War Office are incredible.
Sir James Kempt, to whom I hinted what was
passing, would not believe me. Now, however,
the plot thickens, and one of us must give way.
288 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. A division took place in the House of Commons
on a motion of Whittle Harvey's for directing
the Speaker to give correct lists of majority and
minority. Lord Althorp, in the morning, had
said, that for a wise man like Harvey he thought
it the most foolish motion he had ever heard of,
and yet 92 Members voted for it and only 142
against it. This disconcerted some of us on the
Treasury Bench. Home said it seemed the House
of Commons would vote anything to catch a little
popularity, even if it turned the Ministers out.
I owned that I did not like the complexion of
Parliament, for although in great questions the
new Members seemed to feel correctly, yet on
small points, and more especially on money
matters, no Government would be sure of a
majority again.
February 22. — At King's Levee, which was very
full. The Swedish Minister told me that their
army was not now punished by flogging. He had
been Minister of War and had opposed the
abolition of striking soldiers, but the result had
proved he was wrong, for the Swedish army had
gained in discipline since the abolition.
In the House of Commons to-day Sir Henry
Hardinge announced to me his determined hostility
to my suspension of his tenpenny pension and to
my new warrant. This is pleasant ! What with
Hume, Davies, and Hardinge in Parliament — and
Lord Hill, Lord Grey, and the King out of Parlia-
ment— I shall have opposition enough ; to say
CHAP. XIV. SINECURES AND FALSE ECONOMY 289
nothing of my own constituents, who may break 1833.
my head. However, I shall go right onwards,
notwithstanding. No one will ever know my
difficulties, but all will perceive my inadequacy
for an office of great apparent power, but no real
authority.
February 23. — I went to the King, who received
me rather abruptly. He opened the Red Book
and desired me to tell him which were sinecures
and which were not. I did so, but nearly all
were sinecures. He told me the Round Tower
of Windsor was in the personal gift of the
sovereign, and that the Deputy-Lieutenancy of the
Tower was also supposed to be peculiarly the King's.
He told me that Lord Thurlow had said to him,
" God d it, there is nothing to prevent any
man in Parliament from making any motion. He
may propose to take the crown off the King's
head. It would be d absurd and d
stupid, but I know no punishment for it."
The King said he hated sinecures, but he hated
false economy. He said he had given the Round
Tower of Windsor and the Deputy-Lieutenancy
to his two sons, because they were not in the
nature of garrison appointments, but peculiarly
his own.
I am convinced, unless one of the Pitzclarence
appointments is given up, both will be negatived
in the House of Commons. It seems to be one of
King William's unhappy mistakes, handed down
to him perhaps from his immediate predecessors,
VOL. iv 37
290 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
that there are certain places exclusively in his
personal gift, and nothing can persuade him to
the contrary.
Dining at the S.S.B.S., I heard that Lord E.
Eitzclarence had given up his place.
February 25. — I received a note from Lord
Grey telling me I must not leave out the two
appointments, Berwick and Kinsale, in my esti-
mate, without explaining why the omission was
made to the King, and calling the saving
trumpery. Althorp wrote a note telling me to
take my own course. This put me in a fury. I
had signed the Estimates leaving out the appoint-
ments at the express order of Lord Althorp as
settled by the Cabinet, and here comes Lord Grey
throwing the whole business on me to squabble
about with the King. Nothing could be more
unfair, but what could I do, the whole arrange-
ment being made and the Estimates signed !
February 26. — I went to the King and showed
him my list of garrison appointments. The first
thing he told me was that he had filled up Berwick
and Kinsale that morning. I said nothing, and
we went over the list of garrisons.
The King then sent for Sir Herbert Taylor, and
desired him to state the position of English officers
and the justice of upholding them. I said I was
not afraid of the reasoning of my Parliamentary
opponents but only afraid of their votes, and I
expressed my fear that some of the garrison
appointments would be negatived. The King
CHAP. XIV. ECONOMIES REALISED 291
said he was aware of the feeling, and if it hecame 1833.
general the Government could not stand ; that
he thought a change of Government in the present
state of affairs the worst thing that could happen.
He said he had mixed a great deal with the world
and endeavoured to find out facts, and trusted he
was as well acquainted with them as could he
expected in his position. He had done all he
could to economise the public money, hut he de-
tested paltry savings. He spoke of Hume as a
had man, and alluded to his objection to the
Eitzclarence appointments as unhandsome.
We had a good deal more talk without my
advancing a step as to the appointments, and I
went away very civilly but very unsatisfactorily
treated.
I stated to Sir Herbert Taylor, as I was leaving,
the gross impolicy of filling up the appointments,
and when I told him I had the orders of Lord
Althorp and the Cabinet not to fill them, he
stared and said Lord Grey had not said a word
to the King on the subject, and offered to go
back and convey my sentiments to H.M. He
went to the King, and returned shortly saying
I knew H.M.'s inclinations, but I might use my
own discretion, either insert the appointments in
the Estimates or not. I thought this treatment
handsome, and I eventually decided to estimate
the sums and put " Vacant " to the appoint-
ments.
This evening I laid my Estimates and my
292 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. new Warrant on the table of the House of
Commons.
FROM BOOK, "RECOLLECTIONS."
February 27. — The debate in the House on the
Irish Coercion Bill had not come on until late.
It went on languidly till ten o'clock, when
Stanley rose, and made one of the most impres-
sive speeches ever heard in Parliament. His
closing invective against O'Connell's late be-
haviour moved nearly the whole House from
the benches ; and, when he sat down, cries were
heard from all sides for O'Connell to explain.
He did make the attempt, and shuffled out
a shabby, but impudent, explanation of his
" scoundrel " speech, which drew on him volleys
of " Ahs " and " Ohs," and every token of disgust
and contempt. I never saw a man so completely
put down.
March 1. — The debate on the Coercion Bill still
going on. I had an opportunity of seeing how
completely an Irish Member acted under some
sort of compulsion ; for Henry Grattan, showing
me a petition to the King to dismiss his Ministers,
said, " I wish to heaven you would hang or shoot
O'Connell, and pass some Algerine Act if you
like, but not this Bill." The same gentleman,
on the same evening, made the most furious of all
the furious speeches made against us and our
Irish measures. But those who remember him
will recollect that, when on his legs, he seemed
CHAP. XIV. IRISH COERCION BILL 293
to have lost all self-control, and rather raved than
talked.
Peel gave one of his best speeches for two
hours. Except a sneer at Reform it was all
handsome and candid, and powerfully in favour
of the measure. His eloquence was not quite so
good as his argument. He got on the back of
a river of blood, and could not pass it for some
time. Stanley said to me, " He'll never get over
that passage." His conclusion was most power-
ful. The debate was continued until March 4,
when we divided 466 to 89, a decisive majority,
but only for the first reading of our Bill.
EROM DIARY.
March 4. — A disturbance in the Guards in
consequence of some confusion respecting the
suspension of the temporary pension and my
new Warrant. The Adjutant- General showed me
a police report to that eifect.
EROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
March 8. — Hume opposed the order of the day
for the second reading of the Irish Coercion Bill.
He made a violent, clumsy speech, recommended
resistance to the measure, and denied that the
wishes and opinions of the People were to be
collected in that House. In the course of this
debate my friend Henry Warburton was thrown
so much off his guard, that he announced a
message from Mr. Hume, who had left the House.
294 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. The shouts of laughter with which this message
was received enlivened a dull debate.
The debate closed on March 12, and the
majority, curiously enough, amounted to the
same numbers as before, 466 to 89.
March 13. — I heard to-day that Lord Durham
had resigned the Privy Seal, and was to be made
an Earl. His resignation was attributed to ill-
health and family afflictions.
March 14. — Ministers received a check in the
Commons this evening, for Charles Wynn would
not allow them to read their Irish Church Reform
Bill a second time, suggesting that it was a Money
Bill and must be referred previously to a Com-
mittee. I found my masters very much discomfited.
Lord Althorp said to me, (( Well, master, we have
put our foot in it this time " ; and Stanley said,
" This is a blunder."
EEOM DIARY.
March 15. — I went to a meeting about the
repeal of House and Window Tax, which I pro-
mised to support, and which I must support,
let what will come of it. Indeed, I think this
will be a good occasion for resigning my odious
office. I must vote for repeal on the 22nd. I
have promised so to do repeatedly, and I do not
wish to do otherwise, foolish as it would appear
to leave the Government for such a cause; but the
real difficulties of my position make this fair pre-
text such as it is expedient to avail myself of.
CHAP. XIV. A DEADLOCK 295
Here is the Mutiny Bill, which I have not got 1833.
ready and which I shall not be able to carry as I
wish, to add to my difficulties. I have had a very
civil letter from the King, but what can that
do for me ?
PROM BOOK, " BECOLLECTIONS."
March 23. — I wrote to Lord Hill, stating my
intention of abolishing regimental flogging, except
in cases of mutiny under arms ; and I transmitted
at the same time an excellent letter written to
me by Bobert Grant on the same subject. I felt
that this was bringing our differences to a crisis ;
and that, if Lord Hill played his cards well, he
would get rid of me — if I was supported by the
Cabinet, I should get rid of him. That we could
not both of us retain our present positions was
quite clear.
March 25. — I went to Lord Althorp and told
him Lord Hill would not consent to my proposal
about regimental flogging. He was more per-
plexed than I had ever before seen him. He said,
" Ay, I now do believe we are at a deadlock. I
can go on no longer."
He then told me that, to all appearance, the
Cabinet was on the eve of dissolution. Stanley
would not stay at the Irish Office ; Goderich
would not move from the Colonial Office. He
would not move the West India question if
Goderich stayed at the Colonial Office ; and the
Government could not go on if Stanley went out.
296 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
I asked why all this was to take place, merely
because Goderich was not told to move. It
seemed that Lord Grey did not like to make this
proposal to Goderich — an amiable delicacy, but a
weakness where such vast interests were at stake.
The fact was that Lord Grey was tired with his
official life. Lady Mary Wood told me her father
had resolved not to continue at the head of affairs
after the next July.
March 26. — I had a letter from Lord Hill
refusing to accede to my proposal. I went at
once to Lord Althorp, left the letter and Robert
Grant's letter with him, and told him to inform
Lord Grey I could not present the Mutiny Bill
unless the clause proposed by me was inserted in
it. Lord Althorp said, "Very well, I will send
a box to Lord Grey directly." I returned to the
War Office, more tranquil ; " certus eundi," as I
thought.
March 27. — I prepared for bringing on the
Estimates, and for announcing that I was no
longer Secretary-at-War. I went to the House,
but had not been there five minutes when Graham
came in, and, seating himself next to me, said,
"Je vous salue, mon ami." I asked him what
for. "It is all settled," he said: "no Estimates
to-night — no Mutiny Bill — all is right. Stanley
and you are where you ought to be."
At House of Commons. Lord Althorp beckoned
to me, and we retired behind "Solomon's Porch."
He said that Lord Grey had desired him to
CHAP. XIV. THE " DETESTABLE WAR OFFICE " 297
apologise to me for not communicating with me 1833.
himself, and had told him to offer me the Irish
Office. "I take it," I said, "if it were only to
get rid of that detestable War Office."
We tried all we could to put off Estimates,
but there was a general cry for them, so at
half -past eleven o'clock I was obliged to bring
on the vote for the number of men, which after
some discussion was carried unanimously at one
o'clock.
March 28. — I had a long walk in St. James's
Park with Stanley, who gave me a sketch of the
different official people with whom I should have
to deal in Ireland. He spoke unequivocally well
of only one man — Blackburn, the Attorney-
General. He gave me the character of Plunket,
and the Lord-Lieutenant, with very little reserve.
The first was timid and wavering ; the other a
good man, but vain and easily flattered. He told
me his rule had been " to hear everything, say
nothing, and believe nothing."
Stanley's whole behaviour was most friendly;
and nothing that has occurred since those long-
passed days has obliterated the grateful remem-
brance of his assistance.
March 29. — I had an amusing conversation with
Lord Durham, who told me that Lord Goderich
had struggled violently before quitting his Colonial
Department. At last the King was prevailed
upon to ask him. When he assented, Lord Grey
came in haste to Lord Durham, to get the Privy
VOL. iv 38
298 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. Seal at once, for fear of some change of purpose ;
and the Seal was crammed into the pocket of
Goderich, who complained bitterly to Lord
Durham, saying, " Why should Stanley have my
place ? why not Melbourne's ? " He was somewhat
mollified when he heard there was a salary
attached to it, and he then asked if there was
any patronage belonging to it. He had since
been asking Lord Grey for several things; but,
as Lord Durham said, he ought to have done
this before he gave up the seals. I laughed
heartily at the story, which I tell as it was
told to me.
Edward Ellice came to me, and showed me a
letter from Lord Grey, pressing him to take the
War Office. I urged him strongly to give an
affirmative answer. Ellice was much more fit for
this office than I could pretend to be. He knew
how to manage men, which I never could do ;
and I was persuaded that his intercourse with the
military authorities would be more smooth than
mine had been, or ever could be; and to this
must be added his near connection with Lord
Grey, and the influence he possessed over that
most influential statesman,.
April 3. — I went to the King's Levee. I found
His Majesty not in the pleasantest of humours,
and rather sleepy. However, he recovered his
usual good-humour, and began to talk about
Ireland. He asked me if I had ever been there.
He told me there were two parties there — Re-
CHAP. XIV. RE-ELECTED FOR WESTMINSTER 299
pealers and Saints — and he liked the latter as little 1833.
as the former.
I told His Majesty that I wished to express
my acknowledgments for my new appointment.
He said, "Oh, as for that ," as much as to
say, " You owe that to my advisers." I bowed
away as quickly as I could, and learnt from
Lord Althorp afterwards that Lord Grey had
found the King in a had temper.
Poor Lord Goderich, when he came out of the
closet, after resigning the seals, looked half in tears.
I was re-elected for Westminster without oppo-
sition.
April 6. — I removed to the Irish Office in
Queen Street. I had endeavoured to do my duty
as Secretary-at-War, and had attempted several
reforms, which would have been successful had
I been seconded by the Government. My Pension
Warrant, if not superseded by my successors,
would produce a great national saving when it
came into operation. All the arrears which en-
cumbered the office when I came into it had
been cleared away, and the establishment had
been reduced from seventy-three to sixty-two
clerks, the number fixed by Sir Henry Hardinge.
Considering that it was my first experiment of
official life — for I never had held any subordinate
office — I was pleased to think that I had not
disappointed my friends. I had many tokens of
regard from those who served under me, and even
the Heads of Departments on the other side of
300 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. the archway wrote and said several civil things
on my retirement. Lord Hill himself, good man,
was very friendly.
I found a great change in the establishment
in Queen Street, which consisted of only two
clerks and three messengers. Having been so
admirably seconded and assisted at the War Office,
I felt rather forlorn in my new abode ; but
Stanley's private secretary promised to help me,
and Mr. O'Hanlan, the counsel attached to the
office, came to instruct me.
EBOM DIARY.
April 12. — My first duty at the I.O. was to
correspond with Lord Anglesey about proclaiming
Kilkenny and suppressing the Volunteers. He
was for doing both at once, but Lord Grey and
myself wrote to him to wait for some act of the
Volunteers before issuing the proclamation. As
for Kilkenny, it must be proclaimed at once.
April 16. — I took my seat at the morning
sitting of the House of Commons. The Speaker,
shaking hands, said to me, " Out of the frying-
pan into the fire."
April 22. — Attwood of Birmingham brought
forward his motion on currency as connected with
national distress. He was violent and virulent.
Lord Althorp answered him admirably, and
moved that a change would be inexpedient and
dangerous.
April 23. — The debate on currency was re-
CHAP. XIV. DEBATE ON CURRENCY 301
sumed. Baring spoke for us, but as usual the 1833.
last part of his speech contradicted the first,
and seemed to countenance paper money. Peel
got up and attacked Baring on this, and made
a nohle defence of his Bill of 1819. The
debate and feeling of the House evidently with
us, although this motion was announced as
being likely to shake if not destroy the Ad-
ministration.
April 24. — The debate was closed by M. Att-
wood in a long speech ; we were 331 to 139 in
favour of Lord Althorp's amendment. We next
had a division on distress of the country, which
Attwood tried to tack to Lord Althorp's amend-
ment, but we were still 279 to 155 ; then came
Lord Althorp's amendment. George Sinclair
divided the House on this, and we had 304 to 49,
and so ended this much dreaded discussion. Peel
was much pleased, and said in my hearing,
" Worthy of a son of Sir John Sinclair."
April 26. — I was so much knocked up by
business at the office, and the long nights in
Parliament that I did not attend the House of
Commons this evening. I sent to inquire what
was going on, and the answer came back, " Malt,
malt, malt," Sir W. Ingleby's motion for reduction
of half the Malt Tax.
April 27. — Ministers were beaten last night,
and were in a minority of 10 ; and I thought they
must surely go out.
I went to Althorp, who laughed and said, " Well,
302 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. Hobhouse, this time we have escaped ; we are out
now." He seemed quite happy, and told me that
he had not been so well for a long time.
Those of our party who had voted against us
were not aware of the consequences of their vote,
and, when the majority were cheering at the
announcement of the numbers, Hume said, "Ah,
if you knew what you have done, you would not
cheer."
Althorp had received a letter from the King
that morning which contained these words : " His
Majesty deeply regrets the result of last night's
debate. He most anxiously desires that his con-
fidential servants will surmount their embarrass-
ments in the Cabinet of this day."
We had a long talk of who was to come in.
Althorp thought Peel, and perhaps some of the
present set. He told me in strict confidence that
he suspected Brougham intended to be Prime
Minister, for that when Lord Grey and others
wanted to make him (Althorp) Eirst Lord of the
Treasury, Brougham opposed it strongly; hence
his plan to get rid of the judicial functions of
the Lord Chancellor.
J. Hume has written to Ellice begging Ministers
not to resign, assuring him that he and some
twenty others of the best supporters of Government
had voted against them last night, but not to turn
them out. They had nothing to do but withdraw
their Estimates, and make smaller ones ! ! ! This
is incredible, but true. Lord Grey does not think
CHAP. XIV. A GOOD WOBD FOR O'CONNELL 303
resignation necessary, but Althorp persists it is 1833.
indispensable.
I went to Brooks's, and found all in an uproar ;
those who had voted against us in despair, and
insisting we ought not to go out. They said that
Peel and his friends were of the same opinion ; it
would be base desertion, etc. We had a great
deal of fun, but some of them were serious
enough and talked of revolution and such matters.
They swore we should not go out. I told them
all their swearing would not swear away the
resolution for taking off half the Malt Tax, and
out we must go.
This day a large party, chiefly Irish Members
of Parliament, dined with me ; amongst them was
Lord Duncannon, who told me something much to
the credit of O'Connell. When the Grey Govern-
ment was formed, he was authorised by Lord
Anglesey to assure O'Connell that neither Doherty
nor Blackburn should be promoted ; yet, soon
afterwards, the first of these gentlemen was made
Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, and the other
Attorney-General. O'Connell had never com-
plained of this, nor even told the story ; and Lord
Duncannon, who would have been injured by it,
was sensibly affected by that unexpected delicacy
on the part of the great agitator. Indeed, he
never abandoned that extraordinary man ; nor did
O'Connell ever speak in public, nor, so far as I
know, in private, unfavourably of Lord Dun-
cannon.
304 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
April 28. — I went to the Lord Chancellor and
asked him whether I was to put off the Irish
Grand Jury Committee. He stared and looked
red in the face, as if hesitating to tell me. I then
said that Lord Althorp had promised to let me
know whether men remained in office or not.
Brougham said, " Oh, to he sure, we must move
some milk-and-water resolution to make the House
repent of their Friday's folly ; it would be ahsurd
to go out on such a question."
He then said that the breaking up of this
Administration would probably bring about a
patchwork Government, of which Peel would be
a part, and he added this would be a sad thing. I
thought his comment was uttered more in the tone
of inquiry than of reprobation. My suspicion is
that he wants some such condition, and will bring
it about.
April 29. — At the House of Commons, I sat
next to Lord Althorp, who was fidgety, and
actually fretful, which I never before saw him
to be in my life. A little after five he rose,
and said that he should move an amendment
on Sir John Key's motion for repeal of the
House and Window duties. The amendment
stated that the repeal of half the Malt Tax
and the whole of the House and Window duties
would occasion a large deficiency in the revenue,
which could only be supplied by a property
tax, and that a property tax was at that time
inexpedient.
CHAP. XIV. RESIGNATION OF OFFICE 305
As Peel passed the Treasury Bench, I heard isss.
him say to Althorp, "Your resolution will do."
I was afterwards told by Althorp that this was
a little hit of acting on the part of Sir Robert,
for the resolution had been communicated to
Peel on Sunday, and he had approved of it. He
was not taken by surprise, but I was, and,
turning to Lord John Russell, I said, I did not
know what to do ; I could not vote against the
repeal of the House and "Window duties. " Can't
you ? " said Hussell ; " then stay away ; it would
be very awkward for you to vote against us,
when so many of our friends are about to retract
their Friday's vote in order to support us." I
said nothing ; but, going to Poulett Thomson,
told him that I should resign my office.
In the course of the evening I had a letter
from Graham and Althorp, saying I ought to
keep my office and resign. I told Graham that
I was not certain as to resigning my seat ; but
I certainly would resign my office.
The next morning I consulted my wife, who
approved of my resigning office, so I sat down
and wrote a letter of resignation to Lord Grey.
I received a note from him almost immediately,
saying my letter had distressed him greatly, and
desiring me to come to him.
I went to Lord Althorp and told him it was
impossible, after the conduct of the Westminster
electors to me, to retain office, and abandon them.
I detailed the circumstances of our long con-
VOL. iv 39
306 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. nection, and concluded by saying " that my
resignation was irrevocable; I could not retract
it." Lord Althorp then said : " Though, as one
of the Ministers, I have thought it my duty
to dissuade you from leaving office, I must, as
your friend, say that I think you are right.
Your resignation will be a great blow to us; it
will all but knock up the Government." I
said, "Pooh! nonsense!" "Ah," rejoined Lord
Althorp, "you may say so; but whom shall we
put in your place?"
I told Althorp I was in great difficulties about
voting. He then reminded me how he and I
had abused Baring for voting against his con-
science to please his constituents ; and he asked
me whether I really thought it a good thing
for the country that Sir John Key's motion
should be carried. I said, " No ; I think it a
very bad thing." " Well, then," said he, " how
can you vote for it ? " I said, " I would not
vote for it, but would resign my seat." He
owned my position " was a very painful one ; but
he had never thought of it until Monday morning,
when he was in bed."
Lord Grey received me very kindly and very
mournfully ; told me he did not know what
they should do if I left office ; suggested what
had been suggested before, of my resigning only
my seat, and seeing the effect of that step. I
persevered ; said I was very sorry, but I could
not help taking the step ; that I gave the best
CHAP. XIV. THE CHILTERN HUNDREDS 307
possible proof of the sincerity of my attachment 1833.
to him and his colleagues, by resigning my seat
as well as my place.
I went to Sir Francis Burdett, and begged him
to move a new writ for Westminster the same
evening, I having accepted the Chiltern Hundreds.
I said I had resigned my office, that was done ;
and, as for my seat, I could not keep it without
voting either against my constituents or against
my conscience, so that I had nothing to do but
to resign. Seeing he could not alter my deter-
mination, Burdett undertook this disagreeable
task.
I walked away to De Year, and told him what
I had done. He approved, and we both agreed
to bid farewell to Westminster politics, unless
indeed the electors should spontaneously call
upon me to serve them again.
I went home. Lord Lansdowne called to
dissuade me from leaving office ; but I looked
at the clock, and said that by that time the
step was taken.
I thought over the events of this day, and
felt sure that in these, the most critical circum-
stances of my whole life, I had acted as became
me ; erring, if anything, on the side of too great
scrupulosity; — and I felt sure of general, if not
of universal, approbation. Indeed, it seemed
utterly impossible to impute to me any but the
best motives for this double sacrifice.
On Wednesday, May 1, I wrote to Sir Herbert
308 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833 Taylor, requesting him to convey my duty and
regrets to the King, for being compelled to quit
H.M.'s service. I had an answer very soon,
telling me that the King " deeply lamented the
loss of me, at a moment when my talents and
energies would have been so advantageously
employed in the service of the country/' I also
received complimentary notes from many dis-
tinguished people ; and an article in the Times
called the virtue of the resignations unparalleled.
Being quite sure that I had done right, I was
pleased that others thought so.
May 2. — Charles Wood called on me, and I had
a long talk with him. The purport of his visit
was to persuade me to return to office. Lord
Grey, at the King's desire, would write such a
letter to me as I might publish. He detailed
over and over again the difficulties caused by my
retirement.
I told him I did not know what would be
thought of my return to office, as regards West-
minster ; but as there was to be a meeting at
the Crown and Anchor this evening, perhaps the
opinion of the constituency might be collected
there.
Some of the papers begin to abuse me, and I
hear that many good folks stare and confess they
cannot understand what I meant by resigning.
The double sacrifice is incomprehensible ; I must
have some motive. General Gascoyne told me
very gravely that of course I had other reasons
CHAP. XIV. HE-NOMINATED FOR WESTMINSTER 309
than those which I assigned in my advertisement. 1833.
I replied that I was not in the habit of advertising
lies. He laughed at my delicacy towards my
constituents, and said he would have seen them
d hefore he would have acted as I have
done.
At the meeting of Westminster electors resolu-
tions were passed highly complimentary to me,
and I was again put in nomination.
May 3. — A meeting took place in Westminster,
professedly about House and Window Tax, but in
reality to put Evans in nomination for West-
minster, and at that meeting my conduct was
denounced as an act of the basest duplicity, a
desertion of my duty, and a perfidious trick ; and
a resolution accordingly was passed by acclama-
tion, although the chairman, Mr. Daniel Whittle
Harvey, defended me. Indeed, I find even my
own friends begin to think I must have some
deep-laid plot in contemplation. The Government
people contribute to this by expressing their
anxiety that I should come back, by not appoint-
ing my successor. I hear that people cannot be
brought to believe in the reality of my making
such a sacrifice for honour and conscience' sake ;
but it is true, nevertheless.
The abuse of the press more violent. Had I
kept both office and seat, and voted against the
Repeal, I should have been less attacked.
After some hesitation I agreed to stand again
for Westminster, and on May 7 I went to Co vent
310 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
1833. Garden with Lord Ebrington, Buncombe, Stanley,
and other Members of Parliament, together with a
large body of friendly electors. But the moment
I got into the Market the disturbance began;
and it was not without difficulty, not to say
danger, that I got within the rails of the church
portico. The people were ferocious, and, if they
had got me down, I should never have risen again.
I saw many of my Committee, " well tried through
many a varying year," now ranged with my
opponents. Eearon, the American traveller, said
that he began to suspect we had given more
Reform than the civilisation of the people would
bear.
I was proposed in the usual way, but when I
stepped forward to speak, I was instantly assailed
with the most unsavoury missiles, and a storm of
hisses and yells. Finding I could get no hearing,
my friends persuaded me to return to the hotel
where my committee was sitting.
In the meantime, Evans, and Escott, and
Wakley attacked me furiously. The chief charge
against me was for not voting for the repeal
of the House and Window duties ; and Evans
affected not to believe that I was really out of
office.
May 10. — Colonel Evans was returned M.P. for
Westminster, by a majority of 152 ahead of me.
It was but poor consolation to be told, as I was,
that had the poll been kept open one hour longer,
I should have won the election. After all my
CHAP. XIV. DEFEATED 311
toils and sacrifices, it appears that there could isss.
not be found 2,000 electors of Westminster to
record their opinion in favour of my public
character or of my private honour, which was
clearly involved in the event of the contest.
Nevertheless I never felt more self-satisfied in
my life — never more certain that I had acted as
became me, and in a way which would, finally,
be creditable to myself and useful to the public.
Even at the time I saw, in the applause of every
honourable man, a certain proof of the opinion
which would ultimately be formed of me. Pelted
by the people, deserted by the electors, abused
by the press, and assailed in every way by my
antagonists, without office and out of Parliament,
I never felt more tranquil in my life than this
day, at my own house, with my wife, and three
brothers, and my wife '3 brother, Lord Thomas
Hay ; and, whilst waiting to hear by how many
I had lost the election, I allowed myself the
pardonable vanity of reciting a very hackneyed
quotation — " Virtus repulsae nescia sordidse,"
etc.
My principal friends, De Vear, and Wylde, and
Pouncey, called upon me next day to discuss the
expediency of petitioning against the return,
which, perhaps, might have been set aside on
account of some informality; but I decided
against the proposal, and one of my friends went
to the hustings, at the declaration of the numbers,
and declared that I should not dispute the return.
312 LONDON CHAP. XIV.
Even this did not prevent Colonel Evans from
having a fling at me ; for he said, in his speech
of thanks, that he hoped, if ever he proved
recreant, he might be treated as I had been.
Recreant indeed ! When will he give up high
office, and £6,000 or £7,000 a year, rather than
violate his engagements ?
But such was the blind violence of the moment,
that even the John Bull newspaper confessed that
it could not understand why I had been so abused.
Returning from a walk on the day of the declara-
tion of the poll, I found my window-shutters
closed, and heard that a message had been sent
by the police that Colonel Evans's chairing-pro-
cession would pay me a visit, and twelve police-
men were sent to guard me. Contrasting this
with former scenes in Westminster, I could not
help bursting into a fit of laughter ; but I thought
it advisable to send my wife and children to the
house of a friend. The triumphant procession did
not come to my house ; but drew up before that of
my chairman, the worthy De Year. They pelted
it a little, but did no mischief.
On May 12 I went to Send Grove, and was
joined by my wife and children in a few days. I
heard that my door-knocker had not been silent
for half an hour since I left London.
May 15. — I had a letter from Sir G. Shee,
Under-Secretary of State, hoping I would return
to office and find a seat in the summer. I sent
back to say that I was not enamoured of martyr-
CHAP. XIV. ATT REVOIR TO POLITICS 313
dom, but one day or other I might wear King's 1833.
Livery again. El lice wrote me a letter on the
following Friday saying I might be returned for
Dover. Perhaps I might have been ; but there
was nothing particularly inviting in the pro-
ceedings in Parliament at that time.
VOL. iv 40
CHAPTER XV
EROM DIARY.
May 22. — I dined with the Duchess of Kent.
There were upwards of thirty at table. Sir James
Graham and Lord John Russell were of the
party. It was the first time I had seen them
since I had quitted office.
I had a good deal of talk with Sir J. Conroy
on personal politics and characters of M.P.'s. He
told me he once heard Joseph Hume recommend
the Duke of Kent to be content with keeping
one horse-chaise for the Duchess, at which the
Duke laughed very heartily. He asked me if I
thought Hume meant mischief. I said, " De-
cidedly not." He agreed with me.
He told me that H.R.H. had taken a great
interest in the Westminster election, and was
exceedingly vexed at the result. She was most
particularly attentive to me. Indeed, I must
say that every one I see endeavours to repair
the injustice of my late constituents, so far as
praise can repair it. I never met with a warmer
reception in my life from every one — friend, ac-
quaintance, and stranger.
May 24.— Went to the Children's Ball at
314
CHAP. XV. ASPECTS OF WELLINGTON 315
St. James's Palace : a very beautiful sight. I
had a most gracious reception from all, par-
ticularly Tories, and some of my old masters.
This being Derby week, there was little done
in Parliament; but I remark two votes — one on
Corn Laws and another on House and Window
Tax — on which, if I had been in the House,
I should have been obliged to go against the
Ministers : so how could I have held office ?
The more I think of the course I pursued, the
more I feel sure that I did what was right;
nay, more, the only thing that was right.
May 26. — I dined at Lord Sligo's : a pleasant
party. I sat next to Lady Clanricarde, and was
trying to find out the resemblance between her
and Canning. I could not, however. She said
one or two agreeable and sensible things, and
seemed to have a humorous turn. As a specimen
of young Lady Salisbury's good sense, she told
me that the Tory Marchioness had said that the
Duke of Wellington had no taste about women;
though, she added, " I have no right to say so,
I am sure."
May 28. — Went to the Queen's Drawing-Room
to celebrate the King's birthday. The King
looked cold enough, the Queen particularly
gracious ; all very friendly, save one, who turned
on his heel ; and who was he ? The Duke of
Wellington. I hope, for his sake, I made a
mistake.
May 31. — I dined with Lady Davy, and met
316 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1833. Lucien Buonaparte, the Prince of Canino. He
pressed my hand and said handsome things on
being introduced to me.
He looked to me very like his wonderful
brother, particularly in the lower part of his
face. He was more than polite to me, and,
sitting next to me, talked with a frankness that
was very pleasing. He said that there was no
reason to fear a revolution in England ; but he
would not answer for Erance. He added that
Napoleon knew Erance better than any one, and
confessed that he and his Republican friends had
been wrong. He thought Waterloo had ruined
Europe. Had Napoleon been victorious, he would
have governed constitutionally and peaceably; at
least, he said he would, and Lucien believed him.
Lady Dudley Stuart, Lucien }s daughter, was
one of the party : a very pleasing woman, but
now very plain. Lord Stuart de Rothsay and
his wife dined with us; he, as usual, was very
agreeable. Lord Kerry and Lord Russell were
both there — very young, and made me feel very
old.
I afterwards went to an Assembly at Lady
Grey's. Lord Grey received me most kindly,
as, to be sure, he ought.
June 19. — There are rumours of a change of
Ministers and dissolution of Parliament. The
friends of Government, as usual, are the chief
propagators of these tales; the cause assigned is
that the Peers will throw out the Church
CHAP. XV. ILLNESS OF LADY JULIA 317
Temporalities Bill, and Lord Althorp having 1833.
said the Government would stand or fall hy the
Bill, he and his colleagues must abide by the
assertion and resign.
I had some talk with Chief Justice Denman
on the subject, and he seemed to think the em-
barrassment great. I foretell the Government
will scramble through this difficulty.
P. Methuen, who has been here this minute,
says that Ellice and Gordon hint that the
Ministers have resolved to give way on the point
on which they and the Peers are likely to differ,
namely, the appropriation of Church revenues (if
any surplus) to such purposes as Parliament may
approve.
All these reflections were soon lost in the
serious attack which threatened the life of my
wife. Most unfortunately she had been prevailed
upon to try the new quack system, and a certain
Doctor Beluomini was the person sent for to
carry it into effect. It produced the worst pos-
sible effect : a blood-vessel broke in the lungs,
and for a short time I thought she was lost;
but Dr. Warren assured me that there was still
some hope, and, by his assistance and constant
attendance, the hemorrhage was stopped.
Lady Julia continued to improve, and was
soon so much better that I was able to see some
of my friends. I found, however, now that I
was altogether out of the concern, that Parlia-
mentary talk was insufferable.
318 LONDON CHAP. XV.
June 27. — I was asked to attend a Committee
to answer questions respecting the duties of
Secretary-at-War. I almost made up my mind
not to attend, as I knew the intention was to
extract evidence from me against the military
authorities at the Horse Guards, and there were
no less than four M.P.'s on the Committee who
had already been at the head of the War Office.
June 28. — After some consideration I went to
the Committee, and all went smoothly till Hume
asked me whether the Commander-in-Chief had
opposed any of my proposals for reduction. I
declined to answer that question, as this would
hetray the secrets of official intercourse, and the
question was afterwards withdrawn.
No man ever made greater efforts than myself
to control the power of the military authorities,
and, had I been listened to, the Secretary-at-War
would have become an independent Minister. But
I would not consent to abuse my official experi-
ence by making it the foundation of charges
against those with whom I had been in confidential
intercourse. I would willingly and fearlessly act
upon the knowledge I gained, when in the office ;
but I will not tell tales out of school, which
would not produce the desired reforms. On the
contrary, some of my details might be incorrect,
my inferences wrong. Hardinge and others would
contradict me ; their authority might be thought
better than mine, and my disclosures would retard
instead of advancing the public cause. Never-
CHAP. XV. RESIGNATION AND AFTER- 319
theless I shall, of course, be much abused by 1833>
the worthy Radicals . " N'importe."
July 2. — Dined at Paul Methuen's. A House
of Commons party, very dull for an ex-M.P.
Burdett again expressed his discontent at my
giving up Westminster, so did James Brougham.
I said, as the girl did who ran away with the
footman, I would do it again if it were to be
done again. Burdett said that so far as I was
concerned there was nothing to be said, but he
had been so long in the habit of considering only
the public good, that he never thought of his
own character or convenience.
Now this is all very well, but how can the
public good be advanced by the ruin of individual
reputation ? I might have retained my office
and my seat and voted with Government, but
after so shameless a contrast between my repeated
assurances to my constituents, and my after-con-
duct in Parliament, what weight could I ever
have given to any Government, or to any party,
or to any cause ? I might indeed have retained
my seat and opposed Government, and I some-
times think this would have been preferable to
throwing open Westminster to an adventurer,
and thereby degrading the Metropolitan con-
stituency. But who could have foreseen that,
after my double sacrifice, the electors should be
so imposed upon as to treat me, not as a martyr
to my own notions of scrupulous honour, which
I was ; but as a traitor to themselves, and a
320 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1833. deserter of my principles ? Had I thought such
a mistake possible, it is likely I should have
hesitated much more than I did before I resigned
my seat, for it must be confessed the result of
the last contest cannot but be prejudicial to the
public interests. There wanted not another
example of public ingratitude. It is some com-
fort, however, that the question seems now to
be tolerably well understood. The gallant Colonel
is not raised, I am not lowered in public estima-
tion, and the electors of Westminster will probably
take the first opportunity of showing that they
have recovered from the error of the moment.
July 4. — Dined at David Baillie's; met there
Lord Tavistock, with whom I had a good deal
of conversation on the state of the Cabinet. He
told me Lord John Russell is not pleased with
the doings of Government, and once had almost
resigned. There must be a change at the close
of the Session.
July 6. — I have read a little lately, chiefly
lounging books ; but I cannot say I take very
readily to study after years of public turmoil.
The business of office has also given a different
turn and tone to my mind. I hope, however,
to be able to return to books in good earnest,
unless I should return to my old occupation.
July 7. — Dined at H. Stephenson's. Duke and
Duchess of Cleveland, Duke of Sussex, etc., there:
a pretty Sunday party.
The Duke of Cleveland showed us the letter
CHAP. XV. DINNER AT LORD HARRINGTON'S 321
of summons to attend the Lords on Tuesday next, 1833.
when it is expected Ministers will be hard run
on Local Courts Bill. The Duke told me that
he expected our friends would be beaten, and he
was alarmed at the consequences which might
ensue from a change of Administration, or from a
collision between the two Houses. He seemed
very serious indeed, and he is not at all a timid
politician.
July 9. — This evening Ministers beaten by
majority of 12 on Local Courts Bill in the Lords.
Now for the tug of war.
July 13. — I sat for my bust to Campbell, the
sculptor.1 A tedious operation. He seems a very
ignorant man, and I have remarked this of almost
every artist I ever knew, Chantrey and Jackson
excepted.
July 14. — I dined at Lord Harrington's : a most
curious scene. His wife (Miss Eoote), a pleasing
person, who did the honours well to a most
numerous and miscellaneous party.
Lord Harrington, in his usual strange costume,
did not appear till just before dinner at half -past
eight. Lady Tavistock was the only female pre-
sent. I sat between Lord Tavistock and Luttrell ;
the latter amused himself in quizzing the feast,
as might be expected. I must say it was very
absurd. The servants were dressed in some
ancient costume with large sleeves. Count
d'Orsay was of the party, and fixed his eyes on
1 This bust is now at 42, Berkeley Square.
VOL. IV 41
322 LONDON CHAP. XV.
the Countess in a very intelligible manner. A
singular bye-road to fame, and yet Lord
Harrington must love notoriety; nothing else
can account for such troublesome vagaries. He
is a pleasing, agreeable, and, in most respects,
a very sensible man. We had a weary time of
it till half -past ten.
In the drawing-room were one or two more
ladies, and Mrs. S. Whitbread amongst them.
We had music, i.e. a song from the Countess,
the Jews' harp performer — a curious exploit —
and James Smith with his eternal Sirname
song.
I had a long talk with Tavistock on the state
of affairs. He seemed persuaded that the present
Ministerial arrangement neither could nor ought
to last beyond the Session. He was against any
measure that would annihilate the power of the
House of Peers.
He told me that the plan was for Abercromby
to move and Grote second a resolution or address
to the King, if the Church Reform Bill were
thrown out, expressive of the wish of the Commons
for His Majesty to take some steps to prevent
a collision between the two Houses, i.e. create
Peers. If the present Ministers are to remain
in office, such a step appears inevitable.
July 15. — It appeared very clearly by the
Opposition papers this morning that the Peers
had given way, so far as the second reading was
concerned.
CHAP. XV. ORLEANS HOUSE 323
Went to the Zoological Gardens and saw Mr. 1833.
Sabine, who told me that the year before last
the Society had taken £12,000 in shillings, but
only £10,000 this year. He said that all the
keepers were country folk, sons of gamekeepers,
etc.; no menagerie men — they had found them
to be rogues.
July 16. — This day we went to Twickenham
to the villa recently inhabited by Sir George
Pococke, and now called Orleans House. It
was a delightful residence, open and yet re-
tired ; not a building was to be seen from our
terrace, or from our windows. Our own smooth
lawn, the lovely Thames, the avenues of Ham,
the meadows of Petersham, the woody slopes of
Bichmond Hill, seemed to belong to us alone,
and made for our enjoyment ; and the tranquillity
of the retreat, after London, was in itself the
charm of charms.
During this season I went into society more
than 1 had been for many years, and had no
reason to regret my retirement from public life*
July 17. — I had a letter from E. J. Littleton 1
yesterday, telling me he " likes his office much,
and contemplates official deposition with pain."
Now this is just the man for office. He has no
reputation to lose, and has what are called habits
of business, without any anxiety to excel in
Parliament.
1 Edward John Littleton, Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant
of Ireland, created Baron Hatherton 1835.
324 LONDON CHAP. XV.
July 22. — I am employed in looking over
newspapers since 1820 — a tiresome and not so
instructive an employment as I should have
thought. I find, however, as far as myself is
concerned, that with my present experience I
should not have acted always as I have done.
Indeed, who would ? Yet I have nothing to
regret or blame in the general tenor of my
conduct, and least of all towards the people of
Westminster, to whom I have devoted the best
years of my life.
July 27. — Sharp work in the Lords. Govern-
ment beat on one important clause in Committee,
but Lord Grey said it would be folly to go out
upon it.
Lord Tavistock came to us to-day. He said if
Government were to restore the amended clause,
they would be beat ; if not, they will carry their
Bill. Ellice tells me Lord Grey will not attempt
any change, and the Duke of Wellington is sick
of opposition and sighs for repose.
July 31. — The Lords passed the second reading
of the Irish Church B/eform Bill by a large
majority, 59. The Duke of Wellington for it.
August 17. — My friend Lord Althorp declared
the other day that it was his intention to give
up the House Tax the next Session of Parliament.
Had he told me this, I should not have had all
my troubles, but he did not know it.
August 20. — I have been debating what I shall
do with myself during the autumn and winter.
CHAP. XV. BASILDON PAKK 325
This no employment, after my active life, is an 1833.
annoyance. I do not like to begin any serious
pursuit, but I must, or I shall eat up my own
soul.
August 29. — Parliament prorogued to-day. As
I foretold, Ministers managed to scramble through
the Session.
September 10. — Returned to London. Walked
about the streets and met scarcely a soul. A
most melancholy scene.
I have resolved to return to my Italian work,
and prepared books and journals accordingly. I
hope I shall be able to do something with it,
but I doubt, my hand has been out so long.
September 12. — Left London and went to
Basildon Park, to take up our residence there
on a year's trial.
November 7. — I have nothing to record of my
life at Basildon. I have endeavoured to suit
myself to a country life, but I do not think
with much success. Besides the land let with
the mansion, about 40 acres, I have also taken
the Park, 179 acres ; because I do not chose to
have the farmer, his sons, and servants walking
under and looking into my kitchen windows. I
have bought 3 cows, 27 pigs, and 192 sheep.
I have put four or five men to work in the
neglected garden, and have taken the spade and
mattock in hand myself. I have retained the
keeper, and declared I shall preserve the game.
I walk to my stable, cowyard, and garden, and
326 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1833. look at my young wheat most days. I go out
with a gun in my hand and toil between five and
seven hours, and bring home little or nothing. I
go to church, and am civil to the neighbours.
In short, I do what is usually done, and perhaps
might be well contented to continue the experiment
if my wife's health permitted me ; but Dr. Warren
informed me I must remove her, if only for a
short time, and accordingly I am going from
this place to-morrow to London.
November 14. — I went with my wife to Eendles-
ham, where my wife's brother, Lord Thomas Hay,
was rector of the parish.
November 17. — Heard Hay preach. Like most
other preachers he is a good fellow, and we won't
talk of his sermon !
November 23. — Returned to London, and got
permission from Dr. Warren for my wife to make
another trial of Basildon.
December 2. — I met my old acquaintance
Macaulay, who, to my surprise, told me that he
was going to India as Legislative Member of
the Calcutta Council. This, he said, would make
a vacancy at Leeds, and he hoped I would think
of it.
Macaulay told me that it was all very fine
for him to be M.P. for Leeds and Secretary to
the Board of Control ; but, not having a shilling
in the world, he found Parliament was not the
place for him, and he was resolved to make
money enough to ensure an independence. Six
CHAP. XV. MACAULAY 327
years in India would satisfy his wants ; he should 1833.
not, at his return, be more than forty years old,
and he might return to public life.
He then declaimed against Stanley, to whom
he allowed the highest capacity in almost every
respect, except that of seeing what was beneficial
for the country ; and who therefore, even more
than W. Pitt, seemed born for the destruction
of the aristocracy, by his honest, uncompromising
defence of them.
He spoke of Brougham as everybody else speaks
of him, saying that when he (Macaulay) came
into Parliament, Brougham, because not consulted,
turned his back on him. So I see my friend
Macaulay is not pleased with his position or his
masters.
December 3. — C. Wood wrote to ask me if I
would stand for Huddersfield or Leeds. Lord
Tavistock, Lord J. Russell, and Ellice hint on
the same subject. The truth is it will not do
for me who has been chosen seven times for
Westminster, without solicitation, to become a
canvasser, and I will not.
December 4. — Colonel Jones called ; he is much
changed for the better. He told me some
anecdotes of the scoundrels who conduct our
daily press.
Alderman Harmer, the attorney, who sits on
the London bench to punish petty larceny, gets
£3,000 or £4,000 a year by being proprietor of the
Weekly Dispatch, a paper which thrives on the
328 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1833. worst of all crimes : the destruction of private
and public character.
December 6. — Ellice having told me as a great
secret that the King had granted a Commission
to him and Russell, and several others, to inquire
into the practicability of consolidating the Civil
Departments of the Army under a Board, I
wrote to him to tell him another secret, namely,
that the said project was a child of my own, left
in the cradle when I quitted office, as he would
learn from a Memorial drawn up by me.
It is a good joke affecting to forget all the
efforts I made to effect this reform ! ! !
1834. January 1, 1834 — Another year. May it
prove less disastrous than the last !
January 6. — The consolidation scheme, after a
great struggle, is given up. I thought so !
Early in this year George Lamb, my old
opponent in Westminster, died. He and I had
latterly been on very friendly terms, and I much
regretted his loss. Ellice wrote to say that Lord
Howick was to succeed him in his office.
I had letters inviting me to stand for Bridge-
water, East Somerset, Marylebone, Devizes, and
one or two other constituencies. I answered
uniformly, " Yes, but on my own terms : no
canvassing, no pledges, no promising, no lying."
Being a party to the passing of the Reform
Bill as a final measure (so far as we were con-
cerned), I never could support any essential
CHAP. xv. "BLUE TO THE BACKBONE" 329
change of that great measure, and would sooner 1834.
remain out of Parliament all my life than adopt
that sort of politics.
This doctrine is very likely to keep me out of
Parliament, but a man may live and not be an
M.P. "Hoc sine viximus ante," up to thirty-
three years of age. We have Reform, and it is
something to have been engaged, and deeply too,
in bringing about that great change.
January 17. — Old Mr. Arthur Palmer called, a
very fine old gentleman in his eightieth year. He
rises at five every morning. He told me of my
grandfather, that going to canvass him for some
small appointment, he said, " Sir, you are "Whig
and your father before you. I am blue to the
backbone. Say no more ; I will not vote for you,
and ask me no more questions," at the same time
pointing to the door. How am I degenerated !
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
February 4. — Parliament met. The King's
Speech of a conservative character, and promised
little. The Opposition in the House of Commons
was insignificant.
February 20. — The Session has been much
taken up with the only serious scrape in which
Lord Althorp was ever involved. I allude to
his imprudent attack on certain Irish Members,
whom he accused of saying one thing in private
and another in public.
On the question being put to him by Mr. Sheil,
VOL. iv 42
330 LONDON CHAP. XV.
L834. Lord Althorp very quietly replied, " The honour-
able gentleman is one of them." A committee
was appointed to examine into the general truth
of the charge, and Sheil was fully acquitted.
Lord Althorp made an apology in the House of
Commons ; hut, heing acquainted with the whole
transaction and the origin of Lord Al thorp's error,
I did not think he made so manly an avowal of
his mistake as he might have done. But it is
a good deal to say of a man, who played so con-
spicuous a part as Lord Althorp, that he made
only one false move in his whole career.
FROM DIARY.
February 24. — Went to the Queen's Drawing-
Room. Introduced for the first time to Ada
Byron; she is a large, coarse-skinned young
woman, hut with something of my friend's
features, particularly the mouth. I was exceed-
ingly disappointed.
March 8. — Dining with Sir G. Shee, I met
Prince Lieven, Count Bjornstjerne, Dedel, Biilow,
Duke of Richmond, Lord Lansdowne, Lord J.
Russell, Littleton, Spring Rice, P. Thomson,1
Sullivan, Lord Cawdor, and Lord Palmerston ; so
that, excepting Lord Cawdor, I was the only
non-official guest present.
I had a long conversation with Littleton. He
1 Charles Edward Poulett Thomson was then President of the
Board of Trade. He was created Baron Sydenham in 1840, and
died in 1841.
CHAP. XV. MEN AND MINISTERS 331
told me he liked the Irish, but owned that he
could put little faith in any Catholic, almost all
were Jesuits, nor could he find much help in any
official man. Plunket was grasping and shabhy,
rash at first and timid afterwards. He told me
he could not have gone on with Lord Anglesey,
vain and rash, and taking no counsel. He had a
scene with him shortly after coming to Dublin.
Of Lord Wellesley he spoke in high terms. He
said that, if he had quarrelled with O'Connell at
the beginning of the Session, the Estimates would
not have been passed yet, but the quarrel would
soon come.
In short, I see it is with him as it was with me.
He is not master. He was very civil, and said
that he was sorry I had not gone to Ireland, I
should have just suited the Irish.
Poulett Thomson then had a long talk with me.
Said things could not go on much longer ; they
might get through the Session. He believed
Tories would come in before a good Government
was formed. He condemned Graham's conduct,
and as usual declaimed against the Duke of
Richmond. He abused the Cabinet Ministers for
making no arrangements during the long holidays,
but shooting, etc. He thought Althorp the best
of them, but condemned his indecision. Althorp
said at the close of the Session that nothing
should induce him to meet Parliament again as
Chancellor of the Exchequer, yet there he is.
Poulett Thomson agreed with me that, if a
332 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. dissolution took place to-morrow, the present
Ministry, as Ministers, would not have a majority.
I see that he, like Littleton, is also a reluctant
labourer, hut both of them will grumble and
go on.
March 9.— Dined at Lord Holland's. Lord
Holland told me that Mr. Fox thought shy
men were fond of public speaking. I said,
Yes, and begin with Mr. Pox himself. Lord
Holland said that was true ; Mr. Eox was shy in
company until he had got a footing there by
a few sentences. Another saying Lord Holland
told us : that a silent man was not to be trusted
with a secret.
March 13. — I went to Lady Grey's assembly.
Lord Grey was, on that day, seventy years of age.
I said a few words to him on the occasion.
"Yes," said he, "many gone, and few to come."
I thought I had more than once remarked of Lord
Grey that he had a melancholy turn of mind ; but
I had not then learnt that this belongs to old age
more than to individual despondency.
March 20. — Lord Tavistock has written a letter
to me begging to know what I think of the pro-
priety of some of the Cabinet retiring to save
their character, because they differ from Lord
Grey and do not approve of his timidity. He
begs me to answer him without showing that he
has asked me the question. I did answer him,
half in jest, half in earnest, and did not recom-
mend retirement.
CHAP. XV. " PHILOSOPHER AND STATESMAN " 333
Tavistock sent to me John Russell's apology 1834.
for appointing the Tory Gleig to the chaplaincy
of Chelsea. I do not think it wants an apology,
but I admire Tavistock's comparing his brother's
conduct to mine last year, and saying that it is
intelligible only to very pure and refined minds.
What does Russell abandon? what self-sacrifice
has he made ?
March 21. — Had a party at home. Tweeddale,
young Russell, Sir M. S. Stewart, Sir E. G.
Wilmot, Lord Ormelie and his pretty sister-in-law,
and the ever delightful Lady Charlotte Lindsay.1
Lord Grey presented the Cambridge Petition, in
favour of Dissenters. The Duke of Wellington
opposed, and said the 39 Articles were part of
Christianity or Christian belief. Chancellor of
University of Oxford ! 1 " Brave but barbarous
theologian, in fact philosopher and obsolete
statesman," as the Times calls him. I suppose,
however, the Lords will be of the Duke's opinion,
and a collision will take place, on this as
other questions, e.g. disfranchisement of corrupt
boroughs.
March 22.— Shamefully idle life! Out of
joint, can apply to nothing. I try to read, but
in vain.
Dined at E. B. dive's, and had a great deal of
talk with young Stanley, Clive, H. Tracy, and
Denison. They seem to think friend Ellice is
1 Daughter of Lord North (Earl of Guilford), married 1800
Lieut.- Col. the Hon. John Lindsay ; died 1849.
334 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834, bidding for the leadership of the House of
Commons, and is likely to get it.
March 23.— Dined at W. Ord's. Met my old
friends Lady Jane and Lady Eanny Harley.
Wofully changed.
FROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
April 18. — I hear great apprehensions are
entertained respecting the intended procession of
the Trades Unions with their petition to Lord
Melbourne in favour of the Dorchester convicts.
But the putting down of the attempts at insur-
rection at Lyons and Paris has tranquillised the
alarmists in London. The Government, however,
have prepared for a possible commotion, and some
light guns have been paraded through Hyde Park
to St. John's Wood.
April 21. — The Trades Unions' procession
marched from Copenhagen Fields to Whitehall.
I saw them ; they were in good order, six abreast,
and were about two hours and a half passing
Whitehall. They were quite orderly, and did not
shout. Dr. Wade, in full canonicals, marched
before them, accompanied by Owen, the philan-
thropist, as some called him. The petition,
signed, it was said, by 100,000 names, was carried
by five bearers to the doors of the Home Office.
Lord Melbourne refused to receive it. The pro-
cession moved on over Westminster Bridge, and
halted in the open space in front of the new
Bedlam. After learning what Melbourne's de-
CHAP. XV. THE TRADES UNIONS* PROCESSION 335
cision had been, they separated quietly. The 1834.
police and the soldiers were kept out of sight ; so
were all the special constables ; and the usual
sentries at the Horse Guards were withdrawn.
Joseph Hume was foolish enough to ride down
Parliament Street by the side of the procession,
but was not noticed. The numbers that marched
in procession were calculated at from 25,000 to
30,000. Some of them were fine-looking fellows,
and well-dressed ; but the great majority very
poorly clad, and meagre-looking. All sorts of
absurd rumours were afloat as to these poor
people. A near connection of mine told me that
15,000 of them carried stilettoes ; I did not believe
that 15,000 stilettoes could be found in all
England — no, nor in all Europe.
EROM DIARY.
We kept our servants at home, and I believe
most families did the same, but when I went
out I could not perceive that the procession had
stopped the usual business of the streets. This,
however, was the case on the line of march, so
I heard.
Notwithstanding this display of physical force
has passed off quietly, a repetition of such scenes
is not to be tolerated, and I trust something will
be done to prevent it. I think some of my Tory
friends are half sorry that blood was not spilt ;
anything that can damage the Government is
acceptable to them, and they now affect to pity
336 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. the poor Unionists as being deceived by Lord
Melbourne; others amongst them assert that a
great part of the procession was armed.
April 22. — I called on Lady Holland, and had
a conversation with her about my resignation
of last April. She told me I was missed every
night in Parliament.
I called on Lord Durham, who has returned
from Paris. He seemed much pleased with his
tour, and talked as if he had really been negotiating
some commercial treaty on behalf, not of the
English Government, but the English people.
He said that when the Due de Broglie went
out, the great anxiety of the French Cabinet
was to know who would be most acceptable to
England as a successor to the Duke, and that his
opinion was eagerly asked. Indeed, to listen to
my worthy friend, you would think he was
already the power he expects to be in the
" kingdom come " of the little Princess.
O'Connell brought on his motion in the House
of Commons for Repeal of the Union. Spring
Rice, in an admirable speech of six hours,
established his reputation. The motion was
negatived by 560 to 38.
April 24. — I read, for the first time, Dumont's
" Souvenirs sur Mirabeau," the most interest-
ing work I ever read on the subject, and
throwing an entirely new light on the events
and characters of the early Revolution. The
selfishness, trickery, and unscrupulousness of
CHAP. XV AT THE DUCHESS OF KENT'S 337
almost all the distinguished men of that period
are placed beyond doubt, by this authentic and
impartial writer. The Girondists cease to be
heroes. Some of the anecdotes are most laughable,
e.g. the attachment of Teutsch, Mirabeau's valet,
to his master.
April 27. — Dined with Sir Francis Burdett.
I met Stanley and Lord John E/ussell, and had
a few words with the former of these on the
Repeal debate. He told me that I ought to
have heard the set-down that my friend Bickersteth
gave our Lord Chancellor in the argument on
behalf of the London University. Brougham
asked him what would be the consequence if the
University gave degrees without a charter.
Bickersteth replied, "The scorn and contempt
of mankind." B. was counsel for Cambridge
University on this occasion.
May 5. — I went to the Duchess of Kent's: a
very large party, all London there. Sir John
Campbell said, " I feel for you," alluding to
H.B.'s caricature, which to be sure is ludicrously
false as to fact, as if he and I were in the same
predicament. The other day on debate on Heron's
placeman's Bill some one mentioned me amongst
those who had lost their seats by accepting office.
How is history written ! Althorp put the man
right.
May 8. — Met the Chancellor. He spoke about
my coming into Parliament. He told me
Ministers were resolved on passing the Poor Bill
VOL. iv 43
338 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. this Session], in spite of the Times', asked me to
come to his wife's assembly that evening, where
there was, he said, to he a party " choisi," of which
he should not know half a dozen. What can
this queer man mean by lying about such a
trifle ? He reminds me often of what Lady
Bolingbroke said of Pope: he will play the
politician about cabbages and turnips. I went
to the Chancellor's and had a pleasant evening.
May 9. — Edward Ellice dined with us alone ;
gave me an account of Lord Durham's mission
to Paris, and the unbelievable vanity of the
man; but it is true they were both very much
feasted, and that King, Ministers, and Deputies,
all pressed round them to assure them of the
good intentions of Prance towards England.
The Poor Law Bill read a second time and
passed by an enormous majority, 300 and odd
to 28. The Times is furious against the measure,
and falls foul of Lord Al thorp accordingly.
May 11. — The Lord Chancellor and Lord
Advocate of Scotland (Jeffrey) called and read
letters from Edinburgh by which it appeared that
the electors there, on the expected vacancy by
Jeffrey's elevation to the Bench, had resolved to
induce me to be candidate for the representation
of their city.
Brougham and Abercromby urged me very
strongly to come forward, and Jeffrey explained
the Church question, which, he said, was all
that I should have to be explicit about. But
CHAP. XV. O'CONNELL AND IRELAND 339
I still held back, and concluded by saying that 1834.
I wished to have a few hours to consider of the
matter.
I consulted Lord Tavistock, whom I looked
upon as more of a friend than the other advisers,
and he was against my going to Edinburgh. I
therefore wrote to Jeffrey saying positively, no.
I took a walk with Burdett, who told me that
he had opened a negotiation between O'Connell
and Lord Grey. O'Connell told Burdett that
there was now an opportunity of pacifying
Ireland; that if Ministers would but adopt his
Tithe Bill, he would answer for quieting the
whole country ; and following up a hint given
him by Burdett, he confessed his own position
to be a disagreeable one, and he would not be
unwilling to take office under Lord Grey. He
would prefer being Attorney-General, in which
position he could be of great use to Government
by introducing good law reforms. Burdett asked
if he could be re-elected. O'Connell answered,
"Not for Dublin, but for Kerry, yes." They
then talked of his becoming Master of the Rolls ;
the present Master is an old man, and might
make way if raised to the Peerage. This was
the substance of this extraordinary conversation.
Burdett went to Lord Grey, who made no
difficulty as to himself, but asked how Stanley
would or could sit on the same Bench with
O'Connell. As to making the present Master of
the Bolls a Peer, the King would not hear of it ;
340 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. and the negotiation accordingly failed. Sir Francis
thought it was scarcely possible to pay too high
a price for the pacification of Ireland, which, in
his opinion, could be obtained only through
O'Connell.
Lord Tavistock told me this day that the
differences created by Lord John Russell's speech
as to the Appropriation Clause of the Irish Church
Revenues Bill had been made up. Eussell told
Tavistock that Graham is the most difficult man
to deal with on this point. Graham met Russell's
argument by saying, " My position is a difficult
one ; I am a believer ! ! ! " As if Russell and the
Liberals in the Cabinet were not; and as if the
Appropriation Clause could be affected one way
or the other by his belief. Indeed, some might
think the Church stronger by giving up super-
fluous revenues. This man cannot be a Minister
in these times much longer, although an excellent
chef de bureau.
May 12. — Had a note from the Chancellor
insisting on my going to Edinburgh, enclosing
letters from John Murray and Gibson Craig, by
which it appears that the committees who brought
in Abercromby and Jeffrey had met, and come to
an almost unanimous resolution to support me,
giving as reasons my independence, and character,
and talents, etc.
Charles Wood called and read me several letters
all concurring in the same view, and stating that
Sir John Hobhouse was the popular man, and
CHAP. XV. NO CANVASS OR PLEDGES 341
that he alone gave the Whig party a chance of 1834.
success, against the Tories who would start some
one, and the Radicals who had started Mr. Ayton.
But mention was made of the necessity of my
going down, and of the questions which would
be put to me about " Corn Laws, Short Parlia-
ments, and Ballot." I told Wood that I had
made up my mind before he came, but that this
confirmed me. I would neither canvass nor
pledge. I could only say to the Edinburgh
electors what I had said to the Marylebone and
others : if I am chosen I will do my duty, but
I will not personally interfere.
After Wood went away the Lord Advocate
came, but I remained firm. Jeffrey smiled and
said I was not like the bounty of Heaven, to be
won by prayers ; and then in a very melancholy
tone told me they did not know to whom to apply.
I was the only man. " So much the worse for
Scotland," said I.
On a review of what I have done, I feel sure
I am right. If I come back to Parliament it
must be on my own terms, otherwise I should
be of no use.
May 16. — I wrote a letter declining to be
nominated for Edinburgh, and putting my re-
fusal on the true ground which I had stated to
John Murray — namely, a dislike to canvass and
make declarations for the sake of votes, as incon-
sistent with my former practice and my future
free agency. I had some difficulty in wording
342 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. this letter, as the resolutions said nothing either
of canvassing or pledging, so that I was obliged
to refer to my private information, which indeed
was decisive enough as to the indispensable
necessity of personal intercourse, canvassing, and
speechifying, in order to gain the election.
I think that so far as personal interest is con-
cerned I may have done wrong ; so far as character
and public duty are to be consulted I have done
right. I should have carried the election easily
if I had chosen to adopt the usual means — I mean
the cajolery of talking over the good citizens, and
making what Murray in his letter called a good
strong Liberal speech — such, for example, as his
own to the Leith people, in which he boasted
of having voted against Ministers on the Pension
question, for which boast had I been Lord Grey
I would have stopped his appointment.
May 27. — Mr. Plumer Ward brought on a
motion that the revenues of the Church in
Ireland exceeded its wants, and that Parliament
may deal with the surplus. This motion brought
the differences in the Cabinet to an issue. After
Mr. Grote had seconded the resolution, Al thorp
rose and said that, whilst Mr. Grote was speaking,
he had received a communication which made it
expedient to adjourn the debate and the House
until the following Monday. He could not then
tell them what that communication had been ;
but he threw himself upon the generosity of the
House, whose confidence he had never abused,
CHAP. XV. THE CABINET IN PIECES 343
This was received with tremendous cheering, and
the House adjourned.
The next post brought the news of the resig-
nation of Stanley and Graham, shortly followed
by that of the Duke of Richmond and Lord
Ripon.
May 29. — I called on Lord Durham, and found
him in a superlatively sulky humour. He told
me that nothing was yet finally resolved upon,
but that up to this moment the intention was,
if possible, to patch together the pieces of the
broken Cabinet, by shifting and shuffling, and
that neither he nor any decided Liberals were to
be taken into the Government ; most of the papers
strongly recommending the introduction of him
into the Cabinet, for, said Lord Durham, "it is
useless to mince matters ; I am the only man the
country looks to."
Lord Durham told me that he believes Lord
Lansdowne and Lord Holland would have broken
up the Government had they not been assured
that the new Cabinet should be remodelled upon
the same principles as the last, and composed
pretty much of the same quiet men. He (Durham)
had seen Lord Grey that morning. He would not
go on without Lord Lansdowne and Lord Holland,
but Lord Durham did not think him in reality
more inclined to be Liberal than they were, for
he had carte blanche to do what he pleased and
to fill up all vacancies with any men he liked.
This confidence is personal to Lord Grey, and
344 LONDON CHAP. xv.
1834. has no reference to politics. In that respect the
King is as conservative as anybody.
The Globe of the evening stated that Spring
Rice was to he Colonial Secretary and Ellice in the
Cabinet. Lord Durham thought it probable. On
the whole I was exceedingly surprised at all he
told me. I think him wrong as to his own claims
and merits, but I think him right as to the pro-
bable result of the arrangement being satisfactory
to no one. His predictions as to Brougham's
future pre-eminence I know not what to think
of, nor am I quite of his mind as to the
impossibility of forming a Tory Government.
One thing is clear, that Lord Durham when I
last spoke to him was decidedly of opinion that
if there should be a split in the Cabinet he would
inevitably be applied to. He was wrong there,
and may be now.
I went to Brooks's, and had a great many
nattering hopes expressed that I should be in-
cluded in the new arrangements.
May 30. — The Chronicle mentions the new
appointments. Spring Bice is to be Secretary
of State, Ellice is to be in the Cabinet, Lord
Auckland First Lord of the Admiralty, Lord
Carlisle Privy Seal, Lord Mulgrave talked of
for the Post Office.
At Brooks's there was great discontent; some
thought the whole a juggle, and that Government
would after all do nothing effective respecting
the Irish Church. Lord Sefton, who is generally
CHAP. XV. RADICALISM AT METHTJEN*S 345
supposed to be employed as a sort of feeler for
Brougham, spoke to me in rather a discontented
tone, but Fazakerly, " the simmering saucepan "
of Lansdowne House, approved of the new
arrangements. Ellice's appointment staggered
many. Sir G. Philips asked me if I thought
Lord Grey knew Ellice's previous City history.
I am not astonished, and my knowledge of that
history prevents me from being so.
I sat with my friend Dr. Chambers, recovering
from his accident. He told me that Dr. Thorpe,
the Calvinist preacher, had got hold of Graham
and persuaded him that he would go to hell if
he consented to touch the revenues of the Irish
Church.
I hear the Duke of Richmond said if he had
come from Paris three days sooner he might have
prevented the rupture, but that as he did not,
he was bound in honour to follow Stanley and
Graham.
May 31. — Dine at Methuen's: a strange party
to meet the Lord Chancellor : Lord Durham,
T. Duncombe, little Stanley, young Tynte,
Sterling of the Times, Poulett Thomson. The
party was talked of at Brooks's. It was easy
to foresee Brougham would not come, nor did
he, but sent an excuse — illness, a lie. Lord
Durham said he was quite right, and if Brougham
had come he would have stayed away. We had
Radical politics.
After dinner I had a long talk with Poulett
VOL. iv 44
346 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. Thomson. Agreed as to new arrangements. By
the way he is now President of the Board of
Trade ; said it was impossible things could go
on; Ellice ruined by his elevation, cannot cajole
and lie now that he is in the Cabinet. He threw
Durham over, but Poulett Thomson objected to
Durham's extreme vanity and pretensions. He
told me that he had had no communication with
any member of the Government on subject of
new arrangements since Wednesday last. He
spoke of Lord Grey as all but imbecile, said that
Lord Lansdowne in effect was Minister, but he
agreed that the new Government ought to have
a fair trial and be judged by their heads.
June 2. — Debate in House of Commons on
Ward's resolutions. The previous question was
moved, and a Committee of Inquiry into the
revenues of the Irish Church was promised.
This manoeuvre succeeded, though Stanley made
a violent, and, I think, unhandsome speech ; and
Peel treated Ministers with contempt. Yet they
and theirs all voted against the resolutions, and
Ward had only 124 in his minority. Spring
Bice, Palmerston, and Ellice made pitiful figures.
There was little to explain as to secession. The
retiring Ministers would not agree to the Com-
mission, and went out. Al thorp and Bussell
spoke of them most handsomely and almost
wept. Stanley began 'in the tender style, but
ended in a high Church tone, and said he knew
the King would never sanction the alienation
CHAP. XV. CONVERSATION WITH LORD TAVISTOCK 347
of Irish Church property. I hear he was isu.
tremendously cheered, yet so was Althorp the
other day when he announced in reality Stanley's
retirement from office. The numhers were 396
against 124.
June 3. — Campbell and J. Murray returned for
Edinburgh and Leith ; my substitute by a large
majority, more than 500. The Radical strength
much overrated, and amounted to about 500.
I see that Campbell called himself honest John
Campbell, and that his speeches were altogether
such as I would not have made.
June 4. — I had a curious conversation at
Brooks's with Lord Tavistock. He told me that
his brother John had actually proposed to the
Cabinet a Registration Bill similar to that of
W. Brougham; that Brougham had decried it
and stopped it, and the Marriage Bill was
substituted against Russell's will ; that after-
wards Brougham's brother brought in the Bill,
and received the support of Government. Russell
was charged by the Dissenters of Devonshire of
taking their money to carry his election and
betraying them, on which he determined to make
the truth known, and he has written a letter
to them. Althorp has made a declaration in
the House of Commons which absolves him from
secrecy. Lord Tavistock told me he had that
morning a conversation with Lord Holland as
to making Byng a Peer, to make way for me
in Middlesex. Lord Holland thought it very
348 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. desirable, but added, " "Why not make Hobhouse
a Peer ? " I laughed at this, and said my use
and place were in the other House.
The rumour as to Byng is very current. I
had a long talk with him on the subject, and
find he is nothing loth. As for myself I cannot
say I much care about the matter, though I
feel out of water at times. Burdett told me
he now regretted very much I had not gone to
Devizes. Perhaps that is to be regretted for
my sake, at least.
People talked this day of the Government
going out. The Tories do not seem eager ; they
are content with abuse.
June 6. — Debate in the Lords on changes.
Lord Grey spoke well about the feeling of the
country respecting the Irish Church, and he
was right in telling the Tories to turn him out
at once or to refrain from factious complaint.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, and even the
Bishop of London, declared strongly against the
Commission.
June 20. — I had a long letter from Edward
Ellice telling me that he had been offered the
Admiralty at the last change, also that he went
into the Cabinet with the perfect concurrence
of all those before members of it, even the
Chancellor, who had not spoken six words to
him for six months.
He announced a cut between him and Lord
Durham, and I told him my mind freely as to
CHAP. XV. QUARREL OF ELLICE AND DURHAM 349
the treatment I had met with : public ingratitude 1834.
and private neglect, the former beginning to be
less manifest ; whether my soi-disant friends
would ever make amends for the latter remained
to be proved.
June 22. — I had a long talk with Ellice. He
told me that there must be a break-up in the
autumn, and probably the King might send for
the Duke of Wellington and Peel. They might
try, and their Administration could not attempt
to meet Parliament without a dissolution ; a dis-
solution would do them no good, and they would
go out ; after which, good-bye to the House of
Lords !
He told me the particulars of his quarrel with
Lord Durham. Lord Durham suspected Ellice
of writing articles in the Courier and Globe
against him. He remonstrated, and Ellice assured
him the articles did not proceed from him. Then
came a most abusive article in the Times against
Ellice, making use of phrases which Ellice had
dropped in private conversation with Lord
Durham, and so fastening the authorship on
Durham. On this Ellice wrote to Durham
telling him what he thought, and severing
political intercourse with him. Durham met him
and cut him. Certain notes had since passed
between Lady Durham and Ellice, but such
was the quarrel as it stood. Ellice was very
angry. He told me that Lord Durham had
offered to Lord Grey to go out of the way or
350 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. to do anything to facilitate his arrangements
when Stanley, etc., should leave him ; and Lord
Grey, when Stanley did go, offered the embassy
of Paris to Lord Durham, who rejected it, Ellice
said with disdain; and thence all the mischief
and abuse of the new Cabinet. It was hinted
that the Paris embassy would be a step to the
Foreign Office, as Palmerston would not remain
long, but Durham persevered in his refusal. As
we were talking up came C. Wood and young
Stanley, whom Ellice suspects of having forwarded
Durham's grumblings to the Times.
I dined with the Alexanders. P. Stewart
was there, and said to me privately, "You must
be Chancellor of the Exchequer." Perhaps Ellice
has put this about, but the admission of Aber-
cromby into the Cabinet, in preference of me
on the pretext of my not being in Parliament,
convinces me that so long as Althorp is in power
I shall not be. And perhaps it is better so. I
doubt my capacity, and the responsibility is
awful.
June 23. — I went to Lord Durham's, and had
a very long conversation with him. Just as I
was going away he talked of his rupture with
Ellice. I told him my mind freely. He showed
me Ellice's letter, who certainly had not qualified
his cessation of intercourse by the word " political."
He spoke in terms of the greatest indignation of
the attack on Ellice in the Times, and altogether
convinced me that he was very sorry for the
. XV. DURHAM AND ELLICE RECONCILED 351
cut. I did all I could to restore the peace, and 1834.
at last he said, " Well, what shall I do ? I will
do anything you tell me ; I will put myself in
your hands ; I will give you carte blanche"
I went away and wrote a letter to Ellice
urging the expediency of making up this more
than civil war, telling him Durham had given
me carte blanche, and asking him what were
his terms.
June 24*. — A letter from Ellice telling me he
would shake hands with Lord Durham, and
enclosing one from Lady Grey very piteously
begging him to be reconciled with her son-in-law,
for the sake of her daughter. I called on Lord
Durham. He at first was a little restive, but
at last seemed glad of the prospect, provided
they were to be good friends as before. I was
assured by Ellice such was his intention, and
left him as he was going across the way to
shake hands.
June 25. — There is a report Peel is willing
to undertake the Government, and has said so
at a great Conservative meeting; but others
deny it, and say he used quite different language.
Again, as Henry IV. said, " How is history
written ! "
June 27. — D.N. Porty-eight. Sunshine and
showers with thirty tons of cut grass in the
meadow. Typical of my own, the ordinary lot,
on which the recurrence of this day naturally
induces me to reflect.
352 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
July 3. — A scene occurred in the House of
Commons which led to very serious consequences.
The principal actors in it were Littleton, the
Irish Secretary, and O'Connell. These gentlemen
contradicted each other repeatedly " upon their
honour as gentlemen."
It appears Littleton told O'Connell the Irish
Coercion Bill was to be renewed without the
most severe clauses, and that Lord Wellesley
and himself were against these clauses ; adding
he told him this as a great secret, in order to
induce him to mitigate his opposition to the
Government. Accordingly O'Connell withdrew
his Repeal candidate from the County of Wexford.
He afterwards heard the Coercion Bill was to
be renewed much as before, and he told the
secret because he said he had been tricked and
deceived.
Whatever might be thought of this public
altercation, there could not be two opinions of
the imprudence of Littleton ; and Lord Grey,
commenting upon the transaction, used strong
language, and said he was no party to it and
had no cognisance of it. Stanley, on this occasion,
made use of an expression which " told " against
his former colleagues, and showed that he was
now their most formidable opponent. He com-
pared them to the " thimble-rigging cheats of
the racecourse," and said they were robbers
of Church property.
CHAP. XV. RESIGNATION OF LORD GREY 353
July 6. — The Irish Secretary tendered his 1834.
resignation to-day, but Lord Althorp defended
him and would not accept it, saying he was
too valuable a man to lose.
July 7. — There was a debate on the Irish
Coercion Bill, after which Lord Althorp himself
resigned. He said the disclosures made by
Littleton took the ground from under him, and
that he could not go on with the Coercion Bill.
Lord Grey sent Althorp's resignation to the King,
and at the same time sent in his own resignation.
Poor Littleton made the most humiliating
avowal ; confessed that he had committed two
great errors — communicating with O'Connell
without the privity of Lord Grey, and trusting
to a man who was not trustworthy. He con-
cluded by protesting that he had acted from
good motives, and was much cheered as he sat
down.
Lord Grey's speech, on announcing his resigna-
tion, was most powerful and affecting. I could
not resist the pleasure of writing to him, and
telling him what I thought of it.
July 10. — In this confusion the most notable
occurrence was that, in the Commons, Lord
Althorp announced that the Administration was
at an end; and, in the Lords, Lord Brougham
declared positively that the Administration was
not at an end; for no one had resigned, except
Lord Althorp and Lord Grey, and he himself
certainly had not resigned.
VOL. iv 45
354 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. The Duke of Wellington made a most savage
speech in the Lords, against Lord Grey, for com-
paring the state of the country now with that in
which the Duke left it in 1830. He accused
the Whigs of having spilt more blood than any
men.
July 14. — It soon became known that the King
wished to form a Coalition Administration, in-
cluding Peel, Stanley, and the Duke of Welling-
ton ; but that Lord Melbourne had been sent for,
and informed His Majesty that such a Govern-
ment was not practicable. On this Lord Durham
sent me a message, through my brother, to say that
a strong Liberal Government would be formed,
and that I had better come up to London and
be in the way.
July 15. — 1 had a letter from Lord Tavistock
informing me that Lord Althorp had consented
to remain Chancellor of the Exchequer under
Lord Melbourne, and that Lord Grey had given
his sanction to the arrangement. Lord Althorp 's
consent had been decided by an address, signed
by 210 Members of Parliament, presented to him
by Hume and O'Connell. Lord Tavistock added,
" Althorp is miserable/'
July 16. — I had a short note from Lord Tavi-
stock, saying he hoped I would come up to London
immediately. I accordingly went to London with
my wife, and, walking down towards Spring
Gardens, met Edward Ellice, who told me the
King's messenger had gone down to Basildon, with
CHAP. XV. MINISTER FOB WOODS AND FORESTS 355
a letter from Lord Melbourne, offering me the 1834.
Woods and Forests and a seat in the Cabinet.
Ellice told me that Lord Duncannon was to be
Home Secretary, with a peerage. No other
changes were to be made.
I went to Lord Althorp. He laughed, as we
shook hands, and asked me what I said to the
proposal. I then told him that I was inclined
to accept the offer; but that I thought I could
have been of more use in Ireland, with Lord
Durham as Lord Lieutenant, to which I knew
that Lord Durham would have consented. Al-
thorp urged objections personal to Lord Durham,
which I endeavoured to overrule, but in vain.
FROM DIARY.
Walking home from Lord Althorp 's I met Lord
Tavistock and took him to Berkeley Square. He
told me a good deal of what I knew before. The
King had tried to get Stanley, the Duke of
Wellington, and Peel to join Lord Melbourne
and his friends. Lord Melbourne had written
an admirable letter showing the impracticability
of it ; so did Stanley. The Duke and Peel merely
acknowledged the communication, and said no
more. The King then gave Melbourne carte
blanche without restriction of persons. Melbourne
resolved to have the old Cabinet, but Lord Althorp
was indispensable. Althorp asked two hours to
consider, and after a most painful struggle con-
sented. He then announced in the Commons the
356 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. appointment of Lord Melbourne and his con-
tinuance in office, and adjourned the House until
Thursday. Lord Al thorp's refusal would have
thrown the country into the hands of the Tories.
Dined at Brooks's. After dinner came the
messenger who had gone to Basildon with Lord
Melbourne's letter. The offer was couched in
very handsome terms, saying that all those likely
to be in the Government concurred in it.
I then went to Lord Melbourne and after some
conversation accepted his offer of the Woods and
Forests and a seat in the Cabinet. At taking leave
he said to me, " God bless you, and thank you
sincerely." I came home, and reflecting on what
I had done, saw nothing to disapprove. I believed
the Government the best which, under the cir-
cumstances, could be found, and could give no
reason on public grounds for refusing to join it.
Personally, I think the offer creditable to me.
No conditions, no insisting on my coming into
Parliament. I believe I am the first man not
in Parliament who ever had a Cabinet place
offered to him.
My dear wife approved and was happy. I
thank God that her health is visibly improved.
That is my main consolation.
July 17. — I had a very confidential conversation
with Lord Lansdowne. He was far from satisfied
with the late changes, and told me that, if his
retirement would not have broken up Lord
Melbourne's Cabinet, he would have gone to
CHAP. XV. NOMINATED FOR NOTTINGHAM 357
Bowood. He held such language in regard to 1834.
more than one of his colleagues as induced me
to think he would not remain long in the present
Cabinet ; and, as to Lord Durham, he told me
plainly he would not sit in the Cabinet with him.
He considered Lord Melbourne's Government only
as a continuation of Lord Grey's. I said, " Un
Fran9ais de moins.J) " Exactly so," replied he.
PROM BOOK, " RECOLLECTIONS."
July 18. — I accepted an invitation to stand for
Nottingham, and went there the same evening.
I refused to canvass the electors, or to give any
pledges; and in my address merely referred to
my past life, and my resolution to do my duty,
as I had always done.
July 19. — I heard that Mr. Eagle, a barrister,
whom I knew at Cambridge, was to be started
against me at Nottingham ; but I had the
satisfaction of hearing that, when the Ministerial
changes were announced by Lord Althorp, in
the House of Commons, on Thursday, the 17th,
they were received with cheers.
July 23. — The nomination took place in the
Exchange Rooms. A murderer was executed in
the morning, and the crowd that attended that
spectacle adjourned afterwards to our exhibition.
The clock struck twelve, and Mr. Eagle's
proposer began his speech. He was not very
rude ; but the seconder, a Mr. Boothby, an iron-
founder, made the most insolent attack that ever
358 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. had been made even upon me, who had heard
so much of that sort of eloquence. He accused
me of every political crime — apostacy, baseness,
love of place, love of money, cruelty, and what
not — besides telling the meeting that my wife's
sisters, whom he called my sisters, were pensioners
on the public. All this I bore patiently, because
obliged to bear it; only once or twice I said,
"That is false." The fellow went on reading
charges against me from the True Sun, and
treating me as the worst of political delinquents.
Neither Lord Rancliffe, who proposed, nor Mr.
Wakefield, who seconded me, was heard at all.
I experienced the same treatment. I pulled out
my watch, and said I would give them five
minutes to become silent ; this had no effect,
and the Assessor then put the question to the
electors. The great majority in the body of the
hall was certainly for Eagle ; on the hustings
about two hundred hands were held up for me,
and away we came. I was somewhat annoyed
to find that, after my Westminster opponents
had, apparently, repented of their injustice, I
was the object of this blind hatred at Nottingham.
A good deal, however, of the opposition was
directed against the Corporation, who were my
friends, and the friends of the Whig party.
The election lasted two days, and, at the close
of the poll, I had a majority of 1,025. The
decision was announced in silence, when the
patriot Eagle exclaimed, " What, not a greasy
CHAP. XV. ELECTED AT NOTTINGHAM 359
ruffian to throw up his hat ? " He, the day 1834.
before, had called my supporters " ragamuffins,"
and said that nine- tenths of them were drunk.
I believe one-twentieth of them were so; and
my impression then was, that, although the
whole constituency was far inferior to that of
Westminster, yet there were two or three hundred
highly spirited, independent men, as intelligent
and well-mannered as any to be found in the
kingdom.
I left Nottingham the next day.
July 27.— I took my seat on the Treasury
Bench in the House of Commons, and felt as if
I had never been out of Parliament. I had
many very warm greetings from friends on all
sides; but the pleasantest was that which was
said to me by Henry Warburton. He crossed
the House, and, coming to me, said, " Don't you
recollect that the last thing you said to me,
before you left Parliament, was ' Honest man ' ? "
I answered, (( Yes ; I do recollect it well." He
rejoined, " That is what I say to you, now that
we meet again."
July 30. — I began my Cabinet life under circum-
stances not at all encouraging; for Ministers
were beaten in the Commons on the Irish Tithe
Bill, by an amendment proposed by O'Connell—
we were only 34 to 85 — and some of our best
friends, such as Lord Ebrington and Bonham
Carter, voted against us. The Lords also chose
to throw out our Bill for admitting Dissenters
360 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. to the Universities. The majority was above
100, although Lord Melbourne and our Chancellor
made very powerful speeches in support of it.
DIARY.
July 31. — A Cabinet Council, all fifteen present.
Methought the masters of the British Empire
round a table looked and talked much like
other men.
"We deliberated on the change made by the
vote of last night in the Commons, and, excepting
Lord Lansdowne, no one seemed to care much
about the matter. The Premier was decisive.
Lansdowne is an Irish landlord, and Althorp
told me that, whenever his pecuniary interests
interfere, his opinion is sure to be swayed by
them. I thought I saw an air of discontent
about him, and told Althorp so. Althorp said
that Lansdowne ought not to be there, but he
would not go.
August 2. — Dined at the Chancellor's : a large
party, chiefly official men. After dinner Brougham
amused us by telling the events of the interregnum
in May 1832, and what passed between him and
the King. He said he had the King's consent
in writing to make sixty or more peers, if
necessary. I never heard a great man talk in
this way ; he seemed to forget that the King was
still his master. Lord Albemarle and the Duke
of Argyle and Abercromby stared, so did I.
The Chancellor received and took leave of
CHAP. XV. THE MINISTERIAL FISH-DINNER 361
me this night most tenderly : " Mon cher 1334.
collegue." He is or will be crazy, that's clear.
August 5. — Irish Tithe Bill read a third time,
after a spirited debate. No division. There
were not five out of 120 against us in the whole
House. Will the Lords dare to throw out the
Bill ?
August 6. — I dined at Lord Ebrington's. Russell
talked over Stanley and Graham very freely in-
deed. He praised the former as a frank, funny
man. He told us' that the day of Stanley's
" thimble-rig " speech he saw him just come off
a Tunbridge Wells coach. Stanley had a black
on his eye ; Russell remarked it. "Ay," said he,
" I shall give you a black eye before the evening
is over."
Russell said that Stanley was much disappointed
to find his attack on Ministers so ill received in
the House, and has been since ashamed of it.
As to Graham, Russell spoke of him in very
different language — good at his office, that is all.
August 9. — I attended the Ministerial fish-dinner
for the first time, at Black wall. There were thirty-
seven of us present, and we had a good deal of
clumsy merriment about the late changes. At-
torney-General Campbell tried to be waggish about
the Lord Chancellor's letter to Lord Wellesley.
Poor Littleton sat opposite to him ; the jokes were
no laughing matter to him.
I took and carried back Abercromby, who seems
a very excellent man. He spoke much in praise
VOL. iv 46
362 LONDON CHAP. XV.
1834. of Brougham, and said that the longer he was
known the better he was liked.
Abercromby said that Brougham, in spite of
his abuse of friends and enemies, was in the long
run just to both.
August 10. — We had a Cabinet to consider the
King's Speech. Lord Melbourne read his draft
of it. Brougham proposed a few verbal altera-
tions. Dining at Holland House, with the Duke
of Devonshire, the Lord Chancellor, Tom Moore,
and Dedel, the Dutch Minister, our conversation
turned chiefly on the probable fate of our Irish
Tithe Bill in the Lords. Would the Opposition
in that House throw out the Bill ?
August 11. — Attended discussion on Tithe Bill
in the Lords. House very full ; heard Brougham
and part of Wellington, and Bishop of London.
The first very amusing ; the next bitter bad ; the
last temperate but decisive. He stated that the
Irish clergy preferred the rejection of the measure.
I, for the first time in my life, was on the throne
at the division. Bill rejected by 67 — less than
expected.
August 12. — Ministers not at all dejected by last
night, only anxious as to probable consequences in
Ireland. I feel sure that Lord Melbourne is just
the man for his great place.
August 13. — I had an audience of the King, who
told me he had seen the Commander-in-Chief and
Quartermaster-General before me, because he had
little to say to them and much to me. Had a
CHAP. XV. THE KING AND THE PEOPLE 363
long talk aboui Buckingham Palace, which he 1834.
told me he had never seen. Said Duncannon had
crotchets about it; that Sir John Sehright had
told him the other day it was a dog-hole. He said
he lived at Windsor to please the public, other-
wise would have preferred Bushy Park. . . . He
consented that part of Regent's Park should be
opened for pedestrians.
August 15. — Went at one to St. James's. King
held a Council — Ministers, Commander-in-Chief,
Steward of Household, etc. Lord Lansdowne
read some formal papers for approval. In one
he called Duncannon Duncan, at which a great
laugh from King and Council ! ! ! H.M. was in
great good humour, the dust still on his coat from
his Windsor journey. Called P. Greville Ms dear
friend. Melbourne then read the Royal Speech,
and we separated in a hurry to change our
clothes, and get to the House of Commons in
time to hear it.
The King read the Speech well, but more feebly
than usual, I thought.
I saw him return. The crowd received him
in dead silence, and no hats were pulled off,
except Littleton's and mine. Charles Ross, an
ex-Lord of the Admiralty, remarked that in the
days of his Tory friends all the crowd pulled off
their hats. It was the fashion then to impute
every change for the worse to the Reform Bill
and the Reform Ministers.
TABLE OE ADMINISTRATIONS DURING THE
Prime
Minister.
Chancellor of
Exchequer.
Foreign
Secretary.
Secretary -at- War.
1812.
June 9.
Earl of Liver-
ISLVansittartto
VI. of London-
V1 Palmerston.
pool.
1823, retired ;
derry to 1822,
then F. J.
died; then
Robinson.
G e o r g e
Canning.
1827.
April 24.
G. Canning.
G. Canning.
Earl of Dudley.
V* Palmerston.
1827.
Sept. 5.
Ld Goderich.
J. C. Herries.
Earl of Dudley.
V1 Palmerston.
1828.
Jan. 25.
D. of Welling-
H. Goulburn.
Earl of Dudley.
V1 Palmerston,
ton.
1828;LdHar-
dinge, 1828-
30 ; Ld F.
L e v e s o n
Gower, 1830.
1830.
Nov 22.
Earl Grey.
V* Althorp.
V* Palmerston.
C. W. Wynn.
Sir H. Parnell.
E. Ellice.
Sir J. C. Hob-
house, 1832-
1833.
1834.
July 17.
V1 Melbourne.
V1 Althorp.
V1 Palmerston.
E. Ellice.
PERIOD COVERED BY THESE VOLUMES
Home 0£ice.
Lord
Chancellor.
Admiralty.
Chief Secretary
for Ireland.
Board of Control.
V* Sidmouth
Ld Eldon.
V* Melville.
D. of Richmond
E. of Bucking-
(H. Adding-
till 1813; Earl
ham s h i r e ,
ton) till 1821,
Whitworth
1812-16;
retired ; then
1813-17;Earl
died.
Sir R. Peel.
Talbot, 1817-
G. Canning,
22 ; Marquis
1816-21, re-
Wellesley,
signed.
1821-8.
H. Bathurst,
1821-2.
C. W. Wynn,
1822-8.
Sturges Bourne.
Ld Lyndhurst.
D. of Clarence.
M. Wellesley.
C. W. Wfynn.
Marquis of
Ld Lyndhurst.
D. of Clarence.
M. Wellesley.
C. W. Wynn.
Lansdowne.
Sir R. Peel.
Ld Lyndhurst.
D. of Clarence.
M. of Anglesey,
V1 Melville,
V1 Melville.
1828.
1828.
D. of North-
Lord Ellen-
umberland,
borough,
1829-30.
1828-30.
V4 Melbourne.
Ld Brougham.
Sir J. Graham.
M. of Anglesey,
C. Grant.
1829.
M. Wellesley,
1829-33.
Sir J. C. Hob-
house, March
and April,
1833.
V' Duncannon.
La Brougham.
E. of Auckland.
E. Littleton.
Lord Ellen-
borough.
INDEX
Abercromby, Mr., iv. 361
Aberdeen, Lord, iii. 68, 272, 284,
iv. 25
A'Court (Minister at Madrid), iii.
178
Adair, Robert, iv. 2
Addison's " Freeholder," iii. 234
Albemarle, Lord, Master of the
Horse, iv. 108
Alexander, Emperor of Russia,
at Chelsea, Portsmouth, and
Woolwich, iii. 27 ; and Napo-
leon in 1814, iii. 143
Algiers, captured by the French
(1830), iv. 39
Alien Act, the, iii. 131
Allen, Mr., iv. 11
Almack's, iii. 201
Althorp, Lord, iii. 32, 233, iv.
64 ; opposes additional pension
for Duke of Clarence, iii. 169 ;
unites the Whig Opposition,
iv. 36 ; and Reform, iv. 75 ; the
author's independence of, iv.
81 ; announces Reform measure
(1831), iv. 82, 88; altercation
with Peel, iv. 105 et seq, • his
patience, iv. 123 ; offers the
author the Secretaryship at War,
iv. 165 ; on the creation of Peers,
iv. 178 etseq., 194, 195, 209 ; his
repugnance to office, iv. 180,
189 ; his great influence, iv. 192 ;
receives freedom of the City,
iv. 247 ; on Irish Church Re-
form, iv. 283 et seq. ; on the
deadlock in the Cabinet (1833),
iv. 295 ; and author's resigna-
tion of Irish Secretaryship, iv.
306 ; his attack on Shiel and
other Irish Members, iv. 329
Alvanley, Lord, iii. 10, 31, 112
(footnote), 272 ; at Boyle Farm,
iii. 206
American despatches unopened
(1806), iv. 11
Anglesey, Lord, becomes Master-
General of the Ordnance, iii.
185; and the Duke of Wel-
lington's reticence, iii. 222 ;
Littleton's opinion of, iv. 331
Antiquarian Society, iii. 13
Arbuthnot, Mr., to be Chancellor
of the Duchy (1828), iii. 272;
iv. 37
Arguelles (Spanish statesman),
iii. 15, 178
Army Estimates (1832), the
author brings in the, iv. 182
Army, proposed reductions, iv.
183, 185, 186, 193, 194, 265
Army, proposed reforms, iv. 267,
274 ; new Pension Warrant, iv.
280, 282 ; abolition of sinecures,
iv. 285, 289 ; reduction of garri-
son appointments, iv. 286et8eq.,
290 ; proposed Board to con-
solidate Civil Departments, iv.
328
Asgill's life saved by the Queen
of France, iii. 23
Asiatic Society, iv. 275
Athemeum Club, iii. 21
Attenborough, Dr., iii. 69
Attwood (of Birmingham), iv. 28,
191
Auchmore (Loch Tay), iii. 26
Auckland, 1st Lord, negotiates the
Coalition, iii. 249
Auckland, 2nd Lord, made First
Lord of the Admiralty, iv. 344
Badajoz, the slaughter at, iii. 82
Baillie, Dr., on Wm. Pitt's last
words, iii. 21
Bank Act, the (1826), iii. 125
Bankes, Mr. W., iii. 92, 119, 125,
314, iv. 104, 120
367
368
INDEX
Bankes, Mr. Henry, iii. 302, 304
Baring, Mr. Alexander, iii. 190,
iv. 90, 91, 104, 223, 225; on the
failure of Wellington's attempt
to form a Government (1832),
iv. 228 et seq.
Barnes, Mr., of the Times, iv. Ill,
261
Barry, Byron's banker, iii. 50 ; his
account of Byron at Genoa,
iii. 151 ; Byron's letters to, iii.
152 etseq.
Bartolini, his bust of Byron, iii. 8
Basildon Park, iv. 325
Bathurst, Lord, iii. 117, iv. 13
Bavaria, King Maximilian Joseph
of, iii. 148
Bayley, Miss, iv. 158
Bear Club (Devizes), iii. 116
Bedford, 6th Duke of, iii. 164
Bedford, 7th Duke of, iii. 162 ; and
Catholic question, iii. 169
Beefsteak Club, iii. 104, 236
Belgium, revolutionary struggle
in (1830), iv. 51 et seq., 79; de-
nounced in King's Speech, iv.
55 et seq.
Belgrave, Lady Elizabeth, iii. 24
Belgrave, Lord, iii. 133, 264
Belhaven, Lord, iv. 100
Bentinck, Lord William, iii. 208
Bentinck, Lord George, iv. 162
Beresford, Lord, appointed Lt.-
General of the Ordnance, iii. 12
Ber'ri, Duchess of, iv. 119
Berwick, governorship of, iv.
290
Best, Lord Chief Justice, iii. 219
Bex (Rhone Valley), iii. 289
Bickersteth, Mr. Henry (Lord
Langdale), iii. 72, 207 ; Copley's
opinion of, iii. 220 ; dislikes
Brougham, iv. 270, 337
Blandford, Lord, his Reform
resolutions, iii. 322 ; his Bill
(1830), iv. 9
Board of Trade, debate on salary
of President, iii. 129
Bognor, iii. 139
Borghese, Prince, iii. 208
Boswell, Sir A., iii. 128
Bourbons, prospects of the (1822),
iii. 9 ; support of the, iii. 17
Boyd Alexander, Mrs. (author's
sister), iii. 40, 281, iv. 13
Boyle Farm, Fete at, iii. 206
Brancaleone, Contessa (author's
Bister), iii. 40, 291
Brenton, Mr., and Byron, iii. 153
Brighton, iv. 48
British Museum, iii. 20
Brodie, Sir Benjamin, iv. 122
Brougham, H. (Lord), iii. 28 ; un-
popular, iii. 32 ; on Reform, iii.
51 ; on education, iii. 85 ; on
Catholic Relief, iii. 97, 260 ; at
the Beefsteak Club, iii. 104,
236; on religion, iii. 114; on
J. Hume, iii. 159 ; prepares his
speeches, iii. 177 ; his diary,
iii. 223; his vagaries, iii. 232;
on law reform, iii. 241 ; Lord
Holland's recollections of, iii.
252 ; on Huskisson's resignation,
iii. 276 ; on the Wellington
Government, iv. 3, 7 ; on news-
paper reporters, iv. 6 ; and the
Duke of York's debts, iv. 7 ;
scene with Peel, iv. 35 ; his Re-
form motion, iv. 60 ; becomes
Lord Chancellor, iv. 71, 72, 73,
74; on the Reform Bill (1831),
iv. 82 ; on Lord Chancellor's
salary, iv. 85 ; makes mischief,
iv. 93 ; congratulates the author
on taking office, iv. 170 ; Lord
Durham's opinion of, iv. 257 ;
Macaulay's opinion of, iv. 327 ;
and Bickersteth, iv. 337 ; his
wife's assembly, iv. 338 ; on the
interregnum of May 1832, iv.
360
Buckingham, Duke of, iii. 210,
iv. 39
Buckingham, James Silk, iv. 46
Buckingham Palace, iii. 20, iv.
363
Budget of 1831, iv. 84, 86
Buonaparte, Lucien, iv. 316
Buonaparte, Napoleon, advised by
Lallemand not to go on board
the Northumberland, iii. 16 ;
O'Meara's Memoir, iii. 17 ; Las
Casas' "Memorial of St. Helena,"
iii. 18 ; Lavalette on, iii. 141 et
seq. ; as a Captain at Toulon in
1793, iii. 155 ; and Flahaut, iii.
164 ; Bourienne's Memoirs, iv.
17
Buonarrotti, Cosimo, iii. 295
Burdett, Sir F., iii. 18, 19, 22, 37 ;
at Byron's funeral, iii. 68 ; and
the Catholic petition, iii. 85 ;
and the Catholic Bill, iii. 93, 97 ;
anecdote of Fox and Sheridan,
iii. 121 ; on Byron Monument
INDEX
369
Committee, iii. 125 ; returned
for Westminster with the author
(1826), iii. 137; on Canning's
speech on the new world, iii.
1 60 ; and the Catholic question,
iii. 170, 173 ; supports Canning,
iii. 186, 191 ; begs the Duke of
Devonshire to do the same, iii.
198 ; question of peerage for, iii.
208, 209 ; on the Navarino
debate, iii. 242 ; and the West-
minster election (1830), iv. 29,
30, 44 ; on the French revolu-
tion of 1830, iv. 46 ; on the state
of the country (1830), iv. 74;
Westminster election (1831),
iv. 109 ; and the " National
Union," iv. 147, 151 ; on the
author's resignations, iv. 307,
319 ; negotiates between Grey
and O'Connell, iv. 339
Burke, Rt. Hon. E., iii. 14 ; Lord
Carnarvon's anecdotes of, iii.
104 et seq.
Byron, Capt. George, iii. 35 et
seq., 347, iv. 237
Byron, Lady, iii. 39, 347
Byron, Lord, at Pisa, iii. 2 et seq. ;
and the Carbonari, iii. 3, 6 ; at
Ravenna, iii. 4 ; and Scott, iii.
7 ; Bartolini's bust of, iii. 8 ;
his friendship for Moore, iii. 15 ;
and the cause of Greece, iii. 33 ;
details of death of, iii. 35 etseq.,
53, 57 et seq., iv. 20; the
Times on, iii. 41 ; his genius for
friendship, ibid. ; the saviour of
Greece, iii. 43 ; Sir F. Adam's
testimony, ibid. ; his will, iii.
47, 49, 65; and Sheridan, iii.
48 ; Hanson's anecdotes of, iii.
50 ; his body reaches England
in the Florida, iii. 56, 64, 66 et
seq. ; his regret at having
written " Cain " and " Don
Juan," iii. 59 ; his career in
Greece, iii. 60 et seq. ; his
funeral, iii. 68 et seq. ; his letters
and MSS. lodged at Kinnaird's
Bank, iii. 114 ; Moore's Life of,
iii. 124, 134 et seq., 206, 227 ;
monument to, ibid. ; his home
at Genoa, iii. 151 ; his letters to
Barry, ibid, ; to Leigh Hunt, iii.
133 ; to Lady Melbourne, iii.
173, 227 ; monument to, iii.
255, 277, 279, iv. 2 ; destruc-
tion of his Memoirs, iii. 327 et
VOL. IV
seq. ; Pietro Gamba's account
of the last illness of, iii. 365 et
seq. ; sale of his copyrights,
iv. 9 ; the separation con-
troversy, iv. 17
Byron, Miss Ada, iv. 330, 367
Byron,Mrs. (Lord Byron's mother)
iii. 49
Cadiz, taken by French (1823), iii.
28
Calcraft, Mr. John (M.P.), iv. 130
(note)
Campbell (Attorney-General), iv.
361
Campbell, Sir Colin (1828), iii.
255
Campbell, Thos. (the poet), iv. 17,
23, 157
Campbell (the sculptor), iv. 321
Canning, Charles (afterwards
Lord), iii. 181
Canning, Mr., iii. 11, 12, 13 ; as a
young man, iii. 251 ; on wars be-
tween France and Spain (1823),
iii. 16 ; compared with Castle-
reagh, iii. 17 ; on supporting
the Bourbons, iii. 17, 18 ; in
debate, iii. 21 ; smuggling of his
embroidered coat, iii. 30 ; un-
popularity of, iii. 32 ; on
Wellesley and Hastings, iii. 44 ;
and the Foreign Office, iii. 49 ;
and the Catholic Association
debate, iii. 87 ; and the Catholic
Relief Bill, iii. 96, 114; his
policy in the Cabinet on the
same, iii. 104 ; on the dread of
innovation, iii. 127 ; on Portu-
guese affairs and the "new
world," iii. 159 ; illness of, iii.
168, 177 ; his Corn Law plan,
iii. 173; " Toby-Phillpott ' '
speech, iii. 175 ; his personality,
iii. 179; becomes Prime
Minister, iii. 183 ; on the
Catholic question, iii. 188 ; at-
tacks on his family, iii. 189, 194,
213; opposed to Reform, iii. 191;
brings in his Budget, iii. 199;
author declines invitation to
dine with, iii. 205, 209 ; his last
illness, iii. 212 ; his death, iii.
214; character of, iii. 215, 217,
239; his funeral, iii. 218; the
pension to his family, iii. 261
Canning, Mrs., created a Vis-
countess, iii. 236
47
370
INDEX
Canning, Stratford, on Turkey,
iii. 253
Canova, his death, iii. 9 ; his
interviews with Napoleon, iii.
122
Canterbury, Archbishop of,
against Irish Church Com-
mission, iv. 348
Carbonari, the, iii. 3, 4
Cardington, iii. 18
Carlisle, Lord, iii. 68, 207, 210,
iv. 344
Carnarvon, Lord, iii. 104, 136
Castlereagh, iii. 17, 204. See also
Londonderry
Catholic Associations, debates
(1825), iii. 35 et seq., 91 ; (1829),
iii. 301, 303 et seq. ; dissolution
of the, iii. 305
Catholic Emancipation, iii. 169,
113 et seq., 260, 278
Catholic Relief Bill of 1825,
drafted by O'Connell, iii. 96;
debate on, ibid, et seq ; third
reading, iii. 98 ; debate in House
of Lords, iii. 99
Catholic Relief Bill of 1829, iii. 301
et seq. ; passes the Commons,
iii. 314 ; debate in the Lords, iii.
315; bill passed, iii. 3 16; receives
Royal assent, iii. 318 ; Charles
X.'s opinion on, iv. 51
Cavendish, Lord George and Lord
John, iii. 138
Chambers, Dr., iv. 345
Chantrey (the sculptor), iii. 230,
iv. 126, 321
Charlemont, Lady, iv. 100, 197
Charles I., his orders for the arrest
of Prince Rupert, iii. 13
Charles X. in 1829, iii. 299; in
1830, iv. 5 ; deposed, iv. 43 ; at
Lulworth, iv. 51
Charlotte, Princess, iii. 163
Chateaubriand, iii. 156, 292 et
seq.
Chelsea Hospital, King William IV.
visits, iv. 245
Chester, Bishop of (Blomfield),
iii. 258
Chesterfield, Lord, iii. 206
Childe, Mr., moves the Address
(1823), iii. 10
Chillingham Castle, iii. 78
Chisholme, iii. 77
Chiswick House, Canning dies at,
iii. 213
Cholera, the, iv. 150, 160, 181, 216
Churchill, Lord J. (Captain R.N.),
iii. 46
Cimitile, Prince, on Metternich,
iii. 83, 140, 240
Civil List debate (1831), iv. 98
Clanricarde, Lady, iv. 315
Clarence, Duke of, additional
pension for, iii. 169 ; attends
Canning's funeral, iii. 218 ; iv.
1. See also King William IV.
Cleveland, Duke of, iv. 320
Clive, Lord (afterwards 2nd Earl
of Powis), iii. 301, iv. 155
Cobbett, at the Westminster
dinner, iii. 196 ; his wife, 197 ;
his aversions, iv. 71
Cochrane, Lady, iii. 17
Cochrane, Lord, iii. 115 ; and the
Stock Exchange fraud, iii. 155 ;
his account of the Greek Navy,
iii. 243 ; at siege and battle of
Athens, iii. 244
Codrington, Admiral Sir Edward,
iii. 238, 242, iv. 66
Coke,T. (of Holkham), iii. 137, 138
Combination Bill, the, iii. Ill
Como, Lake of, iii. 150
Congreve, Sir William, iii. 161
Conolly, Mr. (M.P.), iv. 117
Constance, Lake of, steamboat
on, iii. 147
Constant, Benjamin, iii. 9, iv. 47
Constantine, Grand Duke, iii. 167
Conyngham, Lady, iii. 13
Conyngham, Lord F., iii. 13
Conyngham, Marquis of, iv. 32
Cooke, T. P. (the actor), iv. 161
Cooper, Sir Astley, iv. 20
Copley (Attorney-General), iii.
107, 111; Master of the Rolls,
iii. 173 ; and the " Toby-Phill-
pott" speech, iii. 175; made Lord
Chancellor, iii. 185, 203; on
George IV., iii. 219 ; and Lord
Brougham, iv. 73 ; defeats
Lord Grey's Government on the
Reform Bill (committal stage),
iv. 218 ; his unyielding opposi-
tion, iv. 230
Corn Laws, iii. 133, 134, 177;
Duke of Wellington defeats
Canning's Bill, iii. 202 ; Can-
ning's resolutions, iii. 204
Cornwall, Mr. (M.P.), anecdotes of
Wellington, iii. 266 et seq. ; dis-
approves of Wellington's oppos
ing all Reform, iv. 58
Cork, Lady, iii. 76, 137, iv. 38
INDEX
371
Corry, Lord, iii. 301
CottlesHouse, home of the author's
father, iii. 223
Cotton Mills Regulation Bill, iii.
99 ; amended, iii. 321, 323
Courtenay, Thomas Peregrine, iv
83
Coutts, Mrs., iii. 137 ; marries the
Duke of St. Albans, iii. 203 ; iv.
22 (note)
Cowper, Lord, iii. 104 etseq., 182
Cox, Rev. R., iii. 279
Creation of Peers. See Peers.
Creevey, iii. 30 ; his character, iii.
80, 93, 177
Crewe, Lord (1823), iii. 22, 77
Croker, J. W., iv. 154, 155, 193
Cromwell, iii. 118
Cumberland, Duke of, attends
Reform debates (1831), iv. 103
Cunningham, Allan, iv. 3
Currency debate, iv. 301
Cutlar Fergusson, Mr. R., iv.
210, 214
Czartoryski, Prince, iv. 210, 215
Dacre, Lady, iii. 281
Dacre, Lord, iii. 231, iv. Ill
Dallas, Mr., and Byron's letters,
iii. 72
Darner, Mrs., iii. 15
Darmstadt, its opera and Grand
Duke, iii. 146
Davenport, Mr. (M.P.), iii. 22
David (the painter), tomb of, iii. 157
Davy, Dr., iii. 119, iv. Ill
Davy, Lady, iv. 101, 315
De Dunstanville, Lord, iii. 52
Delaunay Memoirs, iv. 152
Denman, Chief Justice, iv. 317
Derby Day at Epsom (1825), iii.
101 ; dead-heat (1828), iii. 269
De Roos, Henry, iii. 206
Despatches, stories of unopened,
iv. 11
De Stael, Madame, iii. 24
Destruction of Lord Byron's
Memoirs, iii. 329 et seq.
DeVear,Mr.,iv. 167,307,311,312
Devereux, Mr., on the Canonical
Sabbath, iii. 259
Devonshire, Duke of, iii. 167 ;
banquet given by, iii. 207
D'Israeli (the elder), iii. 92 ; his
" Essay on the Literary Char-
acter," iii. 266
" Diversions of Purley," the, iii.
131
Doherty (Solicitor-General) on
O'Connell, iv. 8
Dom Pedro, of Portugal, iv. 118
(note), 121
"Don Juan," Cantos X., XL, XII.,
iii. 274 ; sale of copyright, iv. 9
Dover, Lord, and the Horse Guards
clock, iv. 277
Doyle, Colonel, iii. 337
Drummond, Mr. Henry, iii. 90
Dudley, Lord, iii. 132, 177; becomes
Foreign Secretary, iii. 1 9 1 ; on the
Greek question (1827), iii. 220
Duel between Wellington and
Winchilsea, iii. 313
Duke of York's School, iv. 244
Duncan, Admiral (Lord Camper-
down), iv. 14
Duncannon, Lord, iii. 203, 260
Dundas, his pension, iv. 13
Durham, Lord, iv. 59 ; becomes
Lord Privy Seal, iv. 71; offers
of office to the author, iv. 92 ;
on the prospects of the Reform
Bill (Feb. 1832), iv. 170 ; on the
proposal to create Peers, iv. 176
et seq., 197 ; and the King, iv.
199 ; and Bishop Phillpotts, iv.
212 ; his opinion of the Emperor
Nicholas, iv. 255 ; on Lord Grey
and his colleagues, iv. 256 etseq. ;
on Brougham, ibid. ; on the
author, iv. 257 ; differences with
Lord Grey about Stanley, iv.
260 et seq., 279; mission to Paris,
iv. 338 ; quarrel with Ellice, iv.
349 et seq.
East Retford disfranchisement,
iii. 269
Eaton, author visits Lord Gros-
venor at, iii. 24
Ebrington, Lady, iii. 133
Ebrington, Lord, iv. 135 ; his
address to the Crown, iv. 222 ;
attack on Wellington, iv. 225
Edinburgh, the author declines
to stand for, iv. 339 et seq.
Elcho, Lady, iii. 19
Elcho, Lord, iii. 18
Eldon, Lord Chancellor, on Uni-
tarian Marriage Bill, iii. 32 ; on
the Bishops and the Catholic
Association Bill, iii. 100 ; not in
the Wellington Cabinet, iii. 239;
on the Test Acts repeal, iii.
258; on Catholic Relief Bill,
iii. 317, 318
372
INDEX
Ellenborough, Lord, iii. 189 ;
history of his promotion by
Wellington, iii. 240
Ellice, Mr., iii. 74, 94, 119, 120,
iv. 78, 109, 313; joins Lord
Grey's Cabinet, iv. 344 ; his pre-
vious history, iv. 345 ; quarrel
with Lord Durham, iv. 349 et seq.
Epsom races, iii. 101, 269
Erskine (Lord Chancellor) and
George III., iii. 80
Eugubian Tables, the, iii. 292
Evans, Colonel, opposes the author
at Westminster election, iv.
260, 310 ; is returned, ibid.
Ewart, Mr., iv. 193
Examiner, the, iv. 247
Eynard, Chevalier, iii. 199 et seq.
Factory Act (1825), iii. 99; Bill
to amend (1829), iii. 321, 323;
(1831), iv. 104, 122, 134, 135
Falloden, iii. 79
Farnley, iii. 28
Fawkes, Mr. (of Farnley), iii. 28
Ferguson, of Pitfour, anecdotes
of, iii. 224, 319
Fitzclarence, Lord Frederick, iv.
250
Fitzclarence, sinecure appoint-
ments for the family of, iv. 289
et seq.
FitzGerald, Maurice, iv. 104
Flahaut, iii. 164
Fletcher, Byron's valet, iii. 35 et
seq., 56etseq., 65, iv. 371, 372
Flogging in the Army, iii. 128, 177,
iv. 197, 208, 246 ; abolished in
the Swedish Army, iv. 288 ; Lord
Hill's opposition, iv. 20-5
Florence, iii. 295
Florida, the, brings Byron's re-
mains home, iii. 58, 64
Fonblanque, A. (editor of the
Examiner), iv. 247
Foremark (Sir F.Burdett's),iii.217
Foscolo on poetry, iii. 23 ; his
career, iv. 15
Fouche's Memoirs, iv. 145
Fox, Rt. Hon. C. , iii. 1 1 ; and Moore,
iii. 12; and Sir — Mildmay,
iii. 22 ; and Hastings, iii. 48 ;
and George IV., iii. 138, 163 ;
Lord Holland's anecdotes of,
iii. 247 etseq., iv. 332
France, declares war against
Spain (1822), iii. 10; state of
(in Jan. 1830), iv. 5
Francis, Philip, iii. 14
Frankfort, defence of, iii. 145
Fremantle, Jack, his account of
the Prussians at Waterloo, iii.
267
Fremantle, Treasurer of the Ex-
chequer, iii. 218, iv. 14
Frere, Bartholomew, iv. 19 (note)
Frere, Hookham, iii. 129
Fuller, Jack, anecdote of Sheridan,
iii. 136
Galiano (Spanish Minister), iii. 178
Gait's Life of Byron, iv. 47, 53
Gamba, Count Pietro, iii. 3, 35,
227 ; on Greece's debt to Byron,
iii. 43 ; anecdotes of Byron
in Greece, iii. 62 et seq. ; his
account of Byron's last illness,
iii. 365 et seq.
Garrick Club, iv. 181
Gascoyne, General (M. P.), iv. 101,
308
Gemmi Pass, iii. 289
General Election (of 1831),iv. 122;
(1832), iv. 264
Genoa, iii. 297
Geographical Society, founding of
the, iv. 26, 64
Gesner's monument, iii. 147
Gibbon, at Lausanne, iii. 29
Gifford, Lord, iii. 220
Glasgow, steamboat service, iii. 25
Gleig, Rev. G. R., appointed chap-
lain to Chelsea Hospital by
Russell, iv. 333
Glenorchy, Lord, iii. 26, 132
Goderich, Lord, iii. 215; resigns,
iii. 230, 232, 235, 241 ; at Literary
Fund Dinner, iii. 263 ; on the
scene in the House of Lords
(1831), iv. 107; on proposed
reductions in Army Estimates,
iv. 186; causes a Cabinet crisis,
iv. 296, 297, 298 ; resigns, iv.
343
Gogel, Mr. (of Frankfort), iii. 145
Gordon, Duchess of, iii. 224
Gordon, Sir Willoughby, iv. 245
Goulburn, Mr., iii. 85
Graham, Sir B., iii. 18
Graham, Sir James, iii. 75, 208,
283 ; speech on reduction of
salaries, iv. 8, 20 ; against Trea-
surership of the Navy, iv. 12 ;
alarmed by the revolution of
1830, iv. 59 ; First Lord of the
Admiralty, iv. 71 ; on dissolving
INDEX
373
Parliament (1 830), iv. 79; on de-
feat of Reform Bill (1831), iv.
103; on the author joining the
Government, iv. 170; on arrears
of Government business, iv. 253 ;
Lord Durham's estimate of, iv.
257 ; melancholy, iv. 278 ; and
the Irish Church Revenues Bill,
iv. 340; resigns, iv. 343; Russell's
opinion of, iv. 361
Grant, Charles, iv. 18
Grant, Sir Alexander Cray (M.P.),
iv. 145
Grant, Sir W., iii. 223
Grantham, Lady, iii. 99
Granville, Lord, iii. 99
Grattan, Mr. H., iv. 292
Greece, iii. 33, 200, 221
Greek Committee, iii. 156
Greek deputies, iii. 73, 115
Greek Loan, iii. 73
Greenock, iii. 25
Grenville, Lord, anecdotes of, iii.
52
Grey, General (Henry), of Fallo-
den, iii. 79
Grey, Lord, on political outlook
(1823), iii. 21 ; and George III.,
iii. 79 ; at home, iii. 81, 93, 95,
226; on Sheridan, iii. 128 ; dis-
satisfied with Canning, iii. 186,
189 ; and Sir R. Wilson, iii. 195 ;
on the House of Lords, iii. 202 ;
on Wellington and Catholic
Emancipation, iii. 305, 318; on
the Galway Franchise Bill, iv.
31 ; his strange character, ibid,
(footnote) ; forms a Government,
iv. 70 et seq. ; on the King's
support to Reform, iv. 94 ; on
Poland, iv. 99 ; made K.G., iv.
113 ; introduces Reform Bill in
the Lords, iv. 134; and Bishop
Phillpotts, iv. 139; his char-
acter, iv. 150 ; on the duties of
the Secretary-at-War, iv. 169;
the proposed Creation of Peers,
iv. 174 et seq.; Mansion House
dinner to, iv. 182 ; on second
reading of the third Reform Bill,
iv. 207 ; his influence with the
King, iv. 208 ; carries the third
reading of the Bill in the Lords,
iv. 214 ; defeated on committal,
iv. 218; resignation of, iv. 219,
223 et seq. ; resumes office, iv.
233 ; receives freedom of the
City, iv. 247 ; on the personalities
of his Cabinet colleagues, iv. 255 ;
Lord Durham's opinion of, iv.
256 ; and the author's, iv. 263 ,
on the King's sinecure appoint-
ments, iv. 290; tired of official
life, iv. 296; attempts to dis-
suade the author from resigning,
iv. 306 ; his seventieth birthday,
iv. 332 ; on the Irish Church
question, iv. 348 ; resigns, iv.
353
Grosvenor, Lord (and Lady), iii.
24, 109
Grosvenor, R., iii. 206, iv. 108
Grote, Mr. G., iv. 342
Gubbio, iii. 291
Guiccioli, Madame, iii. 3
Gurney, Mr. Hudson, iii. 126, iv.
19
Hall, Capt. Basil, iv. 126
Hallein, salt mine of, iii. 149
Hamilton, Terrick, iv. 19
Hanbury Tracy, iii. 53
Hanson (Byron's solicitor), iii.
46, 49, 64, 286
Hardinge, Sir Henry, iii. 270 ; on
Reform, iv. 82, 89, 98, 124 ; on
the dissolution, iv. 106 ; conveys
a challenge from Peel to the
author, iv. 1 10 ; on the action of
the Lords, iv. 133 ; on the riots,
iv. 142; on flogging in the Army,
iv. 208 ; opposes the new Pension
Warrant, iv. 288
Harmer, Alderman, iv. 327
Harrington, Lord, iii. 164, iv. 321
Harrowby, Lord, iii. 230, iv. 134,
207
Hartham House, Wilts, iii. 222
Hawkins, Mr., maiden speech on
Reform Bill, iv. 102
Hay, Lady Julia, iii. 277, 280;
engagement to the author, iii.
281, 284 ; marriage, iii. 285.
See also Lady Julia Hobhouse
Hay, Lord and Lady James, iv. 52
Hay, Lord John (Capt. R.N.), iii.
26, 281
Hay, Lord Thomas, iv. 311, 326
Hazlitt, his animosity to Byron,
iii. 153
Heidelberg, iii. 1
Herries, Mr., becomes Chancellor
of the Exchequer, iii. 219; 241,
245, 246, iv. 96
Hertford, Marquis of, on Canning's
South American policy, iii. 53
374
INDEX
Heytesbury, Lord, iii. 259
Hill, Lord (Commander-in-Chief),
iv. 185, 194; friction with the
author, iv. 247, 267 ; assents to
author's new Pension Warrant,
iv. 280 ; opposes abolition of
flogging, iv. 295
Hinde, H.M.S., iii. 46
" His Majesty's Opposition," ori-
gin of, iii. 129, 161, 191, iv.
21
Hobhouse, Sir Benjamin (author's
father), iv. 114, 122 ; his death,
iv. 129, 140
Hobhouse, Edward, iii. 1
Hobhouse, Henry, in India, iii.
45 ; Under-Secretary at the
Home Office, iii. 185 ; resigns,
iii. 210; at Send Grove, iv. 16 ;
candidate for Bath, iv. 253 ;
beaten at election, iv. 264
Hobhouse, Lady Julia, iii. 286,
iv. 110; her illness, iv. 114,
129 ; at Hastings, iv. 157, 170 ;
gets better, iv. 215,265; at Send
Grove, iv. 312 ; again ill, iv. 317 ;
health improves, iv. 356
Hobhouse, T. B. (author's half-
brother), iii. 145, 233, iv. 264
Hodgson, Provost of Eton, iii. 70
Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, iv.
203
Holland, Dr., iii. 132
Holland, Lady, iii. 15, 17, 90, 95,
198, 230, 240, 282, iv. 72, 204,
254, 336
Holland, Lord, iii. 15 ; talks
Spanish, iii. 19; his story of
Pitt's duel with Tierney, iii. 31 ;
the relief of the Catholics, iii.
91 ; his letters to Byron, iii.
95; on Thurlow, iii. 112; his
character, iii. 118; on France,
iii. 139 ; on Canning's Govern-
ment, iii. 198 ; on the need of
union among the Whigs, iii. 234 ;
his anecdotes of George III.,
Lord North, Pitt, and Fox, iii.
247 etseq., iv. 332; and Welling-
ton, iv. 38 ; on Lord Grey's
Government, iv. 72 ; on Reform,
iv. 75 ; on the crisis (March 1832),
iv. 204
Home, Attorney-General, iv. 277
Horner, Leonard, iii. 229
Horse Guards clock, the, iv. 276
Hortense (ex-Queen), iv. 119
Hotham, Admiral Sir William,
iv. 13, 157 ; anecdotes of his
family, iv. 159
Houghton, visit to, iij. 120
House and Window Tax, iv. 268,
271, 294, 305, 324
House of Lords and Catholic
Emancipation, iii. 100
Howick, Lord, iii. 77, iv. 162
Hucknall (Church), Byron's
funeral at, iii. 70
Hume, Mr. Joseph, iii. 11 ; on
M. A. Carlyle's case, iii. 17 ; and
Greek Loan, iii. 74 ; on Portu-
guese affairs, iii. 159, 201 ; his
use of the word "liable," iii. 204,
iv. 59 ; candidate for West-
minster, iv. 28etseg., 46; and
the Civil List (1831), iv. 98 ; Lord
Rector of Glasgow University,
iv. 150; on the Army Estimates,
iv. 182 ; his letters opened at
Foreign Courts, iv. 201 ; and
Brazilian aggressions, iv. 215; on
flogging in the Army, iv. 246 ;
proposes Littleton for Speaker,
iv. 279; on naval and military
sinecures, iv. 285 ; opposes Irish
Coercion Bill, iv. 293 ; economi-
cal advice to the Duke of Kent,
iv. 314
Hunt, Mr., iv. 83 ; on Reform
Bill, iv. 89 ; on flogging in the
Army, iv. 208
Huskisson,Rt.Hon.W.,iii. 95, 127,
168, 177, 265; on Peel, iii. 193;
anecdotes of Mr. Pitt, iii. 203; his
health, iii. 216; and Lord Lans-
downe, iii. 233 ; in Wellington's
Administration, iii. 237,241, 254;
his change of opinion on the Corn
Question, iii. 257 ; his vote on
the East Retf ord Bill, iii. 27 1 ; his
resignation, iii. 271, 275, 276;
votes for Lord J. Russell's Re-
form proposal (1830), iv. 10; ac-
cident to and death of, iv. 49 ;
author's opinion of, iv. 50
Hutchinson's Memoirs, iii. 118
Inglis, Sir Robert, iii. 75, 212 ; on
Catholic Emancipation, iii. 302,
309 ; on Reform, iv. 80, 88
Irish Church Reform, iv. 283, 292,
324
Irish Coercion Bill (1833), iv. 292,
352 et seq.
Irish Secretaryship, accepted by
the author, iv. 297 : author's
INDEX
375
interview with the King about,
iv. 299 ; author enters on the,
ibid. ; the small establishment
in Queen Street, iv. 300 ; author
resigns, iv. 305 ; Mr. E. J.
Littleton succeeds to the, iv. 331
Irish Tithe Bill, iv. 359, 361 ; in
the Lords, iv. 362
Jeffrey, Mr. (afterwards Lord), iv.
90 (note), 338, 341
Jekyll, iii. 182
Jersey, Lady, iii. 101, iv. 76; and
the Reform riots, iv. 143 (note)
Jersey, Lord, made Lord Cham-
berlain, iv. 39
Jewish Disabilities Bill (1830), iv.
16, 22
John Bull newspaper, on the
author's resignation of his office
and seat, iv. 312
Jones, Sir William, iii. 120 ; his
death-bed, iii. 122
Junius, authorship of, Letters of,
iii. 116
Kemble, Miss Fanny, iv. 14; as
Juliet, iv. 23
Kenmare, Lady, iv. 197
Kennedy, Mrs., iv. 80
Kent, Duchess of, iv. 205, 314, 337
Kerrison, General, iii. 270
King George III. and Lord Grey,
iii. 80 ; his reputed speech
about Catholic Emancipation
not a fact, iii. 205 ; Lord North's
recollections of, iii. 250 ; Sir W.
Hotham's anecdote of, iv. 160
King George IV. at Brighton,
iii. 13 ; quick at quoting Latin,
iii. 52 ; and Fox, iii. 138, 163 ;
and Sheridan, iii. 165 ; opens
Parliament (1826), iii. 158;
letter to the Duke of Welling-
ton, iii. 199 ; and his Tory
Ministers, iii. 203 ; on Cabinet
changes (1827), iii. 218; offers
the Duke of Wellington the com-
mand-in-chief, iii. 222 ; sends
for him to form a Government,
iii. 235, 240 ; at the Drawing-
room, iii. 258 ; and the Catholic
Question, iii. 270, 317, 320 ; and
the Duke of Wellington, iii. 321,
323 ; and the Duke of York's
debts, iv. 7 ; his illness, iv. 18,
20; his death, iv. 31 ; funeral,
iv. 39
King, Lord, iii. 136
King, Mr. (and Mrs.), iii. 31
King William IV., accession of, iv.
32 et seq. ; holds a Levee, iv.
40 ; reviews the Guards, ibid. ;
reviews troops in Hyde Park,
iv. 42 ; at Brighton, iv. 49 ; his
visit to the City postponed, iv.
62 ; alarm in the City, ibid. ; dis-
solves Parliament (April 1831),
iv. 105 et seq. ; the author's high
opinion of, iv. 116; opens new
London "Bridge, iv. 125 et seq. ;
and the author's father, iv. 140,
171; wishes the author appointed
Secretary-at-War, iv. 169; holds
a Council, iv. 172 ; the creation
of Peers, iv. 181, 209 ; and Lord
Durham, iv. 199; refuses to make
Peers, iv. 219; accepts Lord
Grey'sresignation,iv. 220; sends
for Wellington, iv. 223 ; the
author has an audience of re-
signation with, iv. 224 ; Baring
on the King's action, iv. 228,
229 ; struck by a stone at Ascot,
iv. 243 ; waning popularity, iv.
251 ; assents to new Pension
Warrant, iv. 281 ; his prescrip-
tion for the gout, iv. 282 ; on
sinecure appointments, iv. 289 ;
on the author's resigning the
Irish Secretaryship, iv. 308 ;
holds a Council at St. James's,
iv. 363
Kinnaird, Lord, iii. 109, 206
Kinnaird, Mr. D., iii. 37 et seq. ;
and Byron's will, iii. 47 et seq. ;
at Boyle Farm fete, iii. 206 ;
at Sou thill, iii. 231 ; and the
destruction of Lord Byron's
Memoirs, iii. 329 et seq. ; his
death, iv. 12
Kinsale, governorship of, iv. 290
Kleinthal, the, and Gesner's
monument, iii. 147
Knight, Mr., bookseller, iii. 72
Knighton, Sir William, iii. 213
Lafayette, iii. 9, 299, iv. 47, 78
La Harpe, iii. 278
Lallemand, General, iii. 16
Lamb, George, iv. 328
Lamb, Lady Caroline, iii. 43, 82
Lamb, William, iii. 280
Lambton, iii. 44, 45, 208 ; created
Lord Durham, iii. 236, 245. See
also Durham, Lord
376
INDEX
Lambton Castle, iii. 28 ; racing
party at, iii. 81
Lansdowne, 1st Lord, iii. 168,
185 ; joins Canning's Cabinet, iii.
194, 210 ; on the Bishops' action
in the House of Lords, iii. 200,
258; his capabilities, iii. 207,
229, 232 ; out of office, iii. 247 ;
the Byron Memoirs, iii. 362 ; on
the scene in the House of Lords
(April 1831), iv. 108; tries to
dissuade the author from re-
signing, iv. 307 ; on Lord Mel-
bourne's Cabinet, iv. 356 ; and
the Irish Tithes Bill division,
iv. 360
Lascelles, Lord, iii. 29
Lauderdale, Lord, iii. 32, 281, 323,
iv. 21, 39 ; supports Wellington,
iii. 322 ; duel with General
Arnold, iv. 95
Lavalette, Count, iii. 140 ; on
Napoleon and Talleyrand, iii.
141 et seq.
Lawrence, Thos. (artist), iv. 23
Leeds, Duke of, iii. 207
Leigh, Hon. Mrs. (Byron's sister),
iii. 35 et seq., 44, 53, 66; and
the Byron Memoirs, iii. 333 et
seq. ; Count Gamba's letter to,
iii. 365 et seq.
Leigh Hunt, iii. 2 ; and Byron,
iii. 153, 239
Leinster, Duchess of, iii. 168
Leopold, Prince of Orange, iv. 25,
79 ; becomes King of the
Belgians, iv. 118
Lethbridge, Sir Thomas, iii. 180,
181
Levee, the King's, author attends
as a Minister, iv. 184, 185
Leveson-Gower, Lord, iii. 319
Lieven, Princess, iii. 264
Lindsay, Lady Charlotte, iii. 31,
iv. 333 (note)
Listen in Paul Pry, iii. 121
Literary Fund, iii. 241 ; Dinners
(1828), 263; (1832), iv. 216,
285
Littleton, E. J. (Lord Hatherton),
iv. 323 ; on the Irish, iv. 331 ; on
Lords Anglesey and Wellesley,
ibid. ; his scene with O'Connell,
iv. 352 ; he resigns, iv. 353
Liverpool, Lord, iii. 10, 102 ; on
Corn Question, iii. 133 ; illness
of, iii. 169, 177, 179, 233 ; his
indolence, iii. 182, 204
London, Bishop of, iv. 348
London Bridge, iii. 109 ; opening
of, iii. 125
Londonderry, Charles 3rd Mar-
quis of, his duel with Battier,
iii. 31, 82
Londonderry, Marchioness of, iii.
82
Londonderry, Marquis of, his sui-
cide, iii. 1
Louis Philippe becomes King of
the French, iv. 45, 47, 53
Lulworth, Charles X. at, iv. 51
Luttrell, Mr., and Lord Byron's
Memoirs, iii. 328 et seq., iv. 321
Lyndhurst, Lady, iii. 252, 253
Lyndhurst, Lord. See Copley
Lytton Bulwer (M.P.), iv. 285
Macaulay, on Reform Bill (1831),
iv. 89, 119, 125, 138; attacks
Peel, iv. 155 ; difficulty of his
position, iv. 276 ; going to India,
iv. 326 ; on Brougham and
Stanley, iv. 327
Macdonald, Sir James, iv. 165
Mackintosh, his "vindicise gallicse,"
iii. 14 ; Creevey's opinion of,
iii. 30 ; at the Board of
Control, iii. 194; in Catholic
Relief debate, iii. 311 ; on the
abolition of capital punishment,
iv. 27; on Reform Bill, iv. 119;
his death, iv. 237
Mahon, Lord, iv. 124
Maitland, Lord, iv. 168
Malcolm, Sir John, iv. 275
Malt Tax, defeat of Lord Grey's
Government on, iv. 301
Manchester, Duke of, iii. 127
Manners Sutton, again chosen
Speaker (1826), iii. 158, 204;
Reform row in the House, iv.
104, 105 et seq. ; his farewell,
iv. 249 ; re-elected in reformed
Parliament, iv. 279
Mansfield, Lord, attacks Canning,
iii. 189
Marriage of the author, iii. 284,
286
Mars, Mile., iii. 281
Marsden, William (Oriental
traveller), iii. 307
Matthews, C. S., iii. 29, 35, 69
Mavrocordato, Prince, and Byron,
iii. 62, 371, 373
Maximilian Joseph (King of
Bavaria), iii. 148
INDEX
377
Med win's " Conversations " (with
Byron), iii. 83, 359 ; his char-
acter, iii. 166
Mehemet Ali, iv. 275
Melbourne, Lord, iv. 147, 245, 277,
334 ; becomes Premier, iv. 355;
offers the author a seat in the
Cabinet, iv. 356 ; his draft of
King's Speech, iv. 362, 363
Melton, Club Dinner, iii. 18
Mendel, Rabbi, tries to re-convert
Wolff, iii. 172
Methuen, Paul, iv. 317, 319, 345
Meyrick, Dr., iii. 117
Miguel, Dom, iii. 240
Milan, iii. 1, 290
Miles, Mr. John (late Coldstream
Guards), iii. 82
Millingen (Byron's doctor), iii.
58, 64, 371, 372
Milton, Lord, iii. 246
Ministerial Fish-dinner, iv. 361
Mirabeau, iv. 216 ; Dumont's
" Souvenirs," iv. 336
Missolonghi, fall of, iii. 128 ; posi-
tion of, iii. 368
Mitford's " Alexander the Great,"
iii. 237
Molyneux, Lord, iii. 18
Monckton, Mr., iv. 38
Mont Cenis, passage of the, iii.
298
Montholon, and Napoleon's will,
iii. 85
Moore, T., his opinion of Hob-
house, iii. 8 ; at Melton, iii. 18 ;
at Mr. Ord's, iii. 32 ; on Byron's
death, iii. 40 ; on publishing his
Memoirs of Byron, iii. 84, 134,
227 ; his letters to Byron in
1822, iii. 152 ; all are returned
to him by the author, iii. 206,
227 ; differences with the author,
iii. 247, 323 ; and the destruction
of Lord Byron's Memoirs, iii.
329 et seq.; his Life of Byron
published, iv. 5, 81
Morning Chronicle, the, iii. 242,
iv. 137
Morning Journal, prosecution of
the editor, iv. 4
Morpeth, Lord, iii. 68 ; on Catholic
Emancipation, iii. 173
Mulgrave, Lord, iv. 11, 280
Munich, iii. 148
Munster, Lord, on opinion at the
Court about Reform, iv. 183 ; his
indiscreet interference, iv. 236
VOL. IV
Murat, Achille, iv. 118
Murray, Mr., on Byron's death,
iii. 39 ; on publishing a volume
of Byron letters, iii. 51 ; pre-
vents an attack on Byron
by Southey in the Quarterly,
iii. 84 ; his house party in
Whitehall Place, iii. 92 ; asks
author to write a Life of Byron,
iii. 116; offers Moore 4,000
guineas for a Life of Byron, iii.
239 ; introduces author to Sir
Walter Scott, iii. 256; author
lends him Saunders's portrait
of Byron, iii. 323 ; and the
destruction of Lord Byron's
Memoirs, iv. 329 et seq. ; sends
the author Moore's Life of
Byron, iv. 4 ; pays Moore £6,000,
iv. 81
Murray, General Sir George (M.P.),
iii. 272, 309, iv. 11, 57, 120
Musgrave, Sir James, iii. 18
Mutiny Bill, the, iv. 208, 295
Nahmek Pasha, iv. 271 ; his
account of Turkey, iv. 273, 274
Napier, Sir Charles, iii. 225
Napier, Sir George, iii. 224
Napier, Sir William, iii. 224 ;
Wellington and Soult assist
him in his " History," iii. 225
Naples, iii. 294
Napoleon. See Buonaparte
Navarino, "an untoward event,"
iii. 221 ; it saved Greece, iii.
226 ; " an unexpected collision,"
iii. 238 ; author's speech in de-
bate on, iii. 242 et seq.
Necker, during the attack on
Versailles, iii. 24
Nelson, Lord, Sir William Hoth-
am's anecdotes of, iv. 157, 252
Neston Park, iii. 223
Newcastle, Duke of (1779), iv. 11
Newstead Abbey, iii. 29
Ney, tomb of, iii. 156
Nicholas, Emperor, iii. 167 ; on
the Revolution of July, iv. 66 ;
on criticism of him by Parlia-
ment, iv. 252
Norfolk, Duke of, iv. 41
Normanby, Lord, iii. 245, 280
North, Lord, Lord Holland's re-
collections of, iii. 249
Norton, Hon. Mrs., iv. 27
Nottingham Castle, burning of
(1831), iv. 139
48
378
INDEX
Nottingham, the author elected
for (1834), iv. 358
Nugent, Lord, on George III.'s
reputed speech on Catholic
Emancipation, iii. 205
O'Connell, Daniel, iii. 94, 170 ;
Clare election, iii. 283 ; attempts
to take his seat, iii. 320 ; his
maiden speech, iv. 8 ; dines
with the Speaker, iv. 9 ; his
extreme views, iv. 23 ; on Wel-
lington, iv. 25 ; at the West-
minster dinner, iv. 244 ; as
agitator, iv. 281 ; supports Irish
Church Reform scheme, iv. 284 ;
opposes Irish Coercion Bill, iv.
292 ; friendship with Lord
Duncannon, iv. 303 ; his Repeal
motion (1834), iv. 336; would
like to join Lord Grey's Govern-
ment, iv. 339 ; his quarrel with
Littleton, iv. 352
O'Gorman Mahon, iv. 83
Opposition, His Majesty's, iii. 130
Orange, Prince of. See Leopold
Ord, Mr., iii. 31, iv. 334
Orleans, Duke of. See Louis
Philippe
Orleans House, Twickenham, iv.
323
Ouvrard, Napoleon's contractor,
iii. 31
Oxford, Bishop of (1829), speaks
in favour of the Catholic Relief
Bill, iii. 317 ; the King cuts
him, iii. 322
Paganini, iv. 121
Palmer, Mr. Arthur, iv. 329
Palmerston, Lord, on Navarino,
iii. 238 ; leaves the Wellington
Government, iii. 271 ; on the
political outlook (Feb. 1829), iii.
300 ; speech on Catholic Relief
Bill, iii. 311 ; and Brougham's
Reform motion, iv. 60 ; on Lord
J. Russell's Bill, iv. 90; apa-
thetic, iv. 96 ; on the Belgian
question, iv. 164 ; on the crisis,
iv. 198 ; invested with the Order
of the Bath, iv. 241
Papplewick, iii. 69
Parliament, meeting of (1823), iii.
10 ; reform of, see " Re-
form " ; difficulty of speaking
the truth in, iii. 262 ; dissolution
of (1830), iV. 42; (1831),iv. 103,
104 et seq. ; scene in the House
of Lords, iv. 107 ; opening of
(June 1831), iv. 115; King pro-
rogues (1832), iv. 250 ; meeting
of the new reformed, iv. 278
Parnell, Sir Henry, iv. 66 ; Secre-
tary-at-War, iv. 98 ; dismissed,
iv. 165 ; desires Chancellorship
of the Exchequer, iv. 196 ;
Durham's estimate of, iv. 257
Parr, Dr., iii. 84
Parry, Dr. Charles, iii. 223
Passport, author applies for a, iii.
286
Paternoster, Mr., author of
" Byronicus," iii. 282
Paul Pry, origin of, iii. 241
Paulet, Lord William, iii. 280
Peel, Mr. Jonathan, iii. 303
Peel, Mr. (afterwards Sir) Robert,
speech in honour of James
Watt, iii. 52; iii. 90; and
cotton-factory children, iii.
95 ; and the Larceny Bill, Iii.
170 ; on Catholic Emancipa-
tion, iii. 174, 260; with the
King, iii. 177 ; resigns on Can-
ning's promotion (1827), iii. 183;
his reasons, iii. 188 ; supports
Canning's Corn Bill, iii. 204 ;
difference with Lord Milton,
iii. 246 ; on Huskisson's resigna-
tion, iii. 276 ; adopts Catholic
Emancipation, iii. 302 ; his
contest at Oxford, iii. 305 ; his
speech on Catholic Relief Bill,
iii. 308 ; his cold manner, iv.
25 ; succeeds to the baronetcy,
iv. 22 ; scene with Brougham, iv.
35 ; announces resignation of
Wellington Ministry, iv. 68 ; on
the alarming state of the country,
iv. 73 ; and of France, iv. 78 ; on
Lord J. Russell's Reform mo-
tion, iv. 88, 90 ; speech on third
reading, iv. 102 ; on the dissolu-
tion of Parliament, iv. 106 ; sends
challenge to the author, iv. 1 1 1 ;
on the new Parliament, iv. 115 ;
on second Reform Bill, iv. 117 ;
on the third Bill, iv. 155 ; reply
to Macaulay's attack, iv. 156 ;
the Ettrick Shepherd and, iv.
204; on Lord Ebrington's mo-
tion, iv. 222; refuses to join
Wellington, iv. 228
Peers, proposed creation of, iv.
144, 173, llAetseq., 181, 209, 219
INDEX
379
Peninsular War, Napier's History
r|of, iii. 225
Penn, W., iv. 1
Perceval, Spencer, iv. 79, 83
Pere la Chaise, Cemetery, iii.
156
Phillpotts, Bishop (of Exeter), iv.
139, 212
Pisa, iii. 2,296
Pitt, Right Hon. Wm., iii. 11 ;
his last words, iii. 21 ; duel
with Tierney, iii. 31 ; thanks
Brougham for his "Colonial
Policy," iii. 223 ; Lord Hol-
land's anecdotes of, iii. 248 ;
Sir William Hotham's anecdotes,
iv. 158
Place, Francis, iii. 229, iv. 164,
227
Planta, Mr., iii. 203, 265, iv. 103
Plunkett, Lord, iii. 194
Poland, Lord Grey on, iv. 99 ;
Prince Czartoryski on, iv. 210
Polidori, iii. 69
Polignac, iv. 47, 78
Poole, author of Paul Pry, iii.
241
Poor Law Bill (1834), iv. 338
Pope's Correspondence, iii. 221
Porchester, Lord, iii. 105 ; his
maiden speech, iv. 119; op-
poses third Reform Bill, iv. 155
Portugal, King John of, iii. 52
Poulett Thomson (afterwards
Lord Sydenham), iii. 193, iv.
330 (note) ; on Lord Grey's col-
leagues, iv. 331 ; President of
the Board of Trade, iv. 348
Pozzo di Borgo, iv. 2, 275;
anecdotes of Napoleon, iv. 278
Privy Council, meeting of the,
iv. 171
Prussia, King of, at Portsmouth,
iii. 27
Queen Adelaide, iv. 125 et seq.,
243 ; unpopular, ibid., 250, 315
Queen Caroline, her death-bed,
iii. 45
Queen of France (Marie Antoin-
ette), saves Asgill's life, iii. 23 ;
during the attack on Versailles,
iii. 24
Quorn, a run with the, iii. 18,
30
Railway, Liverpool and Man-
chester, opened, iv. 49
Rancliffe, Lord, iii. 69, 359, iv. 358
Reform, Parliamentary, Fox's
speech, iii. 129 ; author's
speech on (1826), iii. 132, 322;
Lord Blandford's Bill (1830),
iv. 9 ; Lord J. Russell's pro-
posal (1830), iv. 10; the
author's advanced views, iv. 24 ;
Wellington declares against, iv.
56, 58; Lords Stafford and
Talbot declare for, iv. 59 ; Lord
Tavistock's and Lord Holland's
views, iv. 75; Lord John Russell
introduces the Bill (1 83 l),iv. 87;
debate on, iv. 88 etseq. ; the King
in favour of, iv. 94 ; debate on
second reading of Bill, iv. 96, 97 ;
views of tradesmen on, iv. 100;
Bill defeated on third reading,
iv. 103 ; Fund established to as-
sist, iv. 109 ; Reform Dinner in
the City, iv. 112; second Reform
Bill introduced, iv. 117; author's
speech on Metropolitan repre-
sentation, iv. 127; new Bill re ad
a third time, iv. 131 ; debate in
the Lords, iv. 1 34 ; thrown outby
the Lords, iv. 136 ; action of the
populace, iv. 139, 140 ; proposed
creation of Peers, iv. 144, 209 ;
third bill introduced (Dec. 1831),
iv. 154 ; additional Members for
London, iv. 187 ; the Bill carried
in the Lords, iv. 213 ; defeated on
committal, iv. 218 ; Lord Grey's
Government resigns, iv. 219;
Wellington's proposal to carry
Reform, iv. 224 et seq. ; he gives
it up, iv. 226 ; Lord Grey
returns to office after receiving
guarantees, iv. 233; the Bill
going through Committee, iv.
235 ; the Bill passed, iv. 240 ;
receives the Royal Assent, iv.
242
Regency question (1830), iv. 37
Repeal of the Union, iv. 336
Revolution of July (1830) in
Paris, iv. 43 et seq., 52, 54
Ricardo, Mr., iii. 1 ; his death,
iii. 26
Richmond, Duke of, iv. 343, 345
Riding Establishment at St.
John's Wood, iv. 184; to be
moved to Maidstone, iv. 202
Riots in the country, iv. 139
Rogers, Sam, iii. 15, 182 ; letter
to Byron in 1818, iii. 152
S80
INDEX
Rome, the author in, iii. 8, 292 ;
Canova's studio in, ibid.
Ross, Charles, ex-Lord of the
Admiralty, iv. 363
Rosslyn, Lord, made Privy Seal,
iii. 322, 324
Royal Society, the, iv. 74
Russell, Lord, iii. 162, 163, 207
Russell, Lord John, iii. 17, 122,
123, 128 ; his Reform motion
(1826), iii. 132; fracas with
Lady Holland, iii. 230; his
Reform proposals of 1830, iv.
10, 24 ; to bring forward the
Reform Bill (1831), iv. 82 ; his
speech, iv. 87; presented with the
freedom of the City, iv. 121 ;
brings forward third Reform
Bill (Dec. 1831), iv. 154; pros-
pects of carrying it in the Lords,
iv. 210 ; a Commissioner of Chel-
sea Hospital, iv. 245 ; appoints
Gleig to the chaplaincy there,
iv. 333 ; and the Irish Church
Bill, iv. 340 ; on Stanley and
Graham, iv. 361
Russo-Belgian Loan, iv. 248
Sackville, Lord George, iii. 116
Sainsbury, Dr., iii. 116
St. Albans, Duke of, marries Mrs.
Coutts, iii. 203, iv. 22
St. Antonio, Countess, iii. 255
St. Aulaire's History of the
Fronde, iii. 226
St. James's Palace, Children's
Ball at, iv. 315
St. Lorenzo, Duke (and Duchess)
of, iii. 19 ; on Spain and France,
iii. 20
Salaries, official, reduction of, iv.
8, 20, 84
Saldanha, Count, and the Terceira
case, iv. 18 (note)
Salzburg, iii. 149
San Marino, Republic of, iii. 291
San Marsan, Marquis, iii. 28
Scarlett, Sir J., iii. 86
Schlegel, iii. 145
Scotland, steamboats on West
Coast of, iii. 25
Scott, Sir Walter, letter to Byron
announcing death of the two
Boswells, iii. 152 ; on the Duke of
York, iii. 161 ; Flahaut's opinion
of, iii. 165 ; author's meeting
with, iii. 157 ; Murray intro-
duces author to him, iii. 256 ; his
conversation with Byron about
his religion, ibid. ; his last ro-
mances, iv. 160
Scrope Davies, iii. 69
Sebright, Sir J., iv. 20 ; seconds
Reform motion, iv. 88
Secretaryship at War, offered to
author, iv. lQ5etseq. ; Lord Grey
on duties of the office, iv. 169;
author's proposed changes, iv.
270, 276 ; at variance with the
Commander -in-Chief, iv. 247,
267, 287, 295 ; the author leaves
the War Office, iv. 297
Send Grove, iv. 16, 113
Seymour, Lord, iii. 260 ; marriage
to Miss Sheridan, iv. 27
Shee, Sir G., iv. 312
Shelley, iii. 2, 69
Shelley, Sir John, iii. 203
Sheridan, iii. 23 ; and Byron, iii.
48 ; and the Duchess of Devon-
shire, iii. 76 ; his failings, iii.
107, 123 ; Moore's Life of, iii.
121, 123 ; his conduct to the
Whigs, iii. 128 ; and to the
Duke of York, iii. 136 ; Mrs. Fitz-
herbert's opinion of, iii. 165 ;
and Lady Holland, iv. 159
Sibthorp, Colonel (M.P.), iv. 117
Sidmouth, Lord, iv. 264
Simond, Louis, iii. 288
Sinecures, abolition of, iv. 285,
289
Slavery Question, iii. 135, iv.
269
Smith, Rev. Sydney, iii. 102, 263 ;
on the belief in a second life, iv.
26, 100
Smith, Sir Sidney, iv. 42
Smuggling by King's messengers,
iii. 30
Somerset, Duke of, iii. 211, 229
Somerset, Lord Fitzroy, iv. 185
Somerville case, the, iv. 246, 250
Soult, Marshal, assists Napier in
his " History," iii. 225
Southey, his attack on Byron, iii.
84
Southill, iii. 230
Spain, France declares war against
(1822), iii. 10; Duke of St.
Lorenzo's opinion, iii. 20
Speaker, the (Manners Sutton),
iii. 158, 204, iv. 104, 105 et seq.,
174
Spencer, Lord Robert, iii. 108,
iv. 39
INDEX
381
Spencer, William, his stories of
Pitt and Fox, iii. 11, 12; of
Burke and Sheridan, iii. 14
Stuttgart, iii. 1
Spring Rice, iii. 189, iv. 336, 344
" S.S.B.S." See Beefsteak Club
Stanhope, Fitzroy, anecdotes of
the Duke of Wellington, iii. 162
Stanhope, Lady Hester, iii. 172
Stanhope, Col. Leicester (friend
of Byron), iii. 33, 42, 46, 56 ;
his account of Byron's career
in Greece, iii. 60 et seq. ; and
Greek Committee, iii. 156
Stanley, Mr. (afterwards Lord),
iv. 77 ; on Reform, iv. 91, 93 ; on
Ireland, iv. 151 ; attacks Croker,
iv. 156 ; on Church Reform, iv.
255 ; Lord Durham's opinion
of, iv. 257; Macaulay's opinion
of, iv. 327 ; resigns, iv. 343 ;
attacks his former colleagues,
iv. 352 ; Russell's opinion of,
iv. 361
Steamboats, iii. 25 ; on Lake of
Constance (1826), iii. 147
Stewart, Villiers, iii. 173
Stormont, Lord, iv. 117
Stowell, Lord (Sir William Scott),
iii. 182
Stuart Wortley on the Canning
pension, iii. 261
Sturges Bourne, Mr., iii. 185, 186,
188, 210, 211, 246, 265
Sussex, Duke of, iii. 93, 140, 218,
278; Ranger of Windsor Park,
iv. 40 ; at the Garrick Club, iv.
181 ; on the creation of Peers,
iv. 184; and the Bristol peti-
tion, iv. 234, 236
Swinburne, Sir John, iv. 216
Talleyrand, iii. 142 ; his know-
ledge of mankind, iii. 192 ; at
the opening of Parliament
(1830), iv. 60; at the Mansion
House, iv. 182
Talma, tomb of, iii. 157
Tankerville, Lord, iii. 78
Tavistock, Lord, iii. 18, 132, 233,
270, iv. 70, 321 ; and George IV.,
iii. 163; at Oakley, iii. 166;
at Devonshire House, iii. 207 ;
views on Reform, iv. 75, 90 ; on
Registration Bill, iv. 347
Taylor, Michael Angelo, iii. 177
Taylor, Sir Brook (Minister at
Munich), iii. 148
Taylor, Sir Herbert, iv. 177, 184,
290
Tenterden, Lord, iii. 220, iv. 135
Terceira case, the, iv. 18
Test and Corporation Acts Re-
peal, iii. 258, 278
Thurlow, Lord, iii. 113
Tierney, his duel with Pitt, iii.
32 ; says W^higs not pledged to
Reform, ibid. ; on the Catholic
Associations, iii. 86; on Sheri-
dan, ibid. ; on "His Majesty's
Opposition," iii. 130, 161, 191;
anecdote of Hotham, iii. 139 ;
becomes Master of the Mint,
194 ; his death, iv. 6
Tighe, Mrs., iii. 15
Timber duties, iv. 93
Times, The, iii. 243 ; "Byronicus"
attacks the author in, iii. 279;
and the destruction of Lord
Byron's Memoirs, iii. 350, 352
et seq. ; against the prosecution
of the editor of the Morning
Journal, iv. 4 ; on Huskisson's
death, iv. 50; on Lords throw-
ing out Reform, iv. 137 ; the
editor on Lord Durham, iv.
261 ; on the author's resigna-
tion of his office and seat, iv.
308 ; and the quarrel between
Durham and Ellice, iv. 349
et seq.
Titchfield, Lord, death of, iii. 30
Tooke, Home, iii. 131
Townshend (Lord Lieutenant of
Ireland), anecdotes of, iv. 217
Trades Unions' procession to the
Home Office, iv. 334
Trelawny, Mr., iii. 46
Trotter (Lord Provost), iii. 128
Tullamore, Lady, iv. 101
Turner, General, iii. 26
Turner, the painter, iii. 28, 295
Tweeddale, Lord, iii. 281, 288; and
the Duke of Wellington, iv. 2;
and his Government, iv. 11; on
the state of Paris (1830), iv. 53
Twickenham Meadows, iii. 112,
iv. 252
Twisleden, Mrs., iii. 109
Twiss, Horace, iv. 18, 38
Tyrrwhit, Sir Thos. (Black Rod),
iii. 52
Ulysses, General, iii. 47
United Service Institution in
ftugurated, iv. 192
382
INDEX
Vandeweyer, Mr., iv. 57, 65, 79
Vansittart, made a Peer, iii. 1 1
Vernon, Harcourt, iv 120
Verona, Congress of, iii. 9
Vestry Bill (the author's), iii. 320,
iv. 14, 15, 22, 40, 75, 86, 133,
134, 135, 144; becomes law,
145
Victoria, Princess (afterwards
Queen Victoria), iv. 206
Villa Diodati, iii. 287
" Vivian Grey," iii. 135
Vyvyan, Sir R., iv. 103, 104
Wakefield, Mr., iv. 358
Walewski, Count, iv. 99
Wall, Mr. Baring, iv. 87
Wallensee lake, the, iii. 148
War Office business, iv. 253 ; dis-
cord with the Horse Guards, iv.
287 ; Committee inquires into,
iv. 318
War Secretaryship, offer of, iv.
lQ5etseq.
Warburton, Mr. (M.P.), iv. 29,
359
Ward, Mr. Plumer, iv. 342
Warren, Dr., iv. 317
Washington, G., iii. 23
Waterloo, some truths about, iii.
267 ; Simond's story about, iii.
288
Webster, Lady, iii. 247
Weekly Dispatch, The, iv. 327
Wellesley, Lady, iii. 247
Wellesley, Lord, iv. 331
Wellington, Duke of, on the losses
at Badajoz, iii. 82 ; on Lord
Liverpool's indolence, iii. 182;
disagreement with Canning, iii.
184 ; his financial ability, iii.
190 ; his mission to St. Peters-
burg (1826), iii. 220 (note) ; ex-
ample of his reticence, iii. 222 ;
helps Napier in his " History,"
iii. 225 ; sent for to form a
Government, iii. 235 ; his in-
clusion of Huskisson, iii. 237,
241 ; and Ellenborough, iii. 240 ;
nearly wrecked on voyage to
Portugal, iii. 255 ; author meets
him at dinner, iii. 264 ; fre-
quent changes in his Cabinet,
iii. 273 ; his opinion of the
author, iii. 285; and the Catholic
Relief Bill, iii. 310, 315, 316 ;
his duel with Lord Winchilsea,
iii. 313 ; falls off his horse, iii.
321 ; Lord Holland's criticism
of, 322, iv. 38 ; and Lord Grey,
ibid. ; on the French revolu-
tion of 1830, iv. 44; at opening
of Liverpool and Manchester
railway, iv. 49 ; declares against
Reform, iv. 56 ; and the King's
visit to the City, iv. 62 ; visits
Mr. Vandeweyer, iv. 65 ; end of
his Administration, iv. 69 ; his
resistance to Reform, iv. 95,
116, 134, 184, 207; his windows
broken, iv. 141, 244; on flogging
in the Army, iv. 197 ; at the
Speaker's Levee, iv. 211; in
favour of some reform, iv. 212 ;
sent for to form Government
(1832), iv. 223; proposes to
carry Reform, iv. 224 et seq. ;
failure, iv. 226 ; his explana-
tion, iv. 230 ; for Irish Church
Reform, iv. 324 ; on the Thirty-
Nine Articles, iv. 333
Westmacott, iii. 15
Westminster, author elected for
(1826), iii. 137; re-elected 1830,
iv. 29; 1831, iv. 109; onaccept-
ing office, iv. 172; Colonel Evans
to oppose the author, iv. 260 ;
re-elected (1832), iv. 264; re-
signs on the question of House
and Window Tax, iv. 305; stands
again and is defeated by Col.
Evans, iv. 310
Westminster Abbey roof on fire,
iii. 308
Westminster Dinners, iv. 113,
244
Wetherell, Sir Charles (Attorney-
General), on Catholic Relief
Bill, iii. 311 ; on Reform Bill,
iv. 89 ; on Reform riots, iv. 141
Wharncliffe, Lord, iv. 104; op-
poses Reform Bill, iv. 134 ; on
the riots, iv. 142 ; decides to
vote for the Bill, iv. 207
Wherry (Charge d'affaires at Dres-
den), iii. 49
Whigs, need of union among the,
iii. 234
Whitbread, Mr. S., iii. 118, 122,
161, iv. 28
White, Miss Lydia, iii. 102
Whitebait Dinner, Ministerial, iv.
361
Whitton Park, iii. 45, IQetseq.,
209, 227, 280
Wilberforce, iii. 17, 204
INDEX
383
Wilbraham, Roger, iii, 22, 125,
126, 244
Wildman, Colonel (of Newstead),
iii. 70, iv. 162
Wilkie, David, iv. 13
Wilkins, Mr. (of the Asiatic Club),
iii. 48, 143
Williams, Mr. John (M.P.), iii. 51,
72
Wilmot Horton, iii. 265, 333
Wilson, Sir Robert, iii. 115; his
conduct to Lorct Grey, iii. 195 ;
on Canning's illness, iii. 213 ; on
the Navarino debate, iii. 242 ;
restored to his rank, iv. 40 ;
speech on Reform Bill, iv. 102
Wimbledon, Lambton's villa at,
iii. 45 ; Duke of Somerset at,
iii. 211, 229
Winchilsea, Lord, attacks Can-
ning, iii. 189 ; on Catholic
Relief, iii. 312 ; his duel with
Wellington, iii. 313
Windham, W., iii. 126, 138; as
Colonial Secretary, iii. 307 ; at
Westminster Abbey fire, iii. 308 ;
his despatches, iv. 11
Windsor Castle, expenses of, iv.
85 ; King William on, iv. 363
Winn, Mr. (M.P. for Maiden), iii.
158
Wolff, the missionary, iii. 171 ;
and Lady Hester Stanhope, iii.
172
Wood, Charles (afterwards Lord
Halifax), iv. 144, 308, 327, 340
Wood, Francis (M.P.), iii. 247
Woods and Forests, the author
becomes Minister for, iv. 356
Woolaston, Dr., iii. 231
Wrottesley, Sir J., iii. 125
Wurtemberg, King of, iv. 41, 42
York, Duke of, on the Catholic
Bill (1823), iii. 10; visit to
Woolwich with Emperor of
Russia, iii. 27 ; on Catholic
claims, iii. 96; his death, iii.
161 ; his debts, iv. 7
Yorke, Sir Joseph, iii. 301
Young, Col., secretary to Lord
Hastings, iii. 45
Zoological Gardens, the, iv. 323
PRINTED BY
HAZELL, WATSON AND V1NEY, LD.
LONDON AND AYLESBURV.
DA Broughton, John Cam
536 Hobhouse
B75A3 Recollections of a long
v.4 life
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY